Ethology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
129(1), P. 47 - 54
Published: Nov. 7, 2022
Abstract
Female
singing
and
coordinated
male–female
duetting
are
often
but
not
always
found
in
the
same
species.
Both
behaviors
more
common
tropical
than
temperate
songbirds,
few
studies
have
differentiated
between
factors
selecting
for
each.
Here
we
investigate
evolution
of
female
vocal
complexity
coordination
Carolina
wrens
(
Thryothorus
ludovicianus
),
one
non‐tropical
members
a
songbird
family
(Troglodytidae)
that
is
well
known
producing
duets.
to
sing;
rather,
they
produce
relatively
simple,
sex‐specific
chatters,
during
territorial
encounters.
We
analyzed
field
recordings
show
females
coordinate
these
chatters
with
male
songs
at
rates
similar
those
observed
some
wren
then
used
phylogenetic
comparative
methods
evolutionary
ancestors
had
were
acoustically
complex
vocalizations
current
females,
suggesting
past
selection
against
complexity.
Levels
males,
contrast,
changed
little
from
ancestors.
Our
results
suggest
two
aspects
behavior,
acoustic
evolved
independently
different
functions
communication.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
97(1), P. 326 - 342
Published: Oct. 5, 2021
ABSTRACT
Birdsong
has
been
the
subject
of
broad
research
from
a
variety
sub‐disciplines
and
taught
us
much
about
evolution,
function,
mechanisms
driving
animal
communication
cognition.
Typically,
birdsong
refers
to
specialized
vocalizations
produced
by
oscines.
Historically,
on
was
conducted
in
north
temperate
regions
(specifically
Europe
North
America)
leading
multiple
biases.
Due
these
historic
biases
are
generally
considered
be
highly
sexually
dimorphic,
heavily
shaped
sexual
selection
essential
for
courtship
territoriality.
Song
is
also
typically
defined
as
learned
trait
cultural
evolution.
Together,
this
framework
focuses
specifically
males,
particularly
during
breeding
season
–
reflecting
thereby
reinforcing
framework.
The
physiological
underpinnings
song
often
emphasize
role
hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal
axis
(associated
with
changes)
control
system
(underlying
vocal
learning).
Over
years
there
great
debate
over
which
features
definition
birdsong,
apply
broadly
contexts
outside
males
region,
importance
having
at
all.
Importantly,
definitions
we
use
can
both
guide
limit
progress
research.
Here,
describe
history
definitions,
how
have
directed
restricted
focus
male
selected
contexts.
Additionally,
highlight
gaps
our
scientific
knowledge,
especially
respect
function
underlying
females
winter,
well
non‐seasonally
species.
Furthermore,
problems
using
complexity
learning
dichotomous
variables
categorize
songs
calls.
Across
species,
no
one
characteristic
dimorphism,
seasonality,
complexity,
selection,
consistently
delineates
other
songbird
communication.
We
provide
recommendations
next
steps
build
an
inclusive
information
that
will
allow
researchers
explore
nuances
promote
comparative
Specifically,
recommend
should
operationalize
variation
most
relevant
their
study/species
identifying
specific
question
variable(s)
(e.g.
seasonality).
Researchers
identify
(axes)
degree
testosterone)
study
language
consistent
testosterone
seasonal
production
birds).
Current Biology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
33(2), P. 372 - 380.e3
Published: Dec. 20, 2022
Male
songbirds
sing
to
establish
territories
and
attract
mates.1Catchpole
C.K.
Slater
P.J.B.
Bird
Song:
Biological
Themes
Variations.
Cambridge
University
Press,
2008https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791Crossref
Scopus
(282)
Google
Scholar,2Gil
D.
Gahr
M.
The
honesty
of
bird
song:
multiple
constraints
for
traits.Trends
Ecol.
Evol.
2002;
17:
133-141https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2Abstract
Full
Text
PDF
(527)
Scholar
However,
increasing
reports
singing
in
non-reproductive
contexts3Rose
E.M.
Prior
N.H.
Ball
G.F.
question:
re-conceptualizing
birdsong.Biol.
Rev.
Camb.
Philos.
Soc.
2022;
97:
326-342https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12800Crossref
PubMed
(10)
by
females4Odom
K.J.
Hall
M.L.
Riebel
K.
Omland
K.E.
Langmore
N.E.
Female
song
is
widespread
ancestral
songbirds.Nat.
