ZEAMAP, a Comprehensive Database Adapted to the Maize Multi-Omics Era DOI Creative Commons
Songtao Gui, Linfeng Yang, Jianbo Li

et al.

iScience, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 23(6), P. 101241 - 101241

Published: June 1, 2020

As one of the most extensively cultivated crops, maize (Zea mays L.) has been studied by researchers and breeders for over a century. With advances in high-throughput detection various omics data, wealth multi-dimensional multi-omics information accumulated its wild relative, teosinte. Integration this potential to accelerate genetic research generate improvements agronomic traits. To end, we constructed ZEAMAP, comprehensive database incorporating multiple reference genomes, annotations, comparative genomics, transcriptomes, open chromatin regions, interactions, high-quality variants, phenotypes, metabolomics, maps, mapping loci, population structures, populational DNA methylation signals within inbred lines. ZEAMAP is user friendly, with ability interactively integrate, visualize, cross-reference different datasets.

Language: Английский

Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato DOI Creative Commons
Michael Alonge, Xingang Wang, Matthias Benoit

et al.

Cell, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 182(1), P. 145 - 161.e23

Published: June 17, 2020

Language: Английский

Citations

639

Designing Future Crops: Genomics-Assisted Breeding Comes of Age DOI Creative Commons
Rajeev K. Varshney, Abhishek Bohra, Jianming Yu

et al.

Trends in Plant Science, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 26(6), P. 631 - 649

