Basic and Applied Ecology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
64, P. 147 - 156
Published: Aug. 7, 2022
Livestock
predation
can
pose
socio-economic
impacts
on
rural
livelihoods
and
is
the
main
cause
of
retaliatory
killings
carnivores
in
many
countries.
Therefore,
appropriate
interventions
to
reduce
livestock
predation,
lower
conflict
promote
coexistence
are
needed.
guarding
dogs
have
been
traditionally
used
yet
details
regarding
use
dogs,
especially
number
per
herd
effectively
required,
rarely
studied.
In
this
study,
we
assessed
how
presence
a
losses
leopard
wolf
corrals
at
night
grazing
grounds
day-time.
Using
systematic
interview
surveys
(2016-2019),
documented
sheep/goat
attack
(predation
rates)
from
139
shepherds
across
32
villages
around
Golestan
National
Park,
Iran.
We
analysed
effects
shepherds,
seasons,
corral
quality,
number,
dog
size,
distance
reserve
rates
using
generalized
linear
models.
For
model,
significantly
decreased
(β
=
–1.80,
95%
confidence
interval
–2.61
–0.81)
during
day-time
1.41
individuals
attack.
attacks
night,
–0.29,
–0.54
–0.04)
with
increasing
numbers.
Also,
shepherd
–0.56,
–1.10
–0.10)
size
–0.36,
–0.60
–0.12)
reduced
rates.
–0.93,
–1.74
Our
study
suggests
that
(1)
reduce,
but
not
eliminate,
by
leopards
day-time;
(2)
every
additional
dog,
wolves
likely
decrease
average
25.2%;
(3)
Conservation Science and Practice,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
4(5)
Published: March 2, 2022
Abstract
Given
the
complex
and
dynamic
interrelationships
of
underlying
factors
contributing
to
conflicts
associated
with
wolf
presence
persistence
in
human‐dominated
landscapes,
it
is
often
difficult
clearly
identify
ultimate
causes
these
conflicts.
In
this
study,
a
system
dynamics
modeling
approach
was
adopted
simulate
human–wolf
an
area
greatest
number
recently
fatal
attacks
on
humans
Iran.
Data
used
build
model
were
obtained
from
questionnaire
surveys
satellite
tracking
wolves.
We
simulated
changes
ecological
social
that
may
influence
under
different
assumptions.
Our
findings
indicate
that,
context,
proximity
wolves
human
settlements
one
determining
leading
increased
livestock.
When
distance
between
territories
increases,
likelihood
both
incidents
retaliatory
killings
are
expected
decrease.
Effective
communication
information
regarding
across
local
communities
result
positive
shift
attitudes
toward
species,
as
well
decrease
fear,
which
turn
will
affect
rate
Improper
disposal
carcasses
domestic
animals
by
locals,
dumping
waste
open
dumpsites
close
villages,
leaving
children
unattended
agricultural
fields
increase
recurrence
strongly
urge
Hamadan
provincial
office
environment
nongovernmental
organizations
initiate
programs
raise
awareness
conflict
its
mitigation.
This
includes
how
properly
handle
livestock
at
safe
distances
settlements.
Furthermore,
design
construction
sanitary
landfills
vicinity
each
village,
providing
education
use
sites
could
help
reduce
risky
Animals,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(6), P. 1536 - 1536
Published: May 25, 2021
Introduction:
Compensation
programs
are
an
important
tool
for
mitigating
conflicts
between
farmers
and
large
predators.
However,
they
present
significant
weaknesses
faults.
For
years,
the
EU
has
been
prioritizing
prevention
of
damage
caused
by
carnivores,
rather
than
compensation
programs,
introducing
compulsory
purposes
decision
EC
(2019)
772
29/01/19.
This
manuscript
reports
experience
with
wolf
in
Italian
region,
Emilia-Romagna,
which
implemented
a
pilot
project,
adopting
new
method
to
interface
involved
programs.
Methods:
Starting
2014,
project
aimed
at
spreading
measures
was
financed
through
regional
European
resources,
accompanied
resources
sharing
technical
assistance
breeders
from
body.
