Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
6(1)
Published: June 8, 2016
Abstract
Male
fitness
depends
on
the
expression
of
costly
traits
involved
in
obtaining
mates
(pre-copulatory)
and
fertilization
(post-copulatory).
However,
very
little
is
known
about
nutrient
requirements
for
these
whether
males
compromise
their
diet
to
maximize
one
trait
at
expense
another.
Here
we
used
Nutritional
Geometry
investigate
macronutrient
pre-
post-copulatory
Drosophila
,
when
were
first
or
second
mate
with
females.
We
found
no
significant
effects
male
sperm
competitiveness.
although
self-regulate
intake
a
protein-to-carbohydrate
ratio
(“P:C
ratio”)
1:1.5,
this
does
not
coincide
optima
several
key
reproductive
traits:
both
short-term
(~24
hr)
rate
offspring
production
after
female’s
mating,
as
well
total
number
sired
maximized
P:C
1:9,
whereas
attractiveness
(latency
mate),
maximised
1:1.
These
results
suggest
compromised
optimum
diet,
single
that
simultaneously
maximizes
all
traits.
The
protein
also
negatively
affected
female
following
remating,
suggesting
long-term
intersexual
effect
nutrition.
Annual Review of Entomology,
Journal Year:
2013,
Volume and Issue:
59(1), P. 427 - 445
Published: Oct. 25, 2013
Sexual
selection
has
resulted
in
some
of
the
most
captivating
features
insects,
including
flashy
colors,
bizarre
structures,
and
complex
pheromones.
These
evolve
dynamic
environments,
where
conditions
can
change
rapidly
over
space
time.
However,
only
recently
ecological
complexity
been
embraced
by
theory
practice
sexual
selection.
We
review
replicated
studies
as
well
on
variation
agents
to
delineate
gaps
current
knowledge
clarify
exciting
new
directions
for
research.
Existing
work
suggests
that
fluctuations
may
be
extremely
common,
though
factors
influencing
these
is
scarce.
suggest
deeper
perspectives
alter
fundamental
assumptions
lead
discoveries.
PLoS Biology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
21(1), P. e3001916 - e3001916
Published: Jan. 10, 2023
Over
the
last
decades,
field
of
sexual
selection
underwent
a
paradigm
shift
from
sexual-stereotype
thinking
“eager”
males
and
“coy”
females
towards
more
nuanced
perspective
acknowledging
that
not
only
but
also
can
benefit
multiple
mating
compete
for
partners.
Yet,
in
is
still
considered
peculiarity,
evolution
polyandry
often
viewed
to
result
higher
interest
males.
Here,
we
present
meta-analytic
evidence
77
species
across
broad
range
animal
taxa
demonstrate
female
reproductive
success
overall
positively
correlated
with
success,
suggesting
typically
mating.
Importantly,
found
these
fitness
gains
likely
promote
polyandry.
Our
findings
offer
support
idea
widespread
play
key
role
systems.
Thereby,
our
results
extend
understanding
evolutionary
consequences
reproduction
contribute
balanced
view
how
operates
females.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2013,
Volume and Issue:
368(1631), P. 20130073 - 20130073
Published: Oct. 29, 2013
This
paper
introduces
a
Theme
Issue
combining
interdisciplinary
perspectives
in
the
study
of
female
competition
and
aggression.
Despite
history
being
largely
overlooked,
evidence
is
now
accumulating
for
widespread
evolutionary
significance
competition.
Here,
we
provide
synthesis
contributions
to
this
on
humans
other
vertebrates,
highlight
directions
future
research.
Females
compete
resources
needed
survive
reproduce,
preferred
mates.
Although
aggression
takes
diverse
forms,
under
most
circumstances
relatively
low-risk
competitive
strategies
are
favoured,
probably
due
constraints
offspring
production
care.
In
social
species,
dominance
relationships
threats
punishment
can
resolve
conflict
without
resort
direct
aggression,
coalitions
or
alliances
may
reduce
risk
retaliation.
Consistent
with
these
trends,
indirect
low
cost
but
effective
form
among
young
women.
Costs
also
minimized
by
flexibility
expression
traits,
aggressive
behaviour
signalling
tailored
ecological
conditions.
Future
research
proximate
mediators
will
be
greatly
enhanced
opportunities
exchange,
as
evidenced
Issue.
Molecular Human Reproduction,
Journal Year:
2014,
Volume and Issue:
20(12), P. 1180 - 1189
Published: Oct. 16, 2014
Sperm
experience
intense
and
varied
selection
that
dramatically
impacts
the
evolution
of
sperm
quality.
Selection
acts
to
ensure
are
fertilization-competent
able
overcome
many
challenges
experienced
on
their
way
towards
eggs.
However,
simply
being
fertilize
an
egg
is
not
enough
male
fertility
in
most
species.
