Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework DOI Creative Commons
Whitney A. Sweeney, Patrick W. Kelly, Allan R. Brasier

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 7(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Abstract The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program supports a national network of medical research institutions working to improve the translational process. High-performing teams (TTs) are critical for advancing evidence-based approaches that human health. When focused on content-appropriate knowledge, skills, attitudes, targeted training results in substantial internalization content, producing new skills can be applied team outputs, outcomes, benefits. More rigorous develop, test, evaluate interventions needed, we used Wisconsin Interventions Team framework as model systematize our efforts. We designed, built, tested five-session TT Training researchers. 90-minute sessions were pilot-tested with 47 postdoctoral fellows evaluated through structured evaluation plan. Ninety-five percent post-session survey respondents indicated content provided would make them more effective collaborators, one hundred recommend colleagues. Respondents’ scores increased from pretest posttest most learning outcomes. Refinements participant feedback described. This work provides foundation continued evolution programs CTSA environment.

Language: Английский

Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education DOI
Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Sara L. Middleton, Jenny Phan

et al.

Published: June 20, 2022

Not all people conform to what is socially construed as the norm and divergences should be expected. Neurodiversity fundamental understanding of human behaviour cognition. However, neurodivergent individuals are often stigmatised, devalued, objectified. This position statement presents perspectives authors, majority whom have personal lived experiences neurodivergence(s), discusses how research academia can improved in terms integrity, inclusivity diversity. The authors describe future directions that relate experience systematic barriers, disclosure, on prevalence, stigma, intersection neurodiversity open scholarship, provide recommendations lead changes improve acceptance individuals’ within academia.

Language: Английский

Citations

82

Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams DOI Creative Commons
Sherry‐Ann Brown, Rodney Sparapani, Kristen Osinski

et al.

American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 32, P. 100306 - 100306

Published: June 3, 2023

Interdisciplinary research teams can be extremely beneficial when addressing difficult clinical problems. The incorporation of conceptual and methodological strategies from a variety disciplines health professions yields transformative results. In this setting, the long-term goal team science is to improve patient care, with emphasis on population outcomes. However, principles necessary for effective are rarely taught in professional schools. To form successful interdisciplinary cardio-oncology beyond, guiding organizational recommendations necessary. Cardiovascular disease results annual direct costs $220 billion (about $680 per person US) leading cause death cancer survivors, including adult survivors childhood cancers. Optimizing has potential aid investigation saving hundreds thousands lives each year United States mitigating cost cardiovascular disease. Despite published reports experiences developing across organizations, specialties settings, there no single journal article that compiles cardiology or teams. review, recurring threads linked working as team, well optimal methods, advantages, problems arise managing described context career development research. worth hurdles approach, based practical lessons learned establishing our multidisciplinary information gleaned relevant presented.

Language: Английский

Citations

18

Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative Qualitative Findings from the Dissemination and Implementation Study of a New Evidence-Based Team Science Intervention DOI Creative Commons
Stephen Molldrem, Heidi Luft,

Jeffrey S. Farroni

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 9(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2025

Abstract Introduction: Team Methods to Advance Processes and Performance in Science (TeamMAPPS) is an evidence-based competency model intervention. TeamMAPPS was developed by experts the of with translational teams mind. focuses on three core teamwork competencies: (1) psychological safety, (2) awareness exchange, (3) self-correction adaptation. In 2023, framework operationalized into five online training modules that can be used train whole or individuals, without facilitation, any order. This article reports formative findings from pre-implementation stage Dissemination Implementation (D&I) study. Methods: We conducted 27 interviews participant-observation fieldwork 23 individuals involved conceptualization, design, implementation (four were interviewed twice). All implementers affiliated a Clinical Translational Award (CTSA) hub. Data collected during pre-implementation, when being tested early-stage trained. D&I theories frameworks structure study, analyze interview data, recommend strategies. Findings: “Adoption,” “reach,” “effectiveness” emerged as key outcomes. perceived evidence-based, highly adaptable, intervention offering unique benefits. draw participants’ responses expert recommendations suggest Conclusions: CTSAs other organizations use varied strategies implement TeamMAPPS. The flexibility its rootedness evidence-base synthesized leaders make appealing for seeking enhance their team offerings.

Language: Английский

Citations

0

Competencies supporting high-performance translational teams: A review of the SciTS evidence base DOI Creative Commons
Allan R. Brasier, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Betsy Rolland

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 7(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Abstract A translational team (TT) is a specific type of interdisciplinary that seeks to improve human health. Because high-performing TTs are critical accomplishing CTSA goals, greater understanding how promote TT performance needed. Previous work by Workgroup formulated taxonomy 5 interrelated team-emergent competency “domains” for successful translation: 1). affect, 2). communication, 3). management, 4). collaborative problem-solving, and 5). leadership. These Knowledge Skills Attitudes (KSAs) develop within teams from the team’s interactions. However, practice in these domains enhance was unaddressed. To fill this gap, we conducted scoping literature review empirical studies broader Science Team domains. We identified KSAs performance, mapped earlier “domain” taxonomy, developed rubric their assessment. This identifies important areas intersection practices competencies across other find inclusive environment, openness transdisciplinary knowledge sharing, situational leadership core triad reinforce each highly linked performance. Finally, identify strategies enhancing competencies. provides grounded approach training interventions context.

