Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Dec. 3, 2020
The
coronavirus
2019
disease
(COVID-19)
is
deepening
the
inequity
and
injustice
among
vulnerable
communities.
current
study
aims
to
present
an
overview
of
impact
COVID-19
on
equity
social
justice
with
a
focus
Vulnerable
communities
include,
but
not
limited
to,
healthcare
workers,
those
from
lower
socioeconomic
backgrounds,
ethnic
or
minority
groups,
immigrants
refugees,
justice-involved
populations,
people
suffering
chronic
diseases
mental
illness.
implications
these
systemic
disparities
beyond
pandemic
are
also
discussed.
People
communities'
experience
disproportionately
adverse
impacts
COVID-19.
has
exacerbated
its
long-term
negative
populations
foretell
impending
crisis
that
could
prevail
era.
It
onerous
issues
be
addressed
efforts
build
inclusive
sustainable
societies
pursued
ensure
provision
universal
for
all.
Without
reinforcements,
we
would
only
compromise
severely
limit
our
preparedness
response
future
pandemic.
Social Science & Medicine,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
265, P. 113521 - 113521
Published: Nov. 1, 2020
There
are
increasing
worries
that
lockdowns
and
'stay-at-home'
orders
due
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic
could
lead
a
rise
in
loneliness,
which
is
recognised
as
major
public
health
concern.
But
profiles
of
loneliness
during
risk
factors
remain
unclear.
The
current
study
aimed
examine
if
how
levels
changed
strict
lockdown
explore
clustering
growth
trajectories.
Data
from
38,217
UK
adults
UCL
COVID
-19
Social
Study
(a
panel
collecting
data
weekly
pandemic)
were
analysed
period
(23/03/2020–10/05/2020).
sample
was
well-stratified
weighted
population
proportions
gender,
age,
ethnicity,
education
geographical
location.
Growth
mixture
modelling
used
identify
latent
classes
trajectories
their
predictors.
Analyses
revealed
four
classes,
with
baseline
level
ranging
low
high.
In
first
few
weeks
lockdown,
increased
highest
group,
decreased
lowest
stayed
relatively
constant
middle
two
groups.
Younger
(OR
=
2.17–6.81),
women
1.59),
people
income
1.3),
economically
inactive
1.3–2.04)
mental
conditions
5.32)
more
likely
be
class
relative
lowest.
Further,
living
others
or
rural
area,
having
close
friends
greater
social
support
protective.
Perceived
under
measures
stable
UK,
but
for
many
these
high
no
signs
improvement.
Results
suggest
efforts
needed
address
loneliness.
American Psychologist,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
77(5), P. 660 - 677
Published: May 9, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
and
measures
aimed
at
its
mitigation,
such
as
physical
distancing,
have
been
discussed
risk
factors
for
loneliness,
which
increases
the
of
premature
mortality
mental
health
conditions.
To
ascertain
whether
loneliness
has
increased
since
start
pandemic,
this
study
to
narratively
statistically
synthesize
relevant
high-quality
primary
studies.
This
systematic
review
with
meta-analysis
was
registered
PROSPERO
(ID
CRD42021246771).
Searched
databases
were
PubMed,
PsycINFO,
Cochrane
Library/Central
Register
Controlled
Trials/EMBASE/CINAHL,
Web
Science,
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
database,
supplemented
by
Google
Scholar
citation
searching
(cutoff
date
search
December
5,
2021).
Summary
data
from
prospective
research
including
assessments
before
during
extracted.
Of
6,850
retrieved
records,
34
studies
(23
longitudinal,
9
pseudolongitudinal,
2
reporting
both
designs)
on
215,026
participants
included.
Risk
bias
(RoB)
estimated
using
in
non-randomised
studies-of
interventions
(ROBINS-I)
tool.
Standardized
mean
differences
(SMD,
Hedges'
g)
continuous
values
logOR
prevalence
rates
calculated
pooled
effect
size
estimators
random-effects
meta-analyses.
Pooling
longitudinal
designs
only
(overall
N
=
45,734),
scores
(19
studies,
SMD
0.27
[95%
confidence
interval
0.14-0.40],
Z
4.02,
p
<
.001,
I
98%)
(8
0.33
[0.04-0.62],
2.25,
.02,
96%)
relative
prepandemic
times
small
sizes.
Results
robust
respect
studies'
overall
RoB,
pseudolongitudinal
designs,
timing
assessments,
clinical
populations.
heterogeneity
effects
indicates
a
need
further
investigate
protective
progresses
inform
targeted
interventions.
(PsycInfo
Database
Record
(c)
2022
APA,
all
rights
reserved).
