From schools of thought to an ecology of practices: Categorizing circular economy's futures DOI Creative Commons
R. L. Nolan, Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae, Mike Michael

et al.

Journal of Industrial Ecology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 28(6), P. 1730 - 1742

Published: Oct. 8, 2024

Abstract In response to pressing societal challenges, scholars are increasingly focusing on research aimed at fostering sustainable futures. We contribute that discussion by theorizing the circular economy (CE) as an “ecology of practices.” The ecology practices concept helps make sense a developing field has been heavily practitioner‐driven. Through analysis diverse CE in analytical and operational contexts, we investigate roles, disciplinary influences, visions for future categorize their trajectories. Drawing sociology expectations, consider articulations practice, advocating inclusive dialogue among stakeholders collective engagement with ontological multiplicity shaping propose framework contributes broader debates organization management studies, emphasizing significance everyday futures beyond realm CE. so doing, focus unpicking how variously enacted way enabling collaboration might otherwise be hindered obligations.

Language: Английский

Imagining Desirable Futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour DOI Creative Commons
Ali Aslan Gümüşay, Juliane Reinecke

Organization Theory, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 5(1)

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

With the looming planetary emergency, future will be anything but an extension of past. Yet theorizing poses a peculiar problem. By definition, it is not present yet. The conundrum that requires conceptualizing and what (yet) observable does exist. Scholars have called for more impactful theories; we argue one powerful avenue to make organizational theories them future-oriented. In this article, call prospective theorizing, which define as future-oriented approach concerned with imagining desirable futures. First, involves shift along two dimensions (onto-epistemological axiological): from projection imagination, values-neutral values-led theorizing. Second, suggest promote practices might enable such shift, distinguishing between inputs, throughputs outputs Third, scientifically evaluable rigorous, develop notion speculative rigour, outline criteria generative potency, process transparency, plausible desirability plausibility. Overall, adds greater plurality in our towards (re)generative scholarship

Language: Английский

Citations

25

The Mission (Im)possible of Climate Action through Quixotic Institutional Work DOI Creative Commons
Giuseppe Delmestri, Elke Schuessler

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Feb. 22, 2025

Abstract The ‘iron cage’ of the (neo‐) liberal‐capitalist system prioritizes economic returns over climate protection. Formerly powerful nation‐states are subordinated to rule markets, whereas business elites have been freed from substantial responsibility for social and environmental concerns. While we agree in principle with Point that a reassertion state power may facilitate more decided action, our Counterpoint adopts cultural institutionalist perspective highlights embeddedness actors broader order. From this perspective, enact scripts while often lacking substantive agency towards protecting natural environment. Cultural change meanings, myths, practices, rituals is needed remodel currently dominant templates modern, ‘world society’, including script actorhood. We suggest notion ‘quixotic institutional work’ as way envisioning prefiguring alternative when both physical reality start showing cracks due crisis. Quixotic work follows logic appropriateness rather than consequential purposiveness, thus constitutes different, overlooked mocked, form systems relevant light forces maintaining an unsustainable world

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Future Making: Towards a Practice Perspective DOI Creative Commons
Matthias Wenzel, Laure Cabantous, Jochen Koch

et al.

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 20, 2025

Abstract Management scholars are increasingly interested in ‘future making’, observing and theorizing how organizational actors produce enact the yet‐to‐come. However, rapid growth of conversation runs risk emptying notion future making, calling into question its meaning relevance. In response to these concerns, our Point is that there value understanding making from a practice perspective. A perspective, we argue, empirically sufficiently open account for plurality open‐endedness futures amidst continual emergence interrelated crises, large‐scale challenges, intractable technologies. Thus, it reinforces relevance research on as central part contemporary life. At same time, four practice‐based dimensions elaborated this provide sufficient conceptual specificity discern what counts does not, thereby providing solid ground cumulative theory‐building area. Our extends management studies by substantiating examining articulating clarifying perspective directs scholarly attention important areas research.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Back to the Future? A Caution DOI Creative Commons
Alex Wright

