Do Non-audit Service Failures Impair Auditor Reputation? An Analysis of Multiple Scandals Surrounding KPMG Advisory Services in Germany DOI
Christian Friedrich, Reiner Quick

SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Big Four accounting firms increasingly focus on non-audit services. Failures in these services may impair the firm’s reputation as an auditor. They negatively affect Four, its clients, and client stakeholders. From perspective of critical scholarship, it is vital to understand whether potentially marginalized actors that auditors are meant protect (e.g., general public) bear adverse consequences from failures. Low litigation settings, such Germany, particular interest this context because they rely risks motivate provide high-quality Accordingly, we analyze two events observable service deficiencies KPMG Germany. We first use event study show KPMG’s audit clients suffer negative capital market reactions after NAS failure events. then ask KPMG, having caused events, also faces consequences. Moreover, explore theoretical mechanisms behind observed reactions. Using Eisenhardt Method, deeply engage with extensive quantitative data sets auditor switches, pricing, clients’ earnings management. The analyses do not reveal significant for KPMG. Earnings management provides some limited indication allows more opportunistic choices. Overall, our analysis suggests be insufficient discipline acting opportunistically at cost less powerful low settings.

Language: Английский

Do non-audit service failures impair auditor reputation? An analysis of KPMG advisory service scandals in Germany DOI
Christian Friedrich, Reiner Quick

Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 98, P. 102550 - 102550

Published: Jan. 19, 2023

Language: Английский

Citations

10

Audit Quality in the Face of a Crisis: Evidence from the Audit Inspection Scandal DOI
Francine McKenna, Mikhail Pevzner, Amy Sheneman

et al.

Published: Jan. 1, 2024

This paper examines the 2017 audit inspection scandal involving PCAOB and KPMG — one of few publicized breaches "tone at top" a Big Four firm. With backdrop an egregious violation professional ethics by leaders KPMG, we study how affected its clients. Using differences-in-differences approach, find that quality increased after compared to other 4 firms. We also was successful in preventing client desertions. Clients most closely tied experienced decline non-audit fees. Overall, document operational improvements response scandal, along with some possible sacrifices revenue generation.

Language: Английский

Citations

2

Regulatory investigations, media coverage, and audit opinions DOI
Xuelian Li, Liang Dong, Hung Wan Kot

et al.

Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 54, P. 100596 - 100596

Published: Jan. 17, 2024

Language: Английский

Citations

1

Client Acquisition Following an Auditor’s Unethical Behavior: An Examination of Reputational Consequences Following KPMG’s “Steal the Exam” Scandal DOI
Kevin Hale, J. Mike Truelson

Accounting Horizons, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 37(2), P. 85 - 104

Published: April 13, 2022

SYNOPSIS We investigate the reputational effects of KPMG’s scandal involving improper receipt confidential regulator data by analyzing acquisition new audit clients in post-scandal period. While we find no evidence that KPMG had difficulty gaining relative to a broad class other large auditors, do rate decreased period comparison Big 4 firms but increased non-Big auditors. This finding indicates shift position market for clients. Our results suggest more nuanced examination auditor damages may help detect distinct between classes firms. Importantly, our findings be interest practitioners and researchers as they consider consequences high-profile on an firm’s reputation, even if does not appear directly impact engagement-level quality. Data Availability: used this study are available from public sources identified document. JEL Classifications: M42; M48.

Language: Английский

Citations

6

Economic Consequences of Auditor Reputation Loss: Evidence from the Audit Inspection Scandal DOI
Francine McKenna, Mikhail Pevzner, Amy Sheneman

et al.

SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2020

This paper examines the 2017 audit inspection scandal involving PCAOB and KPMG — oneof few publicized breaches of "tone at top" a Big Four firm. With backdrop anegregious violation professional ethics by leaders KPMG, we exploit this high-power settingto study how affected its clients. From federal court trial transcripts, weconstruct novel data set clients inspected during years. Wefind that only are associated with an increase in auditor switches reductionin non-audit fees after scandal. We find no evidence fee changes. While KPMG's auditquality decreased scandal, market did not perceive quality to have declined. Ourresults suggest, despite serious ethical violations exposed, there were marketand competitive consequences for

Language: Английский

Citations

3

Do Non-audit Service Failures Impair Auditor Reputation? An Analysis of Multiple Scandals Surrounding KPMG Advisory Services in Germany DOI
Christian Friedrich, Reiner Quick

SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal Year: 2019, Volume and Issue: unknown

Published: Jan. 1, 2019

Big Four accounting firms increasingly focus on non-audit services. Failures in these services may impair the firm’s reputation as an auditor. They negatively affect Four, its clients, and client stakeholders. From perspective of critical scholarship, it is vital to understand whether potentially marginalized actors that auditors are meant protect (e.g., general public) bear adverse consequences from failures. Low litigation settings, such Germany, particular interest this context because they rely risks motivate provide high-quality Accordingly, we analyze two events observable service deficiencies KPMG Germany. We first use event study show KPMG’s audit clients suffer negative capital market reactions after NAS failure events. then ask KPMG, having caused events, also faces consequences. Moreover, explore theoretical mechanisms behind observed reactions. Using Eisenhardt Method, deeply engage with extensive quantitative data sets auditor switches, pricing, clients’ earnings management. The analyses do not reveal significant for KPMG. Earnings management provides some limited indication allows more opportunistic choices. Overall, our analysis suggests be insufficient discipline acting opportunistically at cost less powerful low settings.

Language: Английский

Citations

0