Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
101(45), P. e31385 - e31385
Published: Nov. 11, 2022
At
its
onset,
the
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
brought
significant
challenges
to
healthcare
systems,
changing
focus
of
medical
care
on
acute
illness.
Disruptions
in
service
provision
have
impacted
field
viral
hepatitis,
with
screening
programs
paused
throughout
much
2020
and
2021.
We
performed
a
retrospective
study
consecutive
outpatients
COVID-19
during
second
third
wave
Romania,
from
November
April
2021,
aiming
characterize
prevalence
undiagnosed
hepatitis
B
virus
(HBV)
infection
among
patients
presenting
Overall,
522
had
available
records
timespan.
Their
mean
±
standard
deviation
age
was
51
13
years;
274
(52.5%)
were
male.
identified
16
(3.1%)
cases
active
HBV
infection;
only
six
these
aware
their
status,
3
newly
diagnosed
as
candidates
for
treatment.
A
total
96
(18.4%)
serological
markers
suggestive
prior
vaccination.
large
proportion
(n
=
120,
23.0%)
positive
core
antibodies;
these,
90
(17.2%)
cleared
previous
(being
surface
antibodies
antibodies).
following
parameters
that
significantly
more
frequent
history
infection:
older
(P
<
.001),
hypoalbuminemia
.015),
thrombocytopenia
followed
by
thrombocytosis
.041),
increased
blood
urea
nitrogen
.001)
creatinine
.011).
In
conclusion,
has
taught
us
essential
lessons
about
importance
maintaining
access
ensuring
monitoring
chronic
infections
such
B,
even
crisis.
In Vivo,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
37(4), P. 1455 - 1476
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Background/Aim:
COVID-19
has
dramatically
impacted
non-pandemic-related
care,
including
preventive
medicine.
Our
objective
was
to
quantify
the
alterations
in
volume
of
screening
tests
for
breast
and
cervical
cancer
during
era
compared
pre-pandemic
levels.
Secondarily,
we
discussed
causes
responsible
this
change,
presented
suggestions
optimization
conducted
a
targeted
search
relevant
literature
worsening
future
mortality
due
setback.
Materials
Methods:
We
systematically
searched
Pubmed,
Google
Scholar
Epistemonikos
articles
English
or
Greek,
published
from
March
11th,
2020,
until
September
14th,
2022,
that
illustrated
quantitative
variations
mammograms
Pap/HPV
tests.
Preprint
articles,
editorials
speeches
were
excluded.
Quality
included
studies
assessed
via
JBI
critical
appraisal
checklist
reporting
prevalence
data.
The
evidence
narratively
synthesized.
Results:
A
total
56
included,
being
either
observational
reports
registries.
Large
reductions
universally
identified,
peaked
first
wave
but
partially
persisted
after
easing
restrictions.
Conclusion:
systematic
review
provides
an
updated
record
approaches
neglect
multidimensional
perspective
answering
why
it
happened
how
could
achieve
recovery.
strong
awareness
campaign
is
proposed,
conjunction
with
triaging
citizens
more
likely
benefit
screening.
Cervical
self-sampling
emphasized
literature.
Various
displayed
potential
increase
based
on
predictive
statistical
models.
Frontiers in Oncology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: March 27, 2024
Introduction
The
COVID-19
pandemic
had
collateral
effects
on
many
health
systems.
Cancer
screening
and
diagnostic
tests
were
postponed,
resulting
in
delays
diagnosis
treatment.
This
study
assessed
the
impact
of
screening,
diagnostics
incidence
breast,
colorectal,
lung,
prostate
cancer;
whether
rates
returned
to
pre-pandemic
levels
by
December,
2021.
Methods
is
a
cohort
electronic
records
from
United
Kingdom
(UK)
primary
care
Clinical
Practice
Research
Datalink
(CPRD)
GOLD
database.
included
individuals
registered
with
CPRD
between
January,
2017
2021,
at
least
365
days
clinical
history.
focused
tests,
referrals
diagnoses
first-ever
cancer.
Incidence
(IR)
stratified
age,
sex,
region,
rate
ratios
(IRR)
calculated
compare
during
after
lockdown
before
lockdown.
Forecasted
estimated
using
negative
binomial
regression
models.
Results
Among
5,191,650
eligible
participants,
first
resulted
reduced
for
all
cancers,
which
remained
dramatically
across
whole
observation
period
almost
investigated.
There
significant
IRR
reductions
breast
(0.69
[95%
CI:
0.63-0.74]),
colorectal
(0.74
0.67-0.81]),
(0.71
0.66-0.78])
cancer
diagnoses.
lung
non-significant
(0.92
0.84-1.01]).
