Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Published: Jan. 1, 2024
Language: Английский
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
3International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Jan. 10, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
2Journal of Clinical Medicine, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(2), P. 572 - 572
Published: Jan. 17, 2025
Background: Several artificial intelligence systems based on large language models (LLMs) have been commercially developed, with recent interest in integrating them for clinical questions. Recent versions now include image analysis capacity, but their performance gastroenterology remains untested. This study assesses ChatGPT-4's interpreting images. Methods: A total of 740 images from five procedures-capsule endoscopy (CE), device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC), and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA)-were included analyzed by ChatGPT-4 using a predefined prompt each. predictions were compared to gold standard diagnoses. Statistical analyses accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative (NPV), area under the curve (AUC). Results: For CE, demonstrated accuracies ranging 50.0% 90.0%, AUCs 0.50-0.90. DAE, model an accuracy 67.0% (AUC 0.670). EUS, system showed 0.488 0.550 differentiation between pancreatic cystic solid lesions, respectively. The LLM differentiated benign malignant biliary strictures AUC 0.550. HRA, overall 47.5% 67.5%. Conclusions: suboptimal diagnostic interpretation across several techniques, highlighting need continuous improvement before adoption.
Language: Английский
Citations
0Information Fusion, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 103024 - 103024
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Information Fusion, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 103033 - 103033
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0World Neurosurgery, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 196, P. 123808 - 123808
Published: March 13, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0FEBS Open Bio, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 24, 2025
Medical digital twins (MDTs) are virtual representations of patients that simulate the biological, physiological, and clinical processes individuals to enable personalized medicine. With increasing complexity omics data, particularly multiomics, there is a growing need for advanced computational frameworks interpret these data effectively. Foundation models (FMs), large‐scale machine learning pretrained on diverse types, have recently emerged as powerful tools improving interpretability decision‐making in precision This review discusses integration FMs into MDT systems, their role enhancing multiomics data. We examine current challenges, recent advancements, future opportunities leveraging analysis MDTs, with focus application
Language: Английский
Citations
0International Journal of Medical Informatics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 105871 - 105871
Published: March 1, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8, P. 100120 - 100120
Published: March 22, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0Published: April 9, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0