Published: Nov. 6, 2024
Language: Английский
Education Sciences, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 14(6), P. 636 - 636
Published: June 13, 2024
The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage GenAI systems higher education (HE) and, thus, it still unclear how to make effective technology for teaching learning practice. This paper provides an overview current state research on HE. To this end, study conducted systematic review relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using preferred reporting items reviews meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. search criteria revealed total 625 papers, which 355 met final inclusion criteria. findings from showed future trends documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, co-authorship. gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding detection AI-generated text, may be beneficial understand can incorporated into supporting educational curriculum assessments, teaching, delivery. Furthermore, need additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional HE through collaboration. will strengthen awareness students, tutors, other stakeholders, instrumental formulating guidelines, frameworks, policies usage.
Language: Английский
Citations
22
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 1 - 22
Published: Jan. 21, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1
Journal of Academic Ethics, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 14, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
1
Information Systems Frontiers, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 13, 2025
Abstract The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has disrupted academic institutions across the world, presenting transformative challenges for decision makers, and leading to questions around existing methods practices within higher education (HE). widespread adoption GenAI tools processes highlights an ongoing change perceptions role humans machines. Academics have expressed concerns relating to: integrity, undermining critical thinking, lowering standards threat models. This study presents a mixed approach developing valuable insight key underlying impacting HE. results highlight many makers in formation policy strategic direction. findings identify significant interdependencies between associated with We further discuss implications high levels driving power factors: (i) perceived risks from Large Language Model training learning; (ii) reliability outputs context impact on creativity making; (iii) poor platform regulation. posit this research as offering new perspective changing landscape HE through GenAI.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Education and Information Technologies, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown
Published: Feb. 26, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Education Sciences, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(3), P. 329 - 329
Published: March 7, 2025
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has opened new avenues for enhancing academic writing through student–chatbot interactions. While initial research explored this potential, deeper insights into the nature these interactions are needed. This study characterizes graduate students’ with AI chatbots writing, focusing on types assistance they sought and their communication style tone patterns. To achieve this, individual online sessions were conducted 43 students, chatbot analyzed using qualitative quantitative methods. analysis identified seven distinct by students. most frequent requests involved content generation expansion, followed source verification, then concept clarification definitions. Students also support consultation, text refinement formatting, and, less frequently, rephrasing modifying translation assistance. was “requesting,” marked direct appeals assistance, “questioning” “declarative” styles. In terms tone, “neutral” “praising” dominated interactions, reflecting engagement appreciation responses, while “reprimanding” tones relatively low. These findings highlight need tailored interventions that encourage students to seek a broader more in-depth range tasks.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: unknown, P. 181 - 208
Published: Jan. 17, 2025
This chapter explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education with an emphasis on pedagogy, instruction, and administration for student learning achievement. The paradigm shift moved focus from teacher-centered to learner-centered systems involving AI-powered tools personalized such as intelligent tutoring, adaptive systems, natural language processing (NLP), machine (ML), robotics, automated grading, feedback offer enhanced opportunities teaching learning. However, AI technological transformation presented challenges form ethical considerations, algorithm biases, curriculum development, lack infrastructure, accessibility issues. discusses history evolution AI, technologies education, enhancing pedagogy faculty support, administrative efficiency. Additionally, it addresses considerations future trends adoption education.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Frontiers in Education, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 9
Published: Aug. 7, 2024
Background The use of ChatGPT among university students has gained a recent popularity. current study aimed to assess the factors driving attitude and usage as an example generative artificial intelligence (genAI) in United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods This cross-sectional was based on previously validated Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-based survey instrument termed TAME-ChatGPT. self-administered e-survey distributed by emails for enrolled UAE universities during September–December 2023 using convenience-based approach. Assessment demographic academic variables, TAME-ChatGPT constructs’ roles conducted univariate followed multivariate analyses. Results final sample comprised 608 participants, 91.0% whom heard while 85.4% used before study. Univariate analysis indicated that positive associated with three constructs namely, lower perceived risks, anxiety, higher scores technology/social influence. For usage, being male, nationality, point grade average (GPA) well four usefulness, risks use, behavior/cognitive construct ease-of-use construct. In analysis, only explained variance towards (80.8%) its (76.9%). Conclusion findings is commonplace UAE. determinants included cognitive behavioral factors, ease determined These should be considered understanding motivators successful adoption genAI including education.
Language: Английский
Citations
4
Health Science Reports, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 8(2)
Published: Feb. 1, 2025
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, such as GPT-3, Wordtune, and Jenni, into academic settings has revolutionized content creation, raising significant questions about authorship originality. While AI offers benefits in efficiency productivity, it presents substantial challenges to integrity. This paper examines these the need for new frameworks policies ensure ethical use. Our study aims develop promoting use safeguarding work authenticity. We employed project-based learning (PBL) methodology enhance student engagement performance. A total 179 students participated. PBL involves real-world projects, fostering critical thinking research skills. Turnitin was used evaluate similarity percentage submitted papers, with a maximum allowable 20%. Results showed that had higher performance (82.5 vs. 66.5) lower percentages (4.5% 13%) compared traditional literature review assessments. effectively identified AI-generated content, although struggled more sophisticated texts. findings highlight effectiveness originality reducing plagiarism. Integrating methodologies, along education, can help institutions maintain integrity while leveraging benefits. Future should refine strategies adapt evolving educational landscape.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
Civilia., Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 15(1), P. 23 - 38
Published: Feb. 22, 2025
Language: Английский
Citations
0