Owing
prevalence
female
multiple
mating
throughout
animal
kingdom,
successful
fertilization
requires
outcompete
rival
sperm.
In
addition,
females
can
actively
influence
quality,
storage
or
utilization
fertility.
This
review
provides
overview
how
these
selective
forces
After
exploring
link
between
traits
fertility,
we
examine
post-mating
competition
ejaculates
influences
We
then
describe
complex
genetic,
social
sexual
interactions
focusing
importance
seminal
fluid
female's
reproductive
tract.
light
complexities
traits,
greater
use
multivariate
approaches
incorporate
male–male,
sperm–sperm
sperm–female
study
quality
will
enhance
our
understanding
factors
influencing
Because
metric
success—fertilization—is
same
across
argue
information
about
gained
from
non-human
animals
has
enormous
potential
further
impact
human
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
94(3), P. 929 - 956
Published: Nov. 28, 2018
ABSTRACT
For
sexual
selection
to
act
on
a
given
sex,
there
must
exist
variation
in
the
reproductive
success
of
that
sex
as
result
differential
access
mates
or
fertilisations.
The
mechanisms
and
consequences
acting
male
animals
are
well
documented,
but
research
females
has
only
recently
received
attention.
Controversy
still
exists
over
whether
acts
traditional
sense,
modify
existing
definition
(to
include
resource
competition)
invoke
alternative
(usually
social
selection)
explain
connection
with
reproduction.
However,
substantial
evidence
bearing
characters
exhibiting
behaviours
analogous
those
attributed
males.
Here
we
summarise
literature
provide
female
intrasexual
competition
for
mates,
intersexual
signalling
potential
postcopulatory
such
between
eggs
sperm
cryptic
allocation.
Our
review
makes
clear
males
similar
ways
sometimes
differing
extents:
ceiling
elaboration
costly
traits
may
be
lower
than
We
predict
current
future
will
increasing
support
parsimony
utility
selection.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
29(12), P. 2338 - 2361
Published: Aug. 13, 2016
It
is
well
known
that
sexual
selection
can
target
reproductive
traits
during
successive
pre-
and
post-mating
episodes
of
selection.
A
key
focus
recent
studies
has
been
to
understand
quantify
how
these
interact
determine
overall
variance
in
success.
In
this
article,
we
review
empirical
developments
field
but
also
highlight
the
considerable
variability
patterns
selection,
attributable
variation
resource
acquisition
allocation,
ecological
social
factors,
genotype-by-environment
interaction
possible
methodological
factors
might
obscure
such
patterns.
Our
aim
(co)variances
sexually
selected
be
sensitive
changes
a
range
environmental
variables.
We
argue
failure
capture
when
quantifying
opportunity
for
may
lead
erroneous
conclusions
about
strength,
direction
or
form
operating
on
traits.
Overall,
advocate
approaches
combine
measures
across
contrasting
gradients
better
dynamics
polyandrous
species.
discuss
some
directions
future
research
area.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
93(4), P. 1795 - 1812
Published: April 23, 2018
ABSTRACT
Why
do
some
animals
mate
with
one
partner
rather
than
many?
Here,
I
investigate
factors
related
to
(
i
)
spatial
constraints
(habitat
limitation,
availability),
ii
time
(breeding
synchrony,
length
of
breeding
season),
iii
need
for
parental
care,
and
iv
genetic
compatibility,
see
what
support
can
be
found
in
different
taxa
regarding
the
importance
these
explaining
occurrence
monogamy,
whether
shown
by
sex
(monogyny
or
monandry)
both
sexes
(mutual
monogamy).
Focusing
on
reproductive
social
monogamy
whenever
possible,
review
empirical
literature
birds,
mammals
fishes,
occasional
examples
from
other
taxa.
Each
explain
mating
patterns
taxa,
but
not
all.
In
general,
there
is
mixed
how
well
listed
above
predict
monogamy.
The
factor
that
shows
greatest
across
habitat
limitation.
By
contrast,
while
a
care
might
freshwater
fishes
clear
evidence
this
case
marine
mammals.
Hence,
does
appear
have
single
overriding
explanation,
more
taxon
specific.
Genetic
compatibility
promising
avenue
future
work
likely
improve
our
understanding
patterns.
also
discuss
eight
important
consequences
monogamy:
parentage,
eusociality
altruism,
infanticide,
v
effective
population
size,
vi
choice
before
mating,
vii
sexual
selection,
viii
conflict.
Of
these,
infanticide
been
subject
debate,
briefly
summarised
herein.
A
common
expectation
leads
little
conflict
no
selection.
However,
as
reviewed
here,
selection
substantial
under
mutual
such
Under
long‐term
quality
obviously
numbers,
which
turn
affects
pre‐mating
choice.
Overall,
conclude
that,
despite
much
research
patterns,
still
surprisingly
poorly
understood
further
experimental
comparative
needed.
This
identifies
several
areas
data
proposes
new
hypotheses
test.