Commun.
2014;
5:
3379https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4379Crossref
(260)
Scholar,5Riebel
Odom
New
insights
from
female
towards
an
integrated
approach
studying
male
communication
roles.Biol.
Lett.
2019;
15
(20190059)https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0059Crossref
(72)
show
that
use
more
diverse
than
previously
considered.
Therefore,
alternative
functions
song,
such
as
social
cohesion3Rose
synchronization
breeding,
large,
were
overlooked
even
well-studied
species
the
zebra
finch
(Taeniopygia
guttata).
In
these
songbirds,
only
males
sing,
pairs
breed
synchronously
loose
colonies,6Brandl
H.B.
Griffith
S.C.
Schuett
W.
Wild
finches
choose
neighbours
synchronized
breeding.Anim.
Behav.
151:
21-28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.002Crossref
(15)
Scholar,7Brandl
Farine
D.R.
nest
have
long-term
stable
ties.J.
Anim.
2021;
90:
76-86https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13082Crossref
(21)
following
aseasonal
rain
events
their
arid
habitat.8Morton
S.R.
Stafford
Smith
D.M.S.
Dickman
C.R.
Dunkerley
D.L.
Friedel
M.H.
Mcallister
R.R.J.
Reid
J.R.W.
Roshier
D.A.
M.A.
Walsh
F.J.
et
al.A
fresh
framework
ecology
Australia.J.
Arid
Environ.
2011;
75:
313-329https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.11.001Crossref
(272)
Scholar,9Zann
R.A.
Morton
Jones
K.R.
Burley
N.T.
timing
breeding
relation
rainfall
central
Australia.Emu
–
Austral
Ornithology.
1995;
95:
208-222https://doi.org/10.1071/MU9950208Crossref
(149)
As
are
not
territorial,
form
monogamous
bonds
early
life,
conventional
theory
predicts
should
much
at
all;
however,
they
do
focus
hundreds
lab-based
studies.10Hauber
M.E.
Louder
M.I.
Neurogenomic
into
behavioral
vocal
development
finch.eLife.
10:
e61849https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61849Crossref
Scholar,11Tchernichovski
O.
Eisenberg-Edidin
S.
Jarvis
E.D.
Balanced
imitation
sustains
culture
finches.Nat.
12:
2562https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22852-3Crossref
(13)
Scholar,12Riebel
Song
mate
choice
finches:
a
review.Adv.
Study
2009;
40:
197-238https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40006-8Crossref
Scholar,13Forstmeier
Burger
C.
Temnow
Derégnaucourt
genetic
basis
vocalizations.Evolution.
63:
2114-2130https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00688.xCrossref
(83)
Scholar,14Boogert
N.J.
Giraldeau
L.A.
Lefebvre
L.
complexity
correlates
with
learning
ability
males.Anim.
2008;
76:
1735-1741https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.009Crossref
(148)
Scholar,15Fishbein
A.R.
Idsardi
W.J.
Dooling
R.J.
Sound
sequences
birdsong:
how
birds
really
care?.Philos.
Trans.
R.
Lond.
B
Biol.
Sci.
2020;
375
(20190044)https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0044Crossref
(23)
Scholar,16Williams
H.
Lachlan
R.F.
Evidence
cumulative
cultural
evolution
song.Philos.
377
(20200322)https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0322Crossref
Scholar,17Pfenning
Hara
E.
Whitney
Rivas
M.V.
Wang
Roulhac
P.L.
Howard
J.T.
Wirthlin
Lovell
P.V.
Ganapathy
G.
al.Convergent
transcriptional
specializations
brains
humans
song-learning
birds.Science.
346
(1256846)https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256846Crossref
(292)
Scholar,18Kubikova
Wada
Dopamine
receptors
songbird
brain.J.
Comp.
Neurol.
2010;
518:
741-769https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22255Crossref
(107)
Scholar,19Honarmand
Naguib
Nutrition
peer
group
composition
adolescence:
impacts
on
preference
finches.Anim.
2015;
107:
147-158https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.017Crossref
Scholar,20Slater
Eales
Clayton
N.S.
guttata):
progress
prospects.Adv.
1988;
18:
1-34https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60308-3Crossref
(168)
Scholar,21Gil
Rutstein
A.N.
Early
condition,
learning,
volume
brain
nuclei
guttata).J.
Neurobiol.