Published: April 21, 2021

Availability of reference genomes and genome-wide surveys on comprehensive diversity panels pave the way to associate allelic variation with phenotypes.Methods are now available evaluate genetic worth vast resources archived in gene banks streamline application these crop improvement programs.Precise genome editing technologies concert enhanced trait architectures enable innovative solutions engineer complex variation.High-throughput phenotyping methods beginning alleviate challenge accurate, precise, large-scale measurements plant performance.Optimized speed breeding protocols remain crucial accelerating advance when applied genomic approaches.Sustaining gains from seeks fast-tracking exploitation minor effect alleles, accumulation favorable purging deleterious alleles. Over past decade, genomics-assisted (GAB) has been instrumental harnessing potential modern characterizing exploiting for germplasm enhancement cultivar development. Sustaining GAB future (GAB 2.0) will rely upon a suite new approaches that fast-track targeted manipulation creating novel facilitate their rapid efficient incorporation programs. Genomic strategies optimize beneficial alleles be indispensable designing crops. In coming decades, 2.0 is expected play role more climate-smart cultivars higher nutritional value cost-effective timely manner. Ensuring sustainable increase global food production finite an increasing human population great challenge. wake enormous advances, 15 years back we proposed concept [1.Varshney R.K. et al.Genomics-assisted improvement.Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10: 621-630Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (392) Google Scholar]. Interestingly, proposition coincided release high-quality sequence assembly rice (Oryza sativa), representing first any [2.International Rice Genome Sequencing Project The map-based genome.Nature. 436: 793-800Crossref (2692) Subsequently, array tools have become applications (Table 1). Parallel advancements technologies, designs based multi-parent synthetic populations were implemented discovery impart benefits both association mapping linkage analysis, such as diversity, controlled structure, greater power quantitative locus (QTL) detection improved accuracy [3.Kover P.X. al.A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross fine-map traits Arabidopsis thaliana.PLoS Genet. 2009; 5e1000551Crossref (361) Scholar,4.Yu J. al.Genetic design statistical nested maize.Genetics. 2008; 178: 539-551Crossref (627) Scholar].Table 1Genome Resources Ten Topmost Food CropsaAbbreviation: n.d., no data.CropArea (mha)bSource: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.Production (mmt)bSource: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.Assembled (Mb)SNP arrayGenomic databasesGene expression atlasPan-genomeWheat(Triticum aestivum)215.9765.714 500[61.International Wheat Consortium (IWGSC) Shifting limits wheat research using fully annotated genome.Science. 2018; 361eaar7191Crossref (891) Scholar]Wheat 9K iSelect [62.Cavanagh C.R. al.Genome-wide comparative uncovers multiple targets selection hexaploid landraces cultivars.Proc. Natl. Acad. U. S. A. 2013; 110: 20Crossref (601) 90K [63.Wang Y. al.Simultaneous three homoeoalleles bread confers heritable resistance powdery mildew.Nat. Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 947-951Crossref (839) 660K Axiom HD genotyping [64.Winfield M.O. al.High-density SNP its secondary tertiary pool.Plant 2016; 14: 1195-1206Crossref (44) breeder's (Affymetrix 35K) [65.Allen A.M. al.Characterization breeders' suitable high-throughput accessions (Triticum aestivum).Plant 2017; 15: 390-401Crossref (0) Variation Database (WGVD) [66.Wang al.WGVD: integrated web-database selective signatures.Database. 2020; 2020baaa090Crossref Scholar]WheatExp [67.Pearce al.WheatExp: RNA-seq database polyploid wheat.BMC Biol. 2015; 299Crossref (59) Scholar]18 Cultivars [68.Montenegro J.D. al.The pangenome wheat.Plant 90: 1007-1013Crossref (111) Scholar]Maize(Zea mays)197.21148.42048[69.Schnable P.S. B73 maize genome: complexity, dynamics.Science. 326: 1112-1115Crossref (2568) Scholar]MaizeSNP50 BeadChip (llumina Infinium 50K) [70.Ganal M.W. large (Zea mays L.) array: development genotyping, compare genome.PLoS One. 2011; 6e28334Crossref Scholar]Subset MaizeSNP50 (Illumina 3K) [71.Rousselle al.Study essential derivation maize: III. Selection evaluation panel single nucleotide polymorphism loci use European North American germplasm.Crop 55: 1170-1180Crossref (3) Scholar]Axiom 600K [72.Unterseer powerful tool analysis high density 600 K array.BMC Genomics. 823Crossref 55K [73.Xu C. al.Development 55 coverage molecular breeding.Mol. Breed. 37: Scholar]MaizeSNPDB [74.Zhou W. al.MaizeSNPDB: retrieve SNPs among 1210 lines.Comput. Struct. 2019; 17: 1377-1383Crossref Scholar]36 207 Genes [75.Hoopes G.M. al.An updated atlas reveals organ-specific stress-induced genes.Plant 97: 1154-1167Crossref (29) Scholar]503 Inbred lines [76.Hirsch C.N. al.Insights into pan-genome pan-transcriptome.Plant Cell. 26: 121-135Crossref (226) Scholar]Rice(Oryza sativa)162755.4371[2.International Scholar]Affymetrix (1M) [77.McCouch S.R. assays rice.Breed. 