Making data sharing the norm in medical research
Clara Locher,
No information about this author
Gérard Le Goff,
No information about this author
Anne Le Louarn
No information about this author
et al.
BMJ,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. p1434 - p1434
Published: July 11, 2023
Language: Английский
Longitudinal studies of child mental disorders in the general population: A systematic review of study characteristics
Theodora Bogdan,
No information about this author
Weiyi Xie,
No information about this author
Habeba Talaat
No information about this author
et al.
JCPP Advances,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
3(3)
Published: Aug. 11, 2023
Longitudinal
studies
of
child
mental
disorders
in
the
general
population
(herein
study)
investigate
trends
prevalence,
incidence,
risk/protective
factors,
and
sequelae
for
disorders.
They
are
time
resource
intensive
but
offer
life-course
perspectives
examination
causal
mechanisms.
Comprehensive
syntheses
methods
existing
will
provide
an
understanding
conducted
to
date,
inventory
studies,
inform
planning
new
longitudinal
studies.
Language: Английский
What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data: a cross-sectional survey
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: May 2, 2023
Objectives
To
characterise
the
attitudes
of
Australians
affected
by
cancer
towards
sharing
de-identified
research
data
with
third
parties,
including
public.
Design,
setting,
participants
Anonymous
online
survey
between
October
2022
and
February
2023
adult
previously
diagnosed
cancer.
Main
outcome
measures
Self-reported
human
non-human
data,
hypothetical
their
anonymised
medical
information
responses
to
survey.
Results
551
respondents
contributed
There
was
strong
support
for
researchers
doctors
(90%
95%
respectively)
non-profit
(both
94%).
However,
this
declined
when
were
asked
whether
should
be
shared
for-profit
64%)
or
posted
publicly
61%).
When
if
they
would
hypothetically
consent
at
treatment
location
collecting
publicly,
only
half
agreed
(50%).
In
contrast,
after
being
shown
a
visual
representation
80%
supported
it
publicly.
A
further
10%
also
public
some
most
frequently
desired
withheld
education
history
levels
trust
in
healthcare
stakeholders.
Conclusions
particularly
clinician
researchers.
Visualisation
may
enhance
making
available.
These
results
help
alleviate
any
concerns
about
participants’
on
sharing,
as
well
boost
researchers’
motivation
sharing.
Language: Английский
Responsibilities for receiving and using individual participant data
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
1(9)
Published: Nov. 1, 2023
Sharing
of
individual
participant
data
enhances
the
value
existing
to
generate
new
evidence
and
inform
decision-making.
While
there
is
strong
in-principle
support
for
sharing,
in
practice
study
are
often
difficult
find,
access,
re-use.
Currently,
no
consensus
statement
guide
data-sharing
process.
In
particular,
more
guidance
needed
on
responsibilities
recipients
re-using
data.
To
determine
views
data,
propose
how
these
could
be
met.
A
2-h
online
focus
group
was
conducted
at
2021
Association
Interdisciplinary
Meta-research
Open
Science
conference.
Three
example
scenarios
were
discussed
(evidence
synthesis,
reproducibility,
secondary
analyses).
Notes
audio
transcripts
collated
using
thematic
analysis
shared
with
attendees
further
iterative
input.
purposive
sample
16
conference
delegates
attended
group.
Analyses
revealed
four
recurring
themes
that
synthesized
into
recommendations.
The
"privacy
ethics"
theme
described
need
prioritize
protection
privacy,
recommendation
proactively
share
a
secure
management
plan
ethical
oversight
provider.
"capability
resourcing"
required
demonstrate
sufficient
capacity
process
analyze
"recognition
collaboration"
asserted
responsibility
acknowledge
contributions
providers
invite
them
contribute
project.
Last,
"compliance"
focused
adhere
local
sharing
regulations.
Successful
re-use
requires
cooperation
from
multiple
stakeholders.
We
identified
whom
arose
research
team
who
collected
Implementation
facilitate
increased
sharing.
Language: Английский
Evaluating the Reproducibility and Verifiability of Nutrition Research: A Case Study of Studies Assessing the Relationship Between Potatoes and Colorectal Cancer
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Dec. 2, 2024
The
credibility
of
nutritional
research
is
dependent
on
the
rigor
with
which
studies
are
conducted
and
ability
for
independent
assessment
to
be
performed.
Despite
importance
these,
more
work
needed
in
field
nutrition
buttress
trustworthiness
research.
Language: Английский