Extrapolating
entire
UK
population,
an
18,000
13,000
10,000
21,000
missed
March,
2020
Discussion
substantial
referrals,
significantly
lower
than
cancers
associated
Delays
are
likely
have
adverse
consequences
stage,
treatment
initiation,
mortality
rates,
years
life
lost.
Urgent
strategies
needed
identify
undiagnosed
cases
address
long-term
implications
delayed
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(9), P. e2332363 - e2332363
Published: Sept. 5, 2023
Disruptions
to
health
care
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
may
have
led
missed
cancer
diagnoses.
It
is
critical
evaluate
association
between
and
incidence
address
public
patient
anxiety,
inform
recovery
efforts,
identify
strategies
reduce
system's
vulnerability
future
disruptions.To
examine
in
Manitoba,
Canada.A
population-based
cross-sectional
study
design
was
conducted
using
data
from
Manitoba
Cancer
Registry
an
interrupted
time-series
analysis.
All
individuals
diagnosed
with
Canada,
January
1,
2015,
until
December
31,
2021,
were
included.
Individuals
breast,
colon,
rectal,
or
lung
grouped
by
age
as
follows:
younger
than
50
years,
74
75
years
older.COVID-19
pandemic.Age-standardized
rates
estimated
cumulative
difference
number
of
cases
absence
observed
(fitted)
cases.A
total
48
378
The
median
(IQR)
at
diagnosis
68
(59-77)
23
972
participants
(49.6%)
female.
In
April
2020,
there
a
23%
decrease
overall
incidence.
decreased
46%
for
35%
47%
50%
head
neck,
65%
melanoma,
33%
endocrine
diagnoses
increased
12%
hematological
8%
cancers
unknown
primary
site.
Lung
remained
stable
2020
when
it
11%.
Brain
central
nervous
system
urinary
consistently
over
time
2021
26%
12%,
respectively.
No
gynecologic
(1%
increase),
other
digestive
decrease),
pancreatic
(7%
increase)
As
had
deficit
692
(5.3%)
cancers.
largest
deficits
breast
(273
cases,
14.1%
deficit),
colon
(133
12.2%
(132
7.6%
deficit).In
this
study,
associated
initial
followed
most
sites.
However,
some
high
fatality
needs
immediate
attention.
Background:
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
caused
disruptions
to
cancer
care
by
delaying
diagnoses
and
treatment,
presenting
challenges
uncertainties
for
both
patients
physicians.
We
conducted
a
nationwide
online
survey
investigate
the
effects
of
capture
modifications,
prompted
pandemic-related
control
measures,
on
cervical
screening-related
activities
from
mid-March
mid-August
2020,
across
Canada.
Methods:
consisted
61
questions
related
continuum
in
screening
treatment:
appointment
scheduling,
tests,
colposcopy,
follow-up,
treatment
pre-cancerous
lesions/cancer,
telemedicine.
piloted
with
21
Canadian
experts
prevention
care.
partnered
Society
Colposcopists,
Gynecologic
Oncology
Canada,
Association
Pathologists,
Obstetricians
Gynecologists
which
distributed
their
members
via
email.
reached
out
family
physicians
nurse
practitioners
MDBriefCase.
was
also
posted
McGill
Channels
(Department
Family
Medicine
News
Events)
social
media
platforms.
data
were
analyzed
descriptively.
Results:
Unique
responses
collected
510
participants
(November
16,
February
28,
2021),
representing
418
fully
92
partially
completed
surveys.
Responses
Ontario
(41.0%),
British
Columbia
(21.0%),
Alberta
(12.8%),
mostly
comprised
physicians/general
(43.7%),
gynecologist/obstetrician
professionals
(21.6%).
Cancelled
appointments
mainly
reported
(28.3%),
followed
(19.8%),
primarily
occurred
private
clinics
(30.5%).
Decreases
number
Pap
tests
colposcopy
procedures
consistently
observed
provinces.
About
90%
that
practice/institution
adopted
telemedicine
communicate
patients.
Conclusions:
area
most
severely
impacted
an
important
level
cancellations
reported.
Survey
results
may
inform
resumptions
various
fronts
management.
Funding:
present
work
supported
Institutes
Health
Research
(operating
grant
COVID-19
May
2020
Rapid
Funding
Opportunity
VR5-172666
competition
foundation
143347
Eduardo
L
Franco).
Eliya
Farah
Rami
Ali
each
received
MSc
stipend
Department
Oncology,
University.
