心理与脑科学研究中的样本代表性 DOI

Weibiao Liu,

Zhiyi Chen,

Chuan-Peng Hu

et al.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version), Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 69(24), P. 3515 - 3531

Published: July 30, 2024

Psychological and brain science explore human behavior the by studying volunteers who participate in these studies, generalizability of findings fields largely depends on representativeness samples.However, samples psychological neuroscience research has long been criticized.There are two main problems with current research:(1) Lack sample information.Most studies report only gender/sex, age, country subjects, while important information such as race/ethnicity, education level, socio-economic status subjects is rarely reported.Moreover, this situation not changed significantly over time; (2) The provided suggests that sufficiently representative: there more female participants than male participants, they concentrated Western, young, highly educated populations, middle-aged older people, people lower levels, low-income groups less concerned researchers.Asian, Black/African American Hispanic/Latino populations also receive attention.From a national perspective, Asian, African, Latin countries represented research.The above major may be mainly due to following reasons: convenience sampling method method; European researchers have led science; neglect influence culture various demographic factors whole; themselves biases.Changing will require combined efforts researchers, academic organisations, journal editors funders.Improving help apply scientific knowledge wider range groups, thereby promoting building community shared future for humanity.

Language: Английский

Moving beyond social categories by incorporating context in social psychological theory DOI
Mina Cikara, Joel E. Martínez, Neil A. Lewis

et al.

Nature Reviews Psychology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 1(9), P. 537 - 549

Published: July 12, 2022

Language: Английский

Citations

66

Meta-analytic evidence that mindfulness training alters resting state default mode network connectivity DOI Creative Commons
Hadley Rahrig, David R. Vago,

Matthew A. Passarelli

et al.

Scientific Reports, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 12(1)

Published: July 18, 2022

Abstract This meta-analysis sought to expand upon neurobiological models of mindfulness through investigation inherent brain network connectivity outcomes, indexed via resting state functional (rsFC). We conducted a systematic review and rsFC as an outcome training (MT) relative control, with the hypothesis that MT would increase cross-network between nodes Default Mode Network (DMN), Salience (SN), Frontoparietal Control (FPCN) mechanism internally-oriented attentional control. Texts were identified from databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, ERIC, PSYCINFO, ProQuest, Scopus, Web Sciences; screened for inclusion based on experimental/quasi-experimental trial design use mindfulness-based interventions. RsFC effects extracted twelve studies (mindfulness n = 226; control 204). Voxel-based revealed significantly greater (MT > control) left middle cingulate ( Hedge’s g .234, p 0.0288, I 2 15.87), located within SN, posterior cortex, focal hub DMN. Egger’s test publication bias was nonsignificant, 2.17, 0.162. In support our hypothesis, results suggest targets internetwork (SN-DMN) implicated in flexible attention.

Language: Английский

Citations

46

Conducting research within the acronym: Problematizing LGBTIQ+ research in psychology DOI Creative Commons
Amanda Klysing,

Marta Prandelli,

Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza

et al.

Journal of Social Issues, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Sept. 10, 2024

ABSTRACT LGBTIQ+ research acknowledges shared experiences of groups marginalized due to gender identities, sexualities, and sex characteristics. This universalist coalition approach has resulted in much affirmational progressive policy development. However, it risks homogenizing the unique needs specific groups; a risk lessened by particularist subgroup approach. In this theoretical paper, we reflect on challenges or considering interdependencies boundaries between sex, gender, sexuality‐based identities. Through tracing historical development activism using examples from intersex studies, intersectionality, political actions, explore tensions collective identities that make up acronym. We further offer suggestions for reimagining research, advocating community‐driven approaches respect situated knowledge individuals, use adaptable inclusive practices bridge academia aim improve lives marginalized.

Language: Английский

Citations

8

A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review DOI Creative Commons

Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 10

Published: Feb. 11, 2025

This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance ethical conduct scientific to maintain integrity, credibility, societal relevance has been highlighted. findings revealed growing awareness issues, as evidenced by the development numerous guidelines, codes conduct, oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including lack standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding factors contributing unethical behavior, unclear definitions violations. To address these this recommends promoting transparency data sharing, enhancing education, training programs, establishing robust mechanisms identify encouraging collaborative open practices. emphasizes need restore public confidence science, protect its positive impact, effectively global challenges, while upholding principles social responsibility justice. is crucial maintaining conserving resources, safeguarding both participants public.

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Dismantling the master's house: Decolonizing “Rigor” in psychological scholarship DOI
Mona M. Abo‐Zena, Keith Jones, Jacqueline S. Mattis

et al.

Journal of Social Issues, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 78(2), P. 298 - 319

Published: June 1, 2022

Abstract The purported goal of social science research is to develop approaches and applications the psychological study issues that allow us know, accurately inclusively, lived experiences all human beings. However, our current theoretical methodological tools, while perceived as “objective,” were founded on ahistorical context‐eliminating perspectives privilege designs analytic strategies reflect biased racial reasoning with roots in European colonial knowledge formations. By analyzing how language “rigor” deployed within specific instances research, we assert it conceptualized operationalized maintain a Eurocentric worldview conception “human.” In exploring ways furthers production normative, this manuscript provides critical analysis seeks redress ongoing epistemic violence by decolonizing key term scholarship.

