Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium DOI Open Access
Michael Goggins, Kasper A. Overbeek, Randall E. Brand

et al.

Gut, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 69(1), P. 7 - 17

Published: Oct. 31, 2019

The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium met in 2018 to update its consensus recommendations for management individuals with increased risk pancreatic cancer based on family history or germline mutation status (high-risk individuals).A modified Delphi approach was employed reach among a multidisciplinary group experts who voted statements. Consensus considered reached if ≥75% agreed disagreed.Consensus 55 main goals surveillance (to identify high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions and T1N0M0 cancer) remained unchanged. Experts that those familial risk, should start no earlier than age 50 10 years youngest relative cancer, but were split whether at 55. Germline ATM carriers one affected first-degree are now eligible surveillance. preferred tests endoscopic ultrasound MRI/magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, how alternate these modalities. Annual is recommended absence concerning lesions. Main areas disagreement included be performed hereditary pancreatitis, indeterminate lesions.Pancreatic selected high-risk detect early precursors, research setting by teams centres appropriate expertise. Until more evidence supporting available, benefits, risks costs need additional evaluation.

Language: Английский

A view on drug resistance in cancer DOI Open Access
Neil Vasan, José Baselga, David M. Hyman

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 575(7782), P. 299 - 309

Published: Nov. 13, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

2065

Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications DOI Open Access
Wenya Linda Bi, Ahmed Hosny, Matthew B. Schabath

et al.

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 69(2), P. 127 - 157

Published: Feb. 5, 2019

Abstract Judgement, as one of the core tenets medicine, relies upon integration multilayered data with nuanced decision making. Cancer offers a unique context for medical decisions given not only its variegated forms evolution disease but also need to take into account individual condition patients, their ability receive treatment, and responses treatment. Challenges remain in accurate detection, characterization, monitoring cancers despite improved technologies. Radiographic assessment most commonly visual evaluations, interpretations which may be augmented by advanced computational analyses. In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) promises make great strides qualitative interpretation cancer imaging expert clinicians, including volumetric delineation tumors over time, extrapolation tumor genotype biological course from radiographic phenotype, prediction clinical outcome, impact treatment on adjacent organs. AI automate processes initial images shift workflow management whether or administer an intervention, subsequent observation yet envisioned paradigm. Here, authors review current state applied describe advances 4 types (lung, brain, breast, prostate) illustrate how common problems are being addressed. Although studies evaluating applications oncology date have been vigorously validated reproducibility generalizability, results do highlight increasingly concerted efforts pushing technology use future directions care.

Language: Английский

Citations

1416

Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology DOI
Ellen Heitzer, Imran S. Haque,

Charles E. S. Roberts

et al.

Nature Reviews Genetics, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 20(2), P. 71 - 88

Published: Nov. 8, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

1167

Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma DOI
Michael Lim, Yuanxuan Xia, Chetan Bettegowda

et al.

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 15(7), P. 422 - 442

Published: April 11, 2018

Language: Английский

Citations

1119

Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA DOI Creative Commons

M.C. Liu,

Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Eric A. Klein

et al.

Annals of Oncology, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 31(6), P. 745 - 759

Published: March 30, 2020

Early cancer detection could identify tumors at a time when outcomes are superior and treatment is less morbid. This prospective case-control sub-study (from NCT02889978 NCT03085888) assessed the performance of targeted methylation analysis circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect localize multiple types across all stages high specificity.

Language: Английский

Citations

1079

Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer DOI
Stephen Cristiano, Alessandro Leal, Jillian Phallen

et al.

Nature, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 570(7761), P. 385 - 389

Published: May 29, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

1066

Liquid biopsy enters the clinic — implementation issues and future challenges DOI
Michail Ignatiadis, George W. Sledge, Stefanie S. Jeffrey

et al.

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 18(5), P. 297 - 312

Published: Jan. 20, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

864

Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease — latest advances and implications for cure DOI
Klaus Pantel, Catherine Alix‐Panabières

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 16(7), P. 409 - 424

Published: Feb. 22, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

863

Enhanced detection of circulating tumor DNA by fragment size analysis DOI Open Access
Florent Moulière, Dineika Chandrananda, Anna Piskorz

et al.

Science Translational Medicine, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 10(466)

Published: Nov. 7, 2018

Selective sequencing or in silico analysis for differences DNA fragment size can improve the detection of circulating tumor DNA.

Language: Английский

Citations

849

The emerging roles of circRNAs in cancer and oncology DOI
Lasse S. Kristensen, Theresa Jakobsen, Henrik Hager

et al.

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 19(3), P. 188 - 206

Published: Dec. 15, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

805