BMC Health Services Research,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
24(1)
Published: March 6, 2024
Abstract
Background
Supported
wellbeing
centres
established
during
the
COVID-19
pandemic
provided
high
quality
rest
spaces
and
access
to
peer-to-peer
psychological
first
aid
for
healthcare
workers
(HCWs).
The
were
well
accessed
valued
by
HCWs,
but
their
relationship
with
job-related
factors
is
not
established.
aim
of
this
study
was
explore
between
centre
use,
HCWs
(job
stressfulness,
job
satisfaction,
presenteeism,
turnover
intentions).
Methods
Secondary
analysis
data
from
819
an
acute
hospital
trust
who
completed
online
survey
in
April-July
2020,
as
part
COVID-Well
study.
Measures
included
Warwick
Edinburgh
Mental
Wellbeing
Scale,
four
single-item
global
measures
presenteeism
intentions.
ANCOVA
models
regression
analyses
conducted
on
these
data.
Results
had
lower
(β
=
0.12,
p
<
.001),
higher
stressfulness
−
0.22,
satisfaction
0.39,
.001)
younger
age
0.09,
.002).
Centre
use
associated
irrespective
stressfulness.
Those
reporting
(M
3.30,
SE
0.04)
than
those
did
report
3.06,
(F(1,
791)
18.65,
.001,
η
2
0.02).
significantly
intentions
(B
0.30,
.13;
Wald
2.26;
odds
0.74),
while
stress
showed
significant
effects.
Conclusions
Accessing
particularly
presenteeism.
Therefore,
may
have
greatest
respite
restoration
present
at
work
optimal
health.
Younger
disproportionately
affected
terms
wellbeing,
targeted
support
population
needed.
Strategies
decrease
maximise
are
urgently
required.
Healthcare
organisations
should
provide
long-term,
a
systems-wide
approach
improving
workforce
health
wellbeing.
Heliyon,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
7(7), P. e07393 - e07393
Published: June 26, 2021
BackgroundDuring
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
health
professionals
who
are
at
frontline
of
this
crisis
have
been
facing
extreme
psychological
disorders.
This
research
aims
to
provide
an
overall
scenario
prevalence
depression,
anxiety,
stress,
as
well
insomnia
and
inspect
changes
in
these
over
time
by
analyzing
existing
evidence
during
pandemic.MethodsA
systematic
search
was
performed
on
March
30,
2021,
PubMed,
MEDLINE,
Google
Scholar
databases,
Web
Science.
To
assess
heterogeneity,
Q-test,
I2
statistics,
Meta
regression
for
publication
bias,
Eggers's
test
funnel
plot
were
used.
The
random-effect
model
subgroup
analysis
due
significant
heterogeneity.ResultsAmong
eighty-three
eligible
studies
final
synthesis,
69
(n
=
144649)
assessed
depression
37.12%
(95%
CI:
31.80–42.43),
75
147435)
reported
anxiety
41.42%
36.17–46.54),
41
82783)
stress
44.86%
36.98–52.74),
21
33370)
enunciated
43.76%
35.83–51.68).
severity
mental
problems
among
increased
January
2020
September
2020.LimitationsA
level
heterogeneity
found
measurement
tools
across
studies.ConclusionsTherefore,
it
is
emergency
develop
interventions
that
can
protect
vulnerable
groups
like
professionals.
BMC Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
21(1)
Published: May 12, 2021
Abstract
Background
The
Covid-19
pandemic
has
imposed
extraordinary
strains
on
healthcare
workers.
But,
in
contrast
with
acute
settings,
relatively
little
attention
been
given
to
those
who
work
mental
health
settings.
We
aimed
characterise
the
experiences
of
working
English
NHS
secondary
services
during
first
wave
pandemic.
Methods
design
was
a
qualitative
interview-based
study.
conducted
semi-structured,
remote
(telephone
or
online)
interviews
35
members
staff
from
(inpatient
and
community)
England.
