Synthese,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
205(1)
Published: Dec. 20, 2024
We
defend
a
new,
neurocognitive
version
of
the
view
that
knowing
is
form
how
and
its
manifestation.
Specifically,
we
argue
P
to
represent
fact
P,
ground
such
representation
in
use
guide
action
with
respect
when
needed,
store
traces
representations,
exercising
relevant
know-how.
More
precisely,
agents
acquire
knowledge
via
their
systems
control
organisms
by
building
internal
models
environments
using
action.
Such
implicitly
things
are.
When
agents'
implicit
are
grounded
usable
for
guiding
have
P.
additional
capacity
manipulate
language,
they
also
explicitly
express
world
thus-and-so.
explicit
appropriately
Thus,
both
forms
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
Research
on
concepts
has
concentrated
the
way
people
apply
online,
when
presented
with
a
stimulus.
Just
as
important,
however,
is
use
of
offline,
planning
what
to
do
or
thinking
about
case.
There
strong
evidence
that
inferences
driven
by
conceptual
thought
draw
heavily
special-purpose
resources:
sensory,
motoric,
affective,
and
evaluative.
At
same
time,
afford
general-purpose
recombination
support
domain-general
reasoning
processes—phenomena
have
long
been
focus
philosophers.
growing
consensus
theory
must
encompass
both
kinds
process.
This
book
shows
how
are
able
act
an
interface
between
systems.
Concept-driven
can
take
advantage
complementary
costs
benefits
each.
The
lays
out
empirically-based
account
different
ways
in
which
takes
us
new
conclusions
underpins
planning,
decision-making,
action.
It
also
spells
three
useful
implications
account.
First,
it
allows
reconstruct
commonplace
idea
draws
meaning
concept.
Second,
offers
insight
into
human
cognition
avoids
frame
problem
complementary,
less
discussed,
‘if-then
problem’
for
nested
processing
dispositions.
Third,
metacognition
concept-driven
various
ways.
framework
developed
elucidates
makes
especially
powerful
cognitive
resource.
Psychological Science,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 18, 2025
There
are
many
ways
to
describe
and
represent
the
visuospatial
world.
A
space
can
be
described
by
its
euclidean
properties—the
size
of
objects,
angles
boundaries,
distances
between
them.
also
in
nonspatial
terms:
One
could
explain
layout
a
city
order
streets.
Somewhere
between,
topological
representations—such
as
those
commonly
depicted
public-transit
maps—capture
coarse
relational
structure
without
precise
detail,
offering
relatively
efficient,
low-dimensional
way
capturing
spatial
content.
Here,
we
ask
whether
human
adults
quickly
automatically
perceive
such
relations.
In
six
experiments,
show
that
differences
simple
features
influence
range
visual
tasks
from
object
matching
number
estimation
search.
We
discuss
possibility
relations
kind
primitive
supports
representation.
Philosophical Explorations,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 23
Published: Feb. 17, 2025
Different
researchers
from
psychology
and
neuroscience
state
that
navigation
involves
the
manipulation
of
cognitive
maps
graphs.
In
this
paper,
I
will
argue
navigating
–
specifically,
journey
planning
can
be
conceived
as
a
process
practical
reasoning.
First,
constitutes
case
means-end
reasoning
involving
inferences
with
cartographic
representations.
Then,
output
functions
an
instrumental
belief
in
More
deliver
rule
plays
normative
role
spatial
cognition.
This
approach
motivates
pluralist
conception
reasoning,
stating
might
run
through
different
representational
formats
processes.
Mind & Language,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 26, 2025
Luis
Favela
and
Edouard
Machery
provide
a
summary
of
survey
they
previously
performed
on
how
the
term
representation
is
used
in
brain
sciences
by
neuroscientists,
psychologists
philosophers.
They
then
propose,
based
results,
that
as
likely
not
referring
to
any
ontologically
real
thing
imprecision
its
usage
should
only
be
tolerated
but
fact
encouraged
it
serves
promote
fruitful
comparative
work
between
areas
research
all
use
term.
I
argue
this
sad
fate
for
concept
deep
important
representation.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 117 - 154
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
Concepts
act
as
an
interface
between
general-purpose
conceptual
thought
and
special-purpose
informational
models.
A
concept
is
a
‘plug-and-play’
device
connecting
deliberative
thinking
to
simulations
in
sensory,
motor,
affective,
evaluative
systems.
