Journal of Geriatric Emergency Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
4(4)
Published: Dec. 11, 2023
INTRODUCTION:
To
accommodate
the
complex
healthcare
needs
of
rising
geriatric
population,
Stamford
Hospital’s
(SH)
emergency
department
(ED)
began
a
Geriatric
Emergency
Medicine
Initiative
(GEMI)
in
2018
to
improve
our
ED
environment,
practices,
and
focused
assessments
for
community-dwelling
older
adults.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
unknown
Published: Feb. 4, 2025
ABSTRACT
Background
Although
falls
among
older
adults
pose
substantial
health
risks
and
are
often
preventable,
many
fallers
do
not
seek
medical
care.
The
Raise'Age
program
addresses
this
challenge
by
offering
proactive
fall
prevention
for
who
require
“lift
assistance”
but
taken
to
hospital.
includes
(i)
screening
emergency
services
(EMSs),
(ii)
referrals
a
comprehensive
geriatric
assessment,
(iii)
in‐home
evaluations
mobile
team
(MGT),
(iv)
primary
care
physicians
(PCPs).
Here,
we
outline
the
program's
design,
development,
implementation.
Methods
activity
in
2023
was
assessed
with
regard
number
of
EMS
reports,
reports'
completeness,
eligibility,
acceptance
patients,
assessments,
adherence
follow‐up
programs,
coordination
delays.
Results
In
2023,
received
959
accounting
48%
lift
assistances
paramedics.
Of
these,
37%
reports
were
reviewed
eligibility.
Reports
archived
due
irrelevance,
recent
hospital
stay,
or
difficulty
contacting
PCPs.
Among
eligible
77%
approved
evaluations,
remainder
referred
geriatrician
scheduled
admission.
median
processing
time
26
days.
228
patients
home
visits,
150
accepted
intervention.
Visit
rates
higher
when
PCP
endorsed
program.
Follow‐up
provided
36%
patients‐
primarily
via
teleconsultation.
Finally,
15.6%
whom
assistance
report
sent
MGT
completed
Conclusions
demonstrates
that
collaboration
MGTs
feasible,
although
some
may
decline
offered.
Continuous
interventions
community‐based
social
effectively
address
needs
adults.
JAMA Network Open,
Journal Year:
2025,
Volume and Issue:
8(3), P. e250814 - e250814
Published: March 11, 2025
Importance
Given
that
older
adults
are
at
high
risk
for
adverse
drug
events
(ADEs),
many
geriatric
medication
programs
have
aimed
to
optimize
safe
ordering,
prescribing,
and
deprescribing
practices.
Objective
To
identify
emergency
department
(ED)–based
associated
with
reductions
in
potentially
inappropriate
medications
(PIMs)
ADEs.
Data
Sources
A
systematic
search
of
Scopus,
Embase,
PubMed,
PsycInfo,
ProQuest
Central,
CINAHL,
AgeLine,
Cochrane
Library
was
conducted
on
February
14,
2024,
no
date
limits
applied.
Study
Selection
Randomized
clinical
trials
or
observational
studies
focused
ED-based
(aged
≥65
years)
provide
ED
clinician
support
avoid
PIMs
reduce
Extraction
Synthesis
Preferred
Reporting
Items
Systematic
Reviews
Meta-Analyses
guidelines
abstracting
data
the
risk-of-bias
tool
were
used
assess
quality
validity.
Abstract
screening
full-text
review
independently
by
2
reviewers,
a
third
reviewer
acting
as
an
adjudicator.
Main
Outcomes
Measures
Process
(ordering,
PIM
rates)
(ADE,
health
care
utilization,
falls)
outcomes.
Results
The
strategy
identified
3665
unique
studies,
98
assessed
eligibility
review,
25
44
640
participants,
included:
9
pharmacist
reviews
(with
28
360
participants),
1
geriatrician
teleconsultation
50
8
educational
interventions
5888
4
computerized
decision
systems
(CDSS;
9462
3
fall
risk–increasing
(FRID)
880
participants).
Clinical
not
decreased
hospital
admission
length
stay,
but
showed
32%
reduction
from
(odds
ratio
[OR],
0.68
[95%
CI,
0.50-0.92];
P
=
.01).
One
study
also
found
enhanced
PIMs.
Three
intervention
19%
prescribing
(OR,
0.81
0.68-0.96];
.02).
Two
CDSS
40%
ordering
0.60
0.48-0.74];
<
.001).
FRID
reduced
time
first
recurrence
12
months.