Language: Английский

Citations

32

Participant diversity in Psychophysiology DOI
Heather A. Kissel, Bruce H. Friedman

Psychophysiology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 60(11)

Published: June 18, 2023

Abstract The Society for Psychophysiological Research and accompanying journal, Psychophysiology , have increasingly incorporated diversity inclusion into their posted values, conference programming, science. Much of this focus on equity, diversity, work has occurred since 2010. current review content analyzed the articles published in from 2010 through 2020 to determine if SPR 's commitment resulted changes reporting analysis participant demographics. Demographic practices were compared APA standards use demographic variables assessed according guidance proffered introduction 2016 Special Issue Diversity Representation. Results indicated near perfect biological sex frequent average age. Age range educational attainment reported over half studies, while race or ethnicity only 17%. Socioeconomic status, income, gender identity, sexual orientation almost never reported. In 60% studies at least one major variable was reported, but not used preliminary, main, supplementary analyses as a covariate, moderator, otherwise. should continue advocating increased ethical modulation various psychophysiological mechanisms. We provide preliminary template call more open science by psychophysiologists.

Language: Английский

Citations

20

Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science DOI Creative Commons
Sean Grant,

Kathleen E. Wendt,

Bonnie J. Leadbeater

et al.

Prevention Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 23(5), P. 701 - 722

Published: Feb. 17, 2022

The field of prevention science aims to understand societal problems, identify effective interventions, and translate scientific evidence into policy practice. There is growing interest among scientists in the potential for transparency, openness, reproducibility facilitate this mission by providing opportunities align practice with ideals, accelerate discovery, broaden access knowledge. overarching goal manuscript serve as a primer introducing an overview open researchers. In paper, we discuss factors motivating transparency reproducibility, research practices associated science, stakeholders engaged impacted reform efforts. addition, how why different types could incorporate practices, well ways that tools methods be leveraged advance wider movement. To promote further discussion, conclude reservations challenges address it transitions greater reproducibility. Throughout, activities aim strengthen reliability efficiency its products outputs, collaborative inclusive participation activities. By embracing principles can better achieve evidence-based solutions individual collective well-being.

Language: Английский

Citations

25

Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience DOI Creative Commons
Teresa Girolamo, Termara Parker, Inge‐Marie Eigsti

et al.

Frontiers in Neuroscience, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 16

Published: Sept. 8, 2022

This article reviews some of the ideological forces contributing to systematic exclusion Black, Indigenous, and People Color (BIPOC) in clinical neuroscience. Limitations functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) other methods systematically exclude individuals with coarse or curly hair darker skin. Despite these well-known limitations, neuroscience manuscripts frequently fail report participant race ethnicity reasons for excluding participants. Grounding discussion Dis/ability Studies Critical Race Theory (DisCrit), we review factors that exacerbate contribute multiple marginalization BIPOC, including (a) general methodological issues, (b) perceptions about disability, (c) underreporting methods. We also present solutions. Just as scientific practices changed response replication crisis, advocate greater attention crisis underrepresentation provide strategies serve make field more inclusive.

Language: Английский

Citations

25

Addressing workplace gender inequality: Using the evidence to avoid common pitfalls DOI Creative Commons
Michelle K. Ryan

British Journal of Social Psychology, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 62(1), P. 1 - 11

Published: Nov. 22, 2022

In this Landmark article I outline four common missteps that are made when designing and implementing workplace gender equality initiatives: (1) we don't go beyond describing the numbers; (2) try to 'fix' women rather than fix systems; (3) overly optimistic about progress have made; (4) fail recognise intersectionality of experiences face. will briefly consider each these in term, presenting research suggests alternative ways approaching initiatives.

Language: Английский

Citations

24

An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers DOI
Christine C. Call, Kristen Eckstrand, Steven William Kasparek

et al.

Perspectives on Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 18(5), P. 979 - 995

Published: Dec. 2, 2022

The collection and use of demographic data in psychological sciences has the potential to aid transforming inequities brought about by unjust social conditions toward equity. However, many current methods surrounding do not achieve this goal. Some function reduce, but eliminate, inequities, whereas others may perpetuate harmful stereotypes, invalidate minoritized identities, exclude key groups from research participation or access disseminated findings. In article, we aim (a) review ethical social-justice dilemmas inherent working with (b) introduce a framework positioned ethics justice help psychologists researchers social-science fields make thoughtful decisions data. Although vary across subdisciplines topics, assert that these core issues-and solutions-are relevant all within sciences, including basic applied research. Our overarching is support stakeholders psychology (e.g., researchers, funding agencies, journal editors, peer reviewers) making socially-just collection, analysis, reporting, interpretation, dissemination

Language: Английский

Citations

23