Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 109, P. 110266 - 110266
Published: Feb. 6, 2021
Language: Английский
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 109, P. 110266 - 110266
Published: Feb. 6, 2021
Language: Английский
The Lancet, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 392(10161), P. 2299 - 2312
Published: Nov. 1, 2018
Language: Английский
Citations
2972Bipolar Disorders, Journal Year: 2018, Volume and Issue: 20(2), P. 97 - 170
Published: March 1, 2018
The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) previously published treatment guidelines bipolar disorder in 2005, along with international commentaries subsequent updates 2007, 2009, 2013. last two were collaboration the International Society Bipolar Disorders (ISBD). These 2018 CANMAT ISBD Treatment Guidelines represent significant advances field since full edition was including to diagnosis management as well new research into pharmacological psychological treatments. have been translated clear easy use recommendations first, second, third- line treatments, consideration given levels of evidence efficacy, clinical support based on experience, consensus ratings safety, tolerability, treatment-emergent switch risk. New these guidelines, hierarchical rankings created first second- treatments recommended acute mania, depression, maintenance I disorder. Created by considering impact each across all phases illness, this hierarchy will further assist clinicians making evidence-based decisions. Lithium, quetiapine, divalproex, asenapine, aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, cariprazine alone or combination are first-line mania. First-line options depression include lurasidone plus lithium lithium, lamotrigine, lurasidone, adjunctive lamotrigine. While medications that shown be effective phase should generally continued disorder, there some exceptions (such antidepressants); available data suggest aripiprazole monotherapy considered those initiating switching during phase. In addition addressing issues also provide an overview of, for, II advice specific populations, such women at various stages reproductive cycle, children adolescents, older adults. There discussions psychiatric medical comorbidities substance use, anxiety, metabolic disorders. Finally, related safety monitoring is provided. groups hope become a valuable tool practitioners globe.
Language: Английский
Citations
1404BMC Medicine, Journal Year: 2017, Volume and Issue: 15(1)
Published: Jan. 28, 2017
The possible therapeutic impact of dietary changes on existing mental illness is largely unknown. Using a randomised controlled trial design, we aimed to investigate the efficacy improvement program for treatment major depressive episodes. 'SMILES' was 12-week, parallel-group, single blind, an adjunctive intervention in moderate severe depression. consisted seven individual nutritional consulting sessions delivered by clinical dietician. control condition comprised social support protocol same visit schedule and length. Depression symptomatology primary endpoint, assessed using Montgomery–Åsberg Rating Scale (MADRS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included remission change symptoms, mood anxiety. Analyses utilised likelihood-based mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) approach. robustness estimates investigated through sensitivity analyses. We 166 individuals eligibility, whom 67 were enrolled (diet intervention, n = 33; control, 34). Of these, 55 utilising some form therapy: 21 psychotherapy pharmacotherapy combined; 9 exclusively psychotherapy; 25 only pharmacotherapy. There 31 diet group who had complete data demonstrated significantly greater between baseline weeks MADRS than group, t(60.7) 4.38, p < 0.001, Cohen's d –1.16. Remission, defined as score <10, achieved 32.3% (n 10) 8.0% 2) groups, respectively (χ 2 (1) 4.84, 0.028); number needed treat (NNT) based scores 4.1 (95% CI NNT 2.3–27.8). A analysis, testing departures from missing random (MAR) assumption dropouts, indicated that robust violations MAR assumptions. These results indicate may provide efficacious accessible strategy management this highly prevalent disorder, benefits which could extend common co-morbidities. Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12612000251820 . Registered 29 February 2012.
Language: Английский
Citations
826World Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 19(3), P. 360 - 380
Published: Sept. 15, 2020
There is increasing academic and clinical interest in how “lifestyle factors” traditionally associated with physical health may also relate to mental psychological well‐being. In response, international national bodies are producing guidelines address behaviors the prevention treatment of illness. However, current evidence for causal role lifestyle factors onset prognosis disorders unclear. We performed a systematic meta‐review top‐tier examining activity, sleep, dietary patterns tobacco smoking impact on risk outcomes across range disorders. Results from 29 meta‐analyses prospective/cohort studies, 12 Mendelian randomization two meta‐reviews, randomized controlled trials were synthesized generate overviews targeting each specific depression, anxiety stress‐related disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Standout findings include: a) convergent indicating use activity primary spectrum disorders; b) emerging implicating as factor both common severe illness; c) need clearly establish relations between illness, diet should be best addressed within care; d) poor sleep although further research required understand complex, bidirectional benefits non‐pharmacological sleep‐focused interventions. The potentially shared neurobiological pathways multiple discussed, along directions future research, recommendations implementation these at public service levels.
Language: Английский
Citations
722Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 50(5), P. 410 - 472
Published: April 22, 2016
Objectives: This guideline provides recommendations for the clinical management of schizophrenia and related disorders health professionals working in Australia New Zealand. It aims to encourage all clinicians adopt best practice principles. The represent consensus a group Australian Zealand experts disorders. includes ultra-high risk syndromes, first-episode psychoses prolonged psychoses, including associated with substance use. takes holistic approach, addressing aspects care people disorders, not only correct diagnosis symptom relief but also optimal recovery social function. Methods: writing planned scope individual members drafted sections according their area interest expertise, reference existing systematic reviews informal literature undertaken this guideline. In addition, specific areas contributed relevant sections. All reviewed entire document. considered international guidelines. Evidence-based were formulated when judged that there was sufficient evidence on topic. Where weak or lacking, consensus-based formulated. Consensus-based are based field informed by agreement as group, collective research knowledge experience. Key considerations selected group. To wide community participation, Royal College Psychiatrists invited review its committees members, an expert advisory committee key stakeholders professional bodies special groups. Results: reflects increasing emphasis early intervention, physical health, psychosocial treatments, cultural improving vocational outcomes. uses staging model framework regarding assessment, treatment ongoing care. refers readers published guidelines statements directly practice. Conclusions: improve these living advocates respectful, collaborative approach; evidence-based treatment; consideration needs those adverse circumstances facing additional challenges.
