Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
25(9), P. 2048 - 2061
Published: Aug. 4, 2022
A
narrative
in
ecology
is
that
prey
modify
traits
to
reduce
predation
risk,
and
the
trait
modification
has
costs
large
enough
cause
ensuing
demographic,
trophic
ecosystem
consequences,
with
implications
for
conservation,
management
agriculture.
But
a
long
history
of
emphasising
quantifying
importance
an
ecological
process
ultimately
requires
evidence
linking
unmanipulated
field
patterns.
We
suspected
such
process-linked-to-pattern
(PLP)
studies
were
poorly
represented
risk
literature,
which
conflicts
confidence
often
given
effects.
reviewed
29
years
literature
revealed
there
are
well
over
4000
articles
on
Of
those,
349
examined
effects
fitness
measures
or
abundance
(i.e.,
non-consumptive
effects)
only
26
PLP
studies,
while
275
other
interacting
species
trait-mediated
indirect
35
studies.
narrowly
focused
taxonomically
included
three
patterns
abundance.
Before
concluding
widespread
influential
role
predation-risk
effects,
more
attention
must
be
observed
across
diverse
ecosystems.
Ecology Letters,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
27(6)
Published: June 1, 2024
Abstract
Human
activities
catalyse
risk
avoidance
behaviours
in
wildlife
across
taxa
and
systems.
However,
the
broader
ecological
significance
of
human‐induced
perception
remains
unclear,
with
a
limited
understanding
how
phenotypic
responses
scale
up
to
affect
population
or
community
dynamics.
We
present
framework
informed
by
predator–prey
ecology
predict
occurrence
non‐consumptive
effects
(NCE)
trait‐mediated
indirect
(TMIE)
anthropogenic
disturbances.
report
evidence
from
comprehensive
review
different
types
behavioural
physiological
changes
their
influence
on
vital
rates
parameters
wildlife.
Evidence
for
NCEs
TMIEs
is
mixed,
half
published
studies
finding
relationship
between
human
activities,
change
outcomes.
The
net
depend
mismatch
response
lethality
activity.
strong
research
biases
taxa,
systems,
disturbance
demographic
measures
prevent
unified
inference
about
prevalence
activities.
Coexistence
conservation
requires
additional
linking
Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
15(1)
Published: Jan. 1, 2025
ABSTRACT
Experiments
have
shown
that
predation‐risk
effects
on
prey
fitness
can
be
highly
contingent
environmental
conditions,
suggesting
a
potential
difficulty
in
generalizing
risk
abundance
natural
settings.
Rather
than
study
the
influence
of
particular
controlled
factor,
we
examine
problem
with
novel
approach.
We
examined
multiple
experiments
performed
under
similar
conditions.
Any
differences
would
typically
deemed
incidental,
is,
they
not
given
attention
methodology,
nor
presented
as
factors
affecting
results
or
inferences.
Therefore,
any
magnitude
and
direction
among
indicate
population
are
strongly
influenced
by
context
communities.
The
were
conducted
objectives,
measurables
implementation,
captured
much
complexity
systems
(e.g.,
diverse
assemblages
(≥
11
taxa)
over
generations).
Our
highlight
potentially
profound
dependence
effects:
density
some
zooplankton
species
varied
between
significant
negative
effect
one
experiment
to
positive
another,
whereas
other
showed
no
another.
review
mechanisms
could
underlie
having
opposite
same
prey.
findings
illustrate
observed
may
hold,
even
for
system.
Research Square (Research Square),
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 28, 2025
AbstractBackground
Behavioral
responses
of
prey
to
predation
risk
have
ecological
impacts
that
can
be
as
great
direct
mortality.
Risk
response
involves
either
behavioral
changes
or
spatial
avoidance,
but
it
is
not
clear
how
decide
between
these
strategies.
Theory
often
suggests
pair
risks
based
on
the
hunting
mode
(hunting
hypothesis),
may
ignore
prioritize
responding
most
lethal
predators
(lethality
hypothesis).
Furthermore,
respond
distribution
(risky
places
hypothesis)
only
during
periods
highest
times
Methods
To
test
hypotheses,
we
evaluated
white-tailed
deer
(Odocoileus
virginianus)
from
two
natural
mesopredators
and
human
sources
Specifically,
determined,
for
each
source
risk,
whether
responded
with
state
avoidance
this
behavior
changed
time
(diurnally
annually).