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: March 26, 2025

Abstract This Counterpoint cautions that future making research treats the too simplistically and fails to acknowledge fundamental uncertainty inherent in all futures work. First, scholarship overlooks existing academic research, which similar concerns have been pursued, empirically conceptually, for years. Second, utopian are considered achievable if only actors a vision of what they wish create. Finally, most statements around grand challenges rely on little more than hope, failing account complex relationalities shaping them. I substantiate my argument by drawing scenario planning literature, Knightian uncertainty, anthropology research. also critique Point's call scholars adopt practice‐based approaches (Wenzel et al., forthcoming) their empirical inquiries, arguing ‘as Practice’ move management studies is yet achieve its aspirations. Additionally, caution against other this debate requires realization desired emancipatory (Comi forthcoming), as view restrictive broad deep theorizing emerge.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Prescriptive Theorizing to Tackle Societal Grand Challenges: Promises and Perils DOI Creative Commons
Christopher Wickert

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 61(4), P. 1683 - 1691

Published: Feb. 18, 2024

Abstract Descriptive and prescriptive theorizing are two sides of the same coin fundamentally complementary, if not reciprocal in their relationship. Both have a place management theorizing, yet this Point‐Counterpoint debate takes issue with how they currently performed research. The Point makes case for to help tackle societal grand challenges meaningfully impact practice, it offers recipe doing on solid normative foundation. Counterpoint cautions against that such prescriptions may calls more contextualized approaches. In introduction debate, I intend take conversation both provoked even further by highlighting some under‐emphasized but important theoretical avenues examine (un)intended consequences descriptive theorizing; namely mobilizing research performativity counter‐performativity.

Language: Английский

Citations

14

What is the Strategy of Strategy to Tackle Climate Change? DOI Creative Commons
Christopher Wickert, Daniel Muzio

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: June 6, 2024

Abstract To effectively tackle climate change, the strategic management enterprise needs to fundamentally reinvent itself. In their Point , Bansal, Durand, Kreutzer, Kunisch and McGahan forcefully argue for such a turnaround outline ‘new strategy’ paradigm that integrates constraints of planetary boundaries Earth systems not as an afterthought, but basis inquiry. This, however, doesn't come without fierce contestation, shown by Counterpoint Foss Klein further Davis DeWitt. this introduction Point‐Counterpoint debate on we contestation is largely due what call three epistemic fault lines cut through how strategy scholars understand devise possible solutions, assume relationship between theories reality. We specify these connect them important avenues future research expand conversation about change.

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Transforming Management Education: Insights from Social‐Ecological Systems and Social Innovation Research DOI Creative Commons
Laura A. Colombo

Journal of Management Studies, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Nov. 17, 2024

Abstract It is clear that contemporary management education (ME) needs to be transformed tackle complex social‐ecological crises effectively. However, the concept of transformation often ill‐defined in context ME; while there also a lack understanding about what concrete trajectories (also called scaling pathways) are available educators. This conceptual paper adopts systems lens shed light on basics (the why, what, where, when and who); combined with social innovation provide more clarity transformation's practical specificity how). Rooted vision ME aimed at cultivating flourishing (i.e. civic ME), this integrates different theoretical lenses assert possibility of–and outline for–transformation business school. work contributes developing approach proposing multiple pathways support ME. highlights stands crossroads: educators could passively wait until forced by unintended crossing tipping points; or deliberately collectively navigate it. Ultimately, emerges from delicate interplay structure inescapable structural barriers) agency intentional transformative actions).

Language: Английский

Citations

2

From schools of thought to an ecology of practices: Categorizing circular economy's futures DOI Creative Commons
R. L. Nolan, Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae, Mike Michael

et al.

Journal of Industrial Ecology, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 28(6), P. 1730 - 1742

Published: Oct. 8, 2024

Abstract In response to pressing societal challenges, scholars are increasingly focusing on research aimed at fostering sustainable futures. We contribute that discussion by theorizing the circular economy (CE) as an “ecology of practices.” The ecology practices concept helps make sense a developing field has been heavily practitioner‐driven. Through analysis diverse CE in analytical and operational contexts, we investigate roles, disciplinary influences, visions for future categorize their trajectories. Drawing sociology expectations, consider articulations practice, advocating inclusive dialogue among stakeholders collective engagement with ontological multiplicity shaping propose framework contributes broader debates organization management studies, emphasizing significance everyday futures beyond realm CE. so doing, focus unpicking how variously enacted way enabling collaboration might otherwise be hindered obligations.

Language: Английский

Citations

1