Embracing artificial intelligence in the arts classroom: understanding student perceptions and emotional reactions to AI tools DOI Creative Commons
Alberto Grájeda, Pamela Córdova Olivera,

Juan Pablo Córdova

et al.

Cogent Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 11(1)

Published: July 20, 2024

This study investigates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within School Arts at a private university in Latin America, focusing on student perceptions and emotional reactions. The research addresses two primary questions: how students perceive AI their educational experience, AI-enhanced classes affect students' reactions compared to traditional lecture-based classes. To explore first question, we constructed Synthetic Index Use Tools (SIUAIT) measure perceived effects usage across five dimensions: effectiveness tools, implementation ChatGPT, proficiency, instructor advanced skills. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) validated SIUAIT, revealing an increase from 58.84 semester 60.60 second 2023, indicating growing acceptance utility arts education. address employed neuromarketing technologies, including eye tracking facial expression analysis, assess versus findings showed that elicited more positive emotions, such as joy surprise, methods. Statistical analyses, Pearson correlation, Student's t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, confirmed significance these differences. comprehensive approach provides valuable insights into benefits challenges integrating highlights AI's potential enhance experiences engagement while emphasizing need for ongoing training addressing ethical concerns ensure effective equitable use tools.

Language: Английский

Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI DOI Creative Commons
James Hutson

Journal of Intelligent Communication, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 4(1)

Published: April 26, 2024

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has precipitated a paradigm shift in the realms academic writing, plagiarism, and intellectual property. This article explores evolving landscape English composition courses, traditionally designed to develop critical thinking through writing. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into sphere, it necessitates reevaluation originality purpose learning research frameworks governing property (IP) plagiarism. paper commences with statistical analysis contrasting actual use LLMs dishonesty educator perceptions. It then examines repercussions AI-enabled content proliferation, referencing limitation three books self-published per day September 2023 by Amazon due suspected influx AI-generated material. discourse extends potential accelerating akin contributions digital humanities computational linguistics, highlighting its accessibility general public. further delves implications on pedagogical approaches contemplating impact communication skills, while also considering role bridging divide socio-economic disparities. Finally, proposes revisions writing curricula, adapting transformative influence contexts.

Language: Английский

Citations

31

Are Lesson Plans Created by ChatGPT More Effective? An Experimental Study DOI Open Access
Muhammet Remzi Karaman, İdris Göksu

International Journal of Technology in Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 7(1), P. 107 - 127

Published: Feb. 4, 2024

In this research, we aimed to determine whether students' math achievements improved using ChatGPT, one of the chatbot tools, prepare lesson plans in primary school courses. The research was conducted with a pretest-posttest control group experimental design. study comprises 39 third-grade students (experimental = 24, 15). implementation process lasted five weeks and 25 hours. group, lessons were taught according prepared while existing used. Students' academic achievement measured multiple-choice test questions two separate for each learning objective. According results, increased significantly (d 1.268) ChatGPT. Although there difference between post-test scores favor it determined that not significant. These results show teaching ChatGPT is effective achievement. Teachers should consider their plans, combining them benefiting from both process.

Language: Английский

Citations

23

Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education DOI Creative Commons
Ahmad Almassaad, Hayat Alajlan, Reem Alebaikan

et al.

Systems, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 12(10), P. 385 - 385

Published: Sept. 24, 2024

This research explores the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools among higher education students in Saudi Arabia, aiming to understand their current perceptions these technologies. study utilizes Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and theory Task-Technology Fit (TTF) examine students’ utilization, perceived benefits, challenges associated with tools. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, yielding 859 responses. The findings indicate that 78.7% frequently GenAI tools, while 21.3% do not, often due a lack knowledge or interest. ChatGPT emerged as most widely used tool, utilized by 86.2% respondents, followed other like Gemini, Socratic, CoPilot. Students primarily for defining clarifying concepts, translation, generating ideas writing, summarizing academic literature. They cite benefits such ease access, time-saving, instant feedback. However, they express concerns about challenges, including subscription fees, unreliable information, plagiarism, reduced human-to-human interaction, impacts on learning autonomy. underscores need increased awareness, ethical guidelines, robust integrity measures ensure responsible educational settings. These highlight balanced utilization maximizes addressing potential guides development policies, curricula, support systems.

Language: Английский

Citations

17

Generative AI, Research Ethics, and Higher Education Research: Insights from a Scientometric Analysis DOI Creative Commons
Saba Qadhi, Ahmed Alduais, Youmen Chaaban

et al.

Information, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 15(6), P. 325 - 325

Published: June 2, 2024

In the digital age, intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education (HE) poses novel ethical considerations, necessitating a comprehensive exploration this multifaceted relationship. This study aims to quantify characterize current research trends critically assess discourse on AI applications within HE. Employing mixed-methods design, we integrated quantitative data from Web Science, Scopus, Lens databases with qualitative insights selected studies perform scientometric content analyses, yielding nuanced landscape utilization in Our results identified vital areas through citation bursts, keyword co-occurrence, thematic clusters. We provided conceptual model for integration HE, encapsulating dichotomous perspectives AI’s role education. Three clusters were identified: frameworks policy development, academic integrity creation, student interaction AI. The concludes that, while offers substantial benefits educational advancement, it also brings challenges that necessitate vigilant governance uphold standards. implications extend policymakers, educators, developers, highlighting need guidelines, literacy, human-centered tools.

