JMIR Research Protocols,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
12, P. e40390 - e40390
Published: Jan. 27, 2023
Background
Increased
workload,
lack
of
resources,
fear
infection,
and
the
suffering
loss
residents
have
placed
a
significant
emotional
burden
on
regulated
unregulated
direct
care
nursing
staff
(eg,
registered
nurses,
licensed
practical
aides)
in
homes
(residential
long-term
homes).
Psychological
distress
burnout
related
to
COVID-19
been
cited
among
within
homes.
Studies
also
emphasized
resilience
staff,
who,
despite
challenges
created
by
pandemic,
remained
committed
providing
quality
care.
To
date,
only
one
home–specific
review
has
synthesized
evidence
from
15
studies
conducted
early
which
reported
anxiety,
posttraumatic
stress
disorder,
depression
staff.
Objective
The
objectives
this
systematic
are
(1)
synthesize
all
empirical
impact
pandemic
staffs’
mental
health,
physical
work-life
outcomes;
(2)
identify
specific
risks
protective
factors;
(3)
examine
effect
strategies
or
interventions
that
developed
improve
these
outcomes.
Methods
We
will
include
study
designs
reporting
objective
subjective
measurements
home
settings
during
(January
2020
onward).
search
multiple
databases
(MEDLINE,
CINAHL,
Embase,
Scopus,
PsycINFO)
gray
literature
sources
with
no
language
restrictions.
Two
authors
independently
screen,
assess
data
quality,
extract
for
synthesis.
Given
heterogeneity
research
designs,
we
use
synthesis
methods
suitable
quantitative
qualitative
studies.
Results
As
December
2022,
full
text
screening
completed
extraction
is
underway.
expected
completion
date
June
30,
2023.
Conclusions
This
uncover
gaps
current
knowledge,
increase
our
understanding
disparate
findings
factors
protect
against
sustained
effects
elucidate
feasibility
support
frontline
inform
future
exploring
how
health
system
can
be
more
proactive
improving
supporting
psychological
needs
amid
extreme
stressors
such
as
wider
context
prepandemic
conditions.
Trial
Registration
PROSPERO
CRD42021248420;
https://tinyurl.com/4djk7rpm
International
Registered
Report
Identifier
(IRRID)
DERR1-10.2196/40390
BMJ,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. e075148 - e075148
Published: July 24, 2023
Sharon
Straus
and
colleagues
argue
that
residents,
families,
staff
in
long
term
care
homes
Canada
were
failed
by
governments
during
the
pandemic
need
coordinated
efforts
across
federal,
provincial,
territorial
to
safeguard
these
populations
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
71(1), P. 198 - 205
Published: Sept. 9, 2022
Care
aides
(certified
nursing
assistants,
personal
support
workers)
are
the
largest
workforce
in
long-term
care
(LTC)
homes
(nursing
homes).
They
provide
as
much
90%
of
direct
to
residents.
Their
health
and
well-being
directly
affect
both
quality
life
for
The
aim
this
study
was
understand
impact
COVID-19
on
working
LTC
during
first
year
pandemic.We
conducted
semi-structured
interviews
with
a
convenience
sample
52
from
8
Alberta
one
British
Columbia,
Canada,
between
January
April
2021.
Nursing
were
purposively
selected
across:
(1)
ownership
model
(2)
COVID
(the
rate
infections
reported
March
December
2020).
Interviews
recorded
analyzed
using
inductive
content
analysis.Care
mainly
female
(94%)
older
(74%
aged
40
years
or
older).
Most
spoke
English
an
additional
language
(76%),
54%
worked
full-time
homes,
37%
multiple
positions
before
"one
worksite
policies"
implemented.
Two
themes
emerged
our
analysis:
experienced
mental
emotional
distress
enforcing
resident
isolation,
grief
related
deaths,
fear
contracting
spreading
COVID-19,
increased
workload
combined
staffing
shortages,
rapidly
changing
policies.
aides'
resilience
supported
by
their
strong
relationships,
faith
community,
capacity
maintain
positive
attitudes.These
findings
suggest
significant,
ongoing
adverse
effects
through
pandemic.
Our
data
demonstrate
considerable
strength
occupational
group.
results
emphasize
urgent
need
appropriately
meaningfully
adequately
resource
workforce.
We
recommend
improved
policy
guidelines
interventions.
BMC Geriatrics,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
23(1)
Published: Oct. 2, 2023
Abstract
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
devastatingly
affected
Long-Term
Care
Facilities
(LTCF),
exposing
aging
people,
staff
members,
and
visitors.
world
learned
through
the
lessons
can
be
taken
to
adopt
effective
measures
deal
with
outbreaks
in
LTCF.
We
aimed
systematically
review
available
evidence
on
effect
of
minimize
risk
transmission
LTCs
during
since
2021.