Language: Английский
Citations
711The Lancet, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 388(10047), P. 881 - 890
Published: June 11, 2016
Language: Английский
Citations
617International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, Journal Year: 2016, Volume and Issue: 4(1)
Published: Nov. 21, 2016
Despite its virtually universal acceptance as the gold standard in treating bipolar disorder, prescription rates for lithium have been decreasing recently. Although this observation is multifactorial, one obvious potential contributor side effect and toxicity burden associated with lithium. Additionally, concerns assuredly play some role nonadherence. This paper summarizes knowledge base on effects suggests optimal management of these problems. Thirst excessive urination, nausea diarrhea tremor are rather common that typically no more than annoying even though they prevalent. A simple set strategies involve timing dose, minimizing levels within therapeutic range and, situations, antidotes will minimize patients. In contrast, weight gain cognitive impairment from tend to be distressing patients, difficult manage likely Lithium has adverse kidneys, thyroid gland parathyroid glands, necessitating monitoring organ functions through periodic blood tests. most cases, lithium-associated renal relatively mild. small but measurable percentage lithium-treated patients show progressive impairment. Infrequently, need discontinued because insufficiency. Lithium-induced hypothyroidism easily diagnosed treated. Hyperparathyroidism a recently recognized phenomenon.
Language: Английский
Citations
432Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 55(1), P. 7 - 117
Published: Dec. 22, 2020
Objectives: To provide advice and guidance regarding the management of mood disorders, derived from scientific evidence supplemented by expert clinical consensus to formulate s that maximise utility. Methods: Articles information sourced search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO Google Scholar were literature known disorders committee (e.g. books, book chapters government reports) published depression bipolar disorder guidelines. Relevant was appraised discussed in detail members committee, with a view formulating developing consensus-based recommendations guidance. The guidelines subjected rigorous consultation external review involving: advisors, key stakeholders, professional bodies specialist groups interest disorders. Results: Royal Australian New Zealand College Psychiatrists practice 2020 (MDcpg ) up-to-date is informed experience. guideline intended for use psychiatrists, psychologists, primary care physicians others an mental health care. Conclusion: MDcpg builds on previous 2015 maintains its joint focus both depressive It provides within evidence-based framework, consensus. Mood committee: Gin S Malhi (Chair), Erica Bell, Darryl Bassett, Philip Boyce, Richard Bryant, Hazell, Malcolm Hopwood, Bill Lyndon, Roger Mulder, Porter, Ajeet B Singh Greg Murray.
Language: Английский
Citations
395Depression and Anxiety, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: 37(2), P. 134 - 145
Published: Oct. 22, 2019
Varying conceptualizations of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have made translating research findings or systematic reviews into clinical practice guidelines challenging and inconsistent.We conducted a review for the Centers Medicare & Medicaid Services Agency Healthcare Research Quality to clarify how experts investigators defined TRD systematically well this definition comports with definitions in trials through July 5, 2019.We found that no consensus existed TRD. The most common major depressive disorder required minimum two prior treatment failures confirmation adequate dose duration. bipolar one failure. No clear emerged on defining adequacy either Our only 17% intervention studies enrolled samples meeting frequently specified criteria Depressive outcomes global impressions were commonly measured; functional impairment quality-of-life tools rarely used.Two key steps are critical advancing research: (a) Developing addresses best specify number duration; (b) identifying core package outcome measures can be applied standardized manner. recommendations about stronger approaches designing conducting will foster better evidence translate clearer treating patients serious condition.
Language: Английский
Citations
333World Psychiatry, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 19(3), P. 269 - 293
Published: Sept. 15, 2020
Depression is widely acknowledged to be a heterogeneous entity, and the need further characterize individual patient who has received this diagnosis in order personalize management plan been repeatedly emphasized. However, research evidence that should guide personalization at present fragmentary, selection of treatment usually based on clinician's and/or patient's preference safety issues, trial‐and‐error fashion, paying little attention particular features specific case. This may one reasons why majority patients with depression do not achieve remission first they receive. The predominant pessimism about actual feasibility routine clinical practice recently tempered by some secondary analyses databases from trials, using approaches such as data meta‐analysis machine learning, which indicate variables indeed contribute identification are likely respond differently various antidepressant drugs or medication vs. psychotherapies. develop decision support tools guiding reaffirmed, point made these developed through large observational studies comprehensive battery self‐report measures. paper aims describe systematically salient domains considered effort treatment. For each domain, available summarized, relevant assessment instruments reviewed, special their suitability for use practice, also view possible inclusion above‐mentioned main unmet needs address area Where allows providing clinician advice can already used today make more personalized, highlighted. Indeed, sections paper, those neurocognition physical comorbidities, modern becoming increasingly complex, several components other than simply choice an psychotherapy, reliably personalized.
Language: Английский
Citations
294