Classification of triple-negative breast cancers based on Immunogenomic profiling DOI Creative Commons
Yin He,

Zehang Jiang,

Chen Cai

et al.

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 37(1)

Published: Dec. 1, 2018

Abundant evidence shows that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is heterogeneous, and many efforts have been devoted to identifying TNBC subtypes on the basis of genomic profiling. However, few studies explored classification specifically based immune signatures may facilitate optimal stratification patients responsive immunotherapy.Using four publicly available genomics datasets, we classified immunogenomic profiling 29 signatures. Unsupervised supervised machine learning methods were used perform classification.We identified three named Immunity High (Immunity_H), Medium (Immunity_M), Low (Immunity_L) demonstrated this was reliable predictable by analyzing multiple different datasets. Immunity_H characterized greater cell infiltration anti-tumor activities, as well better survival prognosis compared other subtypes. Besides signatures, some cancer-associated pathways hyperactivated in Immunity_H, including apoptosis, calcium signaling, MAPK PI3K-Akt RAS signaling. In contrast, Immunity_L presented depressed increased activation cycle, Hippo DNA replication, mismatch repair, adhesion molecule binding, spliceosome, adherens junction function, pyrimidine metabolism, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis, RNA polymerase pathways. Furthermore, a gene co-expression subnetwork centered around five transcription factor (TF) genes (CORO1A, STAT4, BCL11B, ZNF831, EOMES) significant subtype two TF (IRF8 SPI1) characteristic subtype.The identification has potential clinical implications for treatment.

Language: Английский

Cyclin D–CDK4 kinase destabilizes PD-L1 via cullin 3–SPOP to control cancer immune surveillance DOI
Jinfang Zhang, Xia Bu, Haizhen Wang

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 553(7686), P. 91 - 95

Published: Nov. 16, 2017

Language: Английский

Citations

831

Turning Cold into Hot: Firing up the Tumor Microenvironment DOI Open Access

Qianqian Duan,

Hualing Zhang, Junnian Zheng

et al.

Trends in cancer, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 6(7), P. 605 - 618

Published: March 21, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

734

Unmasking senescence: context-dependent effects of SASP in cancer DOI
Douglas V. Faget, Qihao Ren, Sheila A. Stewart

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 19(8), P. 439 - 453

Published: June 24, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

657

The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer DOI
Lindsey N. Kent, Gustavo Leone

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 19(6), P. 326 - 338

Published: May 3, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

644

Tumor Cell-Intrinsic Factors Underlie Heterogeneity of Immune Cell Infiltration and Response to Immunotherapy DOI Creative Commons
Jinyang Li, Katelyn T. Byrne, Fangxue Yan

et al.

Immunity, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 49(1), P. 178 - 193.e7

Published: June 26, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

632

Loss of ADAR1 in tumours overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint blockade DOI
Jeffrey J. Ishizuka, Robert T. Manguso, Collins Cheruiyot

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 565(7737), P. 43 - 48

Published: Dec. 13, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

570

MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer DOI Creative Commons
Stephen Johnston, Miguel Martín, Angelo Di Leo

et al.

npj Breast Cancer, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: Jan. 11, 2019

Abstract At the MONARCH 3 interim analysis, abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) with tolerable safety profile as initial treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). is randomized, phase III, double-blind study of abemaciclib/placebo (150 mg twice daily, continuous) AI (1 anastrozole or 2.5 letrozole, daily). A total 493 postmenopausal women HR+, HER2− ABC no prior systemic therapy in this setting were enrolled. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (final analysis after 240 events); other endpoints included evaluations. Here we analyze final data update secondary endpoints. arm had longer median than placebo (28.18 versus 14.76 months; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.540 [0.418–0.698]; p = .000002). ORR 61.0% 45.5% (measurable disease, .003). duration (27.39 months) compared to (17.46 months). consistent previous reports. most frequent grade ≥ adverse events arms neutropenia (23.9% 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% leukopenia (8.6% 0.6%). Abemaciclib an effective acceptable ABC.

Language: Английский

Citations

536

Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable solid tumors DOI
Diana Miao, Claire A. Margolis, Natalie I. Vokes

et al.

Nature Genetics, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 50(9), P. 1271 - 1281

Published: Aug. 22, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

524

Exploiting senescence for the treatment of cancer DOI Open Access
Liqin Wang, Lina Lankhorst, René Bernards

et al.

Nature reviews. Cancer, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 22(6), P. 340 - 355

Published: March 3, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

521

Cancer-Cell-Intrinsic Mechanisms Shaping the Tumor Immune Landscape DOI Creative Commons

Max D. Wellenstein,

Karin E. de Visser

Immunity, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 48(3), P. 399 - 416

Published: March 1, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

513