In
detail,
(i)
standardized
types
intervention
were
defined
structured;
(ii)
ex
post,
effectiveness
interventions
carried
out
assessed;
(iii)
difficulties
encountered
using
various
financing
instruments
analyzed.
Results:
Overall,
298
farms
analyzed,
166
applied
calls
132
funds.
The
mitigation
produced
reduction
predatory
phenomena
93.4%,
i.e.,
528
35
predations
over
period
4–6
years.
study
shows
that
more
one-third
forced
abandon
two
tenders,
mainly
due
lack
liquidity
anticipating
measures.
Conclusion:
years
examined
this
study,
Emilia-Romagna
support
offered,
proved
be
functional
effective
tool,
capable
significantly
reducing
predation
on
livestock.
work
highlights
high
percentage
denials
interested
these
tools,
stressing
need
agencies
focus
policies
can
provide
advance
economic
solve
authorization
problems
related
bodies
participant
tenders
must
interface.
Conservation Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
36(2)
Published: July 7, 2021
Conflicts
between
humans
and
mammalian
predators
are
globally
widespread
increasing,
creating
a
long-lasting
challenge
for
conservation
local
livelihoods.
Protection
interventions,
which
essential
to
conflict
mitigation,
should
be
based
on
solid
evidence
of
effectiveness
produced
by
robust
study
designs.
Yet,
it
is
unclear
what
designs
have
been
used
in
predator-targeted
interventions
how
they
can
improved
provide
best
practices
replications.
I
examined
applications
five
(before-after,
before-after-control-impact,
control-impact,
crossover
[i.e.,
the
same
randomly
assigned
units
acting
as
treatments
controls
during
alternating
trials],
randomized
controlled
trial)
changed
over
time
these
changes
related
authors,
predator
species,
countries,
intervention
types
(aversion,
husbandry,
mixed
invasive
management,
lethal
control,
noninvasive
management).
applied
multinomial
regression
modeling
434
cases
(28
species
45
countries)
from
244
studies
published
1955
2020.
Study
design
was
only
type.
Less
reliable
before-after
control-impact
were
most
common
(47.7%
38.2%
cases,
respectively),
their
use
increased
years
did
all
interventions.
The
contribution
before-after-control-impact
(7.4%),
trial
(5.3%),
(1.4%)
remained
minor
time.
Crossover
suitable
aversion,
husbandry
techniques,
few
other
but
also
limitations
terms
applicability.
Randomized
generally
applicable,
impractical
or
inappropriate
some
appears
widely
applicable
interventions.Definición
de
los
Diseños
Prácticos
y
Robustos
para
las
Intervenciones
Enfocadas
en
Mamíferos
Depredadores
Terrestres
Resumen
Los
conflictos
entre
humanos
mamíferos
depredadores
se
ubican
todo
el
mundo
están
aumento,
creando
un
desafío
prolongado
la
conservación
sustento
local.
Las
intervenciones
protección,
que
son
esenciales
mitigación
conflictos,
deberían
basarse
evidencias
sólidas
efectividad
producidas
por
diseños
estudios
robustos.
Aun
así,
no
está
claro
cuáles
estudio
han
sido
utilizados
enfocadas
cómo
pueden
mejorarse
proporcionar
mejores
prácticas
sus
replicaciones.
Examiné
como
aplicaciones
cinco
(antes-después,
control-impacto-antes-después,
control-impacto,
intervención
cruzado
[es
decir,
mismas
unidades
asignadas
al
azar
actúan
tratamiento
control
durante
pruebas
alternantes]
prueba
aleatorio)
cambiado
con
tiempo
estos
cambios
relacionados
autores,
especies
depredadoras,
países
tipos
(aversión,
crianza,
mixtas,
manejo
invasivo,
letal
invasivo).
Apliqué
modelo
regresión
casos
países)
publicados
El
diseño
del
sólo
estuvo
relacionado
tipo
intervención.
más
comunes
fueron
menos
confiables:
antes-después
control-impacto
casos,
respectivamente).