JMIR Aging,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
4(2), P. e26474 - e26474
Published: March 10, 2021
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
drastically
changed
the
lives
of
countless
members
general
population.
Older
adults
are
known
to
experience
loneliness,
age
discrimination,
and
excessive
worry.
It
is
therefore
reasonable
anticipate
that
they
would
greater
negative
outcomes
related
given
their
increased
isolation
risk
for
complications
than
younger
adults.
Objective
This
study
aims
synthesize
existing
research
on
impact
pandemic,
associated
protective
measures,
older
secondary
objective
investigate
with
Alzheimer
disease
dementias.
Methods
A
rapid
review
published
literature
was
conducted
October
6,
2020,
through
a
search
6
online
databases
results
from
original
studies
regarding
Human
Development
Model
conceptual
framework–Disability
Creation
Process
used
describe
understand
interactions
between
personal
factors,
environmental
life
habits.
reported
following
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-analyses
Statement.
Results
total
135
records
were
included
initial
strategy
13,452
individual
studies.
Of
these,
113
(83.7%)
determined
be
level
4
according
levels
evidence
classification
by
Centre
Evidence-Based
Medicine.
presence
psychological
symptoms,
exacerbation
ageism,
physical
deterioration
aged
populations
in
Decreased
social
fewer
in-person
during
occasionally
reduced
quality
depression.
Difficulties
accessing
services,
sleep
disturbances,
reduction
activity
also
noted.
Conclusions
Our
highlight
need
adequate
measures.
represent
heterogeneous
group,
which
could
explain
contradictory
found
literature.
Individual,
organizational,
institutional
strategies
should
established
ensure
able
maintain
contacts,
preserve
family
ties,
ability
give
or
receive
help
current
pandemic.
Future
focus
specific
consequences
needs
more
at-risk
inclusion,
both
public
health
recommendations
considerations
made
policy
makers.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Jan. 15, 2021
Purpose:
This
systematic
review
aimed
to
analyze
the
impact
that
COVID-19
lockdown
had
on
amount
of
physical
activity
performed
by
university
students.
Materials
and
Methods
:
A
electronic
search
for
studies
providing
information
regarding
levels
pre
during
pandemic
in
students
was
up
20th
October
2020
databases
Cochrane
Library,
PubMed,
SPORTDiscus,
Web
Science.
The
risk
bias
external
validity
quality
included
assessed
means
those
Newcastle-Ottawa
Scale
(NOS).
evidence
main
outcomes
graded
using
Grading
Recommendations
Assessment,
Development
Evaluation
(GRADE)
approach.
Results
Conclusions
total
10
were
selected.
Physical
questionnaires
(10
studies)
accelerometer
(1
study).
Risk
regarded
as
low
high
six
four
investigations,
respectively.
downgraded
low.
significant
reduction
observed
9
studies.
Compared
pre-lockdown
values,
five
showed
a
light/mild
(walking)
between
32.5
365.5%,
while
seven
revealed
high/vigorous
2.9
52.8%.
Walking,
moderate,
vigorous,
have
been
reduced
confinements
different
countries.
Despite
reductions,
who
met
current
minimum
PA
recommendations
before
generally
also
confinements.
Aging & Mental Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
25(7), P. 1161 - 1164
Published: Jan. 25, 2021
Responses
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic
in
terms
of
physical
distancing
risk
collateral
damage
such
as
increased
loneliness.
Older
adults
have
been
identified
being
at
higher
poor
outcomes
if
infected
and
many
countries
subjected
greater
restrictions
on
contacts
with
others.
Most
research
so
far
points
towards
an
increase
loneliness
during
pandemic.
However,
there
has
a
lack
prospective
studies
based
representative
samples
older
adults,
oldest
old,
low
or
no
Internet
usage,
those
health
currently
underrepresented.
Despite
significance
cultural
norms
for
individuals'
standards
social
relations
and,
thus,
experience
loneliness,
comparative
Reviews
found
little
evidence
what
interventions
elements
are
effective
reducing
There
is
potential
be
maintained
via
technology-based
solutions,
although
excluding
limited
resources
who
both
least
likely
use
technology
most
vulnerable
Furthermore,
remote
cannot
fully
compensate
loss
contacts.
Where
stay-at-home
orders
not
imposed,
supporting
neighbourliness
community
accessible
open
spaces
other
options.
Finally,
policy
responses
need
more
nuanced
non-ageist
order
avoid
unnecessary
increases
adults.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Dec. 4, 2020
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
led
governments
worldwide
to
implement
unprecedented
response
strategies.
