Addictive Behaviors Reports,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
15, P. 100413 - 100413
Published: Feb. 8, 2022
Methods
of
cannabis
engagement
have
proliferated
in
recent
years,
which
many
self-report
measures
do
not
adequately
capture.
There
is
a
clear
need
for
that
capture
current
patterns
use
across
range
methods,
and
can
be
used
to
track
changes
over
time.
The
study
developed
the
Cannabis
Engagement
Assessment
(CEA),
measure
past
month
dry
flower,
concentrate,
edible
products.
A
sample
349
participants
from
undergraduate
student
population
broader
community
were
recruited.
To
examine
convergent
validity
CEA,
completed
engagement,
misuse,
use-related
problems.
assess
divergent
validity,
also
depression
alcohol
Criterion
test–retest
reliability
examined
subset
65
who
re-completed
CEA
timeline
follow-back
interview
(TLFB).
Indicators
frequency
quantity
showed
good
convergence
with
patterns,
problematic
Divergent
was
supported
by
lower
associations
problems
symptoms.
estimates
TLFB.
viable
representative
recreational
engagement.
Its
focus
on
preceding
30
days
lends
itself
measuring
npj Mental Health Research,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
4(1)
Published: April 24, 2025
Abstract
Posttraumatic
stress
disorder
(PTSD)
is
associated
with
poor
hippocampal
function
and
disrupted
pattern
recognition.
Cannabis
use
highly
prevalent
in
individuals
PTSD,
yet
the
impact
on
these
cognitive
functions
poorly
understood.
Participants
(
n
=
111)
a
range
of
PTSD
symptoms
without
regular
cannabis
completed
mnemonic
similarity
task.
We
hypothesized
that
would
be
alterations
separation
ability
symptoms.
High
were
reduced
performance
minimal
users.
Regular
users
high
showed
greater
separation,
but
low
These
results
suggest
may
disrupt
similar
hippocampal-dependent
processes,
while
it
improve
cross-sectional
require
longitudinal
follow-up
studies
to
evaluate
causal
effects
PTSD.
Substance Use & Misuse,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 4
Published: April 27, 2025
This
commentary
focuses
on
assessment
challenges
of
cannabis
vaping
and
the
need
to
expand
Minority
Stress
Theory
(MST)
understand
elevated
levels
among
sexual
minority
individuals.
These
topics
are
discussed
as
a
Maglalang
et.
al
(2024),
who
examined
two
novel
measurements
(i.e.
recency
number
puffs).
Our
provides
an
overview
relevant
literature
future
directions
for
research
Elevated
rates
individuals
concerning
given
THC
potency
greater
frequency
product
use,
associated
health
concerns,
individuals'
access
care.
The
existing
body
has
focused
heavily
MST
explain
substance
use
fails
consider
several
contextual
factors
(e.g.
location
companions)
situational
motives
(situation
or
environment-dependent),
creating
narrow
lens
vapes,
well
other
substances.
underscores
growing
individuals,
reported
by
et
al.
various
accompanied
in
attempts
quantify
vape
quantity.
In
addition,
authors
suggest
expanding
beyond
explore
more
diverse
set
influencing
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 30, 2025
Background
Cannabis
use
is
associated
with
psychosis
development
and
symptom
relapse
in
persons
schizophrenia
spectrum
disorders
(SCZ).
As
more
U.S.
states
legalize
cannabis
products
increase
potency,
it
crucial
to
better
understand
recent
patterns
SCZ.
Methods
We
conducted
a
scoping
review
of
research
on
SCZ
after
January
2016
present
case
series
six
inpatients
from
2023–2024.
Results
Scoping
review:
Of
672
references,
nine
studies
(775
participants)
were
included;
none
designed
characterize
quantity,
frequency,
or
type
over
time.
measurement
methodology
varied
widely
most
did
not
follow
recommendations
for
measuring
use.
Frequency
quantity
at
study
baseline
reported
by
these
ranged
widely.
At
least
minority
participants
each
used
very
frequently;
0.6±0.6
3.4±2.2
joints/day.
One
small
detailed
product
among
users
THC
(93%
flower,
80%
edibles,
60%
concentrates)
CBD
(40%
20%
concentrates,
13%
oils).
Case
Series
Participants
(32.0±14.4
years;
83.3%
diagnosed
SCZ)
who
2.7±2.1
days/week.
All
leaf
(3.1±2.3
joints/day);
half
(all
heavy
users)
also
concentrates
(33.3%)
edibles
(16.7%).
Conclusion
Only
measured
SCZ;
methodologies
varied.
legalization
expands
potency
increases,
further
should
its
consequences
Suchttherapie,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
26(02), P. 77 - 84
Published: May 1, 2025
Zusammenfassung
Cannabiskonsum
ist
ein
Risikofaktor
für
somatische
und
psychische
Erkrankungen
sowie
(Verkehrs-)Unfälle.
