Globalization and Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
17(1)
Published: April 6, 2021
Abstract
Background
Italy
was
the
first
European
country
to
implement
a
national
lockdown
because
of
COVID-19
pandemic.
Worldwide,
this
pandemic
had
huge
impact
on
mental
health
people
in
many
countries
causing
similar
reaction
terms
emotions
and
concerns
at
population
level.
Our
study
investigated
psychological
well-being
cohort
Italian
university
students.
Methods
We
conducted
cross-sectional
survey
period
immediately
after
through
administration
questionnaire
personal
websites
students
attending
their
undergraduate
courses
Università
Cattolica
del
Sacro
Cuore.
used
Patient-Health-Engagement-Scale,
Self-Rating-Anxiety-Scale,
Self-Rating-Depression-Scale
assess
engagement,
anxiety
symptoms,
depression
symptoms
our
sample.
Results
The
sample
size
501
subjects,
which
35.33%
were
classified
as
anxious
72.93%
depressed.
Over
90%
respondents
good
understanding
preventive
measures
despite
over
70%
suffered
from
impossibility
physically
seeing
friends
partners.
Around
55%
would
have
been
willing
contribute
much
more
face
An
increase
occurrences
associated
with
being
female,
student
Rome
campus,
suffering
university,
distant
colleagues,
unable
one’s
partner.
Performing
physical
activity
reduced
likelihood.
Conclusion
University
are
risk
distress
case
traumatic
events.
evolution
is
uncertain
may
long-term
effects
health.
Therefore,
it
crucial
most
effective
interventions
identify
vulnerable
subgroups
plan
for
acute
services
control
reduce
burden
problems.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
1486(1), P. 90 - 111
Published: Oct. 2, 2020
Abstract
Evidence
from
previous
coronavirus
outbreaks
has
shown
that
infected
patients
are
at
risk
for
developing
psychiatric
and
mental
health
disorders,
such
as
depression,
anxiety,
sleep
disturbances.
To
construct
a
comprehensive
picture
of
the
status
in
COVID‐19
patients,
we
conducted
systematic
review
random‐effects
meta‐analysis
to
assess
prevalence
disturbances
this
population.
We
searched
MEDLINE,
EMBASE,
PubMed,
Web
Science,
CINAHL,
Wanfang
Data,
Wangfang
Med
Online,
CNKI,
CQVIP
relevant
articles,
included
31
studies
(
n
=
5153)
our
analyses.
found
pooled
depression
was
45%
(95%
CI:
37–54%,
I
2
96%),
anxiety
47%
37–57%,
97%),
sleeping
34%
19–50%,
98%).
did
not
find
any
significant
differences
estimates
between
different
genders;
however,
varied
based
on
screening
tools.
More
observational
assessing
wellness
outpatients
countries
other
than
China
needed
further
examine
psychological
implications
infections.
Psychological Medicine,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
51(2), P. 201 - 211
Published: Jan. 1, 2021
Abstract
Lockdowns
to
control
the
spread
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
have
had
profound
effects
on
everyday
life
worldwide,
but
their
effect
mental
health
remains
unclear
because
available
meta-analyses
and
reviews
rely
mostly
cross-sectional
studies.
We
conducted
a
rapid
review
meta-analysis
longitudinal
studies
natural
experiments
investigating
relationship
between
COVID-19
lockdowns
health.
A
total
25
involving
72
004
participants
58
sizes
were
analyzed.
Using
random
model,
we
found
that
small
symptoms,
g
=
0.17,
s.e.
0.05,
95%
CI
(0.06–0.24),
p
0.001,
positive
psychological
functioning,
−0.12,
0.11,
(−0.33
0.09),
0.27,
not
significant.
Multivariate
analysis
revealed
significant
relatively
for
anxiety
depression,
while
those
social
support,
loneliness,
general
distress,
negative
affect,
suicide
risk
The
results
indicated
substantial
heterogeneity
among
studies,
meta-regression
analyses
no
moderation
mean
age,
gender,
continent,
death
rate,
days
lockdown,
publication
status
or
study
design.
impact
is
in
magnitude
highly
heterogeneous,
suggesting
do
uniformly
detrimental
most
people
are
psychologically
resilient
effects.
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(2), P. 299 - 313
Published: Oct. 27, 2020
No
systematic
review
or
meta-analysis
has
yet
been
conducted
to
examine
the
impact
of
pandemic
on
prevalence
sleep
problems
among
general
population,
health
care
workers,
patients
with
COVID-19.
Therefore,
this
was
assess
and
those
categories.American
Psychological
Association
PsycINFO,
Cochrane,
Cumulative
Index
Nursing
Allied
Health
Literature
(CINAHL),
EBSCOhost,
EMBASE,
Google
Scholar,
MEDLINE,
ProQuest
Medical,
ScienceDirect,
Scopus,
Web
Science
from
November
1,
2019
July
5,
2020
were
used.
