Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
65(14), P. 22 - 22
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Purpose:
To
evaluate
the
impact
of
optical
vs.
illuminance
factors
and
their
duration-dependency
on
lens-induced
hyperopia
(LIH)
in
chick
eyes.
Methods:
Hyperopia
was
induced
one
eye
chicks
(10
groups;
n
=
126)
from
day
1
after
hatching
until
8
using
+10-diopter
lenses
with
fellow
eyes
as
controls.
One
group
served
control
without
any
interventions.
The
remaining
groups
were
exposed
to
2,
4,
or
6
hours
unrestricted
vision
(UnV),
high-intensity
light
(HL;
15,000
lux),
both
(HL
+
UnV).
Ocular
axial
length
(AL),
refractive
error,
choroidal
thickness
measured
days
1,
8.
Inter-ocular
difference
(IOD
experimental
−
contralateral
eye)
±
SEM
used
express
outcome
measures.
Results:
By
8,
LIH
decreased
AL
(−0.42
0.03
mm)
produced
hyperopic
refraction
(+3.48
0.32
diopters)
thickening
(+85.81
35.23
µm)
(all
P
<
0.001).
Exposure
UnV
reduced
(i.e.,
refraction,
shortening,
thickening)
a
duration-dependent
manner,
whereas
HL
potentiated
development
manner.
When
combined,
overpowered
HL,
resultant
being
close
alone,
except
at
hours,
when
shorter
compared
alone
(P
0.03).
Conclusions:
Daily
exposure
UnV,
altered
manner
producing
competing
signals.
signal
generated
by
generally
stronger
than
combined
exposure,
yet
longer
durations
affected
drive
for
emmetropization
UnV.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Nov. 27, 2024
A
recent
randomised
controlled
trial
(RCT)
by
Su
et
al.1
evaluated
spectacle
lenses
with
negatively-powered
lenslets,
rather
than
positively
powered
as
a
treatment
for
myopia.
The
new
results
al.
may
shed
further
light
on
the
mechanism
of
action
various
forms
optical
treatments
Most
and
contact
lens-based
interventions
slowing
myopia
progression
in
children
were
designed
to
exert
their
therapeutic
effect
via
'simultaneous
defocus',
such
that
retina
receives
clear,
in-focus
image
well
myopically
defocused
image,
is,
an
focused
front
retina.2,
3
In
eyes
fitted
MiSight®
(misight.com),
DISC
(Defocus
Incorporated
Soft
Contact
lens),
centre-distance
bifocal
or
orthokeratology
lenses,
central
(foveal)
region
primarily
sharply
corrects
child's
on-axis
refractive
error.
Meanwhile,
mid-peripheral
out-of-focus
produced
one
more
rings
positive
'add'
power.4,
5
retinal
also
receive
lower
contrast,
from
ring(s)
plus
power,
while;
clear
regions
correcting
orthokeratology,
ring
power
originates
changes
cornea
after
overnight
lens
wear;
MiSight,
zones
altered
curvature
themselves.
Instead
this
concentric
design,
most
use
array
discrete,
lenslets.
Lenslets
are
small
produce
additional
power;
they
typically
cover
about
50%
surface.
For
example,
MiyoSmart®,
known
Defocus
Multiple
Segments
(DIMS)
(hoyavision.com),
there
is
containing
~400
circular
1
mm-diameter
lenslets
+4.00
D
add
compared
portion
lens.
Stellest®
(Essilor.com)
highly
aspheric
achieve
similar
(known
Highly
Aspherical
Lenslet
Target
[HALT]
technology).
An
individual
lenslet
produces
discrete
patch
defocus
offset
patches
formed
adjacent
lenslets.6,
7
level
across
each
influenced
lenslet,
but
diffraction
aberrations
arising
its
transition
carrier
zone
result
myopic
shell
does
not
provide
even
if
eye
accommodates.8
By
design
do
continuous
provides
accommodates
(although
quality
be
relatively
poor9).
Diffusion
optics
technology
(DOT®)
(sightglassvision.com)
exploit
different
interventions.4,
10
DOT
have
like
MiyoSmart
Stellest
lenses.
However,
instead
remainder
contains
hundreds
light-scattering
elements
reduce
contrast
retina.4,
Although
reduction
analogous
mild
form
deprivation,
been
found
slow
whereas
deprivation
stimulates
development.11-13
cylindrical
annular
element
(CARE®)
(zeiss.com),
utilises
+8.00
micro-cylinders
arranged
rings,
induce
blur
somewhat
scatter
CARE
shown
progression.14
As
altering
falling
retina,
DIMS
alter
peripheral
which
could
relevance
action.15
Where
fit
into
picture?
These
authors
wearing
novel
type
surrounded
−3.00
(so-called
Negative
Lenslet-ARray-Integrated
[NLARI]
lenses)
(hkoptlens.com)
effective
+3.00
('LARI'
children's
progression.1
This
very
expected
receiving
hyperopic
defocus,
since
stimulus
would
accelerate
progression.16
Leaving
aside
questions
authors'
rationale
testing
NLARI
myopia,
ethical
risk–benefit
balance
these
parsimonious
explanation
anti-myopia
effects
operate
using
introducing
over
retina.