Das
Fehlen
einer
einheitlichen
Definition
riskanten
Cannabiskonsums
erschwert
derzeit
die
Kommunikation
von
Gesundheitsrisiken
damit
eine
effektive
Cannabisprävention
Früherkennung
in
klinischer
Praxis.
Zudem
mindert
sie
Vergleichbarkeit
Studienergebnissen.
Es
bestehen
der
Literatur
unterschiedliche
Ansätze
zu
definieren,
z.
B.
mittels
Konsumfrequenz
oder
durch
standardisierte
Screeninginstrumente
(z.
CAST
SDS).
Anhand
vier
Kriterien
(einfach,
verhaltensbasiert,
kontinuierlich
evidenzbasiert)
diskutieren
wir
Passung
unterschiedlicher
riskantem
Cannabiskonsum.
Auf
dieser
Grundlage
haben
einen
Vorschlag
dreiteilige
Arbeitsdefinition
erarbeitet:
1.
gibt
keinen
risikofreien
Konsum;
2.
wird
empfohlen,
dass
Cannabis
grundsätzlich
verschiedenen
Personengruppen
bzw.
bestimmten
Situationen
vermieden
werden
sollte;
3.
Konsumierende
steigern
ihre
drei
Verhaltensweisen:
höhere
Konsumfrequenz,
THC-Konsummenge
an
Konsumtagen,
Rauchen
statt
Verdampfen,
insb.
zusammen
mit
Tabak.
Zukünftig
könnten
Risikozonen
niedriges
vs.
moderates
hohes
Risiko)
Schwellenwerte
auf
Basis
empirischer
Arbeiten
bestimmt
werden.
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
9(2), P. 646 - 658
Published: Dec. 28, 2022
Standardized
survey
measures
that
capture
diverse
cannabis
consumption
patterns
are
needed
to
inform
public
health
and
policy.
Our
team
is
developing
a
flexible,
personalized,
low-burden
item
inventory
measure
use
estimate
milligrams
of
THC
(mgTHC)
in
large
samples.
This
study
aimed
identify
measurement
gaps
analysis
implications
associated
with
an
initial
pool
candidate
items
assessed
flower
concentrate
products
(smoked
and/or
vaporized).
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
17
Published: Feb. 6, 2024
Rationale
Cannabis
is
one
of
the
most
widely
used
psychoactive
substances
globally.
use
can
be
associated
with
alterations
reward
processing,
including
affective
flattening,
apathy,
anhedonia,
and
lower
sensitivity
to
natural
rewards
in
conjunction
higher
cannabis-related
rewards.
Such
have
been
posited
driven
by
changes
underlying
brain
pathways,
as
per
prominent
neuroscientific
theories
addiction.
Functional
neuroimaging
(fMRI)
studies
examined
function
cannabis
users
via
monetary
incentive
delay
(MID)
fMRI
task;
however,
this
evidence
yet
systematically
synthesised.
Objectives
We
aimed
integrate
on
MID
relation
metrics
exposure
(e.g.,
dosage,
frequency)
other
behavioural
variables.
Method
pre-registered
review
PROSPERO
reported
it
using
PRISMA
guidelines.
Literature
searches
were
conducted
PsycINFO,
PubMed,
Medline,
CINAHL,
Scopus.
Results
Nine
included,
comprising
534
people
mean
ages
16-to-28
years,
which
255
who
daily
or
almost
daily,
279
controls.
The
literature
date
led
largely
non-significant
group
differences.
A
few
differences
ventral
striatum
while
participants
anticipated
losses;
caudate
received
neutral
outcomes.
correlations
between
withdrawal,
age
onset;
inconsistent
findings.
Conclusions
There
emerging
but
altered
task.
Future
are
required
confirm
if
system
vulnerable
experience
a
Use
Disorder,
postulated
Addiction,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
119(9), P. 1502 - 1504
Published: March 7, 2024
Considerable
differences
in
the
types
of
cannabis
products,
methods
use,
social
norms
and
cultures
legal
climates
surrounding
use
exist
among
regions,
resulting
distinct
contexts.
Research
examining
accounting
for
these
contextual
is
crucial
to
further
understanding
disorder,
developing
refining
context
sensitive
strategies
prevention,
treatment
harm
reduction.
The
past
two
decades
have
seen
increased
legalization
recreational
across
globe,
prevalence
emerging
evidence
cannabis-related
harms
[1].
We
argue
that
precisely
how
impacts
people
who
cannabis,
as
well
likely
why,
may
vary
substantially
depending
upon
variation
legislation,
promotion,
acceptability
around
use.