2006;
66:
1602-1612https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20312Crossref
(81)
Scholar,22Kriengwatana
B.
Schmidt
K.L.
Taves
M.D.
Soma
K.K.
MacDougall-Shackleton
S.A.
Effects
nutritional
stress
during
different
developmental
periods
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
axis
finches.Horm.
65:
285-293https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.12.013Crossref
(34)
We
hypothesize
maintain
cohesion
synchronize
breeding.
Here,
we
test
this
idea
using
data
5
years
field
studies,
including
observational
transects,
focal
year-round
audio
recordings,
large-scale
playback
experiment.
frequently
while
groups,
status
influences
output
aggregations,
year
round,
predominantly
when
partner,
suggesting
remains
important
after
pair
formation.
Our
reveals
actively
features
aggregations
it
attracts
conspecifics.
Together,
results
demonstrate
birdsong
has
beyond
territoriality
choice,
illustrating
its
importance
coordination
units
within
larger
societies.
Royal Society Open Science,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Vocal
communication
is
widespread
in
animals,
with
vocal
repertoires
of
varying
complexity.
The
social
complexity
hypothesis
predicts
that
species
may
need
high
to
deal
complex
organization
(e.g.
have
a
variety
different
interindividual
relations).
We
quantified
the
two
geographically
distant
captive
colonies
rooks,
corvid
and
cognitive
performances,
but
understudied
abilities.
diversity
gradation
their
repertoire,
as
well
inter-individual
similarity
at
unit
level.
found
males
produced
call
units
lower
than
females,
while
song
did
not
differ
between
sexes.
Surprisingly,
females
highly
similar
repertoires,
even
colonies,
each
individual
male
almost
completely
from
any
other
individual.
These
findings
question
way
rooks
communicate
partners.
suggest
actively
seek
remain
vocally
distinct,
which
could
be
an
asset
frequently
changing
environment.
conclude
similarity,
aspect
should
also
considered
measure
Behavioral Ecology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
33(5), P. 912 - 925
Published: April 25, 2022
In
species
with
mutual
mate
choice,
we
should
expect
adaptive
signaling
in
both
sexes.
However,
the
role
of
female
sexual
signals
is
generally
understudied.
A
case
point
birdsong
that
has
received
considerably
less
attention
than
male
song.
This
holds
even
for
well-studied
such
as
blue
tit
(
Scientific Reports,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: May 27, 2023
Abstract
Many
seabird
species
breed
in
colonies
counting
up
to
hundreds
of
thousands
individuals.
Life
such
crowded
might
require
special
coding–decoding
systems
reliably
convey
information
through
acoustic
cues.
This
can
include,
for
example,
developing
complex
vocal
repertoires
and
adjusting
the
properties
their
signals
communicate
behavioural
contexts,
thus
regulate
social
interactions
with
conspecifics.
We
studied
vocalisations
produced
by
little
auk
(
Alle
alle
)—a
highly
vocal,
colonial
seabird—over
mating
incubation
periods
on
SW
coast
Svalbard.
Using
passive
recordings
registered
a
breeding
colony,
we
extracted
eight
vocalisation
types:
single
call,
clucking
,
classic
call
low
trill
short
short-trill
terror
handling
vocalisation.
Calls
were
grouped
production
context
(based
typically
associated
behaviour),
which
valence
(positive
vs
negative)
was
later
attributed,
when
possible,
according
fitness
threats,
i.e.
predator
or
human
presence
(negative)
promoters,
interaction
partner
(positive).
The
effect
putative
selected
frequency
duration
variables
then
investigated.
contextual
significantly
affected
calls.
assigned
positive
had
higher
fundamental
spectral
centre
gravity
as
well
shorter
sound
than
these
negative
valence.
These
results
indicate
that
auk’s
communication
system
may
facilitate
expression
seems
include
plasticity
within
types—however,
more
data
are
necessary
better
understand
this
possible
interplays
other
factors.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
90, P. 102965 - 102965
Published: Jan. 5, 2025
Corvids,
readily
adaptable
across
social
and
ecological
contexts,
successfully
inhabit
almost
the
entire
world.
They
are
seen
as
highly
intelligent
birds,
current
research
examines
their
cognitive
abilities.
Despite
being
songbirds
with
a
complete
'song
system',
corvids
have
historically
received
less
attention
in
studies
of
song
production,
learning,
perception
compared
to
non-corvid
songbirds.