Language: Английский

Citations

12

Model of AI acceptance in higher education: arguing teaching staff and students perspectives DOI
Manar Hazaimeh, Abdullah M. Al-Ansi

International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 41(4), P. 371 - 393

Published: July 11, 2024

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) is constantly evolving and poised to significantly transform the world, affecting nearly every sector aspect of society. As AI continues evolve, it expected create a more dynamic, efficient personalized education system, supporting lifelong learning adapting needs pace each student. In this research, we focus on testing model acceptance in higher (HE) through human interaction-based factors including attitudes, competencies openness experience. Perceived benefits were our expectation enhance HE. Design/methodology/approach To test model, collected data from Arab HE institutions by spreading an online questionnaire. The sample consisted 1,152 teaching staff students region, which selected randomly. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed determine interrelated dependence relationships among variables. Furthermore, processing analysis conducted ensure reliability validity questionnaires, multicollinearity factor loading, items tested one time their after translation into language. Findings Results reveal that adopted attitude, digital competency experience have positive significant relationship with both perceived region. results also demonstrate indirect impact existence benefits, important validation model. Originality/value research contributes theory providing evidence generative applications continue expand change, way accept interact them will be different. This could authorities facilitate institutions.

Language: Английский

Citations

8

ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: a study among university students in the UAE DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam, Walid El‐Sayed, Muhammad Y. Al‐Shorbagy

et al.

Frontiers in Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 9

Published: Aug. 7, 2024

Background The use of ChatGPT among university students has gained a recent popularity. current study aimed to assess the factors driving attitude and usage as an example generative artificial intelligence (genAI) in United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods This cross-sectional was based on previously validated Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-based survey instrument termed TAME-ChatGPT. self-administered e-survey distributed by emails for enrolled UAE universities during September–December 2023 using convenience-based approach. Assessment demographic academic variables, TAME-ChatGPT constructs’ roles conducted univariate followed multivariate analyses. Results final sample comprised 608 participants, 91.0% whom heard while 85.4% used before study. Univariate analysis indicated that positive associated with three constructs namely, lower perceived risks, anxiety, higher scores technology/social influence. For usage, being male, nationality, point grade average (GPA) well four usefulness, risks use, behavior/cognitive construct ease-of-use construct. In analysis, only explained variance towards (80.8%) its (76.9%). Conclusion findings is commonplace UAE. determinants included cognitive behavioral factors, ease determined These should be considered understanding motivators successful adoption genAI including education.

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Teacher Professional Development: A Systematic Review DOI Creative Commons
Xiao Jian Tan, Gary Cheng, Man Ho Ling

et al.

Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 100355 - 100355

Published: Dec. 1, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

7

Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5 and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam,

Khaled Al‐Salahat,

Huda Eid

et al.

Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: Volume 15, P. 857 - 871

Published: Sept. 1, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots excel in language understanding and generation. These models can transform healthcare education practice. However, it is important to assess the performance of such AI various topics highlight its strengths possible limitations. This study aimed evaluate ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 GPT-4), Bing, Bard compared human students at a postgraduate master's level Medical Laboratory Sciences.

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice Questions DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam,

Khaled Al‐Salahat,

Huda Eid

et al.

medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 9, 2024

Abstract The advances in large language models (LLMs) are evolving rapidly. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on LLMs excel understanding and generation, with potential utility to transform healthcare education practice. However, it is important assess the performance of such AI various topics highlight its strengths possible limitations. Therefore, this study aimed evaluate ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 GPT-4), Bing, Bard compared human students at a postgraduate master’s (MSc) level Medical Laboratory Sciences. design was METRICS checklist for reporting AI-based studies healthcare. utilized dataset 60 Clinical Chemistry multiple-choice questions (MCQs) initially conceived assessment 20 MSc students. revised Bloom’s taxonomy used as framework classifying MCQs into four cognitive categories: Remember, Understand, Analyze, Apply. A modified version CLEAR tool quality AI-generated content, Cohen’s κ inter-rater agreement. Compared mean students’ score which 40/60 (66.8%), GPT-4 scored 54/60 (90.0%), followed by Bing (46/60, 76.7%), GPT-3.5 (44/60, 73.3%), (40/60, 66.7%). Statistically significant better noted lower domains (Remember Understand) GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard. scores indicated that ChatGPT-4 “Excellent” “Above average” ChatGPT-3.5, findings excelled exam, while were above-average. Given directed high degree specialization, these remarkable. Due risks academic dishonesty dependence models, appropriateness an higher should be re-evaluated.

Language: Английский

Citations

5

ChatGPT Usage and Attitudes are Driven by Perceptions of Usefulness, Ease of Use, Risks, and Psycho-Social Impact: A Study among University Students in the UAE DOI Creative Commons
Malik Sallam, Walid El‐Sayed, Muhammad Y. Al‐Shorbagy

et al.

Research Square (Research Square), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 1, 2024

Abstract Background The use of ChatGPT among university students has gained popularity. current study aimed to assess the factors driving attitude and usage as an example generative artificial intelligence in United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods This cross-sectional was based on a previously validated technology acceptance model (TAM)-based survey instrument termed TAME-ChatGPT. self-administered e-survey distributed by emails for enrolled UAE universities during September–December 2023 using convenience-based approach. Assessment demographic, academic, TAME-ChatGPT constructs role conducted univariate followed multivariate analyses. Results final sample comprised 608 participants, 91.0% which heard while 85.4% used before study. Univariate analysis indicated that positive associated with three namely lower perceived risks, anxiety, higher scores technology/social influence. For usage, being male, nationality, point grade average well four usefulness, risks use, behavior/cognitive construct ease construct. In analysis, only explained variance towards (80.8%) its (76.9%). Conclusions findings is commonplace UAE. determinants included cognitive behavioral factors, determined These should be considered understanding motivators successful adoption AI including education.

Language: Английский

Citations

5