International Journal of Management Reviews,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
24(4), P. 480 - 500
Published: Jan. 17, 2022
Abstract
The
societal
vision
of
sustainable
development
changes
both
the
context
businesses
and
expectations
that
management
should
contribute
to
solving
sustainability
problems
beyond
organizational
boundaries.
Companies
are
influenced
by
macro‐level
developments
such
as
new
environmental
regulations
meso‐level
social
industry
standards
guidelines.
At
same
time,
companies
expected
transformations
markets
at
grand
greenhouse
effect.
These
increase
change
information
needs
managers
accounting.
This
paper
provides
a
systematic
literature
review
how
accounting
(SMA)
addresses
links
with
organization's
contexts
contributions
analysis
questions
conventional
assumption
an
internal
scope
for
SMA.
It
recognises
this
problematic
constricting
in
and,
instead,
proposes
multi‐level
Context,
Action‐formation
Transformative
(CAT)
framework
further
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
27(8), P. 1518 - 1546
Published: Feb. 1, 2021
Abstract
Nature‐based
solutions
(NbS)—solutions
to
societal
challenges
that
involve
working
with
nature—have
recently
gained
popularity
as
an
integrated
approach
can
address
climate
change
and
biodiversity
loss,
while
supporting
sustainable
development.
Although
well‐designed
NbS
deliver
multiple
benefits
for
people
nature,
much
of
the
recent
limelight
has
been
on
tree
planting
carbon
sequestration.
There
are
serious
concerns
this
is
distracting
from
need
rapidly
phase
out
use
fossil
fuels
protect
existing
intact
ecosystems.
also
expansion
forestry
framed
a
mitigation
solution
coming
at
cost
rich
biodiverse
native
ecosystems
local
resource
rights.
Here,
we
discuss
promise
pitfalls
framing
its
current
political
traction,
present
recommendations
how
get
message
right.
We
urge
policymakers,
practitioners
researchers
consider
synergies
trade‐offs
associated
follow
four
guiding
principles
enable
provide
society:
(1)
not
substitute
rapid
fuels;
(2)
wide
range
land
in
sea,
just
forests;
(3)
implemented
full
engagement
consent
Indigenous
Peoples
communities
way
respects
their
cultural
ecological
rights;
(4)
should
be
explicitly
designed
measurable
biodiversity.
Only
by
following
these
guidelines
will
design
robust
resilient
urgent
sustaining
nature
together,
now
into
future.
Science,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
368(6497)
Published: June 18, 2020
Risks
to
mitigation
potential
of
forests
Much
recent
attention
has
focused
on
the
trees
and
mitigate
ongoing
climate
change
by
acting
as
sinks
for
carbon.
Anderegg
et
al.
review
growing
evidence
that
forests'
is
increasingly
at
risk
from
a
range
adversities
limit
forest
growth
health.
These
include
physical
factors
such
drought
fire
biotic
factors,
including
depredations
insect
herbivores
fungal
pathogens.
Full
assessment
quantification
these
risks,
which
themselves
are
influenced
climate,
key
achieving
science-based
policy
outcomes
effective
land
management.
Science
,
this
issue
p.
eaaz7005
Global Change Biology,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
27(7), P. 1328 - 1348
Published: Jan. 25, 2021
Abstract
Urgent
solutions
to
global
climate
change
are
needed.
Ambitious
tree‐planting
initiatives,
many
already
underway,
aim
sequester
enormous
quantities
of
carbon
partly
compensate
for
anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions,
which
a
major
cause
rising
temperatures.
However,
tree
planting
that
is
poorly
planned
and
executed
could
actually
increase
emissions
have
long‐term,
deleterious
impacts
on
biodiversity,
landscapes
livelihoods.
Here,
we
highlight
the
main
environmental
risks
large‐scale
propose
10
golden
rules,
based
some
most
recent
ecological
research,
implement
forest
ecosystem
restoration
maximizes
rates
both
sequestration
biodiversity
recovery
while
improving
These
as
follows:
(1)
Protect
existing
first;
(2)
Work
together
(involving
all
stakeholders);
(3)
Aim
maximize
meet
multiple
goals;
(4)
Select
appropriate
areas
restoration;
(5)
Use
natural
regeneration
wherever
possible;
(6)
species
biodiversity;
(7)
resilient
plant
material
(with
genetic
variability
provenance);
(8)
Plan
ahead
infrastructure,
capacity
seed
supply;
(9)
Learn
by
doing
(using
an
adaptive
management
approach);
(10)
Make
it
pay
(ensuring
economic
sustainability
project).
We
focus
design
long‐term
strategies
tackle
crises
support
livelihood
needs.
emphasize
role
local
communities
sources
indigenous
knowledge,
benefits
they
derive
from
successful
reforestation
restores
functioning
delivers
diverse
range
products
services.
While
there
no
simple
universal
recipe
restoration,
crucial
build
upon
currently
growing
public
private
interest
in
this
topic,
ensure
interventions
provide
effective,
sinks
people.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
36(1), P. 20 - 28
Published: Sept. 18, 2020
The
United
Nations
(UN)
recently
declared
2021
to
2030
the
Decade
on
Ecosystem
Restoration.
Against
this
background,
we
review
recent
social-ecological
systems
research
and
summarize
key
themes
that
could
help
improve
ecosystem
restoration
in
dynamic
social
contexts.
relate
resilience
adaptability,
stewardship
navigation
of
change,
relational
values,
coevolution
human
ecological
systems,
long-range
connections,
leverage
points
for
transformation.
We
recommend
two
cross-cutting
new
foci;
namely:
(i)
post
hoc
cross-sectional
assessments
projects;
(ii)
transdisciplinary
'living
labs'
accompany
projects
as
they
unfold.
With
global
agendas
increasingly
taking
a
perspective,
recasting
endeavor
offers
exciting
opportunities
both
practice.
Ecological Applications,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
31(8)
Published: Aug. 2, 2021
We
review
science-based
adaptation
strategies
for
western
North
American
(wNA)
forests
that
include
restoring
active
fire
regimes
and
fostering
resilient
structure
composition
of
forested
landscapes.
As
part
the
review,
we
address
common
questions
associated
with
climate
realignment
treatments
run
counter
to
a
broad
consensus
in
literature.
These
following:
(1)
Are
effects
exclusion
overstated?
If
so,
are
unwarranted
even
counterproductive?
(2)
Is
forest
thinning
alone
sufficient
mitigate
wildfire
hazard?
(3)
Can
prescribed
burning
solve
problem?
(4)
Should
management,
including
thinning,
be
concentrated
wildland
urban
interface
(WUI)?
(5)
wildfires
on
their
own
do
work
fuel
treatments?
(6)
primary
objective
reduction
assist
future
firefighting
response
containment?
(7)
Do
under
extreme
weather?
(8)
scale
problem
too
great?
ever
catch
up?
(9)
Will
planting
more
trees
change
wNA
forests?
And
(10)
is
post-fire
management
needed
or
ecologically
justified?
Based
our
scientific
evidence,
range
proactive
actions
justified
necessary
keep
pace
changing
climatic
declining
heterogeneity
after
severe
wildfires.
Science-based
options
use
managed
wildfire,
burning,
coupled
mechanical
as
consistent
land
allocations
conditions.
Although
some
current
models
averse
short-term
risks
uncertainties,
long-term
environmental,
social,
cultural
consequences
primarily
grounded
suppression
well
documented,
highlighting
an
urgency
invest
intentional
restoration
regimes.