Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Perspectives on Psychological Science, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 17(4), P. 915 - 936

Published: Jan. 19, 2022

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this article provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental-health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support mental health during pandemic beyond.

Language: Английский

---

Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress during COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 11, P. 519 - 525

Published: Sept. 11, 2020

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis has greatly affected human lives across the world. Uncertainty and quarantine have been affecting people’s mental health. Estimations of health problems are needed immediately for better planning management these concerns at a global level. A rapid scoping review was conducted to get estimation in COVID-19 pandemic during first 7 months. Peer-reviewed, data-based journal articles published English language were searched PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar electronic databases from December June 2020. Papers that met inclusion criteria analyzed discussed this review. total 16 studies included. Eleven China, two India, one Spain, Italy, Iran. Prevalence all forms depression 20%, anxiety 35%, stress 53% combined study population 113,285 individuals. prevalence rate depression, anxiety, stress, sleep problems, psychological distress general found be higher pandemic.

Language: Английский

---

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility in ten countries and associated perceived risk for all transport modes

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 16(2), P. e0245886 - e0245886

Published: Feb. 1, 2021

The restrictive measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have triggered sudden massive changes travel behaviors of people all around world. This study examines individual mobility patterns for transport modes (walk, bicycle, motorcycle, car driven alone, company, bus, subway, tram, train, airplane) before and during restrictions adopted ten countries on six continents: Australia, Brazil, China, Ghana, India, Iran, Italy, Norway, South Africa United States. cross-country also aims at understanding predictors protective related sector COVID-19. Findings hinge upon an online survey conducted May 2020 (N = 9,394). empirical results quantify tremendous disruptions both commuting non-commuting travels, highlighting substantial reductions frequency types trips use modes. In terms potential virus spread, airplanes buses are perceived be riskiest modes, while avoidance public is consistently found across countries. According Protection Motivation Theory, sheds new light fact that two indicators, namely income inequality, expressed as Gini index, reported number deaths due per 100,000 inhabitants, aggravate respondents' perceptions. research indicates socio-economic inequality morbidity not only actual health risks, well documented relevant literature, but risks. These findings document global impact crisis provide guidance transportation practitioners developing future strategies.

Language: Английский

---

COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10)

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 15(10), P. e0240011 - e0240011

Published: Oct. 6, 2020

Background Understanding public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 may foster improved cooperation. Trust in and population risk exposure influence perception the response. Other population-level characteristics, such as country socio-economic development, morbidity mortality, degree democratic government, perception. Methods findings We developed a novel ten-item instrument that asks respondents rate key aspects their government's response pandemic (COVID-SCORE). examined whether results varied by gender, age group, education level, monthly income. also internal external validity index using appropriate predefined variables. To test for dimensionality results, we used principal component analysis (PCA) ten survey items. found Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 first PCA explained 60% variance with remaining factors having eigenvalues below 1, strongly indicating tool is both reliable unidimensional. Based on from 13,426 people randomly selected general 19 countries, mean national scores ranged 35.76 (Ecuador) 80.48 (China) out maximum 100 points. Heterogeneity observed across age, income greatest amount heterogeneity between countries. National correlated respondents' reported levels trust country-level mortality rates. Conclusions The COVID-SCORE demonstrated satisfactory validity. It help governments more effectively engage constituents current future efforts control COVID-19. Additional country-specific assessment should be undertaken measure trends over time other

Language: Английский

---

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

Royal Society Open Science, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 8(2)

Published: Feb. 1, 2021

The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers investigate how psychological differ across countries and cultures, this has impacted behaviour, coping trust government efforts slow spread virus. Starting March 2020, leveraged convenience unpaid online recruitment generate public data. objective present analysis is understand relationships between months coronavirus restrictions help different measures succeed or fail changing behaviour. There were variations within Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, stressed, having slightly governments' efforts, there no clear geographical pattern compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder protect themselves others. However, concern itself did not account for all variances experienced stress during restrictions. More alarmingly, such associated less compliance. Further, those most trusted primarily where policies strict. While a disease source mental distress, other factors including strictness protective measures, social support personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration fully appreciate impact why some people follow guidelines intended others infection. Stage 1 manuscript submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) 18 May 2020. Following IPA, accepted version preregistered Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/ytbcs . This preregistration performed prior analysis.

