Medicine,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
101(7), P. e28924 - e28924
Published: Feb. 18, 2022
Extensive
evidence
in
the
literature
supports
mandatory
use
of
facemasks
to
reduce
infection
rate
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2,
which
causes
disease
(COVID-19).
However,
effect
mask
on
course
remains
controversial.
This
study
aimed
determine
whether
influenced
case
fatality
Kansas,
USA
between
August
1st
and
October
15th
2020.This
applied
secondary
data
updates,
mandates,
demographic
status
related
Kansas
State,
USA.
A
parallelization
analysis
based
county-level
was
conducted
these
data.
Results
were
controlled
by
performing
multiple
sensitivity
analyses
a
negative
control.A
showed
that
counties
with
mandate
had
significantly
higher
rates
than
without
mandate,
risk
ratio
1.85
(95%
confidence
interval
[95%
CI]:
1.51-2.10)
for
COVID-19-related
deaths.
Even
after
adjusting
number
"protected
persons,"
is,
persons
who
not
infected
mask-mandated
group
compared
no-mask
group,
remained
high
at
1.52
CI:
1.24-1.72).
By
analyzing
excess
mortality
this
determines
over
95%
can
solely
be
attributed
COVID-19.These
findings
suggest
might
pose
yet
unknown
threat
user
instead
protecting
them,
making
mandates
debatable
epidemiologic
intervention.The
cause
trend
is
explained
herein
using
"Foegen
effect"
theory;
deep
re-inhalation
hypercondensed
droplets
or
pure
virions
caught
as
worsen
prognosis
linked
long-term
effects
COVID-19
infection.
While
proven
vivo
an
animal
model,
further
research
needed
fully
understand
it.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
119(23)
Published: May 31, 2022
Significance
We
resolve
conflicting
results
regarding
mask
wearing
against
COVID-19.
Most
previous
work
focused
on
mandates;
we
study
the
effect
of
directly.
find
that
population
notably
reduced
SARS-CoV-2
transmission
(mean
mask-wearing
levels
corresponding
to
a
19%
decrease
in
R).
use
largest
survey
(n
=
20
million)
and
obtain
our
estimates
from
regions
across
six
continents.
account
for
nonpharmaceutical
interventions
time
spent
public,
quantify
uncertainty.
Factors
additional
mandates
influenced
worldwide
early
uptake
wearing.
Our
analysis
goes
further
than
past
quality
data–100
times
size
with
random
sampling–geographical
scope,
semimechanistic
infection
model,
validation
results.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
37(2)
Published: May 22, 2024
SUMMARYThis
narrative
review
and
meta-analysis
summarizes
a
broad
evidence
base
on
the
benefits-and
also
practicalities,
disbenefits,
harms
personal,
sociocultural
environmental
impacts-of
masks
masking.
Our
synthesis
of
from
over
100
published
reviews
selected
primary
studies,
including
re-analyzing
contested
meta-analyses
key
clinical
trials,
produced
seven
findings.
First,
there
is
strong
consistent
for
airborne
transmission
severe
acute
respiratory
syndrome
coronavirus
2
(SARS-CoV-2)
other
pathogens.
Second,
are,
if
correctly
consistently
worn,
effective
in
reducing
diseases
show
dose-response
effect.
Third,
respirators
are
significantly
more
than
medical
or
cloth
masks.
Fourth,
mask
mandates
overall,
community
Fifth,
important
symbols;
non-adherence
to
masking
sometimes
linked
political
ideological
beliefs
widely
circulated
mis-
disinformation.
Sixth,
while
much
that
not
generally
harmful
general
population,
may
be
relatively
contraindicated
individuals
with
certain
conditions,
who
require
exemption.
Furthermore,
groups
(notably
D/deaf
people)
disadvantaged
when
others
masked.
Finally,
risks
environment
single-use
respirators.
We
propose
an
agenda
future
research,
improved
characterization
situations
which
should
recommended
mandated;
attention
comfort
acceptability;
generalized
disability-focused
communication
support
settings
where
worn;
development
testing
novel
materials
designs
filtration,
breathability,
impact.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
118(51)
Published: Dec. 13, 2021
Significance
To
study
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
its
effects
on
society,
and
measures
for
reducing
spread,
researchers
need
detailed
data
course
of
pandemic.
Standard
public
health
streams
suffer
inconsistent
reporting
frequent,
unexpected
revisions.
They
also
miss
other
aspects
a
population’s
behavior
that
are
worthy
consideration.
We
present
an
open
database
COVID
signals
in
United
States,
measured
at
county
level
updated
daily.
This
includes
traditionally
reported
cases
deaths,
many
others:
mobility,
social
distancing,
internet
search
trends,
self-reported
symptoms,
patterns
COVID-related
activity
deidentified
medical
insurance
claims.