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
16(3), P. 102 - 109
Published: July 18, 2022
Purpose
of
review
Cancer
screening
disruption
due
to
COVID-19
may
have
a
significant
impact
on
patients,
healthcare
practitioners,
and
systems.
In
this
present
review,
we
aim
offer
comprehensive
view
the
effect
pandemic
cancer
programs
worldwide.
Recent
findings
The
comprised
33
publications.
During
pandemic,
rates
investigations
were
drastically
reduced
Screening
plummeted
for
all
types
cancer,
ages,
racial/ethnic
groups.
Reductions
in
percentages
higher
several
underserved
racial
was
suspended
at
least
30
days
13
countries.
Summary
Screenings
fell
sharply.
chain
management,
delays
any
step
are
liable
change
outcome
next
step.
Further
long-term
research
will
be
needed
fully
comprehend
services
patient
outcomes.
Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 15, P. 51 - 89
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Abstract:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
several
priority
diseases
were
not
getting
sufficient
attention.
Whilst
breast
cancer
is
a
fatal
disease
affecting
millions
worldwide,
identification
and
management
of
these
patients
did
initially
attract
critical
attention
to
minimize
impact
lockdown,
post-lockdown,
other
measures.
Breast
patients'
conditions
may
remain
stable
without
proper
care,
worsening
their
prognosis.
Proper
care
includes
timely
instigation
surgery,
systemic
therapy,
psychological
support.
This
low-and
middle-income
countries
where
there
are
already
concerns
with
available
personnel
medicines
adequately
identify
treat
patients.
Consequently,
was
need
summarize
current
scenario
regarding
managing
during
across
all
countries,
including
any
guidelines
developed.
We
systematically
searched
three
scientific
databases
found
76
eligible
articles
covering
medical
strategies
high-income
versus
LMICs.
Typically,
diagnostic
facilities
in
hospitals
affected
at
beginning
pandemic
following
lockdown
resulted
more
advanced-stage
cancers
being
detected
initial
presentation
negatively
impacting
patient
outcomes.
Other
than
increased
telemedicine,
instigating
neo-adjuvant
endocrine
therapy
often,
reducing
non-essential
visits,
increasing
application
chemotherapy
meet
challenges,
encouragingly,
no
significant
difference
among
Numerous
evolved
address
challenges
posed
by
lockdowns
measures,
which
subsequently
adopted
various
LMICs
improve
care.
The
associated
especially
peak
waves,
subsequent
effect
on
patient's
mental
health
must
also
be
considered
this
high-priority
group.
will
continue
monitor
situation
provide
direction
future
pandemics.
Keywords:
COVID-19,
cancer,
healthcare
system,
management,
treatment,
guidelines,
unintended
consequences
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
6(1), P. e2253204 - e2253204
Published: Jan. 26, 2023
COVID-19
has
had
a
major
effect
on
health
care
activities,
especially
surgery.
At
first,
comparisons
were
proposed
using
2019
activities
as
the
highest
standard.
However,
while
such
an
approach
might
have
been
suitable
during
first
months
of
pandemic,
this
no
longer
be
case
for
period.To
examine
approaches
that
may
better
assess
use
cancer
surgeries.In
cross-sectional
design,
nationwide
French
hospital
facility
data
(Medicalised
Information
System
Program)
used
to
surgery
6
site
categories
in
adults
from
January
1,
2010,
December
31,
2021.Estimated
activity
pandemic.Three
models
expected
number
surgical
procedures
between
2020
and
2021
make
comparison
with
those
observed
earlier
years.In
France,
removal
surgeries
account
approximately
7000
hospitalizations
per
year
liver
cancer;
4000
pancreatic
7700
ovarian
1300
esophagus
23
000
ear,
nose,
throat
(ENT)
78
breast
16
600
thoracic
cancers.
For
most
sites,
increased
2010
2019:
liver,
14%;
pancreas,
38%;
ovary,
esophagus,
18%;
breast,
8%;
thoracic,
29%.
Assuming
stability,
these
values
underestimate
gap
2020-2021.
other
procedures,
decrease
was
observed:
stomach,
-10%,
ENT,
-6%.
overestimate
end
2021,
according
model,
2020-2021
estimated
at
-1.4%
1.7%
-6.6%
-7.3%
-3.1%
-2.5%
ovarian,
-4.2%
-1.7%
-6.7%
5.9%
-13.0%
-13.9%
esophageal
urologic
cancers,
because
trend
different
before
after
2015,
it
necessary
opt
modeling
only
recent
period.
The
cumulative
-1.0%
ENT
-5.3%
-2.9%
cancers.The
findings
study
suggest
short-
medium-term
trends
must
considered
estimate
activities.
