Journal of Forestry,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
118(3), P. 244 - 259
Published: March 27, 2020
Abstract
Silvicultural
decisions
and
forest-management
practices
in
Minnesota
represent
the
collaboration
partnership
between
forest
managers
from
multiple
organizations
researchers.
To
better
understand
current
practices,
trends,
needs,
opportunities,
has
invested
collection
of
quantitative
data
on
application
silvicultural
systems
activities
1991,
1996,
2008,
2017.
Drawing
those
data,
goal
our
study
is
to
summarize
26
years
characterize
quantify
trends
practices.
During
this
period
time,
timberland
ownership
(acres)
increased,
whereas
harvested
volume
decreased
(cords).
Across
state,
federal,
county,
industry,
tribal
lands,
which
collectively
majority
timberlands
Minnesota,
clearcut
system
91%
area
1991
72
percent
In
contrast,
proportion
total
as
part
shelterwood,
seed
tree,
selection,
thinning
treatments
all
more
than
doubled
Factors
influencing
changes
relate
health
diseases,
shifts
structure,
organizational
policy
and/or
goals.
The
factors
identified
mirror
many
are
experiencing
other
regions,
nationally
internationally.
Ecosphere,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
13(10)
Published: Oct. 1, 2022
Abstract
There
is
increasing
momentum
to
implement
conservation
and
management
approaches
that
adapt
forests
climate
change
so
as
sustain
ecosystem
functions.
These
range
from
actions
designed
increase
the
resistance
of
current
composition
structure
negative
impacts
those
transition
substantially
different
characteristics.
A
component
many
adaptation
will
likely
include
assisted
migration
future
climate‐adapted
tree
species
or
genotypes.
While
forest‐assisted
(FAM)
has
been
discussed
conceptually
examined
experimentally
for
almost
a
decade,
operationalizing
FAM
(i.e.,
routine
use
in
forest
projects)
lags
behind
acceptance
need
adaptation.
As
vulnerability
ecosystems
increases,
may
become
an
integral
tool
reduce
long‐term
risks
function,
despite
real
perceived
barriers
its
implementation.
Here
we
discuss
concept
operational‐scale
why
it
remains
controversial,
not
yet
widely
adopted
We
present
three
case
studies
illustrate
how
practice
can
be
approached
pragmatically
within
framework
acceptance.
Finally,
path
toward
advancing
wide
FAM.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
38(1), P. 55 - 71
Published: Oct. 3, 2022
Adaptive
management
(AM)
is
a
stepwise
iterative
process
in
which
interventions
are
implemented,
their
effects
monitored
and
evaluated,
the
next
intervention
adapted
according
to
knowledge
gained.In
theory,
this
of
learning
adaptation
leads
increased
understanding
ecological
processes
improved
management.
However,
AM
approach
faces
many
obstacles
its
effective
implementation.These
may
be
exacerbated
by
emerging
challenges
related
rapidly
changing
environment.
In
face
large-scale
climate
land
use
change,
AM's
not
keep
pace
with
environmental
changes.To
inform
future
schemes,
transdisciplinary
needed
address
technical
social
components
AM,
but
also
ecosystem
governance
system.
widely
promoted
improve
natural
resources,
yet
implementation
challenging.
We
show
that
only
per
se
external
factors
such
as
properties
systems.
To
overcome
obstacles,
there
need
build
capacities
within
ensuring
adequate
tools,
collaboration,
learning.
Additionally,
building
legal
institutional
frames
can
enable
necessary
flexibility
Furthermore,
systems
experiencing
profound
changes
wildlife
populations,
even
more
critical
will
cope
uncertainty
changed
conditions.
For
decades,
(see
Glossary)
has
been
touted
an
decision-making
capable
handling
complexities
uncertainties
when
managing
resources
[1.Holling
C.S.
Environmental
Assessment
Management.
John
Wiley
&
Sons,
1978Google
Scholar,
2.Walters
C.J.
Holling
Large-scale
experiments
doing.Ecology.
1990;
71:
2060-2068Crossref
Scopus
(1030)
Google
3.Allen
C.R.
Gunderson
L.H.
Pathology
failure
design
adaptive
management.J.
Environ.
Manag.
2011;
92:
1379-1384Crossref
PubMed
(221)
4.Westgate
M.J.
et
al.Adaptive
biological
systems:
review.Biol.
Conserv.