2010; 60: 524-535Crossref (130) Scholar]RiceSNP50 [78.Chen analyses provide biochemical insights natural metabolism.Nat. 46: 714-721Crossref (293) Scholar]RICE6K 6K) [79.Yu H. whole-genome (RICE6K) rice.Plant 12: 28-37Crossref (101) Scholar] OsSNPnks [80.Singh N. al.Single-copy 50 chip studies rice.Sci. Rep. 5: 11600Crossref (34) Affymetrix GeneChip (44K) [81.Tung platform dissecting phenotype genotype associations spp.).Rice. 3: 205-217Crossref Scholar]SNP-Seek [82.Alexandrov al.SNP-Seek derived 3000 genomes.Nucleic Acids Res. 43: D1023-D1027Crossref (188) Scholar][83.Wang L. dynamic covering entire life cycle 61: 752-766Crossref (248) Scholar,84.Cao P. Oligonucleotide Array Database: expression.Rice. 2012; 17Crossref Scholar]66 Accessions [85.Zhao Q. al.Pan-genome highlights extent cultivated wild rice.Nat. 50: 278-284Crossref (149) Scholar]Soybean(Glycine max)120.5333.7973[86.Schmutz al.Genome palaeopolyploid soybean.Nature. 463: 7278Crossref (2570) Scholar]SoySNP50K [87.Song SoySNP50K, high-density soybean.PLoS 8e54985Crossref (292) Scholar]SoyaSNP180K [88.Lee Y.G. al.Development, validation soybean array.Plant 81: 625-636Crossref (30) Scholar]SoyKB [89.Joshi T. al.Soybean knowledge base (SoyKB): web resource integration translational genomics breeding.Nucleic 42: D1245-D1252Crossref Scholar]55 616 [90.Libault M. transcriptome model Glycine max, plants.Plant 63: 86-99PubMed Scholar]26 [91.Liu soybeans.Cell. 182: 162-176Abstract (42) Scholar]Barley(Hordeum vulgare)51.1158.94980 [92.International Barley A physical, functional barley 491: 711-716Crossref (978) Scholar]; 4790 [93.Mascher chromosome conformation capture ordered 544: 427-433Crossref (553) Scholar]9K Illumina Custom Genotyping [94.Comadr`an al.Natural homolog Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed spring growth habit environmental adaptation barley.Nat. 44: 1388-1392Crossref (284) 50K [95.Bayer M.M. 50k array.Front. 8: 1792Crossref (74) Scholar]BarleyVarDB [96.Tan al.BarleyVarDB: variation.Database. 2020baaa091Crossref (1) Scholar]21 439 [97.Druka seed through development.Funct. Integr. 2006; 6: 202-211Crossref Scholar]20 [98.Jayakodi hidden legacy mutation breeding.Nature. 588: 284-289Crossref (6) Scholar]Sorghum(Sorghum bicolor)4057.9739 [99.Paterson A.H. Sorghum bicolor diversification grasses.Nature. 457: 551-556Crossref (1906) Scholar]3K [100.Bekele W.A. al.High-throughput sorghum: resequencing screening 11: 1112-1125Crossref (37) Scholar]SorGSD [101.Luo al.SorGSD: sorghum database.Biotechnol. Biofuels. 9: 6Crossref (21) Scholar]27 577 [102.Shakoor genotype-specific profiles vegetative tissues grain, sweet bioenergy sorghums.BMC 35Crossref (45) Scholar]n.d.Rapeseed(Brassica napus)3470.5849.7 [103.Chalhoub B. al.Early allopolyploid evolution post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed 345: 950-953Crossref (1027) Scholar]International (60K) [104.Clarke W.E. ancestral diploid species optimised markers allotetraploid genome.Theor. Appl. 129: 1887-1899Crossref Scholar]BnaGVD [105.Yan al.BnaGVD: rapeseed (Brassica napus).Plant Cell Physiol. 2021; (Published online January 5, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcaa169)Crossref Scholar]101 040 [106.Chao al.BrassicaEDB: crops.Int. Mol. 21: 5831Crossref (2) Scholar]8 [107.Song J.M. al.Eight reveal architecture ecotype differentiation napus.Nat. Plants. 34-45Crossref (61) Scholar]Dry beans(Phaseolus vulgaris)3328.9473 [108.Schmutz common bean dual domestications.Nat. 707-713Crossref (602) Scholar]BARCBean6K_1, BARCBean6K_2, BARCBean6K_3 [109.Song al.SNP assay map construction, anchoring sequence, other bean.G3 (Bethesda). 2285-2290Crossref (73) Scholar]PhaseolusGenes (http://phaseolusgenes.bioinformatics.ucdavis.edu/)[110.O'Rourke J.A. RNA-Seq bean.BMC 866Crossref (68) Scholar]n.d.Groundnut(Arachis hypogaea)29.648.82540 [111.Bertioli D.J. sequences Arachis duranensis ipaensis, ancestors peanut.Nat. 48: 438-446Crossref (372) 2540 [112.Zhuang peanut provides insight legume karyotypes, domestication.Nat. 51: 865-876Crossref (64) Scholar]'Axiom_Arachis' 58K [113.Pandey M.K. Axiom_Arachis 58 genetics groundnut.Sci. 7: 40577Crossref Scholar]n.d.57 344 Transcripts [114.Sinha al.Arachis hypogaea fastigiata subspecies groundnut accelerate applications.Plant 18: 2187-2200Crossref Scholar]n.d.Sugarcane(Saccharum officinarum)26.71949.3800–900 (Monoploid)76K [115.Yang X. al.Mining variations representative sugarcane accessions.BMC 594Crossref (17) 84K [116.Balsalobre T.W.A. al.GBS-based dosage QTL allow mining yield-related sugarcane.BMC 72Crossref Sugarcane100K [117.You construction identification.Theor. 13: 2829-2845Crossref Scholar]n.d.n.d.n.d.a Abbreviation: data.b Source: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Open table tab characterization underlying important agronomic processes. this article, discuss products delivered opportunities latest innovations offer sustain recent decades [i.e., or (GB)]. We highlight broad create selection. years, expedited timelines progress across range species, than 130 publicly bred different crops [5.Vogel Marker-Assisted Selection: Biotechnology Breeding Without Genetic Engineering. Greenpeace International, 2014Google majority noteworthy by variety programs include having elevated levels against diseases bacterial blight blast rust aestivum). Among biotic stresses, tolerance submergence, salinity, drought remained key target GAB. similar impact witnessed quality several (Box 1).Box 1Key Products Delivered Genomics-Assisted Some CropsGAB Biotic Stress ResistanceSimply inherited under influence strong-effect QTL, disease resistance, most preferred introgression approaches. 