Analysis
based
constant
comparative
method.
Results
Participants
reported
wide-ranging
changes
organisation
care
nature
response
pandemic,
including
pausing
all
deemed
be
“non-essential”,
deployment
across
new
unfamiliar
roles,
moves
working.
quality
participants’
life
impaired
by
increasing
levels
daily
challenge
associated
trying
provide
constrained
circumstances,
problems
forging
ways
remotely,
constraints
ability
access
informal
support.
were
confronted
difficult
dilemmas
relating
clinical
decision-making,
prioritisation
care,
compromises
perform
therapeutic
function
their
roles.
Other
centred
balance
risks
controlling
infection
need
for
human
contact.
Many
features
moral
injury
linked
perceived
failures
providing
level
that
they
felt
service
users
needed.
They
sometimes
sought
compensate
deficits
through
increased
advocacy,
taking
additional
tasks,
making
exceptions,
but
this
led
further
personal
strain.
experienced
feelings
grief,
helplessness,
isolation,
distress,
burnout.
These
compounded
poor
communication
about
feeling
could
not
take
time
off
because
potential
impact
others.
Some
poorly
supported
organisations.
Conclusions
Mental
workers
faced
multiple
adversities
highly
consequential
wellbeing.
findings
can
help
identifying
targets
European journal of psychotraumatology,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(2)
Published: Oct. 18, 2022
Background:
Moral
injury
is
defined
as
the
strong
emotional
and
cognitive
reactions
following
events
which
clash
with
someone's
moral
code,
values
or
expectations.
During
COVID-19
pandemic,
increased
exposure
to
Potentially
Morally
Injurious
Events
(PMIEs)
has
placed
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
at
risk
of
injury.
Yet
little
known
about
lived
experience
cumulative
PMIE
how
NHS
staff
respond
this.Objective:
We
sought
rectify
this
knowledge
gap
by
qualitatively
exploring
experiences
perspectives
clinical
frontline
who
responded
COVID-19.Methods:
recruited
a
diverse
sample
30
HCWs
from
CHECK
study
cohort,
for
single
time
point
qualitative
interviews.
All
participants
endorsed
least
one
item
on
9-item
Injury
Scale
(MIES)
[Nash
et
al.,
2013.
Psychometric
evaluation
scale.
Military
Medicine,
178(6),
646–652]
six
month
follow
up.
Interviews
followed
semi-structured
guide
were
analysed
using
reflexive
thematic
analysis.Results:
described
being
routinely
exposed
ethical
conflicts,
created
exacerbations
pre-existing
systemic
issues
including
inadequate
staffing
resourcing.
found
that
experienced
range
mental
health
symptoms
primarily
related
perceptions
institutional
betrayal
well
feeling
unable
fulfil
their
duty
care
towards
patients.Conclusion:
These
results
suggest
multi-facetted
organisational
strategy
warranted
prepare
exposure,
promote
opportunities
resolution
associated
prevent
disengagement.HIGHLIGHTS
Clinical
have
been
an
accumulation
potentially
morally
injurious
throughout
betrayed
both
government
leaders
provide
patients.HCWs
significant
adverse
impact
health,
anxiety
depression
sleep
disturbance.Most
interviewed
believed
change
within
was
necessary
excess
distress.
Journal of Mental Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
32(5), P. 890 - 898
Published: March 8, 2023
Potentially
morally
injurious
events
(PMIEs)
can
negatively
impact
mental
health.
The
COVID-19
pandemic
may
have
placed
healthcare
staff
at
risk
of
moral
injury.To
examine
the
PMIE
on
wellbeing.Twelve
thousand
nine
hundred
and
sixty-five
(clinical
non-clinical)
were
recruited
from
18
NHS-England
trusts
into
a
survey
exposure
wellbeing.PMIEs
significantly
associated
with
adverse
health
symptoms
across
staff.