If
indeed
act
mechanism,
then
supports
suggestion
Papadogiannis
al.8
all
lenslet-based
spectacles
reduction.
One
might
begin
question
whether
incorporating
ring-based
reduction,
previously
assumed.9
It
will
important
find
out
confirmed
future
studies
beneficial
persist
beyond
1-year,
case
DIMS,
HALT
spectacles.17-19
meantime,
animal
models
great
value
distinguishing
positive-power
defocus.
achieved,
rearing
animals
exposed
combination
and/or
scattering
lenses,20
comparing
under
specific
ambient
lighting
conditions.21
choice
study
important:
tree
shrews,
guinea
pigs
chicks,
area
centralis
towards
periphery
posterior
segment,
so
it
optically
difficult
create
mimicked
experienced
children.
marmosets
macaque
monkeys,
fovea
near
pole,
comparable
situation
humans.
There
remain
unanswered
mechanisms
behind
control
interventions.
serves
reminder
us
always
our
assumptions.
Jeremy
A.
Guggenheim:
Conceptualization
(equal);
writing
–
original
draft
review
editing
(equal).
Louise
Terry:
thank
Dr.
Thomas
T.
Norton
insightful
comments
earlier
manuscript.
work
was
funded
UK
Research
Innovation
(UKRI)
government's
Horizon
Europe
funding
guarantee
[grant
number
EP/Y032292/1].
Funded
European
Union
(Project
101119501
—
MyoTreat
HORIZON-MSCA-2022-DN-01).
Views
opinions
expressed
however
those
author(s)
only
necessarily
reflect
UKRI.
Neither
nor
granting
authority
can
held
responsible
them.
Guggenheim,
PhD,
Professor
Optometry
Vision
Sciences
at
Cardiff
University,
UK.
He
received
his
BSc
PhD
formerly
Associate
Head
School
Optometry,
Hong
Kong
Polytechnic
Kong.
Guggenheim
member
CREAM
Consortium
genetics
researchers
Biobank
Eye
Consortium.
Editor
Investigative
Ophthalmology
Visual
Science
Editorial
Board
Member
Ophthalmic
Physiological
Optics.
recently
served
'Focus
Myopia'
consensus
committee
United
States,
National
Academies
Science,
Engineering
Medicine.
Terry,
Lecturer
Her
main
research
interests
ocular
imaging,
anterior
eye,
control.
undertook
her
postgraduate
University
topic,
'An
vivo
investigation
choroidal
vasculature
age-related
macular
degeneration'.
centred
around
artificial
intelligence
detect
classify
3-D
OCT
scans.
qualified
optometrist,
Louise's
has
strong
clinical
focus
includes
both
academic
industry
collaborators.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 100125 - 100125
Published: Dec. 1, 2024
Myopia
has
ever-rising
prevalence
in
the
past
few
decades
globally.
Its
pathogenesis
is
still
not
adequately
elucidated
especially
at
signal
transduction
level.
For
environmental
risk
factors,
there
a
large
body
of
fragmented
knowledge
about
visual
inputs
for
accommodation,
myopiagenesis
and
emmetropization,
with
latter
two
being
essentially
local
processes.
The
red-green
yellow-blue
chromatic
pathways,
together
underlying
L-M
S-(L+M)
cone
opponency,
seem
to
be
common
denominator
amongst
them.
In
this
review,
experimental
observational
evidence
are
summarized
delineate
interplay
This
review
may
establish
pivotal
role
longitudinal
aberration
(LCA)
mechanistic
approach
future
research
myopia
control.
looks
into
processes
specifically
focusing
on
opponency
vision
as
components.
roles
contrast
onset
development
intriguing.
How
input
pathways
(specifically,
blue-yellow
opponency)
contribute
accommodation
that
trigger
emmetropization
mechanisms,
thereby
influencing
eye
growth
patterns
explored
discussed.
brief,
manuscript
delves
physiology
processing
highlights
foundational
aspect
science
account
"Go"
or
"Stop"
signaling
axial
growth.
It
further
proposes
metric
gauge
myopia-inhibiting
optical
devices
such
peripheral
defocus
lenses,
its
best
iteration.
Future
above-mentioned
areas
warranted.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: June 11, 2024
Abstract
PURPOSE
To
evaluate
the
impact
of
optical
versus
illuminance
factors
and
their
duration-dependency
on
lens-induced
hyperopia
(LIH)
in
chick
eyes.
METHODS
Hyperopia
was
induced
one
eye
chicks
(10
groups,
n=126)
from
day
1
(D1)
post-hatching
until
D8
using
+10
D
lenses
with
fellow
eyes
as
controls.
One
group
served
control
without
any
interventions.
Remaining
groups
were
exposed
to
2,
4
or
6
hours
unrestricted
vision
(UnV),
high
intensity
light
(HL),
both
(HL
+UnV).