Additionally,
5
preprints
servers
(medRxiv.org;
preprints.org;
psyarxiv.com;
arXiv.org;
biorxiv.org)
also
searched
for
papers
accepted
after
peer
but
not
published
indexed.
There
no
language
restriction.
The
random-effect
models
model
used
DerSimonian
Laird
methodology.Forty-four
papers,
involving
a
total
54,231
participants
13
countries,
judged
relevant
contributed
during
global
pooled
rate
all
populations
35.7%
(95%
confidence
interval,
29.4-42.4%).
Patients
COVID-19
appeared
be
most
affected
group,
74.8%
28.7-95.6%).
workers
population
had
comparative
rates
problems,
36.0%
21.1-54.2%)
32.3%
25.3-40.2%),
respectively.The
is
high
affects
approximately
40%
people
populations.
active
have
higher
problems.
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: May 13, 2021
To
provide
a
contemporary
global
prevalence
of
mental
health
issues
among
the
general
population
amid
coronavirus
disease-2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
We
searched
electronic
databases,
preprint
grey
literature,
and
unpublished
studies
from
January
1,
2020,
to
June
16,
2020
(updated
on
July
11,
2020),
with
no
language
restrictions.
Observational
using
validated
measurement
tools
reporting
data
were
screened
identify
all
relevant
studies.
have
included
information
32
different
countries
398,771
participants.
The
pooled
COVID-19
pandemic
varied
widely
across
regions
was
higher
than
previous
reports
before
outbreak
began.
estimate
28.0%
for
depression;
26.9%
anxiety;
24.1%
post-traumatic
stress
symptoms;
36.5%
stress;
50.0%
psychological
distress;
27.6%
sleep
problems.
Data
are
limited
other
aspects
issues.
Our
findings
highlight
disparities
between
in
terms
poverty
impacts
COVID-19,
preparedness
respond,
economic
vulnerabilities
that
impact
Research
social
burden
is
needed
better
manage
problems
during
after
epidemics
or
pandemics.
Systematic
review
registration:
PROSPERO
CRD
42020177120.
Human Resources for Health,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
18(1)
Published: Dec. 1, 2020
Stress,
anxiety,
and
depression
are
some
of
the
most
important
research
practice
challenges
for
psychologists,
psychiatrists,
behavioral
scientists.
Due
to
importance
issue
lack
general
statistics
on
these
disorders
among
Hospital
staff
treating
COVID-19
patients,
this
study
aims
systematically
review
determine
prevalence
stress,
anxiety
within
front-line
healthcare
workers
caring
patients.In
work,
systematic
review,
meta-analysis
meta-regression
approaches
used
approximate
patients.
The
keywords
prevalence,
depression,
psychopathy,
mental
illness,
disorder,
doctor,
physician,
nurse,
hospital
staff,
2019-nCoV,
COVID-19,
SARS-CoV-2
Coronaviruses
were
searching
SID,
MagIran,
IranMedex,
IranDoc,
ScienceDirect,
Embase,
Scopus,
PubMed,
Web
Science
(ISI)
Google
Scholar
databases.
search
process
was
conducted
in
December
2019
June
2020.
In
order
amalgamate
analyze
reported
results
collected
studies,
random
effects
model
is
used.
heterogeneity
studies
assessed
using
I2
index.
Lastly,
data
analysis
performed
Comprehensive
Meta-Analysis
software.Of
29
with
a
total
sample
size
22,380,
21
papers
have
23
9
stress.
24.3%
(18%
CI
18.2-31.6%),
25.8%
(95%
20.5-31.9%),
stress
45%
24.3-67.5%)
hospitals'
According
analysis,
increasing
size,
decreased,
statistically
significant
(P
<
0.05),
however,
increased
yet
not
=
0.829).The
clearly
demonstrate
that
patients
high.
Therefore,
health
policy-makers
should
take
measures
control
prevent
staff.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(4), P. 1826 - 1826
Published: Feb. 13, 2021
The
number
of
people
working
from
home
(WFH)
increased
radically
during
the
coronavirus
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
purpose
this
study
was
therefore
to
investigate
people’s
experiences
WFH
pandemic
and
identify
main
factors
advantages
disadvantages
WFH.
Data
29
European
countries
on
knowledge
workers
(N
=
5748)
early
stages
lockdown
(11
March
8
May
2020)
were
collected.
A
factor
analysis
showed
overall
distribution
how
weeks
can
be
grouped
into
six
key
factors.
results
indicated
that
most
had
a
more
positive
rather
than
negative
experience
lockdown.
Three
represent
WFH:
(i)
work–life
balance,
(ii)
improved
work
efficiency
(iii)
greater
control.
(iv)
office
constraints,
(v)
uncertainties
(vi)
inadequate
tools.
Comparing
gender,
children
at
home,
age
managers
versus
employees
in
relation
these
provided
insights
differential
impact
lives.
help
organisations
understand
where
action
is
needed
safeguard
both
performance
well-being.
As
data
collected
amidst
COVID-19
pandemic,
we
recommend
further
studies
validate
their
importance
for
well-being
work.