However,
recent
neurobiological
demonstrated
that
songbird
vocal
production
its
neuronal
representations
regularly
influenced
by
environmental
factors.
This
opinion
article
discusses
literature
on
'corvid
song'
before
introducing
other
flexible
behaviors
both
wild
controlled
laboratory
studies.
We
suggest
control
promising
model
species
study
links
between
brain
networks
for
cognition
vocalization.
Studying
corvid
flexibility
associated
processes
lab
settings
offers
complementary
insights,
crucial
bridging
fields
birdsong.
Ibis,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Jan. 5, 2025
As
a
field,
ecology
has
historically
misunderstood
or
overlooked
female
organisms,
assumed
that
they
are
‘similar
enough’
to
males.
The
typical
unit
of
study
for
research
stops
at
the
species
level,
but
can
be
too
coarse
and
obscure
important
intraspecific
differences.
Projecting
results
studies
based
on
only
half
population
(i.e.
males)
onto
females
misleading,
if
not
dangerous,
as
birds
differ
from
males
in
key
aspects
their
biology.
Birds
widespread
sexed
more
often
than
most
other
taxa;
yet
although
it
uses
them
model
current
ornithological
is
disproportionately
male
birds.
We
review
some
fields
pertinent
conservation
highlight
biases
gaps.
find
that,
counter
‘traditional’
assumptions,
reproductive
roles
balanced
between
sexes
across
many,
all,
species.
In
addition,
sing,
tend
dispersive
males,
have
lower
survival,
use
different
habitats
–
which
implications
may
affected
by
climate
change
differently.
call
ornithologists
separately
because
lack
attention
these
differences
real‐world
implications.
Potential
solutions
include
training
observers
recognize
traits,
using
field
methods
increase
detection
(e.g.
catching
during
migration
season,
DNA
determine
sex),
broadening
geographical
regions
recruiting
diverse
group
scientists
help
equalize
research.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
380(1925)
Published: May 1, 2025
Over
40%
of
bird
species
learn
their
vocalizations
from
conspecifics.
Avian
therefore
represent
one
the
most
pervasive
and
quantifiable
examples
culturally
acquired
behaviour
that
evolves
is
maintained
within
populations
through
conformity
selection.
We
review
research
exploring
loss
vocal
culture
in
wild
birds
synthesize
how
this
may
occur
three
processes,
defined
as
erosion/fragmentation,
divergence
convergence.
discuss
potential
to
conserve
avian
cultures
captivity,
using
regent
honeyeater
Anthochaera
phrygia
a
case
study.
Given
current
rates
global
biodiversity
decline,
we
predict
more
will
emerge
future.
There
need,
therefore,
for
better
understanding
(i)
birds;
(ii)
what
factors
predispose
culture;
(iii)
fitness
costs
culture,
including
population
size
or
density
range
which
be
greatest;
(iv)
can
best
conserved
restored.
This
knowledge
could
then
inform
management
actions
such
diversity
world's
generations
come.This
article
part
theme
issue
'Animal
culture:
conservation
changing
world'.
Abstract
Organisms
filter
the
complexity
of
natural
stimuli
through
their
individual
sensory
and
perceptual
systems.
Such
filtering
is
particularly
important
for
social
stimuli.
A
shared
“social
umwelt”
allows
individuals
to
respond
appropriately
expected
diversity
cues
signals
during
interactions.
In
this
way,
behavioral
neurobiological
mechanisms
sociality
bonding
cannot
be
disentangled
from
processing.
While
a
degree
embeddedness
between
processes
clear,
our
dominant
theoretical
frameworks
favor
treating
as
distinct.
An
integrated
social‐sensory
framework
has
potential
greatly
expand
understanding
underlying
variation
in
more
broadly.
Here
we
leverage
what
known
about
processing
pair
two
common
study
systems
with
significant
species
differences
umwelt
(rodent
chemosensation
avian
acoustic
communication).
We
primarily
highlight
that
(1)
communication
essential
bond
formation
maintenance,
(2)
neural
circuits
perception,
are
integrated,
(3)
candidate
neuromodulatory
regulate
also
impact
perception.
Finally,
propose
approaches
fully
integrate
processing,
communication,
across
levels
analysis:
behavioral,
neurobiological,
genomic.
This
perspective
raises
key
questions:
how
shaped
by
processing?,
extent
saliency
interactions
emerging
relationships?