Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 26, 2023
Abstract
Aim
To
systematically
evaluate
the
real
psychological
experiences
of
pregnant
women
during
Covid-19
pandemic
to
provide
a
basis
for
development
evidence-based
management
measures
this
population.
Design
Systematic
review.
Methods
Qualitative
studies
on
maternal
experience
were
retrieved
from
Web
Science,
Pubmed,
Embase,
Cochrane
Library,
CINAHL,
CNKI,
Wanfang
Database,
VIP
database,
SinoMed
database
and
Proquest
database.
The
search
period
is
establishment
January
7,
2023.
quality
literature
was
evaluated
using
evaluation
criteria
Evidence-Based
Health
Care
Center
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
in
Australia,
results
pooled
integrated
Nvivo11
software.
Results
A
total
15
included,
65
topics
extracted,
13
sub-themes
summarized
form
4
themes:
changes
challenges
life
style;
Emotional
experience;
Seeking
understanding
social
support;
Epidemic
current
advice
establish
confidence.
Conclusion
Families,
medical
institutions,
government
society
should
pay
more
attention
feelings
pandemic,
effective
guidance
help
relieve
pressure
pregnancy
improve
outcome
pregnancy.
Women and Birth,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37(3), P. 101588 - 101588
Published: March 1, 2024
Maternity
care
services
in
the
United
Kingdom
have
undergone
drastic
changes
due
to
pandemic-related
restrictions.
Prior
research
has
shown
maternity
during
pandemic
was
negatively
experienced
by
women
and
led
poor
physical
mental
health
outcomes
pregnancy.
A
synthesis
is
required
of
published
on
women's
experiences
latter
half
COVID-19
pandemic.
Frontiers in Global Women s Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: Feb. 21, 2024
Introduction
The
COVID-19
pandemic
posed
a
significant
lifecourse
rupture,
not
least
to
those
who
had
specific
physical
vulnerabilities
the
virus,
but
also
were
suffering
with
mental
ill
health.
Women
and
birthing
people
pregnant,
experienced
perinatal
bereavement,
or
in
first
post-partum
year
(i.e.,
perinatal)
exposed
number
of
risk
factors
for
health,
including
alterations
way
which
their
care
was
delivered.
Methods
A
consensus
statement
derived
from
cross-disciplinary
collaboration
experts,
whereby
evidence
collaborative
work
on
health
during
synthesised,
priorities
established
as
recommendations
research,
healthcare
practice,
policy.
Results
synthesis
research
focused
effect
outcomes
practices
led
three
immediate
recommendations:
what
retain,
reinstate,
remove
provision.
Longer-term
action
made,
categorised
follows:
Equity
Relational
Healthcare;
Parity
Esteem
Mental
Physical
Healthcare
an
Emphasis
Specialist
Perinatal
Services;
Horizon
Scanning
Health
Research,
Policy,
&
Practice.
Discussion
base
is
growing.
This
synthesises
said
makes
post-pandemic
recovery
re-build
services
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
19(2), P. e0294744 - e0294744
Published: Feb. 23, 2024
Objectives
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
caused
unforeseen
impacts
on
sexual
and
reproductive
healthcare
(SRH)
services
worldwide,
the
nature
prevalence
of
these
changes
have
not
been
extensively
synthesized.
We
sought
to
synthesise
reported
outcomes
impact
SRH
access
delivery
in
comparable
countries
with
universal
systems.
Methods
Following
PRISMA
guidelines,
we
searched
MEDLINE,
Embase,
PsycInfo,
CINAHL
from
January
1st,
2020
June
6th,
2023.
Original
research
was
eligible
for
inclusion
if
study
and/or
delivery.
Twenty-eight
OECD
economies
systems
were
included.
extracted
characteristics,
participant
design,
outcome
variables.
methodological
quality
each
article
assessed
using
Quality
Assessment
Diverse
Studies
(QuADS)
tool.
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-analyses
(PRISMA)
guidelines
followed
reporting
results.
This
registered
PROSPERO
(#CRD42021245596).
Synthesis
Eighty-two
studies
met
criteria.
Findings
qualitatively
synthesised
into
domains
of:
antepartum
care,
intrapartum
postpartum
assisted
technologies,
abortion
access,
gynaecological
health
services,
HIV
care.
Research
concentrated
relatively
few
countries.
Access
negatively
impacted
by
a
variety
factors,
including
service
disruptions,
unclear
communication
regarding
policy
decisions,
decreased
timeliness
fear
exposure.
Across
outpatient
providers
favoured
models
care
that
avoided
in-person
appointments.
Hospitals
prioritized
reduced
time
number
people
hospital
aerosol-generating
environments.
Conclusions
Overall,
demonstrated
across
most
during
COVID-19.
Variations
restrictions
accommodations
heterogeneous
within
between
institutions.
