Cancers,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
14(21), P. 5225 - 5225
Published: Oct. 25, 2022
Background:
We
hypothesize
that
cancer
survival
can
be
improved
through
adapting
treatment
strategies
to
evolutionary
dynamics
and
conducted
a
phase
1b
study
in
metastatic
castration
sensitive
prostate
(mCSPC).
Methods:
Men
with
asymptomatic
mCSPC
were
enrolled
proceeded
break
after
achieving
>
75%
PSA
decline
LHRH
analog
plus
an
NHA.
ADT
was
restarted
at
the
time
of
or
radiographic
progression
held
again
>50%
decline.
This
on-off
cycling
continued
until
on
imaging
progression.
Results:
At
data
cut
off
August
2022,
only
2
16
evaluable
patients
due
28
months
from
first
dose
for
mCSPC.
Two
additional
showed
12.4
20.5
remain
trial.
Since
none
developed
12
months,
succeeded
its
primary
objective
feasibility.
The
secondary
endpoints
median
have
not
been
reached
follow
up
26
months.
Conclusions:
It
is
feasible
use
individual’s
response
testosterone
levels
guide
intermittent
Adaptive
therapy
is
a
dynamic
cancer
treatment
protocol
that
updates
(or
‘adapts’)
decisions
in
anticipation
of
evolving
tumor
dynamics.
This
broad
term
encompasses
many
possible
protocols
patient-specific
dose
modulation
or
timing.
maintains
high
levels
burden
to
benefit
from
the
competitive
suppression
treatment-sensitive
subpopulations
on
treatment-resistant
subpopulations.
evolution-based
approach
has
been
integrated
into
several
ongoing
planned
clinical
trials,
including
metastatic
castrate
resistant
prostate
cancer,
ovarian
and
BRAF-mutant
melanoma.
In
previous
few
decades,
experimental
investigation
adaptive
progressed
synergistically
with
mathematical
computational
modeling.
this
work,
we
discuss
11
open
questions
The
are
split
three
sections:
(1)
integrating
appropriate
components
models
(2)
design
validation
dosing
protocols,
(3)
challenges
opportunities
translation.
Cancer Research,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
81(4), P. 1135 - 1147
Published: Nov. 10, 2020
Abstract
Adaptive
therapy
seeks
to
exploit
intratumoral
competition
avoid,
or
at
least
delay,
the
emergence
of
resistance
in
cancer.
Motivated
by
promising
results
prostate
cancer,
there
is
growing
interest
extending
this
approach
other
neoplasms.
As
such,
it
urgent
understand
characteristics
a
cancer
that
determine
whether
not
will
respond
well
adaptive
therapy.
A
plausible
candidate
for
such
selection
criterion
fitness
cost
resistance.
In
article,
we
study
general,
but
simple,
mathematical
model
investigate
presence
necessary
extend
time
progression
beyond
standard-of-care
continuous
Tumor
cells
were
divided
into
sensitive
and
resistant
populations
their
using
system
two
ordinary
differential
equations
based
on
Lotka–Volterra
model.
For
tumors
close
environmental
carrying
capacity,
was
required.
However,
far
from
may
be
required
see
meaningful
gains.
Notably,
important
consider
cell
turnover
tumor,
discuss
its
role
modulating
impact
cost.
To
conclude,
present
evidence
predicted
cost–turnover
interplay
data
67
patients
with
undergoing
intermittent
androgen
deprivation
Our
work
helps
clarify
under
which
circumstances
beneficial
suggests
play
an
unexpectedly
decision-making
process.
Significance:
modulates
speed
against
drug
amplifying
effects
costs;
as
factor
management
via
See
related
commentary
Strobl
et
al.,
p.
811
Communications Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2(1)
Published: April 25, 2022
Adaptive
therapy
aims
to
tackle
cancer
drug
resistance
by
leveraging
resource
competition
between
drug-sensitive
and
resistant
cells.
Here,
we
present
a
theoretical
study
of
intra-tumoral
during
adaptive
therapy,
investigate
under
which
circumstances
it
will
be
superior
aggressive
treatment.We
develop
analyse
simple,
2-D,
on-lattice,
agent-based
tumour
model
in
cells
are
classified
as
fully
or
resistant.
Subsequently,
compare
this
its
corresponding
non-spatial
ordinary
differential
equation
model,
fit
longitudinal
prostate-specific
antigen
data
from
65
prostate
patients
undergoing
intermittent
androgen
deprivation
following
biochemical
recurrence.Leveraging
the
individual-based
nature
our
explicitly
demonstrate
competitive
suppression
examine
how
different
factors,
such
initial
fraction
costs,
alter
competition.
This
not
only
corroborates
understanding
but
also
reveals
that
with
each
other
may
play
more
important
role
solid
tumours
than
was
previously
thought.
To
conclude,
two
case
studies,
implications
work
for:
(i)
mathematical
modelling
(ii)
dynamics
treatment,
precursor
therapy.Our
shows
tumour's
spatial
architecture
is
an
factor
provides
insights
into
leverages
both
inter-
intra-specific
control
resistance.
