Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
Vol. 89(4), P. 431 - 448
Published: Nov. 30, 2023
La
Nouvelle-Zélande
est
souvent
citée
comme
l’archétype
du
nouveau
management
public
(NMP),
car
elle
allée
«
plus
loin
et
vite
»
que
d’autres
pays
en
réformant
radicalement
son
service
à
la
fin
des
années
1980.
On
a
attribué
ces
réformes
gains
significatifs
termes
d’efficacité
de
réactivité,
tout
introduisant
nouveaux
défis.
Les
successives
30
dernières
ont
retouché
le
modèle
sans
modifier
fondamentalement
paradigme
sous-jacent,
si
bien
certains
auteurs
parlent
mythe
post-NMP
».
En
2020,
abrogé
remplacé
sa
principale
législation
sur
public.
analysant
textuellement
documents
gouvernementaux,
cet
article
explore
les
différentes
racines
théoriques
administratives
cours
examine
leur
degré
cohérence
théorique.
loi
fait
directement
écho
aux
récents
débats
universitaires
s’en
inspire,
s’appuyant
une
série
sources
(telles
nouvelle
gouvernance
publique,
l’ère
numérique
public).
Remarque
l’intention
praticiens
longtemps
été
considérée
l’exemple
pur
(NMP).
approuvée
2020
permis
d’adopter
décrites
dans
littérature
»,
réaffirmant
caractéristiques
associées
l’administration
publique
traditionnelle
(APT).
Si
s’est
éloignée
d’un
purement
NMP
adopté
au
post-NMP,
n’est
pas
doctrine
cohérente
doctrines
ne
peuvent
peut-être
être
identifiées
rétrospectivement.
Nous
entrons
période
complexité
où
se
mélangent
superposent.
This
Element
focuses
on
New
Public
Governance
as
one
of
the
major
administrative
narratives
our
times.
It
offers
a
critical
interpretation
NPG
hybrid
tool
for
management,
governance,
and
reform,
arguing
that
coexists
with
is
likely
to
gradually
merge
into
Management.
Several
arguments
support
'continuity
hybridization'
hypothesis,
whereby
transition
from
NPM
occurred
through
retention
key
elements
layering
sedimentation
process.
These
challenge
“linear
substitution”
accounting
NPM's
persistence
dominance.
The
develops
new
discusses
challenges
poses.
Finally,
it
shows
exploring
hybridity
evaluating
potential
in
terms
shift
public
administration
understanding
governance
trajectories
reform
scenarios.
This
Element
argues
for
a
complementarity
principle
–
governance
values
should
complement
political
as
guide
designing
the
structures
and
procedures
of
public
administration.
It
that
value-congruity
inherent
in
is
indispensable
to
administrative
responsibility.
identifies
several
core
democratic
critically
assesses
systems
collaborative
governance,
representative
bureaucracy,
participatory
policymaking
light
those
values.
shows
principle,
applied
these
different
designs,
facilitates
responsibility
by
making
themselves
more
consistent
with
principles
without
compromising
their
aims.
title
also
available
Open
Access
on
Cambridge
Core.
Intelligence
is
a
concept
that
occurs
in
multiple
contexts
and
has
various
meanings.
It
refers
to
the
ability
of
human
beings
other
entities
think
understand
world
around
us.
represents
set
skills
directed
at
problem-solving
targeted
producing
effective
results.
Thus,
intelligence
governance
are
an
odd
couple.
We
expect
governments
governing
institutions
operate
intelligent
manner,
but
too
frequently
we
criticize
their
understanding
serious
public
problems,
decisions,
behaviors,
managerial
skills,
solve
urgent
overall
governability
wisdom.
This
manuscript
deals
with
such
questions
using
interdisciplinary
insights
(i.e.,
psychological,
social,
institutional,
biological,
technological)
on
integrating
it
knowledge
governance,
administration,
management
non-profit
sectors.
propose
IntelliGov
framework,
may
extend
both
our
theoretical,
methodological,
analytical,
applied
digital
age.