2013;
158:
128-139Crossref
(259)
Scholar].
adaptation,
using
structured
reach
goals
[5.Johansson
J.
al.Inspired
decision
making:
collaborative
multiple
forest
values.Ecol.
Soc.
2018;
23:
1-11Crossref
(9)
6.Bunnefeld
N.
al.Decision-making
Conservation
Natural
Resource
Management:
Models
for
Interdisciplinary
Approaches.
Cambridge
University
Press,
2017Crossref
7.Williams
B.K.
management:
The
U.S.
Department
Interior
Technical
Guide.
Dept.
Interior,
Management
Working
Group,
2009Google
Often
referred
'loop',
involves
iteration
several
stages,
including
set-up
(framing
problem
identification
objectives,
hypotheses,
actions),
implementation,
monitoring,
evaluation
(Figure
1).
Based
on
gained
from
latter
original
reviewed
adjusted
if
necessary,
new
'AM
loop'
ensues
Scholar,6.Bunnefeld
Scholar,7.Williams
This
'learning
doing'
[2.Walters
Scholar]
assumed
lead
system
thereby
ability
fulfil
objectives.
both
scientific
literature
[4.Westgate
Scholar,8.Perino
A.
al.Biodiversity
post-2020:
closing
gap
between
global
targets
national-level
implementation.Conserv.
Lett.
2022;
15e12848https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12848Crossref
(20)
Scholar,9.Folke
C.
al.Resilience
sustainable
development:
capacity
world
transformations.Ambio.
2002;
31:
437-440Crossref
(1682)
international
agreements,
example,
part
endorsed
Convention
Biological
Diversity
implemented
through
Malawi
principles
[10.Prins
H.H.T.
Principles:
clarifications
thoughts
underlay
approach.in:
Schei
P.J.
Proceedings
Norway/UN
Conference
Ecosystem
Approach
Sustainable
Use
Diversity.
Norwegian
Directorate
Nature
Management/Norwegian
Institute
ResearchTrondheim,
1999:
23-30Google
deemed
applicable
scarce
abundant
Scholar],
it
manage
slow
well
rapid
resource
availability
Scholar,11.Marjakangas
al.International
Single
Species
Action
Plan
Taiga
Bean
Goose
(Technical
series
No.
56),
AEWA,
Bonn,
Germany.2015Google
Scholar,12.Madsen
al.Implementation
first
plan
European
migratory
waterbird
population:
case
Svalbard
pink-footed
goose
Anser
brachyrhynchus.Ambio.
2017;
462:
275-289Crossref
(68)
When
comes
applied
spatial
scales
ranging
local
biome
[13.Cummings
restoration
sand-mined
areas
conservation.J.
Appl.
Ecol.
2005;
42:
160-170Crossref
(34)
Scholar,14.Nichols
J.D.
harvest
North
American
waterfowl
populations:
brief
history
prospects.J.
Ornithol.
2007;
148:
343-349Crossref
(188)
Despite
wide
range
actors
advocating
few
projects
have
used
deliver
outcomes
Scholar,15.Richardson
S.
al.A
systematic
review
control
invasive,
non-native
mammals,
other
human–wildlife
conflicts.Mamm.
Rev.
2020;
50:
147-156Crossref
(24)
proposes
lack
successful
examples
interacting
causes
Scholar,16.Gillson
L.
al.Finding
common
ground
evidence-based
approaches
biodiversity
conservation.Trends
Evol.
2019;
34:
31-44Abstract
Full
Text
PDF
(48)
Scholar]:
complexity
terms
administrative
levels
carried
out
over
large
[17.Cash
D.W.
al.Scale
cross-scale
dynamics:
information
multilevel
world.Ecol.
2006;
11:
1-12Crossref
Moreover,
conducted
social–ecological
system,
instances
depends
multi-actor
understanding.
Current
megatrends
–
overexploitation
degradation
[18.IPBES
Global
assessment
report
services
Intergovernmental
Science-Policy
Platform
Biodiversity
Services.
IPBES
secretariat,
Germany2019Google
19.Fox
A.D.
Madsen
Threatened
species
super-abundance:
unexpected
implications
conservation.Ambio.
46:
179-187Crossref
(103)
20.Meek
C.L.
human
dimensions
marine
mammal
policy
North.Mar.
Policy.
35:
466-476Crossref
(28)
21.Walther
G.R.
Community
responses
recent
change.Philos.
Trans.
R.
B
Biol.
Sci.
