Journal of Affective Disorders,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
322, P. 108 - 117
Published: Nov. 13, 2022
Background:
The
ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
an
unprecedented
impact
on
the
lives
of
people
globally
and
is
expected
to
have
profound
effects
mental
health.Here
we
aim
describe
health
burden
experienced
in
Sweden
using
baseline
data
Omtanke2020
Study.Method:
We
analysed
self-reported,
cross-sectional
collected
over
a
12-month
period
(June
9,
2020-June
8,
2021)
from
Study
including
27,950
adults
Sweden.Participants
were
volunteers
or
actively
recruited
through
existing
cohorts
and,
after
providing
informed
consent,
responded
online
questionnaires
socio-demographics,
physical
health,
as
well
infection
impact.Poisson
regression
was
fitted
assess
relative
risk
demonstrating
high
level
symptoms
depression,
anxiety,
related
distress.Result:
proportion
persons
with
15.6
%,
9.5
%
24.5
for
specific
post-traumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD),
respectively.Overall,
43.4
participants
significant,
clinically
relevant
at
least
one
three
outcomes
7.3
significant
all
outcomes.We
also
observed
differences
prevalence
these
across
strata
sex,
age,
recruitment
type,
status,
region,
seasonality.Conclusion:
While
remains
higher
than
ones
reported
pre-pandemic
publications,
our
estimates
are
lower
previously
levels
PTSD
during
elsewhere.
Globalization and Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
16(1)
Published: July 6, 2020
Abstract
Background
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
a
significant
impact
on
public
mental
health.
Therefore,
monitoring
and
oversight
of
the
population
health
during
crises
such
as
panedmic
is
an
immediate
priority.
aim
this
study
to
analyze
existing
research
works
findings
in
relation
prevalence
stress,
anxiety
depression
general
pandemic.
Method
In
systematic
review
meta-analysis,
articles
that
have
focused
stress
among
were
searched
Science
Direct,
Embase,
Scopus,
PubMed,
Web
(ISI)
Google
Scholar
databases,
without
lower
time
limit
until
May
2020.
order
perform
meta-analysis
collected
studies,
random
effects
model
was
used,
heterogeneity
studies
investigated
using
I
2
index.
Moreover.
data
analysis
conducted
Comprehensive
Meta-Analysis
(CMA)
software.
Results
5
with
total
sample
size
9074
obtained
29.6%
(95%
confidence
limit:
24.3–35.4),
17
63,439
31.9%
interval:
27.5–36.7),
14
44,531
people
33.7%
27.5–40.6).
Conclusion
not
only
causes
physical
concerns
but
also
results
number
psychological
disorders.
spread
new
coronavirus
can
different
communities.
Thus,
it
essential
preserve
individuals
develop
interventions
improve
vulnerable
groups
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: May 13, 2021
To
provide
a
contemporary
global
prevalence
of
mental
health
issues
among
the
general
population
amid
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
We
searched
electronic
databases,
preprint
grey
literature,
and
unpublished
studies
from
January
1,
2020,
to
June
16,
2020
(updated
on
July
11,
2020),
with
no
language
restrictions.
Observational
using
validated
measurement
tools
reporting
data
were
screened
identify
all
relevant
studies.
have
included
information
32
different
countries
398,771
participants.
The
pooled
COVID-19
pandemic
varied
widely
across
regions
was
higher
than
previous
reports
before
outbreak
began.
estimate
28.0%
for
depression;
26.9%
anxiety;
24.1%
post-traumatic
stress
symptoms;
36.5%
stress;
50.0%
psychological
distress;
27.6%
sleep
problems.
Data
are
limited
other
aspects
issues.
Our
findings
highlight
disparities
between
in
terms
poverty
impacts
COVID-19,
preparedness
respond,
economic
vulnerabilities
that
impact
Research
social
burden
is
needed
better
manage
problems
during
after
epidemics
or
pandemics.
Systematic
review
registration:
PROSPERO
CRD
42020177120.
Globalization and Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
16(1)
Published: Sept. 25, 2020
Abstract
Background
Health
care
workers
exposed
to
COVID-19
might
be
at
increased
risk
of
developing
mental
health
problems.
The
study
aimed
identify
factors
associated
with
anxiety,
depression
and
insomnia
among
involved
in
response
Nepal.
Methods
This
was
a
cross-sectional
web-based
survey
conducted
between
April
26
May
12,
2020.
A
total
475
participated
the
study.
Anxiety
were
measured
using
14-item
Hospital
Depression
Scale
(HADS:
0–21)
by
7-item
Insomnia
Severity
Index
(ISI:
0–28).
