Educational Research Review, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 27, P. 244 - 260
Published: April 22, 2019
Language: Английский
BMJ, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. n71 - n71
Published: March 29, 2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews.
Language: Английский
Citations
51776
Systematic Reviews, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 10(1)
Published: March 29, 2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews.
Language: Английский
Citations
9324
International Journal of Surgery, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 88, P. 105906 - 105906
Published: March 28, 2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews.
Language: Английский
Citations
8480
Published: Sept. 14, 2020
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did they found. Over last decade, there have been many advances methodology terminology, which necessitated an update guideline.Objectives: To develop PRISMA 2020 statement reporting reviews.Methods: We reviewed 60 documents with guidance generate suggested modifications 2009 statement. sought feedback on through online survey of 110 methodologists journal editors. results were discussed at a 21-member in-person meeting. Following meeting, drafts checklist, abstract explanation elaboration flow diagram generated refined iteratively based from co-authors convenience sample 15 reviewers.Results: In this paper, we present 27-item expanded checklist that details recommendations each item, revised diagrams original updated reviews. includes new reflects methods identify, select, appraise synthesise studies. structure presentation items modified facilitate implementation. replaces statement.Conclusions: is intended transparent, complete accurate Improved should benefit users reviews, including guideline developers, policy makers, health care providers, patients other stakeholders. order achieve this, encourage authors, editors peer-reviewers adopt guideline.
Language: Английский
Citations
4731
PLoS Medicine, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 18(3), P. e1003583 - e1003583
Published: March 29, 2021
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews meta-analyses.
Language: Английский
Citations
3826
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 134, P. 178 - 189
Published: March 29, 2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews.
Language: Английский
Citations
3284
Revista Española de Cardiología, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 74(9), P. 790 - 799
Published: July 21, 2021
La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas documentar manera transparente el porqué la revisión, qué hicieron y encontraron. Durante última década, ha habido muchos avances metodología terminología las sistemáticas, lo que requerido una actualización esta guía. prisma 2020 sustituye 2009 e incluye nueva guía presentación publicaciones refleja métodos identificar, seleccionar, evaluar sintetizar estudios. estructura ítems sido modificada facilitar su implementación. En este artículo, presentamos lista verificación con 27 ítems, ampliada detalla recomendaciones publicación cada ítem, del resumen estructurado diagrama flujo revisado sistemáticas. The Preferred Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. statement replaces includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en
Citations
1254
Scientometrics, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 123(1), P. 321 - 335
Published: Feb. 22, 2020
Language: Английский
Citations
983
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 74(9), P. 790 - 799
Published: Aug. 23, 2021
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review done, what authors did, they found. Over past decade, advances methodology terminology have necessitated an update guideline. PRISMA 2020 statement replaces 2009 includes new reporting guidance that reflects methods identify, select, appraise, synthesise studies. structure presentation of items been modified facilitate implementation. In this article, we present 27-item checklist, expanded checklist details recommendations each item, abstract revised flow diagrams original updated reviews. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en.
Language: Английский
Citations
814
Science Advances, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 6(45)
Published: Nov. 5, 2020
Enhancing biodiversity in cropping systems is suggested to promote ecosystem services, thereby reducing dependency on agronomic inputs while maintaining high crop yields. We assess the impact of several diversification practices above- and belowground services by reviewing 98 meta-analyses performing a second-order meta-analysis based 5160 original studies comprising 41,946 comparisons between diversified simplified practices. Overall, enhances biodiversity, pollination, pest control, nutrient cycling, soil fertility, water regulation without compromising Practices targeting aboveground boosted control regulation, those enhanced regulation. Most often, resulted win-win support Variability responses occurrence trade-offs highlight context outcomes. Widespread adoption shows promise contribute conservation food security from local global scales.
Language: Английский
Citations
726