'Improved Samba Mahsuri' (ISM) carrying (BB) (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) genes (Xa21, xa13, xa5) [132.Sundaram R.M. al.Marker assisted Mahsuri, elite indica variety.Euphytica. 160: 411-422Crossref Two major (Magnaporthe (Pi-2 Pi-54) BB (Xa38) further stacked 'ISM' [133.Madhavi K.R. background elite, resistant variety, Mahsuri.Euphytica. 212: 331-342Crossref (8) Scholar,134.Yugander al.Incorporation Xa38 Improved Mahsuri.PLoS 13e0198260Crossref (14) 'Pusa Basmati 1' pyramided two (Pi2+Pi5) (Pi54+Pi1+Pita) [135.Khanna near-isogenic gene(s) rice.Theor. 128: 1243-1259Crossref (57) version 1121' 6' (Pi2 Pi54) (xa13 Xa21) others [136.Ellur al.Improvement varieties marker backcross breeding.Plant 242: 330-341Crossref Scholar].A DNA improving stress response quality-related (http://maswheat.ucdavis.edu/protocols/index.htm). Examples versions hard red winter (HRWW) 'Jagger' 'Overley' Yr40/Lr57 Lr58, respectively [137.Kuraparthy V. PCR marker-assisted transfer leaf stripe Lr57 Yr40 wheats.Crop 49: 120-126Crossref 'HUW510' Lr34 [138.Vasistha al.Molecular validates spot blotch wheat.Euphytica. 213: 262Crossref (4) pearl millet, 'HHB 67-improved' represented downy mildew 67', which was released commercial cultivation India 2005 (see Rai al. [139.Rai K.N. al.Adaptation germplasm-derived parent millet.Plant Resour. Newsl. 154: 20-24Google Scholar]). Other success stories demonstrating cereal included eyespot (Rhizoctonia cerealis) Pch1, recessive rym4/ rym5 yellow mosaic viruses, mlo (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei).Unlike cereals, grain lagged behind terms product delivery; however, genotyping-based selections increasingly embraced For instance, pyramiding cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) races (2, 3, 14) at USDA-ARS led registration high-yielding genotypes 'JTN 5503', 5303', 'DS 880', 5109' [140.Arelli al.Registration yielding JTN5503.Crop 2723-2724Crossref Scholar, 141.Arelli conventional JTN-4307 nematodes fungal diseases.J. Regist. 192-199Crossref 142.Arelli P.R. Young L.D. Inheritance PI 567516C LY1 infecting cv. Hartwig.Euphytica. 165: 1-4Crossref (19) 143.Smith USDA, ARS, National Program. Germplasm Information Network, 2010Google Similarly, Varshney [144.Varshney al.Marker-assisted region improve popular (Arachis L.).Theor. 127: 1771-1781Crossref (93) obtained set 20 hypogaea) showing yield increased (Puccinia arachidis) transferring susceptible ('ICGV 91114', 'JL 24', 'TAG 24'). chickpea, simultaneous wilt (Fusarium oxysporum ciceris) (Ascochyta rabiei) shown chickpea C 214 [145.Varshney backcrossing introgress Fusarium race 1 Ascochyta 214, chickpea.Plant Genome. 1-11Crossref (77) Scholar].GAB Abiotic ToleranceThe immense utility abiotic exemplified controlling submergence (sub1), salt (Saltol), introgressed them. Sub1 'Swarna', India, within short span 2 [146.Neeraja approach developing submergence-tolerant cultivars.Theor. 2007; 115: 767-776Crossref (276) Vietnam, nearly ten cross OM1490/IR64-Sub1 90–99% revival field conditions [147.Lang N.T. (MAB) Mekong delta.Omonrice. 11-21Google Higher survival rates mega-varieties, including 'Samba (BPT 5204), 'CR 1009' 'Thadokkham (TDK1) Laos, 'BR 11' Bangladesh also evident following QTL-introgression Hasan [148.Hasan backcrossing: useful method improvement.Biotechnol. Equip. 29: 237-254Crossref Scholar]).The Saltol various countries, candidate 1121', 6', 'AS 996', 'BT 7', 'Bacthom 'Q5DB', 'BRRI-Dhan 49' Waziri [149.Waziri al.Saltol salinity rice.Austin. Bioeng. 1-5Google Successful Sub1, Saltol, (Pi2, Pi9), gall midge (Orseolia (Gm1, Gm4) Tapaswini', pyramid (Xa 4, xa5, highly 'Tapaswini', demonstrated [150.Das G. al.Improved Tapaswini four six genes/QTLs, resistance/tolerance stresses 2413Crossref Scholar].Similar above-mentioned examples tolerance, major-effect QTLs 'Sabitri' (a yet drought-susceptible Nepal) yielded variants good type rain-fed areas Nepal countries South Asia [151.Dixit develop drought-tolerant Sabitri, Nepal.Euphytica. 184Crossref (11) availability stable effects facilitated well. 'QTL hotspot' 372' pulse 10216' (https://icar.org.in/content/development-two-superior-chickpea-varieties-genomics-assisted-breeding).GAB Quality TraitsOne breakthroughs plants involves introduction Gpc-B1 (grain protein content) tetra caused creation GPC viz. USA ('Farnum', 'Lassik', 'Westmore', 'Desert King-High Protein'), Canada ('Lillian', 'Somerset', 'Burnside'), Australia (improved 'Wyalkatchem', 'Gladius', 'VR 1128') Mitrofanova Khakimova [152.Mitrofanova O.P. A.G. New content.Russ. 477-487Crossref references therein). variant badh2 Wx basmati 'Manawthukha' (an Myanmar) resulted fragrance intermediate amylose content [153.Yi cooking Myanmar Manawthukha.Field Crops 113: 178-186Crossref By reducing cycles up 3 Chu [154.Chu oleic peanut.Plant 4: 110-117Crossref developed 'Tifguard High O/L' acid resistance. More recently, oil combined late (Phaeoisariopsis personata Berk. & Curtis) [155.Janila fatty desaturase mutant (ahFAD2A ahFAD2B) enhances low containing genotypes.Plant 203-213Crossref (66) Scholar,156.Yaduru Indian foliar SSR backcrossing.Crop 1-15Crossref (5) Resistance Simply bl