Future
work
should
examine
long-term
COVID-19,
underserved
populations,
underrepresented
Midwifery,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
133, P. 103995 - 103995
Published: April 9, 2024
To
explore
antenatal
experiences
of
social
and
healthcare
professional
support
during
different
phases
distancing
restriction
implementation
in
the
UK.
Semi-structured
interviews
were
conducted
via
telephone
or
video-conferencing
software
between
13
July
2020
–
2
September
2020.
Interviews
transcribed
a
recurrent,
cross-sectional,
thematic
analysis
was
conducted.
Twelve
women
interviewed
UK
restrictions
March
(Timepoint
1;
T1)
separate
sample
twelve
initial
easing
these
May
2;
T2).
T1
themes
were:
'Maternity
care
as
non-essential'
'Pregnancy
is
cancelled'.
T2
'Technology
polarised
tool'
'Clinically
vulnerable,
not
clinically
vulnerable?
That
question'.
At
T1,
anxieties
ascribed
to
exclusion
partners
from
routine
care,
perceived
insensitivity
aggression
public.
For
T2,
insufficient
Governmental
transparency
led
disillusionment,
confusion,
anger.
Covert
workplace
discrimination
also
caused
distress
at
T2.
Across
timepoints:
deteriorated
mental
wellbeing
attributed
depleted
opportunities
interact
socially
scaled
back
maternity
care.
Recommendations
are
made
to:
protect
maternal
autonomy;
improve
quality
health
signposting;
prioritise
parental
community
re-opening
'non-essential'
services;
option
for
face-to-face
appointments
when
safe
legal;
protecting
rights
working
mothers.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
25(1)
Published: Jan. 29, 2025
Abstract
Background
Recurrent
early
pregnancy
loss
[rEPL]
is
a
traumatic
experience,
marked
by
feelings
such
as
grief
and
depression,
often
anxiety.
Despite
this,
the
psychological
consequences
of
rEPL
are
overlooked,
particularly
when
considering
future
reproductive
health
or
approaching
subsequent
pregnancies.
The
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic
led
to
significant
reconfiguration
maternity
care
negative
impact
on
perinatal
but
specific
women’s
experience
has
yet
be
explored.
This
study
aimed
examine
changes
social
restrictions
during
rEPL.
Methods
A
qualitative
interview
design
was
employed,
with
semi-structured
interviews
conducted
virtually.
total
16
women
who
had
suffered
two
more
losses
(≤
14
weeks
gestation)
in
United
Kingdom
participated.
Data
were
recorded,
transcribed,
analysed
hand,
following
Classical
Grounded
Theory
Analysis,
appropriate
for
cross-disciplinary
research.
Results
Iterative
inductive
analysis
generated
theory
‘Knights
Shining
Armour
(M)others
Life
Jackets’,
which
describes
advocating
alone,
suffering
pandemic.
derived
from
way
three
emergent
themes
inter-related:
(1)
Dismantling
Validation;
(2)
Preserving
an
Identity
Motherhood;
(3)
Support
Waning.
Conclusions
affirms
recent
findings
devalued
pandemic,
magnification
pre-pandemic
issues
EPL
care,
lack
support
perceived
empathy.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: May 20, 2023
Pregnant
and
postpartum
women
were
identified
as
having
particular
vulnerability
to
severe
symptomatology
of
SARS-CoV-2
infection,
so
maternity
services
significantly
reconfigured
their
care
provision.
We
examined
the
experiences
perceptions
staff
who
provided
during
pandemic
in
South
London,
United
Kingdom
-
a
region
high
ethnic
diversity
with
varied
levels
social
complexity.We
conducted
qualitative
interview
study,
part
service
evaluation
between
August
November
2020,
using
in-depth,
semi-structured
interviews
range
(N
=
29)
working
services.
Data
analysed
Grounded
Theory
analysis
appropriate
cross-disciplinary
health
research.Maternity
healthcare
professionals
views,
experiences,
delivering
pandemic.
Analysis
rendered
three
emergent
themes
regarding
decision-making
provision,
organised
into
pathways:
1)
'Reflective
decision-making';
2)
'Pragmatic
3)
'Reactive
decision-making'.
Whilst
pragmatic
was
found
disrupt
care,
reactive-decision-making
perceived
devalue
offered
provided.
Alternatively,
reflective
decision-making,
despite
difficult
conditions
pandemic,
seen
benefit
services,
regards
high-quality,
sustainability
staff,
innovation
within
service.Decision-making
take
forms
where
at
best
changes
could
be
innovative,
worst
they
cause
devaluation
being
delivered,
more
often
than
not,
these
disruptive.