Language: Английский

Citations

9

Applying the lessons of implementation science to maximize feasibility and usability in team science intervention development DOI Creative Commons
Betsy Rolland, Felice Resnik, Sarah D. Hohl

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2021

The Science of Team (SciTS) has generated a substantial body work detailing characteristics effective teams. However, that knowledge not been widely translated into accessible, active, actionable, evidence-based interventions to help translational teams enhance their team functioning and outcomes. Over the past decade, field Implementation rapidly developed methods approaches increase translation biomedical research findings clinical care, providing roadmap for mitigating challenges developing while maximizing feasibility utility. Here, we propose an approach intervention development using constructs from two frameworks, Consolidated Framework Research, Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance, extend Wisconsin Interventions framework described in Rolland et al. 2021. These can SciTS researchers design, build, test, disseminate meet needs both adopters, institutional leadership decides whether adopt intervention, implementers, those actually intervention. Systematically considering impact design decisions on usability may lead quickly move prototype pilot test pragmatic trials assess impact.

Language: Английский

Citations

19

Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach DOI Creative Commons
Emily Slade, Philip A. Kern,

Robert L. Kegebein

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 7(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

Abstract Introduction: Impactful, transdisciplinary scientific discoveries are created by teams of researchers spanning multiple disciplines, but collaboration across disciplines can be challenging. We examined how team dynamics and related to successes barriers faced from disciplines. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used examine 12 research granted multidisciplinary pilot awards. Team members were surveyed assess their individual views about research. Forty-seven (59.5%) responded, including two eight each funded team. Associations between collaborative scholarly product outcomes, manuscripts, grant proposals, awarded grants. One member selected for an in-depth interview contextualize extend information processes, successes, performing Results: Quality interactions positively associated with achievement products ( r = 0.64, p 0.02). Satisfaction 0.38) scores 0.43) also demonstrated positive associations products, these not statistically significant. Qualitative results support findings add further insight into aspects the process that particularly important foster success on teams. Beyond metrics, additional identified through qualitative portion study career development acceleration early researchers. Conclusions: Both quantitative indicate effective is critical success. Development and/or promotion science-based trainings would promote skills.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

The science of team science (SciTS): An emerging and evolving field of interdisciplinary collaboration DOI Creative Commons
Ying Huang, Xiaoting Liu, Ruinan Li

et al.

El Profesional de la Informacion, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 1, 2023

In recent years, collaboration within a team to solve complicated scientific and social problems has attracted growing popularity. particular, many complex challenges opportunities require expertise skills across disciplinary, organizational, cultural boundaries. However, rapid growth in the demand for outpaced changes factors needed support teams. Also, results are not simply combination of different working results; understanding how teams work what causes them fail or succeed is utmost importance. Thus, Science Team (SciTS), an emerging interdisciplinary research area, emerged as way managing circumstances that facilitate hinder effectiveness large-scale cross-disciplinary, collaborative research, training, translational initiatives. SciTS integrates various quantitative qualitative methods still advancing its sophistication. Using bibliometric information visualization methods, this paper clarifies concepts connotations science. It sets out important events emergence development summarizes characteristics literature, identifying seven main areas. The concludes with discussion on facing future advancement corresponding recommendations breaking through these bottlenecks. Our goal deepen researchers’ better inform policies practices govern more effective

Language: Английский

Citations

5

Dissemination and implementation science resources, training, and scientific activities provided through CTSA programs nationally: Opportunities to advance D&I research and training capacity DOI Creative Commons
Rachel C. Shelton, Rowena J Dolor, Jonathan N. Tobin

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 6(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2022

Abstract Introduction: Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program hubs are well-positioned to advance dissemination implementation (D&I) research training capacity nationally, though little is known about what D&I support services CTSAs provide. To address this gap, the CTSA Dissemination, Implementation, Knowledge Transfer Working Group conducted an environmental scan of (2017–2018). Methods: Of 67 institutions, we contacted 43 that previously reported delivering services. experts from these institutions were emailed a survey assessing resources, services, training, scientific projects. Responses categorized double-coded by study authors using content analysis approach. Results: Thirty-five (81.4%) responded. Challenges in developing supporting science activities related inadequate workforce (45.7%) lack understanding (25.7%). Services provided included consultation/mentoring programs (68%), pilot funding/grants (50%), workshops/seminars/conferences (46%). Training development frequently identified as future priorities. Recommendations increase meet demand (68.6%), accessible tools/resources (34.3%), greater visibility/awareness methods consultation (22.9%), expand (22.9%). Conclusions: have tremendous potential advancement impact across translational continuum. Despite growing presence CTSAs, continued commitment prioritization needed institutional leadership raise awareness its value, demands, develop necessary infrastructure for conducting science.

Language: Английский

Citations

8

A randomized controlled trial of a team science intervention to enhance collaboration readiness and behavior among early career scholars in the CTSA network DOI Creative Commons
Larry W. Hawk, Timothy F. Murphy, Katherine E. Hartmann

et al.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 33

Published: Dec. 14, 2023

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to content, full PDF via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Articulating the social responsibilities of translational science DOI Creative Commons
Elise Smith, Stephen Molldrem,

Jeffrey S. Farroni

et al.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: Jan. 9, 2024

Abstract In recent funding calls, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences has shifted its focus from “translational research,” which applies to studies in specific therapeutic areas, toward science” interventions aim modify system of translational discovery health sciences. To date, social responsibilities science have not been adequately articulated. this paper, we argue that ethical practice should include explicit contribute improved outcomes and decreased disparities. Articulating is justified based on three field’s foundational elements: (1) contract regarding public research, (2) goals science, (3) increased risk direct, indirect, systemic harms involve system-level changes. We integrate into a framework prioritizes developing relevant, usable, sustainable innovations provide illustrative examples demonstrate practical application framework.

Language: Английский

Citations

0