Breast
is
which
showed
smallest
almost
full
recovery
2021.
Cancers,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
15(6), P. 1753 - 1753
Published: March 14, 2023
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
caused
a
significant
disruption
to
cancer
diagnosis,
treatment
and
prevention
worldwide
that
could
have
serious
consequences
in
the
near
future.
We
intend
evaluate
weight
of
this
backlog
on
community-wide
scale
Madrid
during
period
2020-2021,
whether
stage
shift
towards
advanced
occurred.
Cancer
diagnoses
tumor
registry
(RTMAD)
from
2019-2021
were
evaluated.
Absolute
percentage
differences
annual
volume
observed-to-expected
(O/E)
ratios
calculated.
Standardized
incidence
(SIRs)
95%
confidence
intervals
(CIs)
calculated
using
O/E
ratio.
SIR
for
2020-2021
compared
was
94.5%
(95%
CI
93.8-95.3),
with
unequal
gender-specific
diagnosis
recovery
(88.5%
males
102.1%
females).
Most
types
underdiagnosed
2020.
tendency
worsened
2021
colorectal
prostate
cancers
(87.8%),
but
lung
recovered
(102.1%)
breast
over-diagnosed
(114.4%)
reference
pre-COVID-19
data.
These
changes
modified
ranking
most
frequent
malignancies
diagnosed
Madrid.
Breast
overtaken
cancers,
displaced
second
third
position,
respectively.
Not
only
affected
more
as
consequence
COVID-19
malignancy
at
advance
also
increased
by
3.6%
2020
4.2%
2019.
In
summary,
there
is
large
undetected
reduced
access
care
secondary
pandemic,
especially
regarding
cancer.
Strategies
are
needed
recover
effectively
treat
these
cases
future
solve
negative
impact
will
be
diagnostic
delay.
Analyzing
new
suffered
each
different
their
help
understand
how
allocation
resources
should
look.
BMC Health Services Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: Jan. 4, 2024
Abstract
Background
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
has
disrupted
healthcare
systems
throughout
the
world.
Many
patients
faced
delays
and
cancellation
of
care
due
to
scaled
back
services,
mobility
restrictions,
concerns
related
risk
infection.
present
study
aimed
assess
prevalence
factors
associated
with
avoidance
or
delay
medical
COVID-19
in
Armenia.
Methods
We
conducted
a
cross-sectional
telephone
survey
3,483
adults
across
used
stratified
two-stage
cluster
sampling
select
participants
from
different
age
groups
proportionate
their
size
population.
Logistic
regression
analysis
assessed
association
avoidance/delay
routine,
urgent/emergency,
any
care.
Results
mean
sample
was
49.5
(SD
=
14.8),
ranging
18
90.
About
9.9%
respondents
avoided/delayed
type
care;
whereas
5.5%
urgent/emergency
6.6%
routine
In
adjusted
analysis,
female
gender
higher
monthly
expenditures
were
Factors
delay/avoidance
included
perceived
threat
COVID-19.
Younger
age,
gender,
not
being
vaccinated
against
analysis.
Conclusion
Since
avoiding
delaying
might
increase
morbidity
mortality
conditions
COVID-19,
identifying
population
that
are
more
likely
avoid
is
important.
Targeting
such
educational
interventions
focusing
on
risks
using
versus
times
be
crucial.
Ensuring
provision
in-home
services
for
high-risk
help
address
important
needs
during
pandemic.
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
369, P. 117807 - 117807
Published: Feb. 3, 2025
Cervical
cancer
screening
(CCS)
is
a
critical
component
of
preventative
sexual
and
reproductive
healthcare,
yet
there
are
disparities
in
access
to
CCS
for
people
with
disabilities.
This
qualitative
community-engaged
study
uses
the
disability
justice
framework
examine
how
COVID-19
pandemic
impacted
disabilities'
experiences
Canada.
From
May
2022
March
2023,
semi-structured
interviews
were
conducted
40
women
gender-diverse
physical,
sensory,
cognitive,
and/or
mental
health
Results
from
thematic
analysis
indicate
that
barriers
before
during
characterized
by
inaccessibility,
ableism
intersecting
forms
oppression,
provider
distrust,
deprioritization
disregard
disabled
people's
autonomy.
Grounded
these
findings,
this
article
situates
healthcare
like
as
concern.
Amplified
pandemic,
enacted
injustice
through
everyday
micro-eugenics
devalued
Barriers
must
be
addressed
collaboration
communities.
Guided
participant
insights,
recommendations
include
making
services
more
accessible
available
disabilities,
especially
aftermath
public
emergencies
disproportionately
impact