PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
18(3), P. e0278694 - e0278694
Published: March 15, 2023
Vaccine
is
the
cost-effective
and
reliable
public
health
intervention
to
combat
emerging
COVID-19
pandemic.
The
vaccination
considered
safe
effective
at
any
stage
of
pregnancy;
however,
pregnant
women
show
more
vaccine
hesitation
than
general
population.
This
study
aims
assess
women's
awareness,
perception,
acceptability
attending
antenatal
clinics.An
institutional-based
cross-sectional
analytical
design
was
used
acceptance
associated
factors
among
between
Feb-1
March-30-2022
clinics
Bharatpur
Chitwan
using
systematic
random
sampling.
A
semi-structured
interview
schedule
collect
data
from
644
respondents.
Collected
were
analysed
descriptive
inferential
statistics
like
Pearson
chi-square
test
logistic
regression
analysis.The
found
be
22%
ethnicity
(AOR
=
1.826;
95%
CI
1.215-2.745),
education
level
1.773;
95%CI
1.025-3,068;),
history
infection
3.63;
1.323-9.956;),
number
child
5.021;
1.989-12.677;),
trimester
(week
pregnancy)
2.437;
1.107-5.366)
perception
2.152;
1.109-4.178)
statistically
significant
for
mother.In
this
study,
low
levels
found.
Several
influential
occupation,
infection,
pregnancies,
week
gestation,
attitude
women.
Everyone
needs
get
herd
immunity
reduce
infection.
But
hesitancy
one
threats
rollout
successful
pandemic
mitigation.
Therefore,
properly
disseminating
information
removing
misperceptions
about
necessary
raise
acceptance.
Tropical Medicine & International Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
26(10), P. 1303 - 1313
Published: Aug. 9, 2021
The
aim
of
this
study
was
to
assess
acceptance
COVID-19
vaccination
and
the
willingness
pay
(WTP)
for
it,
investigate
associated
factors
among
pregnant
women
in
Vietnam.
Expert Review of Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
21(10), P. 1443 - 1454
Published: July 12, 2022
Introduction
Pregnant
and
breastfeeding
women
are
at
an
increased
risk
of
severe
illness
from
COVID-19.
Despite
this,
low
vaccination
coverages
reported
in
this
population
sub-group.Areas
covered
The
purpose
study
is
to
estimate
the
proportion
pregnant
expressing
hesitation
COVID-19
vaccine
worldwide.
Forty-six
studies
were
included,
selected
scientific
articles
available
three
databases
between
1
January
2020
6
February
2022.
rate
among
was
48.4%
(95%CI=43.4–53.4%).
In
a
sub
analysis
by
period,
it
40.0%
(95%CI=31.6–46.6%)
considering
surveys
administered
2020,
58.0%
(95%CI=48.9–66.9%)
first
semester
2021,
38.1%
(95%CI=25.9–51.2%)
second
2021.
main
reasons
for
lack
information
about
vaccination,
opinion
that
unsafe,
fear
adverse
events.Expert
Available
evidence
literature
has
shown
fighting
resistance
harsh
too
slow
as
process,
rapidity
unpredictability
pandemic.
Health
education
should
be
provided
order
improve
willingness
community,
especially
those
with
lower
levels
education.
Reproductive Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(1)
Published: March 24, 2022
Vaccination
is
one
of
the
most
reliable
interventions
against
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19).
Although
pregnant
women's
attitudes
toward
COVID-19
vaccination
are
well
studied,
husbands'
views
for
these
women
have
not
been
surveyed.
We
aimed
to
determine
rates
and
associated
factors
accepting
during
pregnancy
among
Thai
their
spouses
evaluate
actual
rate
women.A
prospective
survey
was
conducted
at
a
tertiary
care
center
in
Bangkok,
Thailand.
A
total
176
woman/husband
dyads
who
attended
our
antenatal
clinic
between
1
July
2021
30
September
were
consecutively
recruited
evaluations
pregnancy.
After
delivery,
data
on
extracted
from
hospital's
electronic
database.After
exclusion
five
with
prepregnancy
vaccination,
171
male
partners
included.
The
60.8%
61.4%,
respectively.
Multivariate
analysis
showed
that
having
husband
favored
his
wife
independently
vaccine
acceptance
(adjusted
odds
ratio
4.82;
95%
confidence
interval
2.34,
9.94).
However,
safety
an
factor
husband's
willingness
vaccinated
12.56;
2.35,
67.18).
88.3%.Although
modest,
being
high.Vaccination
important
tool
fight
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
In
this
study,
we
investigated
spouses.
enrolled
also
evaluated.
2021.
results
61.4%
husbands
had
Having
significant
women,
whereas
predictor
husband’s
majority
(96.2%)
accepted
On
other
hand,
76.1%
initially
reluctant
be
ultimately
received
vaccines
88.3%.
Given
physicians,
hospital
administrators,
policymakers
should
focus
those
show
hesitancy
or
refusal
implement
intensive
because
there
possibility
change
if
they
more
knowledge
gain
trust
vaccines.
Health Promotion Perspectives,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(1), P. 21 - 35
Published: April 30, 2023
Background:
Although
mass
vaccination
is
considered
one
of
the
most
effective
public
health
strategies
during
pandemic,
in
COVID-19
era,
many
people
vaccines
unnecessary
and,
or
doubted
effectiveness
vaccine.
This
review
aimed
to
tabulate
cognitive
causes
hesitancy,
which
may
help
policymakers
overcome
barriers
vaccinations
future
pandemics.
