Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(1), P. 41 - 50
Published: March 1, 2023
National
health
guidelines
provide
policy
makers
and
the
public
with
recommendations
for
various
behavioral
factors
known
to
promote
reduce
disease
risk,
such
as
diet
physical
activity.
Given
concerns
about
social
isolation,
loneliness,
other
forms
of
lacking
connection,
evidence
supports
establishing
national
“social
connection.”
The
aggregate
body
scientific
demonstrates
connection
protects
reduces
risks,
pointing
clear
relevance
health.
Taken
together
trends
suggesting
greater
disconnection,
there
is
a
compelling
case
preventative
efforts.
This
article
summarizes
on
connections,
potential
opportunities,
challenges
in
implementing
guidelines,
process
provides
illustrative
evidence-based
examples
recommendations.
American Psychologist,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
77(5), P. 660 - 677
Published: May 9, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
measures
aimed
at
its
mitigation,
such
as
physical
distancing,
have
been
discussed
risk
factors
for
loneliness,
which
increases
the
of
premature
mortality
mental
health
conditions.
To
ascertain
whether
loneliness
has
increased
since
start
pandemic,
this
study
to
narratively
statistically
synthesize
relevant
high-quality
primary
studies.
This
systematic
review
with
meta-analysis
was
registered
PROSPERO
(ID
CRD42021246771).
Searched
databases
were
PubMed,
PsycINFO,
Cochrane
Library/Central
Register
Controlled
Trials/EMBASE/CINAHL,
Web
Science,
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
database,
supplemented
by
Google
Scholar
citation
searching
(cutoff
date
search
December
5,
2021).
Summary
data
from
prospective
research
including
assessments
before
during
extracted.
Of
6,850
retrieved
records,
34
studies
(23
longitudinal,
9
pseudolongitudinal,
2
reporting
both
designs)
on
215,026
participants
included.
Risk
bias
(RoB)
estimated
using
in
non-randomised
studies-of
interventions
(ROBINS-I)
tool.
Standardized
mean
differences
(SMD,
Hedges'
g)
continuous
values
logOR
prevalence
rates
calculated
pooled
effect
size
estimators
random-effects
meta-analyses.
Pooling
longitudinal
designs
only
(overall
N
=
45,734),
scores
(19
studies,
SMD
0.27
[95%
confidence
interval
0.14-0.40],
Z
4.02,
p
<
.001,
I
98%)
(8
0.33
[0.04-0.62],
2.25,
.02,
96%)
relative
prepandemic
times
small
sizes.
Results
robust
respect
studies'
overall
RoB,
pseudolongitudinal
designs,
timing
assessments,
clinical
populations.
heterogeneity
effects
indicates
a
need
further
investigate
protective
progresses
inform
targeted
interventions.
(PsycInfo
Database
Record
(c)
2022
APA,
all
rights
reserved).
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
334, P. 116163 - 116163
Published: Aug. 9, 2023
Increasingly,
loneliness
is
being
recognised
as
a
serious
problem
with
detrimental
effects
on
health,
well
social
cohesion
and
community
trust.
To
effectively
tackle
this
complex
issue,
clear
understanding
of
the
phenomenon
its
main
drivers
needed.
Over
years
scientific
research
loneliness,
many
potential
risk
factors
have
emerged
been
tested
empirically.This
narrative
review
109
studies
provides
concise
summary
empirical
evidence
for
presents
an
additional
section
dedicated
to
COVID-19
pandemic.Given
very
large
number
existing
studies,
emphasis
placed
recent
meta-analyses
systematic
literature
reviews
longitudinal
studies.
Similarly,
given
possible
which
may
differ
based
geographical
cultural
context,
focuses
from
Europe
North
America.The
results
show
that
demographic
often
correlate
but
in
cases
link
becomes
negligible
when
controlling
other
factors.
Often,
physical
mental
health
problems
are
found
be
associated
so
some
psychological
factors,
such
neuroticism
or
extroversion.
Loneliness
also
depends
environment
one
lives,
possibly
broader
socio-economic
socio-cultural
contexts.