This
Element
examines
the
recent
history
of
nonprofit
sector-wide
advocacy
at
federal
level,
focusing
on
work
done
by
national
infrastructure
organizations
and
charities,
to
advocate
issues,
such
as
tax
incentives
for
charitable
giving,
that
affect
a
broad
range
nonprofits.The
draws
interviews
with
thirty-nine
state
leaders
policymakers
well
published
papers
journalistic
accounts.It
finds
many
are
only
weakly
supportive
sector.In
end,
this
points
an
uneasy,
shifting
balance
in
sector
between
informal,
decentralized,
issue-based
coalitions
focused
short-term,
if
vital,
legislative
victories,
one
hand,
public
good
mandate
embraced
some
advocates,
which
attends
longer
time
horizons
conception
defense
civil
society,
other.This
title
is
also
available
Open
Access
Cambridge
Core.
From
Caligula
and
the
time
of
ancient
Rome
to
present,
governments
have
relied
on
experts
manage
public
programs.
But
with
that
expertise
has
come
power,
power
long
proven
difficult
hold
accountable.
The
tension
between
in
bureaucracy
policy
goals
elected
officials,
however,
remains
a
point
often
bitter
tension.
President
Donald
Trump
labeled
these
as
'deep
state'
seeking
resist
policies
he
believed
was
pursue—and
developed
scheme
make
it
far
easier
fire
deemed
insufficiently
loyal.
age-old
battles
accountability
sharp
point,
resolving
tensions
requires
fresh
look
at
rule
law
shape
role
governance.
Networks
contain
complex
patterns
of
dependency
and
require
multiple
levels
analysis
to
explain
their
formation,
structure,
outcomes.
In
this
Element,
the
authors
develop
Multilevel
Network
Framework.
The
framework
serves
as
(i)
a
conceptual
tool
think
more
deeply
about
network
dynamics,
(ii)
research
assist
in
connecting
data,
theory,
empirical
models,
(iii)
diagnostic
analyze
categorize
bodies
research.
then
systematically
review
literature
public
administration,
management,
policy.
They
apply
Framework
literature;
identify
significant
gaps;
examine
micro,
macro
cross-level
relations;
relevant
mechanisms
theories.
Overall
Element
helps
readers
understand
classify
research,
use
appropriate
theoretical
frameworks
network-related
problems,
how
networks
emerge
produce
effects
at
different
analysis,
(iv)
select
models.
Public Administration Review,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 11, 2025
ABSTRACT
Although
the
results
of
paradigmatic
change
are
a
common
focus
literature,
significantly
less
attention
has
been
paid
to
process
through
which
public
administration
reform
takes
place.
In
particular,
role
meso‐level
induced
changes
only
recently
started
receive
some
attention,
and
not
much
is
yet
known
about
how
collaborative
systems
at
managerial
level
affect
pathways
administrative
reform.
Here
we
compare
two
most
significant
periods
in
New
Zealand
past
50
years.
The
1988–1989
reforms
were
based
on
simple
(arguably
simplistic)
assumptions,
amenable
rapid
politically
led
top‐down
contrast,
2012–2020
conceived
as
complex
social
system
suited
incremental
managerially
that
was
mainly
driven
by
bureaucratic
elite.
Our
article
shows
collective
leadership
may
result
extensive
endogenous
feedback
processes.
The
question
of
how
agencies
can
work
together
has
been
central
to
the
field
public
administration
for
several
decades.
Despite
significant
research,
process
collaboration
still
be
a
fraught
endeavour
practitioners.
Nevertheless,
keep
trying
because
it
is
only
way
make
progress
on
biggest
challenges
facing
administrators.
This
Element
reveals
deeply
contingent
nature
collaboration,
rejecting
idea
that
reduced
universal
best
practice.
New
Zealand
government
implemented
such
approach
maps
different
collaborative
methods
against
problem
settings
and
degree
trade-off
required
from
actors'
core
or
individual
work.
provides
detailed
case
study
approach,
18
embedded
elements
'model'
forms
joined-up
government.
It
explains
servants
important
question:
'when
use
which
models?'.