Methods:
For
this
systematic
review,
studies
pertaining
vaccine
hesitancy
published
up
June
2022
were
retrieved
from
six
online
databases
(Cochrane
Library,
Google
Scholar
Medline
through
PubMed,
Scopus,
and
Web
Science).
Inclusion
criteria
conducted
on
who
had
a
delay
accepting
refusing
vaccines,
reported
impact
determinants
written
English
timeframe
2020–2022.
Results:
initially
reviewed
1171
records.
From
these
91
articles
met
inclusion
criteria.
The
hesitation
rate
was
29.72%
average.
identified
several
influencing
hesitancy.
Lack
confidence
complacency
frequent
factors
that
predicted
Conclusion:
prevailing
for
indicated
using
initiative
communication
would
be
determinant
factor
building
people’s
trust
pandemic
vaccinations.
BMJ Open,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
13(2), P. e066367 - e066367
Published: Feb. 1, 2023
Background
Pregnant
women,
foetuses
and
infants
are
at
risk
of
infectious
disease-related
complications.
Maternal
vaccination
is
a
strategy
developed
to
better
protect
pregnant
women
their
offspring
against
morbidity
mortality.
Vaccines
influenza,
pertussis
recently
also
COVID-19
widely
recommended
for
women.
Yet,
there
still
significant
amount
hesitation
towards
maternal
policies.
Furthermore,
contradictory
messages
circulating
social
media
impact
vaccine
confidence.
Objectives
This
scoping
review
aims
reveal
how
impacted
confidence
in
lactating
Additionally,
this
studied
the
role
plays
creating
opinions
these
target
groups.
Eligibility
criteria
Articles
published
between
23
November
2018
18
July
2022
that
linked
objectives
were
included.
Reviews,
articles
not
focusing
on
group,
abstracts,
describing
outcomes
infection/COVID-19
excluded.
Sources
evidence
The
PubMed
database
was
searched
select
articles.
Search
terms
used
pregnancy,
lactation,
vaccination,
hesitancy,
media.
Charting
methods
Included
abstracted
synthesised
by
one
reviewer.
Verification
done
second
Disagreements
addressed
through
discussion
reviewers
other
researchers.
Results
generally
less
likely
accept
compared
with
non-pregnant
non-nursing
main
reason
refuse
safety
concerns.
A
positive
link
detected
willingness
acceptance
vaccines
during
pregnancy.
internet
identified
as
important
information
sources
vaccination.
Discussion
conclusion
Vaccine
hesitancy
remains
an
issue,
expressing
need
effective
interventions
increase
coverage.
uptake
unclear.
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
57(1)
Published: Dec. 1, 2021
Abstract
Introduction
Increasing
the
rate
of
vaccination
is
crucial
in
combating
COVID-19
pandemic.
However,
a
survey
112,888
Indonesians
found
that
only
64.8%
were
willing
to
be
vaccinated,
with
7.6%
refusing
all
vaccines
and
27.6%
are
unsure.
Several
factors
related
this
vaccine
hesitancy
refusal,
such
as
cognitive
reflection,
trust
authoritative
figures,
personality
traits.
This
study
aims
identify
psychological
determinants
other
associated
refusal.
was
cross-sectional
data
collection
done
March
2021
using
questionnaire.
We
collected
demographic
data,
respondents'
stance
on
vaccination,
well
their
psychology
measurement.
IBM
SPSS
26.0
(Statistical
Package
for
Social
Sciences,
Corp.,
Armonk,
NY,
USA)
used
statistical
analysis.
Results
The
190
respondents
study.
There
165
(86.8%)
who
belong
“vaccine
acceptance”,
while
25
hesitance”
or
resistance.”
Multivariate
analysis
shows
frequency
tests
(
p
=
0.03),
smoking
status
0.035),
agreeableness
trait
0.001),
government
0.04)
scientist
0.049)
significantly
two
population.
Conclusion
affect
acceptance.
parties
should
consider
these
when
adjusting
future
policies
controlling
pandemic
increasing
rate.
PLoS ONE,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
17(9), P. e0272273 - e0272273
Published: Sept. 28, 2022
The
COVID-19
pandemic
has
led
to
the
death
of
many
people
worldwide.
World
Health
Organization
(WHO)
declared
vaccine
resistance
as
one
greatest
health
threats
in
world
even
before
epidemic.
aim
this
study
was
evaluate
acceptance
pregnant
women.We
performed
systematic
review
and
meta-analysis
accordance
with
PRISMA
guidelines.
We
applied
standard
search
strategy
PubMed/Medline,
Web
Science
(ISI),
Scopus,
Direct,
Cochrane
Library,
EMBASE,
EBSCO
databases,
Google
Scholar
engine.
Heterogeneity
between
studies
relatively
high
therefore
meta-analyses
were
based
on
random
effects
model
95%
CI
using
STATA
version
16.In
16
articles
a
sample
size
19219
women,
estimated
53.46%
(95%CI:
47.64%-59.24%).
Subgroup
analysis
continent
(p
=
0.796),
data
collection
method
0.450)
meta-regression
month
(P<0.001),
only
significant
study.
effect
some
variables
such
graviad
(OR
1.02
[95%CI:
0.90-1.16]),
maternal
age
0.93-1.11])
history
influenza
vaccination
0.87
0.71-1.06])
evaluated,
which
not
significant.The
prevalence
women
53.46%,
much
lower
than
general
vaccination.
Therefore,
necessary
interventions
should
be
taken
increase
vaccine,
address
safety
concerns
educate
about
it.