Nevertheless,
shows
ultimately
everything
comes
down
quantity
quality
relationships.
In
particular,
marital
status,
living
arrangements
characteristics
one's
personal
network
quite
consistently
among
strongest
predictors
loneliness.
These
findings
about
remained
valid
during
pandemic.The
implications
policy,
who
most
vulnerable
groups
key
designing
targeted
policy
solutions
Children,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
10(2), P. 279 - 279
Published: Jan. 31, 2023
Concerns
have
been
raised
about
the
loneliness
and
well-being
of
children
adolescents
during
COVID-19
pandemic.
The
extent
to
which
ongoing
pandemic
has
impacted
association
between
is
unclear.
Therefore,
a
systematic
review
empirical
studies
on
was
conducted
examine
(1)
prevalence
in
adolescents,
(2)
associations
indicators
well-being,
(3)
moderators
these
associations.
Five
databases
(MEDLINE,
Embase,
PsycInfo,
Web
Science,
ERIC)
were
searched
from
1
January
2020
28
June
2022
41
met
our
inclusion
criteria
(cross-sectional:
n
=
30;
longitudinal:
11;
registered
PROSPERO:
CRD42022337252).
Cross-sectional
rates
varied,
with
some
finding
that
over
half
experienced
at
least
moderate
levels
loneliness.
Longitudinal
results
reflected
significant
mean
increases
compared
pre-pandemic
levels.
indicated
higher
significantly
associated
poorer
including
depression
symptoms,
anxiety
gaming
addiction,
sleep
problems.
more
complex
than
cross-sectional
associations,
varying
by
assessment
timing
factors
statistical
analyses.
There
limited
diversity
study
designs
samples,
preventing
thorough
examination
moderating
characteristics.
Findings
highlight
broader
challenge
child
adolescent
predates
need
for
future
research
underrepresented
populations
across
multiple
timepoints.
Personnel Psychology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
77(4), P. 1351 - 1386
Published: March 1, 2024
Abstract
As
the
COVID‐19
pandemic
wanes,
many
organizations
are
asking
employees
to
return
office
concerned
that
more
extensive
remote
work
could
hurt
employee
morale
and
productivity.
Employees,
however,
prefer
remotely
because
of
flexibility
it
provides.
In
light
such
competing
perspectives,
we
conducted
a
meta‐analysis
examining
intensity's
(RWI)
effects
on
outcomes.
RWI
refers
extensiveness
ranging
from
one
or
two
days
week
full‐time
work.
We
propose
dual
pathway
model
linking
outcomes
arguing
has
indirect
but
opposing
same
via
mediators—perceived
autonomy
isolation.
Findings
RWI's
based
108
studies
(
k
=
110,
N
45,288)
support
model.
Allaying
organizational
concerns
about
work,
had
overall
small
beneficial
multiple
consequential
including
job
satisfaction,
commitment,
perceived
support,
supervisor‐rated
performance,
turnover
intentions.
also
use
(RWU),
binary
construct
taking
values—remote
workers
(users)
versus
office‐based
(non‐users
work).
RWU
62
63,
41,904)
suggest
generally
have
better
than
their
colleagues.
Altogether,
findings
offers
modest
upsides
with
limited
downsides—even
for
those
who
spend
time
working
away
office.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
14
Published: April 13, 2023
This
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
aims
to
explore
changes
in
sleep
quality
disturbances
the
general
population
from
before
during
COVID-19
lockdown.The
protocol
was
registered
PROSPERO
(CRD42021256378)
PRISMA
guidelines
were
followed.
The
major
databases
gray
literature
systematically
searched
inception
28/05/2021
identify
observational
studies
evaluating
lockdown
with
respect
pre-lockdown
period.
A
random
effects
undertaken
for
reporting
(a)
means
of
Pittsburgh
Sleep
Quality
Index
(PSQI)
global
scores
or
onset
latency
(SOL)
times
(minutes
-
min)
lockdown,
(b)
percentages
poor
(c)
quality.