Multivariable
logistic
regression
analysis
done
determine
outcomes.
Results
Overall,
41.9%
had
symptoms
37.5%
33.9%
insomnia.
Stigma
faced
significantly
higher
odds
experiencing
anxiety
(AOR:
2.47;
95%
CI:
1.62–3.76),
2.05;
1.34–3.11)
2.37;
1.46–3.84).
History
medication
for
problems
likelihood
3.40;
CI:1.31–8.81),
3.83;
1.45–10.14)
3.82;
1.52–9.62)
while
inadequate
precautionary
measures
workplace
exhibiting
1.89;
1.12–3.19)
1.97;
1.16–3.37).
Nurses
2.33;
1.21–4.47)
more
likely
experience
than
other
workers.
Conclusion
findings
revealed
considerate
proportion
during
early
phase
pandemic
facing
stigma,
those
history
problems,
reporting
their
focus
on
improving
wellbeing
should
immediately
initiated
attention
reduction
ensuring
an
adequate
support
system
such
as
personal
protective
equipments,
family
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Nov. 12, 2020
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
huge
effects
on
the
daily
lives
of
most
individuals
in
first
half
2020.
Widespread
lockdown
and
preventative
measures
have
isolated
individuals,
affected
world
economy,
limited
access
to
physical
mental
healthcare.
While
these
may
be
necessary
minimize
spread
virus,
negative
physical,
psychological,
social
are
evident.
However,
technology
adapted
try
mitigate
effects,
offering
digital
alternatives
many
day-to-day
activities
which
can
no
longer
completed
normally.
elderly
population,
been
worst
by
both
measures,
seen
least
benefits
from
solutions.
age
based
divide
describes
a
longstanding
inequality
to,
skills
make
use
of,
new
technology.
this
problem
is
not
new,
during
it
created
large
portion
population
suffering
crisis,
unable
put
place
help.
This
paper
aims
explore
increased
having
pandemic.
It
also
highlight
need
for
attention
resources
go
towards
improving
literacy
elderly,
offer
immediate
solutions
close
good
long-term.
Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
51(6), P. 881 - 893
Published: March 2, 2021
Abstract
Background
COVID-19
physical
distancing
measures
can
potentially
increase
the
likelihood
of
mental
disorders.
It
is
unknown
whether
these
are
associated
with
depression
and
anxiety.
Objectives
To
investigate
meta-analytic
global
levels
anxiety
during
pandemic
how
implementation
mitigation
strategies
(i.e.
public
transportation
closures,
stay-at-home
orders,
etc.)
impacted
such
Data
sources
PubMed,
MEDLINE,
Web
Science,
BIOSIS
Citation
Index,
Current
Content
Connect,
PsycINFO,
CINAHL,
medRxiv,
PsyArXiv
databases
for
prevalences;
Oxford
Covid-19
Government
Response
Tracker
containment
closure
policies
indexes;
Global
Burden
Disease
Study
previous
eligibility
criteria
Original
studies
conducted
pandemic,
which
assessed
categorical
anxiety,
using
PHQ-9
GAD-7
scales
(cutoff
⩾10).
Participants
interventions
General
population,
healthcare
providers,
students,
patients.
National
measures.
appraisal
synthesis
methods
Meta-analysis
meta-regression.
Results
In
total,
226
638
individuals
were
within
60
included
studies.
prevalence
both
was
24.0%
21.3%,
respectively.
There
differences
in
reported
across
regions
countries.
Asia
(17.6%
17.9%),
China
(16.2%
15.5%)
especially,
had
lowest
Regarding
impact
on
health,
only
closures
increased
especially
Europe.
Limitations
Country-level
data
anxiety/depression
may
not
necessarily
reflect
local
city-specific)
contexts.
Conclusions
implications
key
findings
Mental
health
concerns
should
be
viewed
as
a
delayed
consequence
but
also
concurrent
epidemic.
Our
provide
support
policy-makers
to
consider
real-time
enhanced
services,
initiatives
foster
positive
outcomes.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Aug. 25, 2020
Abstract
Background:
Health
care
workers
exposed
to
COVID-19
might
be
at
increased
risk
of
developing
mental
health
problems.
The
study
aimed
identify
factors
associated
with
anxiety,
depression
and
insomnia
among
involved
in
response
Nepal.
Methods:
This
was
a
cross-sectional
web-based
survey
conducted
between
April
26
May
12,
2020.
A
total
475
participated
the
study.
Anxiety
were
measured
using
14-item
Hospital
Depression
Scale
(HADS:
0-
21)
by
7-item
Insomnia
Severity
Index
(ISI:
0-28).
