How does oxytocin modulate human behavior?
Molecular Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 18, 2025
Language: Английский
Crime and Nourishment: A Narrative Review Examining Ultra-Processed Foods, Brain, and Behavior
Dietetics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
3(3), P. 318 - 345
Published: Aug. 28, 2024
Recently,
there
has
been
increased
scientific
and
clinical
interest
in
the
potential
harms
associated
with
ultra-processed
foods,
including
poor
mental
health,
aggression,
antisocial
behavior.
Research
spanning
epidemiology,
mechanistic
pre-clinical
work,
addiction
science,
microbiome
exposome
human
intervention
trials
underscored
that
nutrition
is
of
relevance
along
criminal
justice
continuum.
As
such,
emerging
dietetics
research
salient
to
thousands
international
psychologists
allied
health
professionals
are
engaged
forensics,
prevention,
intervention.
In
addition,
relationships
between
behavior
relate
“food
crime”,
an
emergent
area
unifying
researchers
psychology,
public
other
interdisciplinary
sectors.
Food
crime
scrutinizes
vast
harms,
non-communicable
diseases
adverse
behavioral
outcomes,
as
influenced
by
distribution
addictive
food
products.
Here,
we
examine
research,
biophysiological
mechanisms,
evidence
indicating
dietary
patterns/components
intersect
psychosocial
vulnerabilities
linked
risks
involvement.
Viewed
through
a
prevention
lens,
study
aggressive
should
be
prioritized,
especially
if
outcomes
emerge
externalities
global
consumption
food.
context
behavior,
need
for
forensic
examination
how
industry
influence
power
structures
can
undermine
matters
justice.
Language: Английский
Does Unfairness Evoke Anger or Disgust? A Quantitative Neurofunctional Dissection Based on 25 Years of Neuroimaging
Xianyang Gan,
No information about this author
Ran Zhang,
No information about this author
Zihao Zheng
No information about this author
et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 21, 2024
Abstract
Over
the
last
decades,
traditional
‘Homo
economicus’
model
has
been
increasingly
challenged
by
convergent
evidence
underscoring
impact
of
emotions
on
decision-making.
A
classic
example
is
perception
unfairness
operationalized
in
Ultimatum
Game
where
humans
readily
sacrifice
personal
gains
to
punish
those
who
violate
fairness
norms.
While
emotional
mechanism
underlying
costly
punishments
widely
acknowledged,
distinct
contributions
moral
(anger
or
disgust)
remain
debated,
partly
due
methodological
limitations
conventional
experiments.
Here,
we
capitalize
a
quantitative
neurofunctional
dissection
approach
combining
recent
developments
neuroimaging
meta-analyses,
behavioral-level,
network-level,
and
neurochemical-level
decoding
data
from
3,266
participants
functional
studies
determine
common
neural
representations
between
two
emotions.
Experience
engaged
widespread
bilateral
network
encompassing
insular,
cingulate,
frontal
regions,
with
dorsal
striatal
regions
mediating
decision
reject
unfair
offers.
Disgust
defensive-avoidance
circuit
amygdalar,
occipital,
while
anger
non-overlapping
systems
including
mid-cingulate,
thalamic,
regions.
Unfairness
disgust
respectively
commonly
anterior
mid-insula,
latter
additionally
showed
recruitment
ventrolateral
prefrontal
orbitofrontal
cortices.
Multimodal
network,
behavioral,
serotonergic
provided
more
granular
convincing
these
results.
Findings
indicate
shared
neuroaffective
basis
unfairness-induced
punishment
behavior
suggest
brain
evolutionarily
shaped
protect
individuals
harm
enforce
societal
Language: Английский
Oxytocin salvages context-specific hyperaltruistic preference through moral framing
Hong Zhang,
No information about this author
Yinmei Ni,
No information about this author
Jian Li
No information about this author
et al.
Published: Nov. 14, 2024
An
intriguing
advancement
in
recent
moral
decision-making
research
suggests
that
people
are
more
willing
to
sacrifice
monetary
gains
spare
others
from
suffering
than
themselves,
yielding
a
hyperaltruistic
tendency.
Other
studies,
however,
indicate
an
opposite
egoistic
bias
subjects
less
harm
themselves
for
the
benefits
of
their
own
benefits.
These
results
highlight
delicate
inner
workings
decision
and
call
mechanistic
account
preference.
We
investigated
boundary
conditions
hyperaltruism
by
presenting
with
trade-off
choices
combing
painful
electric
shocks,
or,
losses
shocks.
first
showed
study
1
switching
context
effectively
eliminated
preference
effect
was
associated
altered
relationship
between
subjects’
instrumental
(IH)
trait
attitudes
relative
pain
sensitivities.
In
pre-registered
2,
we
tested
whether
oxytocin,
neuropeptide
linked
parochial
altruism,
might
salvage
context-dependent
found
oxytocin
increased
reported
levels
framing
task
as
harming
(vs.
helping)
others,
which
mediated
correlation
IH
Thus,
loss
nullified
restored
mediation
subjective
framing,
respectively.
Our
help
elucidate
psychological
processes
underpinning
contextual
specificity
carry
implications
promoting
prosocial
interactions
our
society.
Language: Английский
Oxytocin salvages context-specific hyperaltruistic preference through moral framing
Published: Nov. 14, 2024
An
intriguing
advancement
in
recent
moral
decision-making
research
suggests
that
people
are
more
willing
to
sacrifice
monetary
gains
spare
others
from
suffering
than
themselves,
yielding
a
hyperaltruistic
tendency.
Other
studies,
however,
indicate
an
opposite
egoistic
bias
subjects
less
harm
themselves
for
the
benefits
of
their
own
benefits.
These
results
highlight
delicate
inner
workings
decision
and
call
mechanistic
account
preference.
We
investigated
boundary
conditions
hyperaltruism
by
presenting
with
trade-off
choices
combing
painful
electric
shocks,
or,
losses
shocks.
first
showed
study
1
switching
context
effectively
eliminated
preference
effect
was
associated
altered
relationship
between
subjects’
instrumental
(IH)
trait
attitudes
relative
pain
sensitivities.
In
pre-registered
2,
we
tested
whether
oxytocin,
neuropeptide
linked
parochial
altruism,
might
salvage
context-dependent
found
oxytocin
increased
reported
levels
framing
task
as
harming
(vs.
helping)
others,
which
mediated
correlation
IH
Thus,
loss
nullified
restored
mediation
subjective
framing,
respectively.
Our
help
elucidate
psychological
processes
underpinning
contextual
specificity
carry
implications
promoting
prosocial
interactions
our
society.
Language: Английский