Subgroup
analysis
by
risk
bias
measurement
tool
utilized
carried
out.
narrative
synthesis
on
efficiency,
disturbances,
insomnia
medication
consumption
also
performed.Sixty-three
included.
decline
quality,
reflected
a
pooled
increase
PSQI
(standardized
mean
difference
(SMD)
=
0.26;
95%
CI
0.17-0.34)
SOL
(SMD
0.38
min;
0.30-0.45)
found.
percentage
individuals
increased
(pooled
relative
1.4;
1.24-1.61).
Moreover,
57.3%
(95%
50.01-61.55)
reported
change
quality;
37.3%
34.27-40.39)
these,
it
worsening.
included
decrease
efficiency
an
insomnia,
consumption.Timely
interventions
are
warranted
view
uncovered
their
potentially
negative
impact
health.
Further
research
particular
longitudinal
using
validated
instruments
examining
long-term
variables
is
needed.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021256378,
identifier
CRD42021256378.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
18(3), P. e0279701 - e0279701
Published: March 16, 2023
Loneliness
is
a
highly
relevant
public
mental
health
issue.
This
work
presents
the
validation
of
single-item
measure
loneliness
and
its
subjective
experience:
"I
am
frequently
alone/have
few
contacts".
It
can
be
used
in
large-scale
population
surveys
where
an
economical
assessment
key
importance.Data
was
drawn
from
two
representative
German
conducted
early
late
2020
(combined
N
=
4,984;
52.9%
women;
age:
M
48.39
years
(SD
17.88)).
We
determined
prevalence
men
women
across
different
age
groups.
In
order
to
test
concurrent
validity,
bivariate
correlation
analyses
Chi-square
tests
were
performed.
Convergent
discriminant
validity
tested
by
investigating
intercorrelations
with
another
measure,
other
outcomes,
associations
sociodemographic
characteristics.Based
on
23.4%
participants
reported
some
degree
loneliness,
3.4%
among
them
severe
loneliness.
Comparisons
LS-S
showed
similar
rates
A
moderately
positive
relationship
between
measures
found
analysis
(ρ
.57,
p
<
.001),
but
results
indicated
only
weak
convergent
validity.
Construct
supported
depressive
symptoms,
anxiety
satisfaction
life,
household
size,
partnership.Loneliness
general
population.
The
suitable
as
brief
screening
population-based
assessments.
Journal of Research on Adolescence,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 29, 2024
Abstract
The
main
objective
of
this
rapid
systematic
review
was
to
examine
how
the
COVID‐19
pandemic
impacted
peer
relationships
for
adolescents
(10–25
years
age)
around
globe.
We
focused
on
four
indices
relationships:
(1)
loneliness,
(2)
social
connectedness,
(3)
support,
and
(4)
media
use.
In
addition,
we
examined
gender
age
differences.
Four
databases
(APA
PsychInfo,
PubMed,
Scopus,
Web
Science)
were
searched
articles
published
from
January
2020
November
2022.
A
total
96
studies
(cross‐sectional:
n
=
66,
longitudinal:
30,
quantitative:
67,
qualitative:
12,
mixed‐methods:
17)
met
our
inclusion
criteria
(empirical
observational
with
data
at
least
one
interest,
cross‐sectional
COVID‐19‐related
experiences
or
longitudinal
collected
during
pandemic,
range
10–25
years,
typically
developing
adolescents).
extracted
conducted
a
narrative
synthesis.
Findings
suggest
that
disruptions
negatively
youth.
Most
reported
either
an
increase
in
loneliness
over
course
positive
association
between
experiences.
Similar
findings
observed
increased
use
as
means
continued
communication
connection.
Fewer
support
but
those
did
decrease
negative
Lastly,
mixed
impact
which
might
be
due
strengthening
closer
ties
weakening
more
distant
relationships.
Results
differences
mixed,
comparison
across
ages
not
possible.
heterogeneity
measures
well
timing
collection
prevented
nuanced
examination
short
long‐term
impacts.