Multivariable
logistic
regression
analysis
done
determine
outcomes.
Results:
Overall,
41.9%
had
symptoms
37.5%
33.9%
insomnia.
Stigma
faced
significantly
higher
odds
experiencing
anxiety
(AOR:
2.47;
95%
CI:
1.62-3.76),
2.05;
1.34-3.11)
2.37;
1.46-3.84).
History
medication
for
problems
likelihood
3.40;
CI:1.31-8.81),
3.83;
1.45-10.14)
3.82;
1.52-9.62)
while
inadequate
precautionary
measures
workplace
exhibiting
1.89;
1.12-3.19)
1.97;
1.16-3.37).
Nurses
2.33;
1.21-4.47)
more
likely
experience
than
other
workers.
Conclusion:
findings
revealed
considerate
proportion
during
early
phase
pandemic
facing
stigma,
those
history
problems,
reporting
their
focus
on
improving
wellbeing
should
immediately
initiated
attention
reduction
ensuring
an
adequate
support
system
such
as
personal
protective
equipments,
family
Healthcare Analytics,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
2, P. 100114 - 100114
Published: Oct. 1, 2022
In
this
paper,
we
study
a
Caputo-Fabrizio
fractional
order
epidemiological
model
for
the
transmission
dynamism
of
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
pandemic
and
its
relationship
with
Alzheimer's
disease.
disease
is
incorporated
into
by
evaluating
relevance
to
quarantine
strategy.
We
use
functional
techniques
demonstrate
proposed
stability
under
Ulam-Hyres
condition.
The
Adams-Bashforth
method
used
determine
numerical
solution
our
model.
According
results,
notice
that
an
increase
in
parameter
has
minimal
effect
on
compartment.
Journal of Sports Sciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
39(8), P. 887 - 899
Published: Nov. 26, 2020
In
March
2020,
the
spreading
Coronavirus
(COVID-19)
prompted
United
Kingdom
government
to
introduce
a
societal
shutdown,
accompanied
by
self-isolation
and
social-distancing
measures
reduce
virus
transmission.
doing
so,
opportunities
for
physical
activity
were
likely
reduced,
potentially
causing
detrimental
effects
older
adults.
Therefore,
present
study
investigated
influence
of
initial
six
weeks
lockdown
on
levels,
perceived
function
mood
in
A
cross-sectional,
mixed-methods,
observational
was
conducted
using
self-administered,
fortnightly
online
surveys
throughout
UK
between
21st
March–4
May
2020.
total
117
participants
(52
males
[age:
76
±
4
years]
65
females
years])
completed
all
surveys.
Despite
restrictions,
this
group
adults
maintained
their
pre-lockdown
but
also
increased
self-reported
sedentary
time.
Subsequently,
perception
across
lockdown.
With
regards
mood;
only
strong
evidence
an
increase
depression
(ps
=
95.35%;
>0.3
AU),
although
levels
similar
sexes
at
week
six.
Given
link
behaviour
negative
health
outcomes
adults,
strategies
sedentariness
during
COVID-19
pandemic
are
required.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
16(2), P. e0246784 - e0246784
Published: Feb. 10, 2021
Background
COVID-19
pandemic
has
provoked
a
wide
variety
of
psychological
problems
such
as
anxiety,
depression,
and
panic
disorders,
especially
among
health
service
providers.
Due
to
greater
risk
exposure
the
virus,
increased
working
hours,
fear
infecting
their
families,
providers
are
more
vulnerable
emotional
distress
than
general
population
during
this
pandemic.
This
online
survey
attempts
assess
impact
its
associated
variables
healthcare
workers
in
Nepal.
Materials
methods
For
data
collection
purposes,
Covid-19
Peritraumatic
Distress
Index
(CPDI)
Questionnaire,
was
used
whose
content
validity
verified
by
Shanghai
mental
center.
Data
for
were
collected
from
11
24
October
2020
which
extracted
Microsoft
Excel-13
analyzed.
Results
A
total
254
care
different
provinces
country
participated
study
with
mean
age
26.01(±
4.46)
years.
majority
46.9%
(n
=
119)
participants
not
distressed
(score
≤28)
while
46.5%
118)
mild
moderately
>28
≤51)
6.7%
17)
severely
≥52)
due
current
Female
(p
0.004)
who
doctors
profession
0.001)
experienced
significantly
distress.
Conclusions
heightened
amongst
The
findings
present
may
highlight
need
constructing
implementing
appropriate
plans
policies
relevant
stakeholders
that
will
help
mitigate
so
we
can
have
an
efficient
frontline
workforce
tackle
worse
situation.