Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
71(S2), P. 37 - 46
Published: July 11, 2023
Abstract
This
scoping
review
aimed
to
determine
whether
the
COVID‐19
pandemic
influenced
any
modifications
patient
selection
methods
or
prioritisation
and
services
provided
by
proton
therapy
(PT)
centres.
was
conducted
based
on
PRISMA
methodology
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
guidelines.
A
literature
search
performed
in
Medline,
Embase,
Web
of
Science
Scopus,
as
well
grey
literature.
Keywords
such
“COVID‐19”
“Proton
Therapy”
were
used.
Articles
published
from
1
January
2020
English
included.
In
total,
138
studies
identified
which
11
articles
met
inclusion
criteria.
design
chosen
capture
full
extent
information
relating
aim.
Six
included
statements
regarding
treatment
patients.
Three
publications
recommended
deferred
alternative
treatment,
two
indicated
treat
urgent/emergency
patients
one
reported
continuous
for
infectious
Recurring
impacts
PT
provision
more
frequent
use
unconventional
therapies,
reduced
referrals,
delayed
starts
CT
simulation,
change
target
volumes
staffing
limitations
due
restrictions.
Consequently,
telehealth
consults,
remote
work,
reduction
visitors,
screening
procedures
rigorous
cleaning
protocols
recommended.
Few
detailed
changes
workflow
during
pandemic.
Further
research
is
needed
obtain
current
global
PT,
collecting
this
data
could
aid
future
planning
Australia.
OECD health working papers,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 5, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
disrupted
primary
and
secondary
prevention
efforts
as
well
routine
cancer
care
including
diagnosis
treatment.
number
of
cancer-related
procedures
declined
across
countries.
Many
the
OECD
countries
also
faced
challenges
in
maintaining
further
improving
quality
outcomes
during
pandemic.
This
paper
compiles
initial
findings
from
a
subset
covering
period
March
2020
to
August
2021.
It
illustrates
how
several
these
attempted
mitigate
impact
on
systems.
There
have
been
examples
adapting
treatment
guidelines,
changing
clinical
practices
reducing
backlogs
minimise
negative
impacts
patients.
Several
undertook
more
frequent
monitoring
in-depth
analysis
performance.
analyses
confirm
that
strong
health
information
infrastructure
is
crucial
for
developing
resilient
systems
provide
effective,
timely
people-centred
care.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
5(4), P. e228855 - e228855
Published: April 25, 2022
Importance
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
impacted
cancer
systems
worldwide.
Quantifying
the
changes
is
critical
to
informing
delivery
of
care
while
continues,
as
well
for
system
recovery
and
future
planning.
Objective
To
quantify
change
in
services
across
continuum
during
pandemic.
Design,
Setting,
Participants
This
population-based
cohort
study
assessed
screening,
imaging,
diagnostic,
treatment,
psychosocial
oncological
delivered
pediatric
adult
populations
Ontario,
Canada
(population
14.7
million),
from
April
1,
2019,
March
2021.
Data
were
analyzed
May
1
July
31,
Exposures
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Cancer
service
volumes
first
year
pandemic,
defined
2020,
2021,
compared
with
a
prepandemic
period
2020.
Results
During
there
total
4
476
693
services,
5
644
105
prior,
difference
20.7%
fewer
care,
representing
potential
backlog
167
412
services.
While
less
pronounced
systemic
treatments,
emergency
urgent
imaging
examinations
(eg,
1.9%
more
parenteral
treatments)
surgical
procedures
65%
procedures),
major
reductions
observed
most
beginning
Compared
year,
screenings
reduced
by
42.4%
(−1
016
181
screening
tests),
treatment
14.1%
(−8020
radiation
visits
21.0%
(−141
629
visits).
Biopsies
confirm
decreased
up
41.2%
resections
27.8%
wave.
New
consultation
also
decreased,
such
(−8.2%)
(−9.3%).
use
virtual
increased
visits,
increasing
0%
20%
new
or
follow-up
prior
78%
year.
Conclusions
Relevance
In
this
Canada,
large
observed.
recovered
levels
at
end
substantial
deficit
likely
accrued.
anticipated
downstream
morbidity
mortality
associated
underscore
need
address
recover
warrant
further
study.
Preventive Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
155, P. 106961 - 106961
Published: Jan. 19, 2022
We
evaluated
the
impact
of
COVID-19
on
cancer
screening
in
Manitoba,
Canada
using
an
interrupted
time
series
(ITS)
design
and
data
from
Manitoba's
population-based,
organized
programs
April
2020
to
August
2021.