Methods
search
method
was
guided
by
preferred
reporting
items
for
systematic
reviews
(PRISMA)
guideline
synthesis
without
meta-analysis
(SWiM)
reviews.
performed
April
2023.
Observational
interventional
studies
from
databases
PubMed,
Web
Science,
Scopus,
Cochrane
Systematic
Reviews,
CINAHL,
Academic
Search
were
reviewed.
included
conducted
LTCF
that
quantitatively
assess
non-pharmacological
cases
COVID-19.
Two
authors
independently
reviewed
titles
inclusion,
extracted
data,
undertook
bias
according
pre-specified
criteria.
quality
analyzed
using
Joanna
Briggs
Institute
Critical
Appraisal.
Results
Thirteen
included,
8442
experiencing
598
thousand
participants
(residents
members).
Prevention
control
infection
interventions
grouped
into
three
themes:
strategic,
tactical,
operational
measures.
strategic
reveal
importance
prevention
as
structural
characteristics,
namely
size,
new
admissions,
surveillance,
architectural
structure.
At
tactical
level,
lack
personal
long
shifts
is
related
COVID-19's
spread.
Operational
a
favorable
preventing
are
sufficient.
Personal
protective
equipment
stock,
correct
mask
use,
signaling,
social
distancing,
resident
cohorting.
Conclusions
Operational,
approaches
may
have
spread
LTCFs
outbreaks.
Given
heterogeneous
nature
measures,
performing
not
possible.
Future
research
should
use
more
robust
study
designs
explore
similar
endemic
situations
comparable
Trial
registration
protocol
this
registered
PROSPERO
(CRD42020214566).
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
Volume 17, P. 2935 - 2946
Published: June 1, 2024
Purpose:
Coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
placed
a
significant
strain
on
nursing
homes,
leading
to
numerous
outbreaks
and
high
mortality
rates.
This
situation
created
considerable
stress
challenges
for
residents,
their
physicians
nurses,
as
well
family
caregivers.
By
understanding
these
challenges,
we
can
gain
new
insights
learn
valuable
lessons.
Thus,
the
purpose
of
this
study
is
examine
treatment
care
provided
home
residents
with
COVID-19,
experienced
by
physicians,
Participants
Methods:
secondary
analysis
35
interviews
caregivers,
each
personal
experience
caring
diagnosed
COVID-19.
The
took
place
from
December
2020
April
2021.
We
analyzed
transcriptions
based
Braun
Clarke's
reflexive
thematic
model
followed
qualitative
descriptive
design
outlined
Sandelowski.
Findings:
produced
three
themes:
1)
Balancing
medical
treatment,
2)
need
increased
systematic
monitoring
vital
functions,
3)
Determining
level
residents.
These
themes
were
explored
through
unique
perspectives
participant
groups:
findings
revealed
several
related
applied
both
relief
symptoms,
assessment
use
advance
planning.
Conclusion:
Drawing
experiences
there
should
be
unified
plan
at
municipal
or
national
competency
development
in
homes
prepare
future
crises
like
pandemics
epidemics.
Additionally,
safe
engagement
caregivers
relatives
given
priority.
Keywords:
alleviation,
palliative
care,
pandemic,
safekeeping,
mapping
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1), P. e091645 - e091645
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Objectives
To
explore
care
home
managers’
views
and
experiences
of
optimising
medicines
use
for
residents
with
dementia
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
Design,
setting
participants
A
descriptive
exploratory
qualitative
study
using
semistructured
interviews
(conducted
via
telephone
or
online
videoconferencing
platform),
managers
across
Northern
Ireland,
purposively
sampled
from
homes
that
provided
dementia.
Care
were
asked
to
describe
their
accessing
primary
healthcare
services
(such
as
those
by
general
practitioners
community
pharmacists),
how
was
affected
pandemic,
what
they
had
learnt
experiences.
Data
analysed
inductive
thematic
analysis.
Results
Fourteen
conducted
between
January
July
2022.
Four
themes,
‘isolation’,
‘burden’,
‘disruption’
‘connection
communication’,
identified;
isolation
a
cross-cutting
theme
permeated
other
themes.
described
feeling
isolated
professionals,
residents’
family
members.
This
placed
additional
burden
on
staff
increasing
workload
negatively
affecting
well-being.
Participants
reported
disruption
service
provision,
particularly
practices,
significant
impact
lack
face-to-face
contact
medication
reviews
often
ceased
take
place.
The
connection
communication
key
stakeholders
perceived
be
important
when
Conclusions
has
highlighted
challenges
initial
pandemic
optimisation
dementia,
which
characterised
isolation.
Further
research
is
needed
determine
extent
long-term
this
resident
population.
In
future
public
health
crises,
better
professionals
homes.