Language: Английский

Citations

372

De Novo Domestication: An Alternative Route toward New Crops for the Future DOI Creative Commons
Alisdair R. Fernie, Jianbing Yan

Molecular Plant, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 12(5), P. 615 - 631

Published: April 15, 2019

Current global agricultural production must feed over 7 billion people. However, productivity varies greatly across the globe and is under threat from both increased competitions for land climate change associated environmental deterioration. Moreover, increase in human population size dietary changes are putting an ever greater burden on agriculture. The majority of this met by cultivation a very small number species, largely locations that differ their origin domestication. Recent technological advances have raised possibility de novo domestication wild plants as viable solution designing ideal crops while maintaining food security more sustainable low-input Here we discuss how discovery multiple key genes alongside development technologies accurate manipulation several target simultaneously renders route toward future.

Language: Английский

Citations

330

Revolutions in agriculture chart a course for targeted breeding of old and new crops DOI Open Access
Yuval Eshed, Zachary B. Lippman

Science, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 366(6466)

Published: Sept. 5, 2019

Growing more and better food Increasing human populations demand productive agriculture, which in turn relies on crop plants adjusted for high-yield systems. Eshed Lippman review how genetic tuning of the signaling systems that regulate flowering plant architecture can be applied to crops. Crops flower sooner might adaptable regions with shorter growing seasons, compact shapes facilitate agricultural management. The universality these hormone facilitates application a range crops, from orphan teff well-known wheat. Science , this issue p. eaax0025

Language: Английский

Citations

236

Accelerating Climate Resilient Plant Breeding by Applying Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence DOI Creative Commons
Antoine Harfouche, Daniel Jacobson, David Kainer

et al.

