Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
16
Published: April 4, 2025
Background
Initial
studies
suggest
that
individuals
with
a
history
of
traumatic
life
experiences,
particularly
childhood
trauma,
may
be
more
susceptible
to
increased
mental
health
problems
in
the
wake
COVID-19
pandemic.
Methods
The
present
cross-sectional
study
compared
status
three
cohorts
university
students
before
(2016),
at
beginning
(2020)
and
end
(2022)
each
cohort
were
divided
into
two
groups:
those
self-reported
moderate/severe
trauma
(n
=
126)
no/mild
438).
Results
Across
all
cohorts,
consistently
reported
higher
levels
psychological
physical
stress
experiences.
However,
only
group
exhibited
an
increase
(i.e.,
heightened
depressive
symptoms
greater
subjective
impairment
due
symptoms)
during
Furthermore,
within
group,
2022
significantly
distress
surveyed
2020.
In
contrast,
scores
among
remained
unchanged
across
pre-pandemic
pandemic
cohorts.
Conclusions
findings
this
do
not
support
hypothesis
disproportionately
exacerbated
moderate
severe
trauma.
Instead,
our
results
pandemic’s
impact
on
was
pronounced
no
or
mild
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 30, 2025
Background
Systematic
reviews
have
suggested
mixed
effects
of
the
COVID‐19
pandemic
on
mental
health
children
and
young
people.
However,
most
included
studies
focused
general
population
were
cross‐sectional.
The
long‐term
impact
those
with
pre‐existing
and/or
neurodevelopmental
conditions
remains
unclear.
Thus,
we
conducted
a
systematic
review
meta‐analysis
to
examine
longitudinal
this
clinical
potential
explanatory
factors.
Methods
Ovid
Medline,
Embase,
APA
PsycInfo
Global
Health
databases
searched
between
1
January
2020
3
August
2023
(PROSPERO
CRD42022383546).
We
that
compared
symptoms
pre‐
during
timepoints
in
people
(≤18
years
old)
conditions.
Outcomes
internalising,
externalising
other
symptoms.
Risk
bias
was
rated
using
an
adapted
tool.
Included
narratively
synthesised
multi‐level
meta‐analyses
where
number
sufficient.
Results
identified
21
(
N
=
2,617)
from
6,083
records.
Studies
differed
across
countries,
diagnoses,
measures,
informants
timepoints.
All
had
overall
moderate‐to‐high
risk
bias.
Narrative
synthesis
found
evidence
symptom
change,
individual
showing
increase/reduction/no
change.
Factors
such
as
diagnosis,
baseline
severity,
age
sex/gender
may
explain
variation
outcomes.
Multi‐level
feasible
for
limited
outcomes
no
significant
changes
internalising
versus
or
phases,
high
heterogeneity
noted.
Conclusions
varied
according
contextual
vulnerabilities,
which
not
fully
captured
pooled
analyses.
Further
research
needs
investigate
longer‐term
impacts
better
stratify
vulnerable
population.
The Lancet Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
8(11), P. e889 - e898
Published: Oct. 26, 2023
BackgroundAssessing
the
prevalence
of
clinically
relevant
depressive
symptoms
and
their
possible
variation
by
country
over
time
could
be
a
valuable
resource
to
inform
development
public
health
policies
preventive
resources
reduce
mental
burden.
We
aimed
assess
cross-national
differences
in
point
Europe
2018–20,
evaluate
between
countries
2013–15
2018–20.MethodsIn
this
population-based
study,
data
from
participants
second
third
waves
European
Health
Interview
Survey
(EHIS-2
2013
2015
EHIS-3
2018
2020)
30
were
used
(n=542
580).
From
total
sample,
283
692
belonging
included
study
(52·4%
women
47·5%
men).
The
non-response
ranged
country,
12%
78%.
Point
was
evaluated
using
cutoff
score
10
or
more
for
8-item
version
Patient
Questionnaire.
Crude
ratios
adjusted
(aPRs)
obtained
within
countries.FindingsThe
2018–20
6·54%
(95%
CI
6·34–6·73),
ranging
across
1·85%
(1·53–2·17)
Greece
10·72%
(10·04–11·40)
Sweden.
Compared
with
other
countries,
those
lowest
aPRs
Greece,
Serbia,
Cyprus
highest
Belgium,
Slovenia,
Croatia.
A
small
but
significant
increase
EHIS-2
observed
(aPR
1·11
[1·07–1·14]).
wide
variability
observed,
an
aPR
0·63
(0·54–0·74)
Hungary
1·88
(1·53–2·31)
Slovenia.InterpretationThis
based
on
large
representative
datasets
valid
reliable
screening
tool
assessment
depression,
indicates
that
2020
remains
relatively
stable,
countries.
These
findings
considered
baseline
monitoring
Europe,
policy
strategies
depression
both
at
level.FundingCenter
Biomedical
Research
Epidemiology
Public
Network
AGAUR.