Language: Английский

---

Mental Health During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Recommendations for Moving Forward

Published: Feb. 19, 2021

COVID-19 has infected millions of people and upended the lives most humans on planet. Researchers from across psychological sciences have sought to document investigate impact in myriad ways, causing an explosion research that is broad scope, varied methods, challenging consolidate. Because policy practice aimed at helping live healthier happier requires insight robust patterns evidence, this paper provides a rapid thorough summary high-quality studies available through early 2021 examining mental health consequences living pandemic. Our review evidence indicates anxiety, depression, distress increased months Meanwhile, suicide rates, life satisfaction, loneliness remained largely stable throughout first year In response these insights, we present seven recommendations (one urgent, two short-term, four ongoing) support during pandemic beyond.

Language: Английский

---

Assessing concerns for the economic consequence of the COVID-19 response and mental health problems associated with economic vulnerability and negative economic shock in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 15(10), P. e0240876 - e0240876

Published: Oct. 27, 2020

Many different countries have been under lockdown or extreme social distancing measures to control the spread of COVID-19. The potentially far-reaching side effects these not yet fully understood. In this study we analyse results a multi-country survey conducted in Italy (N = 3,504), Spain 3,524) and United Kingdom 3,523), with two separate analyses. first analysis, examine elicitation citizens' concerns over downplaying economic consequences during COVID-19 pandemic. We for Social Desirability Bias through list experiment included survey. second data from same predict level stress, anxiety depression associated being economically vulnerable having affected by negative shock. To accomplish this, used prediction algorithm based on machine learning techniques. quantify size population, compare its magnitude number people using susceptibility, vulnerability behavioural change collected questionnaire. find that concern economy "the way out" is diffuse there evidence minor underreporting. Additionally, estimate around 42.8% populations three are at high risk anxiety, depression, their exposure

Language: Английский

---

Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: Large-Scale, Online, Self-Reported Population Survey

Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal Year: 2020, Volume and Issue: 22(9), P. e21319 - e21319

Published: Sept. 1, 2020

In this paper, we describe the results of analyzing a large-scale survey, called Covid19Impact to assess citizens feedback on four areas related COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: social contact behavior, financial impact, working situation and health status. A total 24 questions cover demographics, their home situation, personal economic workplace health. The survey was responded by 156,614 participants between evening March 28th April 2nd, 2020. Such large response enables us gain new insights, as well an unprecedented glimpse at respondents experiences concerns during current pandemic. From analysis, draw several implications for design public policies management

Language: Английский

---

The intelligent lockdown: Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the Netherlands

Published: May 13, 2020

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Dutch government has introduced an “intelligent lockdown” with stay at home and social distancing measures. The approach mitigate virus focuses less on repression more moral appeals self-discipline. This study assessed how compliance measures have worked out in practice what factors might affect whether people comply We analyzed data from online survey, conducted between April 7-14, among 568 participants. overall results showed reported was high. suggests that some extent as hoped practice. Repression did not play a significant role compliance, while intrinsic (moral social) motivations produce better compliance. Yet self-discipline work for everyone, lower impulse control were likely violate rules. addition, who lacked practical capacity follow those opportunity break Sustained therefore, relies support aid maintain restrictions reduce opportunities unsafe gatherings. These findings suggest several important recommendations combating pandemic.

Language: Английский

---

Predictors of well-being and productivity among software professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic – a longitudinal study

Empirical Software Engineering, Journal Year: 2021, Volume and Issue: 26(4)

Published: April 28, 2021

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced governments worldwide to impose movement restrictions on their citizens. Although critical reducing the virus' reproduction rate, these come with far-reaching social and economic consequences. In this paper, we investigate impact of an individual level among software engineers who were working from home. professionals are accustomed digital tools, but not all them remotely, in day-to-day work, abrupt enforced work-from-home context resulted unprecedented scenario for engineering community. a two-wave longitudinal study (N = 192), covered over 50 psychological, social, situational, physiological factors that have previously been associated well-being or productivity. Examples include anxiety, distractions, coping strategies, psychological physical needs, office set-up, stress, work motivation. This design allowed us identify variables explained unique variance Results (1) quality contacts predicted positively, stress individual's negatively when controlling other consistently across both waves; (2) boredom distractions productivity negatively; (3) was less strongly predictor at time two compared one, suggesting adapted lockdown situation time; (4) analyses did provide evidence any variable causal Overall, conclude home per se significant challenge engineers. Finally, our can assess effectiveness current general support guidelines provides tailored insights professionals.

Language: Английский

---