Conclusions
Relevance
In
this
meta-analysis
safety
programs,
multidisciplinary
team,
including
pharmacists
and/or
geriatricians,
improved
deprescribing.
Furthermore,
CDSS,
alone
combination
education,
These
findings
will
inform
Geriatric
Guidelines
version
2.0
update.
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
5(4)
Published: June 26, 2024
Abstract
Objectives
Implementation
and
sustainability
of
new
care
processes
in
emergency
departments
(EDs)
is
difficult.
We
describe
experiences
implementing
geriatric
EDs
that
upgraded
their
accreditation
level
for
the
Geriatric
Emergency
Department
Accreditation
(GEDA)
program.
These
can
provide
a
model
adopting
sustaining
guidelines
evidence‐based
care.
Methods
performed
qualitative
interviews
with
ED
nurse
physician
leaders
overseeing
ED's
processes.
The
interview
guide
was
based
on
Consolidated
Framework
Research
(CFIR),
framework
consisting
comprehensive
set
factors
impact
implementation
interventions.
used
inductive
analysis
to
elucidate
key
themes
from
deductive
map
onto
CFIR
constructs.
Results
Clinician
15
19
status
by
March
1,
2023
participated
interviews.
Motivations
upgrade
centered
improving
patient
(73%)
achieving
recognition
(56%).
Rationales
choosing
specific
were
more
commonly
related
feasibility
(40%)
ability
integrate
into
electronic
health
record
(33%)
than
site‐specific
needs
(20%).
Several
common
identified:
(1)
financing
larger
system
or
philanthropy
crucial;
(2)
translating
Guidelines
clinical
practice
challenging
clinician
leaders;
(3)
motivational
barriers
existed
among
frontline
staff;
(4)
longitudinal
staff
education
needed
given
attrition
turnover;
(5)
facilitated
screenings.
Conclusions
involves
significant
time,
resource
allocation,
commitment.
pursuing
balance
aspirations
improve
availability
implement
competing
priorities.
Journal of Geriatric Emergency Medicine,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
4(1)
Published: March 1, 2023
Increasing
numbers
of
emergency
department
(ED)
visits
are
being
made
by
older
adults.Unfortunately,
there
is
widespread
recognition
that
current
ED
systems
poorly
designed
to
serve
this
population's
unique
needs,
both
in
terms
addressing
acute
illnesses
and
injuries
managing
complex
medical
psychosocial
issues.One
strategy
address
these
needs
create
geriatric
EDs
with
a
specific
focus
on
caring
for
adults.To
end,
the
American
College
Emergency
Physicians
(ACEP)
created
Geriatric
Department
Accreditation
(GEDA)
Program,
accrediting
institutions
as
(GEDs)
based
their
ability
assess
intervene
improve
care
meeting
certain
criteria.During
accreditation,
apply
become
level
1,
2,
or
3
facilities
resources
available
policies
processes
place
adhere
best
practices
care.To
achieve
1
status,
GEDs
must
have
protocols
20
27
GED
guidelines,
10
necessary
2
status.Furthermore,
individual
may
specify
how
they
each
policy
process.This
article
Santangelo
et.al.
analyzes
application
materials
all
accredited
roughly
three-year
period.
The
authors
summarize
inclusion
approach
five
important
abstracting
applications
35
36
approved
met
criteria.The
study
identified
significant
heterogeneity
which
were
included,
well
achieved.Results
ranged
from
fall
prevention,
89%
studied
used
one
13
different
screening
protocols,
dementia,
49%
screened
at
least
some
patients,
using
seven
protocols.The
noted
similar
among
responses
positive
screens
personnel
carrying
out
screening.This
has
few
key
limitations
consider:
Data
was
only
collected
not
reflect
sustained
included
GEDs.After
multiple
years
experience,
topics
changed.Additionally,
many
cases,
report
"subsets"
adult
patients.While
identifying
appropriate
subsets
adults
interventions
workflows
an
goal
creating
feasible
effective
workflows,
details
regarding
chosen
unavailable.For
example,
subset
patients
could
be
falls
preselected
risk
factors
availability
additional
nurse
who
performed
screening.Finally,
while
face
validity,
limited
data
support
effectiveness.Thus,
we
do
actually
know
if
presence
majority
leads
measurable
impact
patient-centered
outcomes.Despite
limitations,
provides
excellent
overview
initial
activities
planned
GEDs.The
variation
between
sites
seen
AFFILIATIONS