Age and Ageing,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
52(9)
Published: Sept. 1, 2023
Abstract
Background
Early
in
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
many
experts
pointed
to
potential
adverse
mental
health
effects
for
older
adults.
By
contrast,
studies
young
middle-aged
adults
found
age
be
associated
with
reduced
burden.
However,
a
systematic
review
on
is
missing.
Objectives
To
comprehensively
assess
pandemic’s
impact
Data
sources
We
searched
nine
databases
from
December
2019
April
2022.
Study
selection
included
longitudinal
and
repeated
cross-sectional
assessing
pre-
and/or
peri-pandemic
distress
positive
indicators
(e.g.
wellbeing)
at
least
two
occasions.
synthesis
identified
108
comprising
102,136
participants
(≥60
years).
After
removal
of
outliers,
there
was
small
increase
pre-to-peri-pandemic
assessments,
standardised
mean
difference
(SMD)
=
0.10,
95%
confidence
interval
(CI)
[0.01,
0.18].
Furthermore,
decrease
anxiety
symptoms
observed,
whereas
other
remained
unchanged.
For
indicators,
wellbeing
quality
life
showed
an
initial
decrease,
overall
increased
during
SMD
0.08,
CI
0.15].
Being
female
related
larger
increases
distress.
Conclusions
Based
studies,
this
demonstrated
decreases
early
stages
pandemic
adults,
evidence
later
recovery.
These
findings
are
similar
those
younger
correct
earlier
claims
that
particular
risk
negative
consequences.
The
results
ask
further
research
into
resilience
adaptation
processes
Translational Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: Oct. 23, 2023
Resilience
can
be
viewed
as
trajectory
of
stable
good
mental
health
or
the
quick
recovery
during
after
stressor
exposure.
factors
(RFs)
are
psychological
resources
that
buffer
potentially
negative
effects
stress
on
health.
A
problem
resilience
research
is
large
number
conceptually
overlapping
RFs
complicating
their
understanding.
The
current
study
sheds
light
interrelations
in
face
COVID-19
pandemic
a
use
case
for
major
disruptions.
non-preregistered
prospective
assessed
sample
1275
German-speaking
people
from
February
2020
to
March
2021
at
seven
timepoints.
We
measured
coping,
hardiness,
control
beliefs,
optimism,
self-efficacy,
sense
coherence
(SOC),
mastery,
social
support
and
dispositional
2020,
(i.e.,
psychopathological
symptoms,
COVID-19-related
rumination,
stress-related
growth)
all
Analyses
used
partial
correlation
network
models
latent
growth
mixture
modeling
(LGMM).
Pre-pandemic
were
strongly
interrelated,
with
SOC
being
most
central
node.
strongest
associations
emerged
between
coping
using
emotional
support,
self-efficacy.
active
negatively
linked.
When
we
examined
predictors
trajectories,
was
predictor
symptoms
while
trajectories
predicted
by
optimism.
Subsequent
analyses,
including
individual
intercepts
slopes
LGMM,
showed
had
small
moderate
but
unrelated
slopes.
Our
findings
provide
evidence
playing
an
important
role
distress
suggest
further
examining
SOC's
incremental
validity.
However,
our
results
also
propose
might
more
levels
than
adaptation
processes
over
time.
differential
positive
outcomes
multidimensional
research.
BMC Public Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: April 23, 2024
Abstract
There
are
reports
of
poor
working
conditions
for
early
and
mid-career
academics
(EMCAs)
in
universities,
however,
empirical
data
using
validated
tools
scarce.
We
conducted
an
online,
cross-sectional
survey
to
assess
workplace
satisfaction,
exposure
abuse,
mental
health.
Participants
included
employees
medical
health
faculties
two
the
largest
Australian
surveyed
between
October
2020
January
2021.
Overall,
284
participants
responded.
Many
reported
job
insecurity:
half
(50.7%)
on
contracts
with
less
than
one
remaining
year.
Workloads
were
considerable,
89.5%
overtime
54.8%
reporting
burnout.
Workplace
abuse
forms
bullying
(46.6%),
sexual
harassment
(25.3%),
sexism
(49.8%)
racism
(22.5%)
commonly
reported.
Clinically
significant
symptoms
depression
(28.0%),
anxiety
(21.7%)
suicidal
ideation
or
self-harm
(13.6%)
reported;
a
higher
prevalence
among
those
more
overtime,
exposed
abuse.
Priorities
include
providing
stable
safe
workplace,
increasing
accountability
transparency
addressing
supporting
professional
development.
In
summary,
EMCAs
our
study
precarious
employment
Our
findings
provide
evidence
where
universities
funding
bodies
should
direct
resources
change
organisational
risk
factors,
improve
culture.
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
33
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Population-wide
restrictions
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
may
create
barriers
to
mental
health
diagnosis.
This
study
aims
examine
changes
in
number
of
incident
cases
and
incidence
rates
diagnoses
pandemic.