In
June
(breast
was
suspended
during
May
2020),
there
a
54%
decrease
between
predicted
(i.e.,
observed
produced
regression
models)
expected
counterfactual
values
for
period
by
assuming
did
not
occur)
number
mammograms
(ratio
=
0.46,
95%
Confidence
Interval
(CI)
0.28–0.64).
By
December
2020,
no
significant
difference
0.95,
CI
0.80–1.10).
83%
Pap
tests
0.17,
0.04–0.30).
January
2021,
0.93,
0.81–1.06).
81%
program
fecal
occult
blood
(FOBTs)
0.19,
0.0–0.44).
September
FOBTs
0.65–1.24).
The
estimated
cumulative
deficit
backlog)
2021
17,370
mammograms,
22,086
tests,
5253
FOBTs.
Overall,
adapted
quickly
pandemic.
Additional
strategies
may
be
needed
address
remaining
backlogs.
Journal of Medical Screening,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
29(4), P. 209 - 218
Published: May 20, 2022
Objective
The
ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic
has
caused
an
indefinite
delay
to
cancer
screening
programs
worldwide.
This
study
aims
explore
the
impact
on
breast
outcomes
such
as
mammography
and
diagnosis
rates.
Methods
We
searched
Ovid
MEDLINE,
Embase,
medRxiv
bioRxiv
between
January
2020
October
2021
identify
studies
that
reported
rates
of
before
during
pandemic.
effects
‘lockdown’
measures,
age
ethnicity
were
also
examined.
All
assessed
for
risk
bias
using
Newcastle-Ottawa
Scale
(NOS).
Rate
ratios
calculated
all
pooled
standard
inverse-variance
random
meta-analysis.
Results
identified
994
articles,
which
7
registry-based
24
non-registry-based
retrospective
cohort
studies,
including
data
4,860,786
629,823
patients
respectively
across
18
different
countries,
identified.
Overall,
dropped
by
estimated
41–53%
18–29%
2019
2020.
No
differences
in
mammogram
depending
patient
or
observed.
However,
countries
implemented
lockdown
measures
associated
with
a
significantly
greater
reduction
comparison
those
did
not.
Conclusion
substantial
cancer,
reductions
more
pronounced
under
restrictions.
It
is
early
yet
know
if
delayed
translates
into
higher
mortality.
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
7(3), P. 407 - 418
Published: Nov. 18, 2022
Abstract
Aim
This
study
aimed
to
investigate
the
effect
of
coronavirus
disease
pandemic
on
number
surgeries
for
gastroenterological
cancer
cases
in
Japan.
Methods
The
data
recorded
National
Clinical
Database
Japan
between
2018
and
2020
were
utilized
this
study.
Five
specific
primary
cancers
surgery
acute
diffuse
peritonitis
considered
endpoints.
We
divided
period
into
prepandemic
postpandemic
(after
April
2020)
periods
examined
relation
clinical
factors.
Results
Overall,
228
860
analyzed.
Among
five
surgeries,
distal
gastrectomies
gastric
decreased
most
(to
81.0%
monthly
period),
followed
by
that
low
anterior
resections
rectal
(91.4%).
In
contrast,
pancreaticoduodenectomies
pancreatic
increased
7.1%,
while
remained
stable.
trend
was
observed
nationwide.
also
noted
a
marked
reduction
gastrectomy
72.5%),
resection
(84.0%),
esophagectomy
(88.8%)
procedures
T1
tumors.
noncurative
rate
mortalities
despite
proportion
T4
tumors
older
patients.
Conclusion
A
with
early
T
factors
may
reflect
prioritization
screenings.
Although
quality
maintained
terms
reduced
morbidities,
long‐term
effects
should
be
monitored.
Denmark
was
one
of
the
few
countries
where
it
politically
decided
to
continue
cancer
screening
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
We
assessed
actual
population
uptake
mammography
and
cervical
this
period.The
first
lockdown
in
announced
on
11
March
2020.
To
investigate
possible
changes
activity
due
pandemic,
we
analysed
data
from
beginning
2017
until
end
2021.
A
time
series
analysis
carried
out
discover
trends
outliers
activities
period
2017-2021.
Data
were
retrieved
governmental
pandemic-specific
monitoring
health
care
activities.A
brief
drop
seen
right
after
lockdown,
but
quickly
returned
its
previous
level.
short-term
deficit
43%
[CI
-49
-37]
found
for
screening.
62%
-65
-58]
Furthermore,
a
slight,
statistically
significant
downward
trend
2018
2021
probably
unrelated
Other
changes,
example,
marked
towards
2021,
also
seem
pandemic.Denmark
continued
following
temporary
breast
activity.Region
Zealand
(R22-A597).