We
collared
tracked
40
female
29
male
deer.
determine
collected
data
coyotes
(Canis
latrans),
bobcats
(Lynx
rufus),
modification,
hunters,
roads.
used
hidden
Markov
models
(HMM)
covariate
impacted
probability
transitioning
states
selection
functions
(SSF)
spatially
avoided
covariate.
Results
Generally,
in
both
modification.
In
mesopredators,
consistently
shifted
slower
movement
states.
Spatial
modification
varied
depending
day.
During
daylight
hours,
selected
crepuscular
nighttime
period,
Conclusions
Space
use
was
strongly
related
more
humans,
providing
support
lethality
hypothesis.
Despite
prioritizing
state,
suggesting
still
important
behavior.
Finally,
temporal
patterns
align
other
studies
indicate
time-dependent,
further
highlight
complex
push-pull
relationship
modified
areas
wildlife.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: April 17, 2023
Predation
is
a
powerful
selection
pressure
that
shapes
predator–prey
interactions.
Due
to
long-term
interactions,
moths
have
developed
hearing
detect
the
echolocation
calls
of
bats.
This
allows
bats
impose
non-consumptive
effects
predation
on
moths.
However,
information
changes
in
growth,
development,
reproduction,
and
hormones
are
vulnerable
bat
limited.
In
this
study,
we
used
Spodoptera
litura
(Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae)
determine
risks
their
hormone
titers.
Our
results
showed
larvae
S.
increased
food
intake,
accelerated
development
larval
stages,
mortality
metamorphosis
failure,
had
smaller
body
size
under
risk
by
Additionally,
reproductive
activity
fecundity
decreased
adults
,
but
juvenile
titers
20-Ecdydysone
increased.
These
suggested
an
adaptive
response
at
cost
lower
survival
reproduction.
Finally,
found
different
responses
cues,
which
they
might
assess
magnitude
make
most
suitable
decision
for
highlight
importance
imposed
negatively
regulate
population
dynamics
findings
indicated
biological
control
bugs
using
promising
strategy.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
291(2032)
Published: Oct. 1, 2024
Anti-predator
behaviours
in
response
to
predator
cues
can
be
innate,
or
they
learned
through
prior
experience
and
remembered
over
time.
The
duration
strength
of
continued
anti-predator
behaviour
after
are
no
longer
present,
the
potential
for
an
enhanced
when
re-exposed
later
is
less
known
but
could
account
observed
variation
responses.
We
measured
carryover
effects
past
predation
exposure
learning
memory
marine
snail
Ecological Monographs,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 23, 2024
Abstract
The
removal
or
addition
of
a
predator
in
an
ecosystem
can
trigger
trophic
cascade,
whereby
the
indirectly
influences
plants
and/or
abiotic
processes
via
direct
effects
on
its
herbivore
prey.
A
cascade
operate
through
density‐mediated
indirect
effect
(DMIE),
where
reduces
density
predation,
trait‐mediated
(TMIE),
induces
trait
response
that
modifies
herbivore's
plants.
Manipulative
experiments
suggest
TMIEs
are
equivalent
more
important
driver
cascades
than
DMIEs.
Whether
this
applies
generally
nature
is
uncertain
because
few
studies
have
directly
compared
magnitudes
and
DMIEs
natural
unmanipulated
field
patterns.
TMIE
often
invoked
to
explain
textbook
involving
wolves
(
Canis
lupus
),
elk
Cervus
canadensis
aspen
Populus
tremuloides
)
northern
Yellowstone
National
Park.
This
hypothesis
posits
increase
recruitment
young
into
overstory
primarily
reduced
browsing
spatial
variation
wolf
predation
risk
rather
population
density.
To
test
hypothesis,
we
spatiotemporal
temporal
patterns
across
113
stands
over
21‐year
period
(1999–2019)
Only
2
10
indices
had
statistically
meaningful
aspen,
these
were
8–28
times
weaker
extent
was
attributable
our
results
wolf–elk–aspen
trait‐mediated.
aligns
with
alternative
other
actively
hunting
predators
broad
habitat
domains
cause
dominate
whenever
prey,
such
as
elk,
also
domain.
For
at
least
type
predator–prey
community,
study
suggests
risk‐induced
responses
be
abstracted
ignored
while
still
achieving
accurate
understanding
cascades.
Journal of Animal Ecology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
92(3), P. 690 - 697
Published: Jan. 4, 2023
Abstract
Predation
risk
effects
are
impacts
on
prey
caused
by
predators
that
do
not
include
consumption.
