Environment International,
Journal Year:
2019,
Volume and Issue:
128, P. 125 - 136
Published: May 3, 2019
The
effects
of
heat
stress
are
spatially
heterogeneous
owing
to
local
variations
in
climate
response,
population
density,
and
social
conditions.
Using
global
impact
models
from
the
Inter-Sectoral
Impact
Model
Intercomparison
Project,
our
analysis
shows
that
frequency
intensity
events
increase,
especially
tropical
regions
(geographic
perspective)
developing
countries
(national
perspective),
even
with
warming
held
1.5
°C
target.
An
additional
0.5
increase
2
target
leads
>15%
land
area
becoming
exposed
levels
affect
human
health;
almost
all
Europe
will
be
subject
increased
fire
danger,
duration
season
lasting
3.3
days
longer;
106
projected
experience
an
wheat
production-damage
index.
Globally,
about
38%,
50%,
46%,
36%,
48%
increases
exposure
health
threats,
wildfire,
crop
for
soybeans,
wheat,
maize
could
avoided
by
constraining
rather
than
°C.
With
high
emissions,
these
impacts
continue
intensify
over
time,
extending
end
21st
century:
>95%
face
health-related
stress,
India
Brazil
ranked
highest
integrated
heat-stress
exposure.
magnitude
changes
length
wildfire
substantially
74%
land,
particularly
strong
United
States,
Canada,
Brazil,
China,
Australia,
Russia.
Our
study
should
help
facilitate
policies
account
international
heat-related
threats
posed
change.
Global Environmental Change,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
43, P. 51 - 61
Published: Feb. 9, 2017
Forest-driven
water
and
energy
cycles
are
poorly
integrated
into
regional,
national,
continental
global
decision-making
on
climate
change
adaptation,
mitigation,
land
use
management.
This
constrains
humanity’s
ability
to
protect
our
planet’s
life-sustaining
functions.
The
substantial
body
of
research
we
review
reveals
that
forest,
interactions
provide
the
foundations
for
carbon
storage,
cooling
terrestrial
surfaces
distributing
resources.
Forests
trees
must
be
recognized
as
prime
regulators
within
water,
cycles.
If
these
functions
ignored,
planners
will
unable
assess,
adapt
or
mitigate
impacts
changing
cover
climate.
Our
call
action
targets
a
reversal
paradigms,
from
carbon-centric
model
one
treats
hydrologic
climate-cooling
effects
forests
first
order
priority.
For
reasons
sustainability,
storage
remain
secondary,
though
valuable,
by-product.
tree
at
local,
regional
scales
offer
benefits
demand
wider
recognition.
forest-
tree-centered
insights
analyze
knowledge-base
improving
plans,
policies
actions.
understanding
how
influence
has
important
implications,
both
structure
planning,
management
governance
institutions,
well
might
used
improve
adaptation
mitigation
efforts.
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
48(1), P. 519 - 548
Published: Feb. 20, 2020
Climate
extremes
threaten
human
health,
economic
stability,
and
the
well-being
of
natural
built
environments
(e.g.,
2003
European
heat
wave).
As
world
continues
to
warm,
climate
hazards
are
expected
increase
in
frequency
intensity.
The
impacts
extreme
events
will
also
be
more
severe
due
increased
exposure
(growing
population
development)
vulnerability
(aging
infrastructure)
settlements.
models
attribute
part
projected
increases
intensity
disasters
anthropogenic
emissions
changes
land
use
cover.
Here,
we
review
impacts,
historical
changes,and
theoretical
research
gaps
key
(heat
waves,
droughts,
wildfires,
precipitation,
flooding).
We
highlight
need
improve
our
understanding
dependence
between
individual
interrelated
because
anthropogenic-induced
warming
risk
not
only
but
compound
(co-occurring)
cascading
hazards.
▪
a
world.
Anthropogenic-induced
causes
drivers
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change,
Journal Year:
2015,
Volume and Issue:
7(1), P. 23 - 41
Published: Dec. 16, 2015
Extreme
weather
and
climate‐related
events
occur
in
a
particular
place,
by
definition,
infrequently.
