Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored

Published: March 4, 2024

Recent academic debate has seen the emergence of claim that misinformation is not a significant problem. We believe arguments used to support this minimizing position are flawed, particularly if interpreted (e.g., by policymakers or public) as suggesting can be safely ignored. Here, we rebut two main claims, namely substantive concern (1) due its low incidence and (2) because it no causal influence on notable political behavioral outcomes. Through critical review current literature, demonstrate prevalence non-negligible reasonably inclusive definitions applied impacts important beliefs behaviors. Both scholars should therefore continue take seriously.

Language: Английский

---

Incorporating Psychological Science Into Policy Making

European Psychologist, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 28(3), P. 206 - 224

Published: July 1, 2023

The spread of false and misleading information in online social networks is a global problem need urgent solutions. It also policy because misinformation can harm both the public democracies. To address misinformation, policymakers require successful interface between science policy, as well range evidence-based solutions that respect fundamental rights while efficiently mitigating harms online. In this article, we discuss how regulatory nonregulatory instruments be informed by scientific research used to reach EU objectives. First, consider what it means approach problem. We then outline four building blocks for cooperation scientists who wish misinformation: understanding problem, psychological drivers perceptions finding solutions, co-developing appropriate measures. Finally, through lens science, examine have been proposed EU, focusing on strengthened Code Practice Disinformation 2022.

Language: Английский

---

Using Psychological Science To Understand And Fight Health Misinformation: An APA Consensus Statement

PsycEXTRA Dataset, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2023

There is widespread concern that misinformation poses dangerous risks to health, well-being, and civic life.Despite a growing body of research on the topic, significant questions remain about (a) psychological factors render people susceptible misinformation, (b) extent which it affects real-world behavior, (c) how spreads online offline, (d) intervention strategies counter correct effectively.This report reviews best available science reach consensus each these crucial questions, particularly as they pertain health-related misinformation.In addition, offers eight specific recommendations for scientists, policymakers, health professionals who seek recognize respond in care beyond.

Language: Английский

---

Misinformation interventions decay rapidly without an immediate posttest

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 54(8), P. 441 - 454

Published: June 21, 2024

Abstract In recent years, many kinds of interventions have been developed that seek to reduce susceptibility misinformation. two preregistered longitudinal studies ( N 1 = 503, 2 673), we leverage previously validated “inoculation” (a video and a game) address important questions in misinformation research: (1) whether displaying additional stimuli (such as videos unrelated misinformation) alongside an intervention interferes with its effectiveness, (2) administering immediate posttest (in the form social media post evaluation task after intervention) plays role longevity intervention. We find no evidence other interfere efficacy, but strong posttests strengthen learnings from study 1, 48 h watching video, participants who received continued be significantly better at discerning untrustworthy posts neutral ones than control group d 0.416, p .007), whereas only later showed differences 0.010, .854). 2, observe highly similar results for gamified intervention, provide causal mechanism: help people's memory lessons learned argue active rehearsal application relevant information are therefore requirements learning‐based interventions, which has substantial implications their scalability.

Language: Английский

---

Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions

BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)

Published: Nov. 29, 2024

Language: Английский

---

The Role of Narratives in Countering Health Misinformation: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Health Communication, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 12

Published: Jan. 20, 2025

Given the prevalence of health misinformation, it is essential to develop interventions correct misinformation and reduce its negative influence. Emerging research has investigated use narratives as both prebunking debunking strategies, but findings are mixed regarding their effectiveness. This systematic scoping review aimed examine role in countering drawing on evidence from 19 studies. The identified studies investigate a variety issues, with most employing randomized experimental design collecting data United States. suggest that promising strategy inoculate individuals against misinformation. However, effectiveness remains inconsistent. Narrative features such emotional appeals audiovisual elements may enhance impact. Directions for future discussed.

Language: Английский

---

How effective are fact-checks in Pakistan and who engages with them?

Information Communication & Society, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 23

Published: Feb. 19, 2025

Language: Английский

---

Green minds lead to green actions? Studying media literacy’s role in fostering visitors’ environmental behavior in urban forests in Tehran

City and Environment Interactions, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100199 - 100199

Published: April 1, 2025

Language: Английский

---

The Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Scoping Literature Review of Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)

Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 26, P. e38786 - e38786

Published: Oct. 13, 2022

This scoping review accompanies our research study "The Experience of Health Professionals With Misinformation and Its Impact on Their Job Practice: Qualitative Interview Study." It surveys online health misinformation is intended to provide an understanding the communication context in which professionals must operate.

Language: Английский

---

Understanding the complex links between social media and health behaviour

BMJ, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. e075645 - e075645

Published: June 20, 2024

Fabiana Zollo and colleagues call for comprehensive, robust research on the influence of social media health behaviour in order to improve public responses ### Key messages Over 90% people connected internet are active media, with a total 4.76 billion users worldwide January 2023.1 The digital revolution has reshaped news landscape changed way interact information. Social media's targeted communication rapidly reaches vast audiences, who turn actively participate shaping engaging content. This marks departure from more passive consumption patterns associated traditional media. past few years, have emerged as primary source many people, despite widespread user concerns about potential misinformation (box 1) necessity discern between reliable untrustworthy information.4 Data six continents also indicate preference among content that reflects their reading or viewing history, rather than selected by journalists, suggesting shift towards personalised driven curation. In this evolving landscape, celebrities, influencers, personalities increasingly assuming roles sources, especially platforms such TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat. Box 1 What is misinformation?RETURN TO TEXT

Language: Английский

---