The
provides
all
common,
easy-to-use
format,
empowering
both
research
operational
decision-making.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: June 9, 2021
Behavioral
risk
factors,
such
as
smoking,
excessive
alcohol
consumption,
physical
inactivity,
obesity,
and
unhealthy
food
intake
are
added
factors
for
severe
outcomes
of
COVID-19
infections.
Preventive
measures
to
avoid
infections
therefore
particularly
important
individuals
engaging
in
behavioral
factors.
We
seek
determine
whether
(BRFs)
play
a
significant
role
the
adherence
preventive
population
aged
50
above.
The
SHARE
wave
8
(Survey
Health,
Ageing
Retirement
Europe)
Survey
served
database,
resulting
an
analytical
sample
17,588
respondents
from
23
European
countries
plus
Israel.
Of
these
36.04%
engaged
at
least
one
BRF
16.68%
3
or
more
BRFs.
Multilevel
logistic
regressions
revealed
that
engagement
was
significantly
associated
with
less
hygiene
measures,
i.e.,
hand-sanitizing,
hand-washing
covering
coughs
sneezes
(OR:
0.86;
95%
CI:
0.78;
0.94),
two
BRFs
0.85;
0.74;
0.97)
three
0.72;
0.59;
0.88).
No
association
found
between
adherences
social
isolation
avoiding
meeting
than
five
people,
visiting
others
going
shopping,
regulated
wearing
mask
keeping
distance.
also
stronger
when
were
(1
vs.
BRFs:
χ2
=
3.43,
p
0.06;
2
6.05;
0.01).
study
gives
insight
into
protective
behavior
inherent
vulnerability
during
global
health
emergency.
It
lays
foundation
follow-up
research
about
evolution
pandemic
progresses
long-term
changes.
In
addition,
it
can
aide
efforts
increasing
compliance
by
raising
awareness
pose.
Health Affairs,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
41(3), P. 445 - 453
Published: Feb. 16, 2022
Evidence
for
the
effectiveness
of
masking
on
SARS-CoV-2
transmission
at
individual
level
has
accumulated,
but
additional
benefit
community-level
mandates
is
less
certain.
In
this
observational
study
matched
cohorts
from
412
US
counties
between
March
21
and
October
20,
2020,
we
estimated
association
county-level
public
daily
COVID-19
case
incidence.
On
average,
incidence
per
100,000
people
in
masked
compared
with
unmasked
declined
by
25
percent
four
weeks,
35
six
18
across
weeks
postintervention.
The
beneficial
effect
varied
regions
different
population
densities
political
leanings.
most
concentrated
effects
were
seen
urban
counties;
was
potentially
stronger
within
Republican-leaning
counties.
Although
benefits
not
equally
distributed
all
regions,
conferred
reducing
community
during
an
early
period
pandemic.
Cureus,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: April 19, 2022
Masking
was
the
single
most
common
non-pharmaceutical
intervention
in
course
of
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
pandemic.
Most
countries
have
implemented
recommendations
or
mandates
regarding
use
masks
public
spaces.
The
aim
this
short
study
to
analyse
correlation
between
mask
usage
against
morbidity
and
mortality
rates
2020-2021
winter
Europe.
Data
from
35
European
on
morbidity,
mortality,
during
a
six-month
period
were
analysed
crossed.
Mask
more
homogeneous
Eastern
Europe
than
Western
countries.
Spearman's
coefficients
COVID-19
outcomes
either
null
positive,
depending
subgroup
type
outcome
(cases
deaths).
Positive
correlations
stronger
These
findings
indicate
that
with
high
levels
compliance
did
not
perform
better
those
low
usage.
BMC Geriatrics,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
22(1)
Published: Nov. 19, 2022
Abstract
Introduction
Significant
mortality
amongst
vulnerable
populations,
such
as
people
living
with
dementia,
might
go
undetected
during
pandemic
conditions
due
to
refocus
of
care
efforts.
There
is
an
urgent
need
fully
evaluate
the
impact
on
dementia
in
order
facilitate
future
healthcare
reforms
and
prevent
deaths.
The
purpose
this
study
was
determine
whether
there
any
significant
difference
without
COVID-19
compared
previous
years.
Methods
A
literature
search
conducted
5
databases.
relative
risk
ratio
confidence
interval
used
estimate
change
rates
pandemic.
I
2
value
assess
heterogeneity,
publication
bias,
sensitivity
analyses
were
performed.
Results
Pooled
analysis
11
studies
showed
that
significantly
increased
for
COVID-19.
Mortality
by
25%
time
period
studied.
Subgroup
not
performed
low
number
included
studies.
Conclusions
results
suggest
had
a
even
if
they
did
have
People
should
participate
efforts
reduce
general
social
spread
system
vaccinations,
mask
mandates,
testing.
These
clinical
implications
preventing
direct
infection
enough
adequately
protect
from
mortality.
Measures
limit
infections
help
support
patients
also
be
focus
clinicians.
Further
research
identification
mechanisms
other
explanations
well
contributing
factors
homes
differences
between
countries
various
strategies.