Frogs Call at a Higher Pitch in Traffic Noise DOI Creative Commons
Kirsten M. Parris,

Meah Velik-Lord,

Joanne M. A. North

et al.

Ecology and Society, Journal Year: 2009, Volume and Issue: 14(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2009

Male frogs call to attract females for mating and defend territories from rival males. Female of some species prefer lower-pitched calls, which indicate larger, more experienced Acoustic interference occurs when background noise reduces the active distance or over an acoustic signal can be detected. Birds are known at a higher pitch frequency in urban noise, decreasing low-frequency noise. Using Bayesian linear regression, we investigated effect traffic on advertisement calls two frogs, southern brown tree frog (Litoria ewingii) common eastern froglet (Crinia signifera). We found evidence that L. ewingii with average increase dominant 4.1 Hz/dB total size 123 Hz. This shift is smaller than observed birds, but still large enough detected by conspecific confer significant benefit caller. Mathematical modelling predicted 24% this size. Crinia signifera may also data required confident effect. Because innate rather learned, demonstrated represent evolutionary adaptation noisy conditions. The phenomenon calling could therefore constitute intriguing trade-off between audibility attractiveness potential mates. © 2009 author(s).

Language: Английский

Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments DOI
Mark A. Goddard, Andrew J. Dougill, Tim G. Benton

et al.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Journal Year: 2009, Volume and Issue: 25(2), P. 90 - 98

Published: Sept. 15, 2009

Language: Английский

Citations

1428

The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms DOI
Jesse R. Barber, Kevin R. Crooks, Kurt M. Fristrup

et al.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Journal Year: 2009, Volume and Issue: 25(3), P. 180 - 189

Published: Sept. 16, 2009

Language: Английский

Citations

932

A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish DOI
Hans Slabbekoorn,

Niels Bouton,

Ilse van Opzeeland

et al.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Journal Year: 2010, Volume and Issue: 25(7), P. 419 - 427

Published: May 18, 2010

Language: Английский

Citations

877

Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments DOI

Hélène Lowry,

Alan Lill, Bob B. M. Wong

et al.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal Year: 2012, Volume and Issue: 88(3), P. 537 - 549

Published: Dec. 24, 2012

Increased urbanization represents a formidable challenge for wildlife. Nevertheless, few species appear to thrive in the evolutionarily novel environment created by cities, demonstrating remarkable adaptability of some animals. We argue that individuals can adjust their behaviours new selection pressures presented cities should have greater success urban habitats. Accordingly, wildlife often exhibit differ from those rural counterparts, changes food and den preferences adjustments structure signals. Research suggests behavioural flexibility (or phenotypic plasticity) may be an important characteristic succeeding environments. Moreover, or might possess traits (a particular temperament) are inherently well suited occupying habitats, such as high level disturbance tolerance. This members less ‘plastic’ naturally timid temperament likely disadvantaged high‐disturbance environments consequently precluded colonizing towns.

Language: Английский

Citations

781

A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife DOI
Graeme Shannon, Megan F. McKenna, Lisa M. Angeloni

et al.

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal Year: 2015, Volume and Issue: 91(4), P. 982 - 1005

