How to compare algorithms for automated insulin delivery using different sensors?
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 5, 2025
Language: Английский
Time in tight range: A key metric for optimal glucose control in the era of advanced diabetes technologies and therapeutics
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
27(2), P. 450 - 456
Published: Nov. 11, 2024
Abstract
Compared
to
glycated
haemoglobin
A1c
(HbA1c),
the
rapidly
developing
continuous
glucose
monitoring
(CGM)
technology
provides
more
detailed
information
about
glycemic
control.
Amongst
new
metrics
derived
from
CGM,
time
in
target
range
of
3.9–10.0
mmol/L
(time
range,
TIR)
has
been
widely
used
for
assessment
In
recent
years,
rise
technologies
and
therapies
including
advanced
hybrid
closed‐loop
automated
insulin
delivery
systems
hypoglycemic
drugs
made
it
possible
achieve
better
this
context,
concept
tight
(TITR),
defined
as
percentage
spent
3.9–7.8
mmol/L,
gained
increasing
attention.
Whilst
TITR
is
highly
correlated
with
TIR,
there
are
still
differences
between
two
metrics.
These
make
a
appropriate
indicator
certain
situations,
such
when
levels
close
normal
or
tighter
control
required.
This
review
summarizes
studies
related
TITR.
Language: Английский
Time in tight glucose range in adolescents and young adults with diabetes during Ramadan intermittent fasting: Data from real-world users on different treatment strategies
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 112042 - 112042
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
Sanne Fisker,
No information about this author
Mia Christensen,
No information about this author
Ermina Bach
No information about this author
et al.
Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
8(3)
Published: April 8, 2025
ABSTRACT
Aims
To
compare
glycaemic
outcomes
for
two
automated
insulin
delivery
(AID)
systems,
the
Tandem
Control
IQ
(CIQ)
and
MiniMed
780G
(MM780G).
Material
Methods
In
this
observational
study,
we
evaluated
60
days
of
data
from
139
persons
with
type
1
diabetes
(CIQ:
79
persons,
MM780G:
persons),
who
had
an
active
glucose
sensor
time
≥
85%.
Results
The
AID
was
median
620
(IQR,
439–755)
CIQ
users
509
(429–744)
MM780G
(
p
=
0.26).
last
HbA1c
before
initiation
59.7
mmol/mol
in
60.1
0.88).
higher
than
(median
98.5
(97.4–98.0)%
vs.
96.5
(94.9–97.0)%,
<
0.001).
Time
range
(TIR,
3.9–10.0
mmol/L)
lower
(mean
68.9%
±
11.4%
73.7%
12.0%,
0.02)
as
tight
(TITR)
(glucose
3.9–7.8
(43.0%
12.2%
48.4%
12.7%,
0.01).
difference
TIR
(4.2
(95%
CI
1.0–7.5)%,
0.01)
TITR
(5.0
(1.4–8.6)%,
remained
statistically
significant
a
multiple
regression
model
controlling
various
baseline
variables.
absolute
rate
change
>
1.5
mmol/L/15
min
(9.4
7.2–13.3)%
7.4
(5.2–10.4)%,
Conclusions
system
but
TIR,
TITR,
rapid
system.
Language: Английский
The automated correction index (ACI), a novel report-derived metric correlated to glucose control and variability in patients with type 1 diabetes on advanced hybrid closed loop therapy
Andrea Tumminia,
No information about this author
G.M. Santoro,
No information about this author
Vittorio Oteri
No information about this author
et al.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 112173 - 112173
Published: April 1, 2025
This
study
aimed
to
correlate
the
parameters
of
advanced
hybrid
closed
loop
(AHCL)
function
glycometabolic
outcomes
in
a
cohort
patients
with
type
1
diabetes
(T1D)
using
different
AHCL
systems.
was
retrospective
cross-sectional
on
124
adult
(n
=
87)
and
pediatric
37)
correlating
total
daily
insulin
dose
(TDD),
basal
(TDBa)
bolus
(TDBo)
doses,
percentage
auto-bolus
out
(Automated
Correction
Index
-
ACI)
glycated
hemoglobin
(HbA1c)
sensor-derived
metrics.
The
ACI
only
AHCL-derived
parameter
directly
associated
HbA1c
(p
0.03)
time
above
range
(TAR180-250
mg/dL,
10-13.9
mmol/L,
p
<
0.01),
inversely
correlated
(TIR70-180
3.9-10
0.01).
Patients
30
%
showed
reduced
levels
(6.21
±
0.5
vs.
6.95
0.8,
0.02)
higher
probability
having
TIR
>
70
(OR
3.18,
CI
1.19-8.46,
coefficient
variation
(CV)
36
2.86,
1.07-8.27,
compared
those
≥
%.
could
represent
useful
easy-to-assess
metric
for
AHCL-treated
individuals
T1D.
In
our
an
better
glucose
control
variability.
Language: Английский
12-Month Time in Tight Range Improvement with Advanced Hybrid-Closed Loop System in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Laura Nigi,
No information about this author
Maria De Los Angeles Simon Batzibal,
No information about this author
Dorica Cataldo
No information about this author
et al.
Diabetes Therapy,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Sept. 30, 2024
Language: Английский
Enhanced Metabolic Control in a Pediatric Population with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using Hybrid Closed-Loop and Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Insulin Pump Treatments
Pediatric Reports,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
16(4), P. 1188 - 1199
Published: Dec. 14, 2024
Background:
Insulin
pumps
coupled
with
continuous
glucose
monitoring
sensors
use
algorithms
to
analyze
real-time
blood
levels.
This
allows
for
the
suspension
of
insulin
administration
before
hypoglycemic
thresholds
are
reached
or
adaptive
tuning
in
hybrid
closed-loop
systems.
longitudinal
retrospective
study
aims
real-world
glycemic
outcomes
a
pediatric
population
transitioning
such
devices.
Methods:
We
evaluated
children
type
1
diabetes
mellitus
(T1D)
admitted
Pediatric
Diabetes
Department
from
major
University
Hospital
Bucharest,
Romania,
who
transitioned
predictive
low-glucose
suspend
system
either
non-automated
multiple
daily
injections.
The
primary
outcome
was
assessing
change
glycated
hemoglobin
(HbA1c)
after
initiating
these
Secondary
analyzed
changes
metrics
90
days
prior
baseline
and
follow-up
visit.
Results:
51
were
included
(58.8%
girls),
mean
age
10.3
±
3.7
years,
duration
13.2
4.5
months.
parameters,
as
HbA1c
(6.9
0.7%
vs.
6.7
0.6%,
p
=
0.023),
time
range
(69.3
11.2%
76
9.9%,
<
0.001),
tight
(47.4
10.9%
53.7
10.7%,
below
(5.6
2.9%
3.5
1.9%,
above
(25
20.4
9.4%,
coefficient
variation
(37.9
4.8%
35.6
4.6%,
showed
significant
improvements.
Conclusions:
application
sensor-integrated
can
significantly
enhance
metabolic
control
populations,
minimizing
variations
mitigate
complications
enrich
quality
life.
Language: Английский