Specific
work
factors
experiences
injury,
including
being
redeployed,
lack
PPE,
having
colleague
die
COVID-19.
Nurses
who
reported
disorders
more
likely
to
report
all
forms
PMIEs
than
those
without
(AOR
2.7;
95%
CI
2.2,
3.3).
Doctors
only
betrayal
events,
such
as
breach
trust
by
colleagues
2.7,
1.5,
4.9).A
considerable
proportion
NHS
in
both
clinical
non-clinical
roles
during
pandemic.
Prospective
research
is
needed
identify
direction
causation
between
injury
disorder
well
continuing
monitor
longer
term
outcomes
PMIEs.
About
Us:
The
Ontario
COVID-19
Science
Advisory
Table
is
a
group
of
scientific
experts
and
health
system
leaders
who
evaluate
report
on
emerging
evidence
relevant
to
the
pandemic,
inform
Ontario's
response.Our
mandate
provide
weekly
summaries
for
Health
Coordination
Province
Ontario,
integrating
information
from
existing
tables,
universities
agencies,
best
global
evidence.The
summarizes
its
findings
public
in
Briefs.The
Mental
Working
Group
comprises
with
specific
expertise
mental
health.Their
spans
children
youth,
adults
geriatric
populations,
care
providers,
women's
health,
among
LGBTQ
persons,
Black,
Indigenous,
other
racialized
COVID-19.The
evaluates
related
maintaining
during
COVID-19,
burden
disease
interventions
individuals
across
lifespan,
including
adolescents,
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Dec. 17, 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic
poses
unprecedented
challenges
to
healthcare
workers
worldwide.
This
study
sought
estimate
the
prevalence
of
depression,
anxiety,
and
stress
among
in
Saudi
Arabia,
identify
factors
associated
with
these
psychological
disorders.
Current Opinion in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
35(5), P. 311 - 316
Published: July 18, 2022
Mental
health
(MH)
problems
among
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
have
the
potential
to
impact
negatively
on
capacity
of
systems
respond
effectively
COVID-19.
A
thorough
understanding
factors
that
degrade
or
promote
MH
HCWs
is
needed
design
and
implement
suitable
intervention
strategies
support
wellbeing
this
population.MH
were
elevated
prior
COVID-19
pandemic.
Accumulating
evidence
indicates
public
crisis
has
had
a
disproportionately
negative
specialised
populations,
including
HCWs.
Literature
from
pandemics
suggests
adverse
effects
pandemic
are
likely
persist
in
aftermath
crisis.
Primary
secondary
risk
for
outcomes
been
identified
should
be
considered
when
implementing
interventions
protect
HCWs.The
impacted
by
pandemic,
which
having
detrimental
influence
response
Protecting
both
during
beyond
remain
top
priority,
with
particular
emphasis
multifaceted
aim
balance
psychological
needs
individual
organisational-level
could
targeted
their
wellbeing.
BMJ Leader,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
7(3), P. 178 - 181
Published: March 10, 2023
Burn-out
is
a
long-standing
problem
among
healthcare
workers
(HCWs)
and
leads
to
poorer
quality
less
safe
patient
care,
lower
satisfaction,
absenteeism
reduced
workforce
retention.
Crises
such
as
the
pandemic
not
only
generate
new
challenges
but
also
intensify
existing
workplace
stresses
chronic
shortages.
As
COVID-19
continues,
global
health
burnt-out
under
immense
pressure,
with
multiple
individual,
organisational
system
drivers.In
this
article,
we
examine
how
key
leadership
approaches
can
facilitate
mental
support
for
HCWs
identify
strategies
that
are
critical
supporting
well-being
during
pandemic.We
identified
12
at
individual
levels
crisis.
These
may
inform
responses
future
crises.Governments,
organisations
leaders
must
invest
deliver
long-term
measures
value,
retain
preserve
high-quality
healthcare.