These
can
changes
in
behaviour,
physiology,
and
morphology
(i.e.
risk‐induced
trait
responses),
which
have
consequences
to
individual
fitness
population
dynamics
non‐consumptive
effects).
While
these
responses
(RITRs)
lower
as
compared
exposed
risk,
they
assumed
increase
the
presence
of
predators.
much
work
has
been
built
upon
this
assumption,
most
evidence
occurs
consumptive
experiments
where
values
consumed
unknown.
We
little
showing
individuals
with
a
greater
magnitude
RITR
survival.
Here,
we
tested
hypothesis
RITRs
survival
predators,
but
come
at
cost
growth.
using
Nucella
lapillus
Carcinus
maenas
predator
including
mussels
basal
resource
two‐phase
mesocosm
experimental
set‐up.
In
phase
1,
were
placed
into
either
control
or
treatment
(exposure
non‐lethal
)
for
28
days
their
behaviour
growth
measured.
2,
lethal
was
added
all
mesocosms
(non‐lethal
crabs
removed),
recorded
15
days.
At
(group)
level,
found
predation
1
had
significantly
aversion
(summed
score
risky
vs.
safe
behaviour)
level
(regardless
treatment),
scores
higher
2
when
predator,
came
This
study
provides
some
first
empirical
evidence,
both
group
testing
long‐held
assumption
behavioural
face
direct
predation,
prey.
results
add
our
growing
understanding
benefits
generally.
Ecology,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
104(6)
Published: April 9, 2023
Abstract
The
capacity
of
an
apex
predator
to
produce
nonconsumptive
effects
(NCEs)
in
multiple
prey
trophic
levels
can
create
considerable
complexity
cascading
interactions,
but
these
are
poorly
studied.
We
examined
such
a
model
food
web
where
the
(blue
crabs)
releases
chemical
cues
urine
that
affect
both
intermediate
consumer
(mud
crabs
seek
shelter)
and
basal
(oysters
induced
grow
stronger
shells).
Shelter
availability
presence
were
manipulated
laboratory
experiment
identify
patterns
species
interactions.
Then,
experimentally
uninduced
oysters
planted
across
high‐quality
low‐quality
habitats
with
varying
shelter
habitat
heterogeneity
determine
consistency
field.
Oyster
shell
thickening
response
blue
crab
generally
protected
from
mud
predation
field
environments
differed
intensity,
structural
complexity,
heterogeneity,
composition.
However,
NCEs
on
(greater
use
refugia)
opposed
oyster
interior
reefs
while
still
providing
survival
advantages
reef
edges
bare
substrates.
Thus,
combined
changing
movement
predators
morphological
defenses
complex,
predictable,
landscapes
ecotones
vary
complexity.
Generalist
feed
ubiquitous,
their
potential
propagating
simultaneously
different
must
be
quantified
understand
role
webs.
Journal of Animal Ecology,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Oct. 28, 2024
Abstract
Prey
can
use
several
information
sources
(cues)
to
assess
predation
risk
and
avoid
with
a
variety
of
behavioural
responses
(e.g.,
changes
in
activity,
foraging,
vigilance,
social
behaviour,
space
use,
reproductive
behaviour).
Direct
cues
produced
by
predators
indirect
from
environmental
features
or
conspecific
heterospecific
prey
generally
provide
different
types
about
risk.
Despite
widespread
interest
understanding
antipredator
direct
cues,
clear
general
pattern
relative
response
strength
across
taxa
environments
has
yet
emerge.
We
conducted
meta‐analysis
studies
(
N
=
113
articles
999
effect
sizes
taken
search
over
7500
articles)
testing
risk,
their
combination,
terrestrial
aquatic
ecosystems.
further
contrasted
if
effects
were
moderated
ecosystem
type
(terrestrial,
marine,
freshwater),
cue
source
(predator,
conspecific,
heterospecific,
feature),
sensory
modality
(visual,
auditory,
chemosensory).
Overall,
there
strong
on
behaviour.
found
that
responded
more
strongly
when
both
presented
together
compared
either
isolation,
which
was
driven
activity
levels
but
not
other
behaviours.
There
no
cues.
Responses
these
interactions
between
environment,
source,
visual
elicited
stronger
than
modalities,
chemosensory
those
predator
systems).
These
results
suggest
rather
broad
framework
the
specific
context
system
should
be
considered
tests
predictions
how
respond
elucidate
patterns
responses.