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(2), P. e082817 - e082817
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Background
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
40
mental
health
and
well-being
hubs
were
funded
in
England
to
support
social
care
staff
affected
by
pandemic.
Aims
To
describe
characteristics
of
accessing
four
for
identify
associated
with
clinically
significant
difficulties
work
functioning.
Method
Routinely
collected
screening
data
analysed
from
1973
individuals
across
4
hubs,
including
health,
demographic
occupational
pandemic-related
stressors.
Factors
identified
via
logistic
regression.
Results
Most
hub
clients
as
white
women
who
worked
UK
National
Health
Service;
other
groups
less
well
represented.
Hub
reported
high
levels
difficulties:
60%
had
severe
often
co-occurring
(ie,
depression,
anxiety,
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
or
alcohol
use)
80%
significantly
impaired
Younger
age,
disability
status,
identifying
a
minority
ethnic
group,
sexual
orientations
excluding
heterosexual
higher
likelihood
having
difficulties.
Suffering
financial
loss
during
prepandemic
emotional
concerns
most
consistent
factors
Conclusions
The
supported
Outreach
engagement
under-represented
should
be
undertaken
address
potential
barriers
service
access.
findings
add
knowledge
base
on
needs
workforce
planning
response
future
crises.
The Journal of Frailty & Aging,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
14(3), P. 100038 - 100038
Published: April 7, 2025
Ethical
and
procedural
requirements
make
research
in
care
homes
challenging.
With
people
living
longer
globally,
it
is
essential
that
older
are
included
research,
including
within
the
home
setting.
We
conducted
a
randomised
controlled
trial
(AFRI-c)
91
across
England,
aiming
to
study
available
every
eligible
resident.
Facilitators
flexible
models
for
receiving
consent;
commitment
from
staff,
residents
families;
tailored
specific
training
staff;
support
national
infrastructure
engage
research.
To
facilitate
inclusive
we
recommend
consulting
with
about
their
priorities;
continuing
investment
homes;
using
advance
directives
planning
residents;
embedding
nurses
environments;
more
guidance
researchers
ethics
committees
on
applying
legal
frameworks
regarding
capacity
settings.
Human Resources for Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: July 28, 2023
Abstract
Background
Healthcare
professionals
working
in
long-term
care
facilities
reported
heavy
job
demands
and
a
lack
of
resources
during
the
2019
coronavirus
disease
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
However,
how
these
changed
pandemic,
possible
changes
affected
professionals’
work-related
well-being,
remains
unclear.
Thus,
we
explored
face
surging
COVID-19
infection
rates,
investigated
associations
with
burnout
work
engagement,
among
healthcare
Netherlands.
Methods
This
longitudinal
study
was
conducted
five
Data
were
collected
early
late
2021,
when
rates
low
high
(mean,
29.1
275.4
infections/day),
respectively.
In
total,
173
completed
validated
Job
Demands
Resources
Questionnaire,
Copenhagen
Burnout
Inventory,
Utrecht
Work
Engagement
Scale
at
both
timepoints.
We
performed
paired-samples
t
tests
to
examine
resources,
fixed-effects
linear
regression
analyses
within-person
those
engagement.
Results
perceived
increased
workloads,
associated
decreased
engagement
period.
Within-person
increases
collegial
support
positively
negatively
symptoms.
Conclusions
workloads
wake
resulting
These
also
response
declining
support.
Efforts
protect
well-being
pandemic
context
that
focus
on
workload
reduction
promotion
may
be
most
beneficial.
BMC Geriatrics,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: Feb. 2, 2024
Abstract
Background
During
the
pandemic
in
Sweden,
aim
was
to
protect
older
people,
especially
those
among
them
who
were
sick,
frail
and
vulnerable
residential
care
facilities.
A
ban
put
on
visits
at
all
facilities
March
2020
prevent
spread
of
infection
people.
This
study
aims
describe
experiences
Community
Chief
Nurses
Registered
provided
medical
nursing
for
people
home
during
first
wave
COVID-19
pandemic,
examine
factors
associated
with
quality
care.
Methods
The
has
a
mixed
method
cross-sectional
design
(STROBE).
Data
collected
using
web-based
survey
that
comprised
two
questionnaires,
developed
study.
analysed
descriptive
statistics
logistic
regression
models,
as
well
qualitative
content
analyses.
Results
majority
reported
adequate
opportunities
work
management
handle
pandemic.
care,
person’s
safety,
negatively
affected
Factors
good
follows:
information-sharing;
ability
comply
hygiene
practices;
competence
how
persons
COVID-19;
physician
bedside
assessing
their
health;
support
from
frontline
managers.
Conclusion
highlights
crucial
facets
organizations
must
address
enhance
readiness
future
pandemics
or
disasters,
ensuring
security
well-being