With
regard
positive
changes,
providers
empowerment,
flexible
patterns
(both
for
themselves
collectively
teams),
personalised
delivery,
change-making
general,
key
areas
capitalise
on
current
ongoing
innovations
borne
out
Key
learnings
included
focus
care-related,
meaningful
listening
engagement
all
levels,
order
drive
forward
high-quality
avoid
disruption
devaluation.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
18(6), P. e0285270 - e0285270
Published: June 8, 2023
Initial
COVID-19-related
social
distancing
restrictions,
imposed
in
the
UK
March
2020,
and
subsequent
lifting
of
restrictions
May
2020
caused
antenatal
disruption
stress
which
exceeded
expected
vulnerabilities
associated
with
this
lifecourse
transition.
The
current
study
aimed
to
explore
psychological
experiences
women
during
different
phases
pandemic-related
lockdown
UK.
Semi-structured
interviews
were
held
24
about
their
experiences:
twelve
interviewed
after
initial
(Timepoint
1;
T1),
a
separate
those
2;
T2).
Interviews
transcribed
recurrent,
cross-sectional
thematic
analysis
was
conducted.
Two
themes
identified
for
each
timepoint,
theme
contained
sub-themes.
T1
were:
'A
Mindful
Pregnancy'
'It's
Grieving
Process',
T2
'Coping
Lockdown
Restrictions'
'Robbed
Our
Pregnancy'.
COVID-19
related
had
an
adverse
effect
on
women's
mental
health
period.
Feeling
trapped,
anxious,
abandoned
common
at
both
timepoints.
Actively
encouraging
conversations
wellbeing
routine
care
adopting
prevention
opposed
cure
attitude
toward
implementing
additional
support
provisions
may
serve
improve
crises.
Frontiers in Global Women s Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5
Published: Nov. 28, 2024
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
there
was
substantial
reconfiguration
of
maternity
care
services,
affecting
both
users
and
healthcare
providers
(HCPs),
in
United
Kingdom
(UK)
globally.
Women and Birth,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
36(5), P. 460 - 468
Published: March 14, 2023
There
has
been
little
focus
on
women's
views
of
care
and
recovery
following
pregnancy
complicated
by
hypertensive
disorders
[HDP]
despite
long-term
implications
for
maternal
health.Increasingly
in
clinical
research,
areas
interest
include
the
extent
to
which
women
are
involved
postnatal
planning,
perceived
value
routine
contacts,
lifestyle
behaviour
advice,
ongoing
concerns
about
HDP
could
be
discussed
with
healthcare
professionals.This
study
explored
experiences
birth-recovery
up
12
months
HDP.A
longitudinal
qualitative
using
semi-structured
interviews
at
four
postpartum.
Twenty-four
who
each
had
a
form
HDP,
were
recruited
maximum
variation,
purposive
sampling
strategy
from
National
Health
Service
maternity
units
London,
21
whom
interviewed
both
time
points.
Data
collected
analysed
timepoint
recurrent,
cross-sectional
cohort
approach
template
analysis
methodology.Four
main
themes
ten
sub-themes
identified.
Main
included:
assumptions
blood
pressure;
perinatal
experiences;
pathways;
managing
complex
health
conditions.Postnatal
needs
tailored
individual
review
relevant
clinicians
during
beyond
first
six
weeks.
Many
have
information
status,
treatment
prognoses,
future
birth
planning.Policy
makers,
providers
funders
cannot
continue
ignore
need
ensure
services
meet
experienced
medically
pregnancies.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Aug. 7, 2024
Introduction
Healthcare
services
for
pregnant
and
postpartum
(‘perinatal’)
women
were
reconfigured
significantly
at
the
advent
duration
of
SARS-CoV-2
pandemic,
despite
United
Kingdom
announcing
‘Freedom
Day’
on
19
July
2021
(whereafter
all
legal
lockdown-related
restrictions
lifted),
to
maternity
(antenatal,
intrapartum,
postnatal)
remained.
This
study
presents
data
from
eight
perinatal
about
their
experiences
psychosocial
wellbeing
care
in
post-‘Freedom
epoch.
Methods
Semi-structured
interviews
conducted
virtually,
with
recorded,
transcribed,
analysed
by
hand.
Grounded
theory
analysis
was
employed
final
assessing
reproductive
injustice
pandemic
Day’.
Results
Analysing
iteratively
inductively
led
four
emergent
themes:
‘A
Failing
System,
Women’;
‘Harm
Caused
a
State
Difference’;
‘The
Privileges
(Not
Rights)
Reproductive
Autonomy,
Agency,
Advocacy’;
‘Worried
Women
Marginalised
Mothers’.
Together,
these
themes
form
some,
but
not
Mum’.
Discussion
experienced
lack
high-quality
reliable
information
vaccination
against
virus,
changes
to,
decision-making
surrounding,
care.
recognised
healthcare
professionals
stretched
that
failing
often
reported
hostility
staff
abandonment
times
when
they
unsure
how
navigate
The
most
singular
disparity
between
having
accept
continuing
freedom
whilst
receiving
(reckless)
being
enacted
general
public.