Cornea,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
40(7), P. 809 - 816
Published: March 26, 2021
Aldave,
Anthony
J.
MD*;
DeMatteo,
Jennifer
MCM,
CIC†;
Chamberlain,
Winston
D.
MD,
PhD‡;
Philippy,
Brian
BSChE,
BS,
CEBT§;
Farooq,
Asim
V.
MD¶;
Buckman,
Natalie
CEBT‖;
Crosson,
Andrea
CEBT**;
Li,
MD††;
Meinecke,
Eric
CEBT‡‡;
Kaufman,
Adam
H.
MD§§
Author
Information
Journal of Clinical Virology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
139, P. 104820 - 104820
Published: April 14, 2021
Neutralization
tests
(NT)
are
the
gold
standard
for
detecting
and
quantifying
anti-SARS-CoV-2
neutralizing
antibodies
(NAb),
but
their
complexity
restricts
them
to
research
settings
or
reference
laboratories.
Antibodies
against
S
protein
receptor
binding
domain
(RBD)
have
been
shown
confer
a
activity
SARS-CoV-2.
Assays
quantitatively
measuring
anti-S1-RBD-SARS-CoV-2
could
be
of
great
value
NAb
screening
potential
donors
convalescent-phase
plasma
therapy,
assessing
natural
vaccine-induced
immunity,
stratifying
individuals
vaccine
receipt,
documenting
response.
Elecsys
Anti-SARS-CoV-2
(Elecsys-S),
high-throughput
automated
electrochemiluminescence
double-antigen
sandwich
immunoassay
quantitative
measurement
pan-anti-S1-RBD-SARS-CoV-2
antibodies,
was
evaluated
NT
on
357
patients
with
PCR-confirmed
SARS-CoV-2
infection.
performed
in
BSL-3
laboratory
using
Slovenian
isolate;
titer
≥1:20
considered
positive.
Elecsys-S
detected
352/357
(98.6
%)
samples.
were
identified
by
257/357
(72
The
Elecsys-S/NT
agreement
moderate
(Cohen's
kappa
0.56).
High
(≥1:160)
106/357
(30
Elecsys-S's
antibody
concentrations
correlated
individual
categories
(the
lowest
NT-negative
samples
highest
1:1,280),
cutoff
reasonable
prediction
generated
after
infection
established
(133
BAU/mL).
Although
should
remain
candidates
donors,
selected
commercial
assays
optimized
cutoff,
like
Elecsys-S,
used
rapid,
automated,
large-scale
clinically
relevant
levels
as
suitable
donors.
Clinical Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: March 13, 2024
The
role
of
serologic
testing
for
SARS-CoV-2
has
evolved
during
the
pandemic
as
seroprevalence
in
global
populations
increased.
Infectious
Diseases
Society
America
(IDSA)
convened
an
expert
panel
to
perform
a
systematic
review
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
serology
literature
and
construct
updated
best
practice
guidance
related
testing.
This
guideline
is
update
fourth
series
rapid,
frequently
COVID-19
guidelines
developed
by
IDSA.
Trends in Microbiology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
29(3), P. 214 - 223
Published: Nov. 7, 2020
Antibody
tests
for
detecting
past
infection
with
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
have
many
uses
public
health
decision
making,
but
demand
has
largely
come
from
individual
consumers.
This
review
focuses
on
the
relevance
of
antibody
tests:
their
accuracy
in
prior
infection,
what
SARS-CoV-2
can
currently
infer
about
future
immunity
or
possible
medical
sequelae,
and
potential
importance
vaccine
selection
screening.
Given
uncertainty
(quality,
level,
positive
predictive
value)
those
might
indicate
immunologically
(durability
antibodies
necessity
protection
reinfection),
seropositive
test
results
should
not
be
used
to
inform
testing
remain
a
tool
at
this
time.
Clinical Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
72(12), P. 2225 - 2240
Published: Oct. 23, 2020
Abstract
In
this
article,
the
editors
of
Clinical
Infectious
Diseases
review
some
most
important
lessons
they
have
learned
about
epidemiology,
clinical
features,
diagnosis,
treatment
and
prevention
SARS-CoV-2
infection
identify
essential
questions
COVID-19
that
remain
to
be
answered.
Journal of Clinical Virology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
137, P. 104784 - 104784
Published: March 7, 2021
Accurate
anti-SARS-CoV-2
assays
are
needed
to
inform
diagnostic,
therapeutic,
and
public
health
decisions.
The
first
manufacturer-independent
head-to-head
comparison
of
two
rapid
high-throughput
automated
electrochemiluminescence
double-antigen
sandwich
immunoassays
targeting
total
antibodies
against
different
viral
proteins,
Elecsys
Anti-SARS-CoV-2
(Elecsys-N)
S
(Elecsys-S)
(Roche
Diagnostics),
was
performed
in
a
routine
setting
during
the
exponential
growth
phase
epidemic's
second
wave.The
diagnostic
specificity
Elecsys-N
Elecsys-S
initially
evaluated
on
panel
572
pre-COVID-19
samples,
showing
100
%
both
assays.
Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S
used
3,416
consecutive
blood
samples
from
individuals
that
were
tested
for
presence
within
commercial
out-of-pocket
serologic
testing.Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S
showed
overall
agreement
98.68
(3,371/3,416;
95
CI,
98.23-99.03
%),
positive
95.16
(884/929;
93.52-96.41
high
kappa
value
0.996
(95
0.956-0.976).
Previous
SARS-CoV-2
PCR
positivity
identified
14/24
(58.3
%)
negative/Elecsys-S
4/21
(19.0
positive/Elecsys-S
negative
individuals.The
excellent
highly
specific
An
important
question
is
whether
laboratories
offering
antibody
could
benefit
combining
assays;
if
so,
should
use
be
concomitant
or
sequential-and,
latter
case,
which
order?
Based
our
results,
we
favor
over
sequential
when
testing
high-incidence
settings;
example,
stationary
COVID-19
epidemic.
International Journal of Infectious Diseases,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
101, P. 191 - 193
Published: Sept. 28, 2020
ObjectivesWe
investigated
seroreactivity
by
using
a
commercial
SARS-CoV-2
ELISA
test
in
samples
collected
from
different
groups
of
individuals,
including
patients
diagnosed
to
have
Dengue,
Zika,
and
Chikungunya
infection
between
2015
2019,
an
endemic
area
the
Caribbean
Colombian
region.MethodsA
total
127
sera
obtained
six
individuals
were
included
this
study:
Group
A:
with
confirmed
infection;
B:
symptoms
suggestive
COVID-19
or
asymptomatic
contacts
patients;
C:
acute
recent
dengue
virus
D:
Zika
E:
previous
F:
exposure
spotted
fever
group
rickettsiae.ResultsOverall,
A,
B,
D
showed
92%,
75%,
26%
samples,
respectively;
furthermore,
C,
E,
F
100%
seronegativity.ConclusionsWe
found
serological
cross-reactivity
test.
Further
studies
are
needed
evaluate
whether
cross-reaction
is
maintained
time
nonacute
its
effect
serosurveys
areas
for
arbovirus.