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
31(8), P. 1521 - 1531
Published: May 17, 2022
Abstract
Background:
Cancer
screening
is
a
complex
process
involving
multiple
steps
and
levels
of
influence
(e.g.,
patient,
provider,
facility,
health
care
system,
community,
or
neighborhood).
We
describe
the
design,
methods,
research
agenda
Population-based
Research
to
Optimize
Screening
Process
(PROSPR
II)
consortium.
PROSPR
II
Centers
(PRC),
Coordinating
Center
aim
identify
opportunities
improve
processes
reduce
disparities
through
investigation
factors
affecting
cervical,
colorectal,
lung
cancer
in
U.S.
community
settings.
Methods:
collected
multilevel,
longitudinal
data
from
clinical
administrative
sources
on
>9
million
racially
ethnically
diverse
individuals
across
10
heterogeneous
systems
with
cohorts
beginning
January
1,
2010.
To
facilitate
comparisons
organ
types
highlight
breadth,
we
calculated
frequencies
multilevel
characteristics
volumes
diagnostic
tests/procedures
abnormalities.
Results:
Variations
facility
reflected
differing
target
populations.
PRCs
identified
incident
diagnoses
invasive
cancers,
situ
precancers
(invasive:
372
24,131
11,205
lung;
situ:
911
32
precancers:
13,838
554,499
colorectal).
Conclusions:
II's
aims
advance:
(i)
conceptualization
measurement
process,
its
factors,
quality;
(ii)
knowledge
disparities;
(iii)
evaluation
COVID-19
pandemic's
initial
impacts
screening.
invite
researchers
collaborate
investigators.
Impact:
valuable
resource
for
researchers.
Preventive Medicine Reports,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
50, P. 102975 - 102975
Published: Jan. 13, 2025
Health
insurance
status
is
an
important
determinant
of
health
outcomes
for
patients
with
cancer.
This
study
aimed
to
assess
the
extent
which
coverage
in
Indiana
a
contributing
factor
stage
cervical
cancer
diagnosis.
We
examined
reported
cases
among
females
(N
=
2518)
using
registry
data
from
Department
2011
2019.
Analyses
were
carried
out
SPSS.
Using
multinomial
logistic
regression,
we
associations
both
and
race/ethnicity
diagnosis
after
adjusting
age
at
The
analysis
showed
that
uninsured
(OR
2.42,
95
%
CI
1.35-4.35)
those
who
have
Medicaid
2.36,
1.62-3.42)
significantly
more
likely
be
diagnosed
regional
than
in-situ
compared
private
insurance.
Additionally,
Black
1.98,
1.21-3.24)
Hispanic
2.19,
%CI
1.04-4.61)
when
Non-Hispanic
White
females.
Females
are
4.43,
2.23-8.44)
3.03,
1.91-4.80)
distant
in-situ,
Insurance
associated
later
stages
Increased
routine
screening
preventive
care
services
recommended,
especially
racial/ethnic
minority
populations,
public
PLOS Global Public Health,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
5(4), P. e0004419 - e0004419
Published: April 28, 2025
The
COVID-19
pandemic
disrupted
many
public
health
programs;
understanding
these
disruptions
is
critical
for
directing
future
resources.
In
a
project
studying
the
implementation
of
human
papillomavirus
(HPV)
testing-based
cervical
cancer
screening,
we
queried
about
impact
on
screening
programs
globally.
consultation
with
World
Health
Organization’s
Regional
Advisors,
program
managers,
government
officials,
and
clinicians
involved
in
HPV
were
invited
to
participate
semi-structured,
in-depth,
interviews.
Interview
notes
transcripts
used
inductive
analysis,
focusing
responses
programs.
Thirty-two
interviews
conducted
participants
between
age
29
61
years,
representing
from
25
countries.
Six
key
themes
noted.
Regarding
disruptions,
(1)
entire
continuum
was
affected,
leading
delays
or,
some
cases
even
cessation
vaccination,
treatment
(2)
heightened
sense
fear
around
contracting
transmitting
shifted
priorities
impacted
healthcare
delivery.
Nonetheless,
noted
constructive
ways
which
leveraged
pandemic:
at
community
level,
able
leverage
an
increased
acceptance
surrounding
importance
preventive
behaviors;
HPV-testing:
molecular
laboratories
became
well-equipped
better
technician
training,
increasing
overall
HPV-testing
capacities;
(3)
promoted
virtual
systems;
(4)
planning:
shutdowns
allowed
time
plan
scale-up.
ways,
response
provided
evidence
supporting
countries’
abilities
mobilize
While
noted,
implementers
opportunities
strengthen
programs,
should
be
further
assessed
sustainability
research
prevention
control.