Published: June 26, 2015

ABSTRACT Global increases in environmental noise levels – arising from expansion of human populations, transportation networks, and resource extraction have catalysed a recent surge research into the effects on wildlife. Synthesising coherent understanding biological consequences this literature is challenging. Taxonomic groups vary auditory capabilities. A wide range sources exposure occur, many kinds responses been observed, ranging individual behaviours to changes ecological communities. Also, one several generated by activities, so researchers must contend with potentially confounding explanations for responses. Nonetheless, it clear that presents diverse threats species ecosystems salient patterns are emerging help inform future natural resource‐management decisions. We conducted systematic standardised review scientific published 1990 2013 anthropogenic wildlife, including both terrestrial aquatic studies. Research date has concentrated predominantly E uropean N orth merican rely vocal communication, approximately two‐thirds data set focussing songbirds marine mammals. The majority studies documented noise, altered behaviour mitigate masking, reduced abundance noisy habitats, vigilance foraging behaviour, impacts fitness structure This survey shows wildlife begin at 40 dBA , 20% papers below 50 . Our analysis highlights utility existing information concerning predicting potential outcomes implementing meaningful mitigation measures. Future directions would support more comprehensive predictions regarding magnitude severity include: broadening taxonomic geographical scope, exploring interacting stressors, conducting larger‐scale studies, testing approaches, standardising reporting acoustic metrics, assessing response noise‐source removal or mitigation. broad volume offers valuable assist scientists, industry, natural‐resource managers exposure.

Language: Английский

Citations

730

Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions DOI Creative Commons
Clinton D. Francis,

Catherine P. Ortega,

Alexander Cruz

et al.

Current Biology, Journal Year: 2009, Volume and Issue: 19(16), P. 1415 - 1419

Published: July 24, 2009

Language: Английский

Citations

639

What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science DOI
Bryan C. Pijanowski, Almo Farina, Stuart H. Gage

et al.

Landscape Ecology, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 26(9), P. 1213 - 1232

Published: April 30, 2011

Language: Английский

Citations

631

Advances in the Study of Behavior DOI

Daniel S. Lehrman,

Jay S. Rosenblatt,

Robert A. Hinde

et al.

Advances in the study of behavior, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. i - i

Published: Jan. 1, 2016

Language: Английский

Citations

621

Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change DOI

Ulla Tuomainen,

Ulrika Candolin

Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal Year: 2010, Volume and Issue: 86(3), P. 640 - 657

Published: Oct. 27, 2010

The initial response of individuals to human‐induced environmental change is often behavioural. This can improve the performance under sudden, large‐scale perturbations and maintain viable populations. also give additional time for genetic changes arise and, hence, facilitate adaptation new conditions. On other hand, maladaptive responses, which reduce individual fitness, may occur when encounter conditions that population has not experienced during its evolutionary history, decrease viability. A growing number studies find human disturbances induce behavioural both directly by altering factors influence fitness. Common causes responses are in transmission information, concentration endocrine disrupters, availability resources, possibility dispersal, abundance interacting species. Frequent alterations habitat choice, movements, foraging, social behaviour reproductive behaviour. Behavioural depend on genetically determined reaction norm individuals, evolves over generations. Populations first respond with plasticity, whereafter through innovations patterns within across generations, finally, evolution Only a restricted species show adaptations make them thrive severely disturbed environments. Hence, rapid diversity native species, while facilitating spread invasive highly plastic behaviours. Consequently, have profound effects distribution, adaptation, speciation extinction populations biodiversity. better understanding mechanisms their consequences could our ability predict

Language: Английский

Citations

593

How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review DOI Open Access
Caitlin R. Kight, John P. Swaddle

Ecology Letters, Journal Year: 2011, Volume and Issue: 14(10), P. 1052 - 1061

Published: Aug. 2, 2011

The scope and magnitude of anthropogenic noise pollution are often much greater than those natural predicted to have an array deleterious effects on wildlife. Recent work this topic has focused mainly behavioural responses animals exposed noise. Here, by outlining the acoustic stimuli animal physiology, development, neural function genetic effects, we advocate use a more mechanistic approach in environments. Specifically, summarise evidence hypotheses from research laboratory, domestic free-living biotic abiotic stimuli, studied both observationally experimentally. We hope that molecular- cellular-focused literature, which examines neuroendocrine system, reproduction metabolism, cardiovascular health, cognition sleep, audition, immune DNA integrity gene expression, will help researchers better understand results previous work, as well identify new avenues future Furthermore, given interconnectedness these physiological, cellular processes, their behaviour fitness, suggest can be learned integrative framework how why affected environmental

Language: Английский

Citations

569