La
contribución
robustos
antes-después-control-impacto
aleatorio
(5.3%)
e
cruzadas
permaneció
escasa
tiempo.
adecuadas
aversión,
mayoría
técnicas
crianza
unas
cuantas
más,
pero
también
tienen
mayores
limitaciones
lo
refiere
aplicabilidad.
tiene
una
aplicabilidad
generalizada,
es
impráctica
o
inapropiada
algunas
intervenciones,
mientras
parece
ser
aplicación
amplia
depredadores.
Wildlife Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
49(8), P. 719 - 737
Published: May 19, 2022
Context
Large
carnivores
are
increasingly
threatened
by
anthropogenic
activities,
and
their
protection
is
among
the
main
goals
of
biodiversity
conservation.
The
snow
leopard
(Panthera
uncia)
inhabits
high-mountain
landscapes
where
livestock
depredation
drives
it
into
conflicts
with
local
people
poses
an
obstacle
for
its
Aims
aim
this
study
was
to
identify
groups
most
vulnerable
depredation,
target
them
in
implementation
practical
interventions,
assess
effectiveness
intervention
strategies
conflict
mitigation.
We
present
a
novel
attempt
evaluate
particularly
species,
age
groups,
time,
seasons.
Methods
In
2020,
we
conducted
questionnaire
surveys
two
regions
Annapurna
Conservation
Area,
Nepal
(Manang,
n
=
146
respondents
Upper
Mustang,
183).
applied
sample
comparison
testing,
Jacobs’
selectivity
index,
generalised
linear
models
(GLMs)
rates
spatio-temporal
heterogeneity
reveal
analyse
potential
effects
strategies,
husbandry
factors
relevant
depredation.
Key
results
Snow
predation
major
cause
mortality
both
(25.4–39.8%),
resulting
estimated
annual
loss
3.2–3.6%
all
livestock.
(e.g.
corrals
during
night-time
herding
daytime)
were
inconsistently
not
associated
decreases
reported
losses.
contrast,
found
some
evidence
that
dogs,
deterrents
(light,
music
playing,
flapping
tape,
dung
burning),
use
multiple
interventions
reduction
yaks.
Conclusions
implications
suggest
conducting
controlled
randomised
experiments
quantitative
assessment
deterrents,
widely
applying
effective
ones
communities.
This
would
benefit
long-term
co-existence
leopards
humans
region
beyond.
Basic and Applied Ecology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
64, P. 147 - 156
Published: Aug. 7, 2022
Livestock
predation
can
pose
socio-economic
impacts
on
rural
livelihoods
and
is
the
main
cause
of
retaliatory
killings
carnivores
in
many
countries.
Therefore,
appropriate
interventions
to
reduce
livestock
predation,
lower
conflict
promote
coexistence
are
needed.
guarding
dogs
have
been
traditionally
used
yet
details
regarding
use
dogs,
especially
number
per
herd
effectively
required,
rarely
studied.
In
this
study,
we
assessed
how
presence
a
losses
leopard
wolf
corrals
at
night
grazing
grounds
day-time.
Using
systematic
interview
surveys
(2016-2019),
documented
sheep/goat
attack
(predation
rates)
from
139
shepherds
across
32
villages
around
Golestan
National
Park,
Iran.
We
analysed
effects
shepherds,
seasons,
corral
quality,
number,
dog
size,
distance
reserve
rates
using
generalized
linear
models.
For
model,
significantly
decreased
(β
=
–1.80,
95%
confidence
interval
–2.61
–0.81)
during
day-time
1.41
individuals
attack.
attacks
night,
–0.29,
–0.54
–0.04)
with
increasing
numbers.
Also,
shepherd
–0.56,
–1.10
–0.10)
size
–0.36,
–0.60
–0.12)
reduced
rates.
–0.93,
–1.74
Our
study
suggests
that
(1)
reduce,
but
not
eliminate,
by
leopards
day-time;
(2)
every
additional
dog,
wolves
likely
decrease
average
25.2%;
(3)