These
factors
create
unique
regionally
specific
'cannabis
contexts'.
Although
broader
cross-cultural
considerations
apply
all
addictions
we
believe
they
are
particularly
important
given
global
changes
towards
more
lenient
policies.
aim
increase
awareness
stimulate
research
debate
regarding
contexts
shape
processes
underlying
disorder
(CUD)
associated
outcomes.
percentage
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
products
has
been
increasing
internationally
[1],
but
there
substantial
markets
type
product
Use
higher-potency
appears
risen
United
States
be
common
states
legalized
[2].
temporal
regional
health
implications
[3].
Further
individual
cannabinoid
exposure,
new
THC
rising
popularity
US
market,
with
one
six
users
reporting
Δ8-THC
[4].
produces
fewer
psychoactive
effects
than
Δ9-THC,
preferred
those
seeking
medicinal
benefit,
indicating
a
potential
difference
attitudes
Common
routes
administration
(ROA)
also
differ
throughout
regions
impact
bioavailability
cannabinoids.
Cannabis
combustion
results
faster
onset
action
higher
blood
levels
relative
oral
ingestion
[5].
While
smoking
still
most
prevalent
ROA
Canada,
edible
[6]
smoked
flower
combined
tobacco
European
countries
[7].
Nicotine
cannabinoids
compensatory
synergistic
neurobiological
[8],
nicotine–cannabis
co-users
severe
CUD
prognoses
[9].
variations
result
differential
frequent
on
other
physical,
cognitive
mental
policies,
perceived
it,
influence
trajectories
probably
contribute
CUD.
More
permissive
community
heightened
[10].
interplay
policies
feed
into
interact
perceptions
one's
own
producing
different
outcomes
In
States,
availability
declining
parallel
rates
[11].
Despite
such
increases
self-reported
[12].
Some
that,
rather
reflecting
legitimate
decline
CUD,
this
seemingly
contradictory
pattern
reflect
reduced
treatment-seeking
some
(e.g.
[13]).
tentatively
agree:
per
se,
concomitant
drug
then
acquired,
can
alter
drug's
safety,
turn
potentially
changing
consequences
[14].
Such
forms
messaging
cannabis—for
example,
presence
signs
promoting
benefits
dispensaries
California
[15].
emergence
evidence-based
purported
therapeutic
appeal
bring
while
already
cannabis.
contrast
Canadian
reported
risk
post-legalization
[16],
preliminary
data
from
emergency
psychiatric
units
indicate
[17].
entry
Europe
[18].
short,
local
social,
regulatory
societal
milieu
which
consumed
exceedingly
complex.
There
reasons
affect
initiates
it
affects
them
whether
perceive
effects.
Greater
attention
improve
our
If
experiences
are—as
suggest—potentially
so
variable,
proceed
investigating
cannabis?
One
approach
sample
niche
populations
homogeneous,
cannabis-only
users,
will
ignore
reality
It
complex
picture
need
understand
provide
nuanced
guidelines
safer
patterns
generalize
wider
population
Instead,
researchers
should
embrace
heterogeneity
study
context.
To
achieve
this,
recommend
following;
first,
urge
report
standardized
fashion.
iCannToolkit
[19]
framework
facilitating
integration
characterization
context-specific
proposes
time-line
follow-back
(TLFB)
methodology
(in
combination
5-mg
unit
ROA)
an
extensive
self-report
quantification
method.
Self-reports
quick
reliable
proxy
exposure
[20].
Secondly,
when
testing
time
allows
risks
motives
versus
medicinal)
relevant
incorporate.
When
samples
large
enough,
exploratory
analyses
assess
Beyond
studying
valuable
public
regions—including
often
under-represented
minority
groups—over
time.
Finally,
strongly
studies
incorporate
explicit
context'
statements,
including
elements
described
Box
1.
statements
brief
overview
typical
was
conducted
help
characterize
studies,
improving
synthesis.
Over
time,
information
contained
even
used
meta-analytically
explain
findings
regions.
Location
Year
policy
(i.e.
status
and/or
commercial
non-commercial)
Description
retail
market
(if
applicable)
method
Average
content
available)
Regional
Janna
Cousijn:
Conceptualization
(equal);
funding
acquisition
supervision
(lead);
writing—original
draft
(supporting);
writing—review
editing
(lead).
Lauren
Kuhns:
(equal).
Francesca
Filbey:
(supporting).
Tom
P.
Freeman:
Emese
Kroon:
This
supported
by
grant
1R01
DA042490-01A1
awarded
Cousijn
Filbey
National
Institute
Drug
Abuse/National
Health.
All
authors
no
conflicts
interest
declare.