Trends in biotechnology, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 37(11), P. 1217 - 1235

Published: June 21, 2019

Language: Английский

Citations

202

Designing future crops: challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture DOI Open Access
Zhixi Tian, Jiawei Wang, Jiayang Li

et al.

The Plant Journal, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 105(5), P. 1165 - 1178

Published: Dec. 1, 2020

Summary Crop production is facing unprecedented challenges. Despite the fact that food supply has significantly increased over past half‐century, ~8.9 and 14.3% people are still suffering from hunger malnutrition, respectively. Agricultural environments continuously threatened by a booming world population, shortage of arable land, rapid changes in climate. To ensure ecosystem security, there need to design future crops for sustainable agriculture development maximizing net minimalizing undesirable effects on environment. The projects, recently launched National Natural Science Foundation China Chinese Academy Sciences (CAS), aim develop roadmap customized using cutting‐edge technologies Breeding 4.0 era. In this perspective, we first introduce background missions these projects. We then outline strategies crops, such as improvement current well‐cultivated de novo domestication wild species redomestication cultivated crops. further discuss how ambitious goals can be achieved recent new integrative omics tools, advanced genome‐editing tools synthetic biology approaches. Finally, summarize related opportunities challenges

Language: Английский

Citations

188

A quantitative genomics map of rice provides genetic insights and guides breeding DOI
Xin Wei, Jie Qiu, Kaicheng Yong

et al.

Nature Genetics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 53(2), P. 243 - 253

Published: Feb. 1, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

168

Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review DOI Creative Commons

Marlee R. Labroo,

Anthony J. Studer, Jessica Rutkoski

et al.

Frontiers in Genetics, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 12

Published: Feb. 24, 2021

Although hybrid crop varieties are among the most popular agricultural innovations, rationale for breeding is sometimes misunderstood. Hybrid slower and more resource-intensive than inbred breeding, but it allows systematic improvement of a population by recurrent selection exploitation heterosis simultaneously. Inbred parental lines can identically reproduce both themselves their F

Language: Английский

Citations

163

Smart breeding driven by big data, artificial intelligence, and integrated genomic-enviromic prediction DOI Creative Commons
Yunbi Xu, Xingping Zhang, Huihui Li

et al.

Molecular Plant, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 15(11), P. 1664 - 1695

Published: Sept. 7, 2022

The first paradigm of plant breeding involves direct selection-based phenotypic observation, followed by predictive using statistical models for quantitative traits constructed based on genetic experimental design and, more recently, incorporation molecular marker genotypes. However, performance or phenotype (P) is determined the combined effects genotype (G), envirotype (E), and environment interaction (GEI). Phenotypes can be predicted precisely training a model data collected from multiple sources, including spatiotemporal omics (genomics, phenomics, enviromics across time space). Integration 3D information profiles (G-P-E), each with multidimensionality, provides both tremendous opportunities great challenges. Here, we review innovative technologies breeding. We then evaluate multidimensional that integrated strategy, particularly envirotypic data, which have largely been neglected in collection are nearly untouched construction. propose smart scheme, genomic-enviromic prediction (iGEP), as an extension genomic prediction, multiomics information, big technology, artificial intelligence (mainly focused machine deep learning). discuss how to implement iGEP, models, environmental indices, factorial structure cross-species prediction. A strategy proposed prediction-based crop redesign at macro (individual, population, species) micro (gene, metabolism, network) scales. Finally, provide perspectives translating into gain through integrative platforms open-source initiatives. call coordinated efforts institutional partnerships, technological support.

Language: Английский

Citations

157

Photosynthesis research under climate change DOI
Sajad Hussain, Zaid Ulhassan, Marián Brestič

et al.

Photosynthesis Research, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 150(1-3), P. 5 - 19

Published: July 7, 2021

Language: Английский

Citations

124