It
is
therefore
challenging
to
detect
systematic
changes
their
occurrence
given
the
relative
shortness
of
observational
records.
However,
there
clear
interest
from
outside
climate
science
community
extent
which
recent
damaging
extreme
can
be
linked
human‐induced
change
or
natural
variability.
Event
attribution
studies
seek
determine
what
anthropogenic
has
altered
probability
magnitude
events.
They
have
shown
evidence
for
human
influence
having
increased
many
extremely
warm
seasonal
temperatures
reduced
cold
parts
world.
The
on
precipitation
events,
droughts,
storms
more
mixed.
Although
event
developed
rapidly
years,
geographical
coverage
remains
patchy
based
interests
capabilities
individual
research
groups.
development
operational
would
allow
timely
methodical
production
assessments
than
currently
obtained
an
ad
hoc
basis.
For
most
useful,
remaining
scientific
uncertainties
need
robustly
assessed
results
clearly
communicated.
This
requires
continuing
methodologies
assess
reliability
further
work
understand
potential
utility
stakeholder
groups
decision
makers.
WIREs
Clim
Change
2016,
7:23–41.
doi:
10.1002/wcc.380
article
categorized
under:
Paleoclimates
Current
Trends
>
Detection
Attribution
Climate
Models
Modeling
Knowledge
Generation
with
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
114(19), P. 4881 - 4886
Published: April 24, 2017
Significance
Extreme
climate
events
have
increased
in
many
regions.
Efforts
to
test
the
influence
of
global
warming
on
individual
also
increased,
raising
possibility
operational,
real-time,
single-event
attribution.
We
apply
four
attribution
metrics
variables
at
each
available
point
a
grid.
find
that
historical
has
severity
and
probability
hottest
monthly
daily
more
than
80%
observed
area
driest
wettest
approximately
half
area.
Our
results
suggest
scientifically
durable
operational
is
possible
but
they
highlight
importance
carefully
diagnosing
testing
physical
causes
events.
Geoscientific model development,
Journal Year:
2017,
Volume and Issue:
10(12), P. 4321 - 4345
Published: Nov. 30, 2017
Abstract.
In
Paris,
France,
December
2015,
the
Conference
of
Parties
(COP)
to
United
Nations
Framework
Convention
on
Climate
Change
(UNFCCC)
invited
Intergovernmental
Panel
(IPCC)
provide
a
special
report
in
2018
impacts
global
warming
1.5
°C
above
pre-industrial
levels
and
related
greenhouse
gas
emission
pathways.
Nairobi,
Kenya,
April
2016,
IPCC
panel
accepted
invitation.
Here
we
describe
response
devised
within
Inter-Sectoral
Impact
Model
Intercomparison
Project
(ISIMIP)
tailored,
cross-sectorally
consistent
impact
projections
broaden
scientific
basis
for
report.
The
simulation
protocol
is
designed
allow
(1)
separation
historical
starting
from
conditions
other
drivers
such
as
land-use
changes
(based
model
simulations);
(2)
quantification
additional
up
°C,
including
potential
overshoot
long-term
2299,
comparison
higher
mean
temperature
change
low-emissions
Representative
Concentration
Pathway
RCP2.6
no-mitigation
pathway
RCP6.0)
with
socio-economic
fixed
at
2005
levels;
(3)
assessment
climate
effects
based
same
scenarios
while
accounting
simultaneous
following
middle-of-the-road
Shared
Socioeconomic
(SSP2,
Fricko
et
al.,
2016)
particular
differential
bioenergy
requirements
associated
transformation
energy
system
comply
compared
RCP6.0.
With
aim
providing
an
aggregation
across
sectors
analysis
cross-sectoral
interactions
that
may
dampen
or
amplify
sectoral
impacts,
facilitate
range
models
different
(global
regional
hydrology,
lakes,
crops,
vegetation,
forests,
marine
ecosystems
fisheries,
coastal
infrastructure,
supply
demand,
temperature-related
mortality,
terrestrial
biodiversity).