Ocular
axial
length
(AL),
refractive
error,
choroidal
thickness
measured
days
1,
4,
8.
Inter-ocular
difference
(IOD
=
experimental
-
contralateral
eye)
±
SEM
used
express
outcome
measures.
RESULTS
By
D8,
LIH
decreased
AL
(-0.42±0.03
mm)
produced
hyperopic
refraction
(+3.48±0.32
D)
thickening
(+85.81±35.23
µm)
(all,
P<0.001).
Exposure
UnV
reduced
(i.e.,
refraction,
shortening,
thickening)
a
duration-dependent
manner,
whereas
HL
potentiated
development
manner.
When
combined,
overpowered
HL,
resultant
being
close
alone,
except
after
hours,
when
HL+UnV
shorter
compared
alone
(P=0.03).
CONCLUSION
Daily
exposure
UnV,
altered
manner
producing
competing
signals.
The
signal
generated
by
generally
stronger
than
combined
exposure,
yet
longer
durations
affected
drive
for
emmetropization
UnV.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
44(6), P. 1309 - 1318
Published: July 9, 2024
Abstract
Purpose
Autostereoscopic
displays
have
become
increasingly
common,
but
their
impact
on
ocular
dimensions
remains
unknown.
We
sought
to
identify
changes
in
the
crystalline
lens
induced
by
autostereoscopic
three‐dimensional
(3D)
viewing.
Methods
Forty
young
adults
(age:
22.6
±
2.0
years,
male/female:
15/25)
were
consecutively
enrolled
and
randomly
divided
into
two
groups
(3D
two‐dimensional
[2D]
viewing
groups)
watch
a
30‐min
movie
clip
displayed
3D
or
2D
mode
tablet
computer.
The
thickness
(LT),
diameter,
curvature,
decentration
tilt
measured
with
anterior
segment
optical
coherence
tomography
under
both
non‐accommodating
(static)
accommodating
conditions.
Results
In
static
condition,
LT
decreased
0.03
mm
(
p
<
0.001)
radius
of
curvature
(ARC)
increased
0.49
0.59
=
post‐3D
contrast,
following
viewing,
ARC
0.23
0.25
0.001).
Additionally,
increase
steep
was
greater
high‐myopic
eyes
than
low
moderate
myopic
0.04).
When
comparing
accommodative
(non‐accommodative)
for
(−0.03
0.05
mm,
0.02);
while
posterior
(−0.14
0.20
0.006)
diameter
(−0.13
0.01)
decreased.
Conclusions
Viewing
could
temporally
decrease
However,
its
long‐term
effect
requires
further
exploration.
Eye and Brain,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 16, P. 133 - 146
Published: Dec. 1, 2024
Animal
studies
have
suggested
that
visual
degradation
impacts
eye
growth
due
to
the
attenuation
of
high
spatial
frequencies.
However,
influence
perceptual
visibility
remains
unclear
in
humans.
The
aim
this
study
was
investigate
impact
on
attenuation-related
changes
during
reading.
Frontiers in Medicine,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Changes
in
choroidal
thickness
(ChT)
are
proposed
to
predict
myopia
development
but
evidence
is
mixed.
We
investigated
time
courses
of
responses,
following
different
types
dynamic
artificial
stimulation
chicks
with
and
without
spectacle
lenses,
as
well
changes
retinal
dopamine
metabolism
expression
candidate
genes.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
65(14), P. 22 - 22
Published: Dec. 10, 2024
Purpose:
To
evaluate
the
impact
of
optical
vs.
illuminance
factors
and
their
duration-dependency
on
lens-induced
hyperopia
(LIH)
in
chick
eyes.
Methods:
Hyperopia
was
induced
one
eye
chicks
(10
groups;
n
=
126)
from
day
1
after
hatching
until
8
using
+10-diopter
lenses
with
fellow
eyes
as
controls.
One
group
served
control
without
any
interventions.
The
remaining
groups
were
exposed
to
2,
4,
or
6
hours
unrestricted
vision
(UnV),
high-intensity
light
(HL;
15,000
lux),
both
(HL
+
UnV).
Ocular
axial
length
(AL),
refractive
error,
choroidal
thickness
measured
days
1,
8.
Inter-ocular
difference
(IOD
experimental
−
contralateral
eye)
±
SEM
used
express
outcome
measures.
Results:
By
8,
LIH
decreased
AL
(−0.42
0.03
mm)
produced
hyperopic
refraction
(+3.48
0.32
diopters)
thickening
(+85.81
35.23
µm)
(all
P
<
0.001).
Exposure
UnV
reduced
(i.e.,
refraction,
shortening,
thickening)
a
duration-dependent
manner,
whereas
HL
potentiated
development
manner.
When
combined,
overpowered
HL,
resultant
being
close
alone,
except
at
hours,
when
shorter
compared
alone
(P
0.03).
Conclusions:
Daily
exposure
UnV,
altered
manner
producing
competing
signals.
signal
generated
by
generally
stronger
than
combined
exposure,
yet
longer
durations
affected
drive
for
emmetropization
UnV.