Concept-driven
starts
with
conceptually
structured
thought.
This
drives
the
construction
of
‘suppositional
scenario’—an
interconnected
representation
situation
built
up
using
For
example,
‘will
chair
fit
my
car?’
prompts
mental
simulation
assessing
spatial
configurations.
Conclusions
are
expressed
back
facilitate
this
working
memory
labels
that
sustain
manipulate
representations,
while
also
plugging
into
compositional
structures
for
content-general
composition
reasoning.
gives
concepts
crucial
interfacing
role.
Evidence
supports
providing
such
access,
combination
control.
framework
explains
power
human
thought—flexibly
combining
construct
integrated
scenarios
from
which
new
conclusions
can
be
drawn.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 211 - 228
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
This
chapter
summarises
the
book’s
key
arguments
about
nature
of
concepts
and
their
role
in
human
cognition.
It
emphasises
that
act
as
an
interface
between
domain-general,
logical
reasoning
content-specific
computations
special-purpose
systems.
Conceptual
thought
orchestrates
inferences
across
these
systems
to
construct
rich,
multi-modal
amodal
informational
models.
Deliberation
involves
manipulating
models
anticipate
outcomes
make
choices,
going
beyond
merely
reacting
stimuli.
Concepts
enable
flexible
recombination
representations
while
retaining
connections
experience-based
knowledge.
hybrid
system
allows
humans
engage
sophisticated
planning
inference.
The
power
cognition
emerges
from
interaction
conceptual
are
central
unlocking
special
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 26
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
This
chapter
introduces
the
topic
of
conceptual
thinking.
Conceptual
thinking
involves
conscious,
deliberate
thought
processes
that
rely
on
working
memory
and
are
subject
to
cognitive
load.
Concepts
mental
representations
serve
as
freely-recombinable
components
thoughts.
When
combined
in
memory,
concepts
provide
access
a
variety
information
stored
other
systems,
allowing
construction
rich,
cross-domain
models
situations.
Inference
includes
both
step-by-step
reasoning
non-local
draw
conclusions
from
larger
or
whole.
act
an
interface
between
general-purpose,
broadly-logical
special-purpose
informational
represent
domains
like
space
social
relations.
Thinking
brings
these
elements
together
integrated
‘cognitive
playground’.
Metacognition
monitors
controls
by
assessing
confidence
concepts,
information,
inferences
involved.
The
book
develops
ideas
into
novel,
empirically-grounded
account
explains
central
features
human
cognition
inference.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 155 - 176
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
This
chapter
argues
that
human
cognition
manages
to
solve
the
notorious
frame
problem
(the
of
relevance-based
search)
by
relying
on
concepts
interface
between
special-purpose
informational
models
and
general-purpose
reasoning.
Deep
neural
networks
avoid
building
in
assumptions
relevance,
but
eventually
face
limits.
Storing
explicit
memories
reintroduces
searching
memory
for
relevance.
The
concept-driven
architecture
offers
a
hybrid
solution.
Special-purpose
systems
generate
relevant
considerations
which
reasoning
operates.
Their
state
spaces
allow
search
along
multiple
semantic
dimensions.
can
approximate
isotropic
search.
Concepts
compose
these
combinatorially.
explains
how
partly
avoids,
solves,
problem.
Oxford University Press eBooks,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 87 - 116
Published: Aug. 9, 2024
Abstract
This
chapter
discusses
the
variety
of
ways
that
information
can
be
represented
in
order
to
support
planning,
prospection,
and
inference—here
referred
as
‘informational
models’.
It
outlines
several
types,
focusing
on
key
features
representational
structure
computational
process.
These
include
domain-specific
perceptual
reinforcement
learning
systems;
‘model-based’
systems
rely
representing
causal
structure;
structural
representations
cognitive
maps;
relational
reasoning
with
concepts;
using
one
relation
stand
for
another;
conceptual
models
domains
like
number,
natural
kinds,
causation.
The
informational
differ
along
various
dimensions:
organized
vs.
representation;
content-specific
content-general
computations;
local
non-local
inferences;
whether
inferences
are
automatic
or
deliberative;
model
itself
just
its
outputs
relied
deliberation.
diversity
raises
important
question
how
thought
integrate
such
heterogeneous
models—answered
next
chapter.