Nature Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
7(4), P. 581 - 596
Published: March 9, 2023
Spatial
properties
of
tumour
growth
have
profound
implications
for
cancer
progression,
therapeutic
resistance
and
metastasis.
Yet,
how
spatial
position
governs
cell
division
remains
difficult
to
evaluate
in
clinical
tumours.
Here,
we
demonstrate
that
faster
on
the
periphery
leaves
characteristic
genetic
patterns,
which
become
evident
when
a
phylogenetic
tree
is
reconstructed
from
spatially
sampled
cells.
Namely,
rapidly
dividing
peripheral
lineages
branch
more
extensively
acquire
mutations
than
slower-dividing
centre
lineages.
We
develop
Bayesian
state-dependent
evolutionary
phylodynamic
model
(SDevo)
quantifies
these
patterns
infer
differential
rates
between
central
this
approach
accurately
infers
varying
birth
simulated
tumours
across
range
conditions
sampling
strategies.
then
show
SDevo
outperforms
state-of-the-art,
non-cancer
multi-state
methods
ignore
sequence
evolution.
Finally,
apply
single-time-point,
multi-region
sequencing
data
hepatocellular
carcinomas
find
evidence
three-
six-times-higher
rate
edge.
With
increasing
availability
high-resolution,
sequencing,
anticipate
will
be
useful
interrogating
restrictions
could
extended
non-spatial
factors
influence
progression.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
378(1876)
Published: March 20, 2023
Stackelberg
evolutionary
game
(SEG)
theory
combines
classical
and
to
frame
interactions
between
a
rational
leader
evolving
followers.
In
some
of
these
interactions,
the
wants
preserve
system
(e.g.
fisheries
management),
while
in
others,
they
try
drive
extinction
pest
control).
Often
worst
strategy
for
is
adopt
constant
aggressive
overfishing
management
or
maximum
tolerable
dose
cancer
treatment).
Taking
into
account
ecological
dynamics
typically
leads
better
outcomes
corresponds
Nash
equilibria
game-theoretic
terms.
However,
leader’s
most
profitable
anticipate
steer
eco-evolutionary
dynamics,
leading
equilibrium
game.
We
show
how
our
results
have
potential
help
fields
where
humans
bring
an
desired
outcome,
such
as,
among
management,
treatment.
Finally,
we
discuss
limitations
opportunities
applying
SEGs
improve
biological
systems.
This
article
part
theme
issue
‘Half
century
games:
synthesis
theory,
application
future
directions’.
Annals of Oncology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
34(10), P. 867 - 884
Published: Sept. 28, 2023
Cancer
research
has
traditionally
focused
on
developing
new
agents,
but
an
underexplored
question
is
that
of
the
dose
and
frequency
existing
drugs.
Based
modus
operandi
established
in
early
days
chemotherapies,
most
drugs
are
administered
according
to
predetermined
schedules
seek
deliver
maximum
tolerated
only
adjusted
for
toxicity.
However,
we
believe
complex,
evolving
nature
cancer
requires
a
more
dynamic
personalized
approach.
Chronicling
milestones
field,
show
impact
schedule
choice
crucially
depends
processes
driving
treatment
response
failure.
As
such,
heterogeneity
evolution
dictate
one-size-fits-all
solution
unlikely-instead,
each
patient
should
be
mapped
strategy
best
matches
their
current
disease
characteristics
objectives
(i.e.
'tumorscape').
To
achieve
this
level
personalization,
need
mathematical
modeling.
In
perspective,
propose
five-step
'Adaptive
Dosing
Adjusted
Personalized
Tumorscapes
(ADAPT)'
paradigm
integrate
data
understanding
across
scales
derive
schedules.
We
conclude
with
promising
examples
model-guided
personalization
call
action
address
key
outstanding
challenges
surrounding
collection,
model
development,
integration.
Cancer Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
84(11), P. 1929 - 1941
Published: April 3, 2024
Standard-of-care
treatment
regimens
have
long
been
designed
for
maximal
cell
killing,
yet
these
strategies
often
fail
when
applied
to
metastatic
cancers
due
the
emergence
of
drug
resistance.
Adaptive
developed
as
an
alternative
approach,
dynamically
adjusting
suppress
growth
treatment-resistant
populations
and
thereby
delay,
or
even
prevent,
tumor
progression.
Promising
clinical
results
in
prostate
cancer
indicate
potential
optimize
adaptive
protocols.
Here,
we
deep
reinforcement
learning
(DRL)
guide
scheduling
demonstrated
that
schedules
can
outperform
current
protocols
a
mathematical
model
calibrated
dynamics,
more
than
doubling
time
The
DRL
were
robust
patient
variability,
including
both
dynamics
monitoring
schedules.
framework
could
produce
interpretable,
based
on
single
burden
threshold,
replicating
informing
optimal
strategies.
had
no
knowledge
underlying
model,
demonstrating
capability
help
develop
novel
complex
settings.
Finally,
proposed
five-step
pathway,
which
combined
mechanistic
modeling
with
integrated
conventional
tools
improve
interpretability
compared
traditional
"black-box"
models,
allow
translation
this
approach
clinic.
Overall,
generated
personalized
consistently
outperformed
standard-of-care