While
crucial
limiting
the
spread
of
virus,
"social
distancing"
may
lead
severe
psychological
consequences,
especially
in
lonely
individuals.We
used
cross-sectional
(n
=
380)
and
longitudinal
74)
designs
investigate
links
between
loneliness,
anxiety,
depression
symptoms
(ADS)
risk
perception
affective
young
adults
who
implemented
social
distancing
during
first
2
weeks
state
epidemic
threat
Poland.Loneliness
was
correlated
with
ADS
COVID-19's
health.
However,
increased
worry
about
isolation
heightened
for
financial
problems
observed
lonelier
individuals.
cross-lagged
influence
initial
on
subsequent
levels
loneliness
also
found.The
reciprocal
connections
be
importance
crisis.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: Feb. 25, 2021
COVID-19
took
a
heavy
toll
on
older
adults.
In
Belgium,
by
the
end
of
August,
93%
deaths
due
to
were
aged
65
or
older.
Similar
trends
observed
in
other
countries.
As
consequence,
adults
identified
as
group
at
risk,
and
strict
governmental
restrictions
imposed
them.
This
has
caused
concerns
about
their
mental
health.
Using
an
online
survey,
this
study
established
impact
pandemic
years
older,
which
factors
moderate
impact.
Participants
reported
significant
decrease
activity
level,
sleep
quality
wellbeing
during
pandemic.
Depression
was
strongly
related
declines
quality,
cognitive
functioning.
Our
shows
that
had
severe
health
implies
risk
requires
attention
governments
healthcare.
The Gerontologist,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
61(1), P. 103 - 113
Published: Oct. 24, 2020
Abstract
Background
and
Objectives
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic
resulted
in
social
isolation
globally,
creating
heightened
levels
of
stress
anxiety.
This
study
investigates
the
link
between
mental
well-being
later
life,
how
it
varies
across
countries.
Research
Design
Methods
We
draw
on
a
subset
older
adults
from
Global
Behaviors
Perceptions
COVID-19
Pandemic,
unique
global
online
survey
13,660
participants
62
use
mixed-effects
models
to
analyze
data.
Results
Social
(distancing)
significantly
predicts
poor
health
operationalized
as
coronavirus-induced
distress
(p
<
.01).
At
aggregate
level,
average
positively
countries
with
higher
numbers
coronavirus-related
deaths
.10)
more
fragile
state
capacity
.05),
while
varying
negatively
those
stringent
anticoronavirus
policies
.05).
Finally,
we
report
several
cross-level
interactions
total
number
=
.025),
policy
stringency
.065),
fragility
.061),
globalization
index
.071).
Discussion
Implications
Our
shows
that
proper
understanding
impact
should
consider
moderating
role
national
context.
JAMA Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
79(2), P. 151 - 151
Published: Dec. 22, 2021
Despite
the
emphasis
placed
on
psychological
impact
of
COVID-19
pandemic,
evidence
from
representative
studies
older
adults
including
pre-COVID-19
data
and
repeated
assessments
during
pandemic
is
scarce.To
examine
changes
in
mental
health
well-being
before
initial
later
phases
test
whether
patterns
varied
with
sociodemographic
characteristics
a
sample
living
England.This
longitudinal
cohort
study
analyzed
5146
participating
English
Longitudinal
Study
Ageing
who
provided
(2018
2019)
at
2
occasions
2020
(June
or
July
as
well
November
December).The
characteristics,
sex,
age,
partnership
status,
socioeconomic
position.Changes
depression
(8-item
Centre
for
Epidemiological
Studies
Depression
scale),
anxiety
(7-item
Generalized
Anxiety
Disorder
quality
life
(12-item
Control,
Autonomy,
Self-realization,
Pleasure
loneliness
(3-item
Revised
University
California,
Los
Angeles,
scale)
were
tested
using
fixed-effects
regression
models.Of
included
participants,
2723
(52.9%)
women,
4773
(92.8%)
White,
mean
(SD)
age
was
67.7
(10.6)
years.
The
prevalence
clinically
significant
depressive
symptoms
increased
12.5%
(95%
CI,
11.5-13.4)
to
22.6%
21.6-23.6)
June
2020,
further
rise
28.5%
27.6-29.5)
December
2020.
This
accompanied
by
deterioration
life.
rose
9.4%
8.8-9.9)
10.9%
10.3-11.5)
Women
nonpartnered
people
experienced
worse
health.
Participants
less
wealth
had
lowest
levels
pandemic.
Higher
groups
better
overall
but
responded
more
negative
changes.In
this
England,
continued
worsen
progressed,
inequalities
persisted.
greater