Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Abstract
Experts
increasingly
refine
their
expertise
into
specialties
as
they
labour
in
and
around
organizations.
Yet,
previous
research
assumes
that
experts
are
organized
the
workplace
ways
passively
accommodate
or
mirror
pre‐existing
focuses
on
organizational
structures
codify
content
of
experts’
knowledge
an
encroachment.
Drawing
a
qualitative
field
study
aeronautical
organization's
engineering
unit,
this
paper
examines
chart
area
knowledge,
i.e.,
specialties.
The
findings
show
generative,
defining
contours
existing
catalysing
formation
new
ones
(
generating
).
However,
also
encode
criteria
implicitly
rank
some
forms
over
others,
thereby
reinforcing
status
hierarchies
grading
),
misalignment
across
renders
invisible
ghosting
By
showing
active
role
shaping
rather
than
simply
housing
it,
contributes
to
our
understanding
development
well
dynamics
access
resources
among
experts.
Further,
reveals
how
misalignments
multiple
may
impact
management
human
capital.
Organization Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
45(5), P. 719 - 744
Published: Feb. 10, 2024
Organizations
often
depend
on
experts
to
carry
out
complex
tasks
that
require
specialized
or
tacit
knowledge.
Yet,
organizations
want
increase
their
control
over
how
are
performed
and
thus
reduce
the
autonomy
of
experts.
In
past,
scholars
have
argued
had
ability
rebuff
organizational
attempts
them.
However,
in
an
era
with
increased
digitalization
centralization
organizations,
risk
losing
control.
How
react
when
facing
this
is
not
well
understood.
Thus,
study
seeks
improve
knowledge
as
digitalize
centralize
tasks.
To
do
so,
we
studied
a
large
energy
company,
which
sought
its
expert
engineers
by
implementing
change
included
digital
Using
in-depth
interviews,
portray
workers
reclaimed
using
three
micro-level
tactics
–
strategic
compliance
workaround,
legacy
reclaim
concealing
Based
these
findings,
our
paper
makes
contributions
literature
First,
provide
concept
‘stealth
work’,
outlining
can
otherwise
stripped
them
status
power.
Second,
highlight
may
be
nested
legacy,
use
digitalization,
finally,
engage
small
hacks
curb
usefulness
systems.
International Journal of the Legal Profession,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown, P. 1 - 24
Published: Feb. 13, 2025
This
paper
explores
the
impacts
of
machine
learning
(ML),
as
one
form
artificial
intelligence,
on
legal
work
by
examining
three
questions.
First,
it
considers
trajectories
and
how
ML
is
being
used
in
work.
Actually
existing
use
cases
are
examined
to
reveal
changing
Second,
questions
about
barriers
that
standing
way
different
trajectories,
with
more
rapid
adoption
tried
tested
forms
some
radical
changes
have
been
predicted
contingent
a
range
factors.
Third,
this
evolution
might
change
spaces
profession.
It
examines
both
what
do
reconfigure
role
lawyer
within
law
firms
other
spaces,
lawyers
respond
professional
project
adapts
challenge
intelligence.
Through
analysis
develops
concept
mediated
which
conceptualising
material
meaningful,
but
also
path
dependent
non-linear
thus
needs
be
understood
through
situated
enactment
practice
change.
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
61(6), P. 2724 - 2747
Published: Dec. 20, 2023
Abstract
The
future
of
theory
in
the
age
big
data
and
algorithms
is
a
frequent
topic
management
research.
However,
with
corporate
ownership
processing
capabilities
designed
for
profit
generation
increasing
rapidly,
we
witness
shift
from
scientific
to
‘corporate
empiricism’.
Building
on
this
debate,
our
‘Point’
essay
argues
that
theorizing
research
at
risk
now
.
Unlike
‘Counterpoint’
article,
which
portrays
bright
given
available
technological
opportunities,
are
concerned
about
researchers
increasingly
‘borrowing’
realm
(e.g.,
Google
et
al.)
build
or
test
theory.
Our
objection
borrowing
can
harm
due
how
scaling
effects,
proxy
measures
algorithmic
decision‐making
performatively
combine
undermine
validity
theories.
This
undermining
occurs
through
reducing
explanations,
while
technology
shapes
reality
profit‐predicting
rather
than
truth‐seeking
manner.
has
meta‐theoretical
implications
per
se,
as
well
political
debates
concerning
jurisdiction
legitimacy
knowledge
claims
Practically,
these
connect
responsibilities
researchers.
Journal of Management Studies,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 22, 2024
Abstract
Experts
increasingly
refine
their
expertise
into
specialties
as
they
labour
in
and
around
organizations.
Yet,
previous
research
assumes
that
experts
are
organized
the
workplace
ways
passively
accommodate
or
mirror
pre‐existing
focuses
on
organizational
structures
codify
content
of
experts’
knowledge
an
encroachment.
Drawing
a
qualitative
field
study
aeronautical
organization's
engineering
unit,
this
paper
examines
chart
area
knowledge,
i.e.,
specialties.
The
findings
show
generative,
defining
contours
existing
catalysing
formation
new
ones
(
generating
).
However,
also
encode
criteria
implicitly
rank
some
forms
over
others,
thereby
reinforcing
status
hierarchies
grading
),
misalignment
across
renders
invisible
ghosting
By
showing
active
role
shaping
rather
than
simply
housing
it,
contributes
to
our
understanding
development
well
dynamics
access
resources
among
experts.
Further,
reveals
how
misalignments
multiple
may
impact
management
human
capital.