2010;
365:
2019-2024Crossref
(869)
cause
additional
too
these
[22.Cammen
K.M.
al.Predator
recovery,
shifting
baselines,
they
create.Ecosphere.
10e02579https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2579Crossref
(15)
Wildlife
populations
change
quickly
profoundly,
rarity
abundance
vice
versa.
conservation
drastically
status
red-listed
mammals
birds
full
recovery
[19.Fox
Scholar,23.Apollonio
M.
al.European
ungulates
21st
century.
2010Google
Scholar,24.Chapron
G.
al.Recovery
carnivores
Europe's
modern
human-dominated
landscapes.Science.
2014;
346:
1517-1519Crossref
(1173)
require
swift
shift
strategy
objectives
avoid
either
continued
population
decline
exploited
species,
or
impact
ecosystems
livelihoods
superabundant
Scholar,25.Tyre
A.J.
Michaels
Confronting
socially
generated
1365-1370Crossref
(36)
Such
prompt
innovation
certain
organisations:
allow
flexibility.
Several
reviews
identified
listed
possible
Scholar,26.Gregory
al.Deconstructing
criteria
applications
management.Ecol.
16:
2411-2425Crossref
(231)
Scholar,27.Williams
Brown
E.D.
Double-loop
need,
challenge,
opportunity.Environ.
62:
995-1006Crossref
(30)
any
systematically
quantified
frequency.
quantification
valuable
highlight
particularly
problematic
able
present
solutions
coherent
framework.
current
megatrends,
assist
putting
focus
profoundly
conditions
goals.
analysis
timely,
set
become
frequent
near
future.
facing
mega
trends,
respects
similar
management,
otherwise.
Lessons
learnt
therefore
provide
insights
generally.
about
quantify
frequency
different
categories
special
emphasis
scenarios
(Appendix
S1
supplemental
online).
then
identify
formulate
recommendations
how
AM.
As
illustration
addressed
practice,
we
study
currently
engaging
practitioners
makers,
namely,
flyway
(Box
1).Box
1Case
study:
geeseAM
illustrative
example
handle.
It
uncertainty,
declining
strategies
increasing
mitigation
disservices
(e.g.,
impact,
crop
damage,
air
safety
concerns).
recently
rare
threatened
same
[11.Marjakangas
Scholar,19.Fox
Scholar,80.Buij
al.Balancing
function,
resulting
expanding
populations.Ambio.
301-318Crossref
(43)
Scholar,88.Montràs-Janer
T.
al.Relating
national
damage
grazing
birds:
56:
2286-2297Crossref
migrate
across
nations
legislations,
cultures,
norms
[89.Bainbridge
I.
Scotland:
overview.Ambio.
224-230Crossref
Scholar,90.Stroud
D.
al.Key
actions
towards
geese.Ambio.
328-338Crossref
(23)
coordinating
becomes
challenge
[91.Tombre
I.M.
al.Towards
solution
goose-agriculture
conflict
Norway,
1988-2012:
interplay
policy,
stakeholder
influence
dynamics.PLoS
One.
8e71912https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.poneCrossref
(38)
Scholar,92.Eriksson
al.The
public
geese:
rise?.Hum.
Dimens.
Wildl.
25:
421-437Crossref
(14)
Scholar].To
challenges,
secretariat
African–Eurasian
Migratory
Waterbird
Agreement
(https://www.unep-aewa.org/)
approached
countries
sharing
species.
Important
parts
proposed
were
create
forums
discussion
groups
communication,
consensus-building,
engagement
among
stakeholders,
form
platforms
where
delegations
(authorities,
experts,
interest
groups)
meet
decisions
I).
meetings
now
arranged
annually,
task
force
continuously
work
issues
species-specific
questions
data
collection).
Practitioners
supported
scientists
via
platform
(collecting
compiling
data)
modelling
consortium
(providing
predictive
models).
Using
structure,
plans
launched
Scholar,93.Powolny
al.AEWA
International
Greylag
(Anser
anser)
AEWA
Series
71.
Germany.2018Google
Scholar,94.Jensen
G.H.
Barnacle
-
Russia/Germany
Netherlands
population,
East
Greenland/Scotland
Ireland
Svalbard/South-west
Scotland
population.
70.
all
striving
viable
while
minimising
'ecosystem
disservices'
[95.Lefebvre
greater
snow
caerulescens
atlanticus:
overabundant
population.Ambio.
262-274Crossref
based
models,
coordinated
hunting
quotas
One
(pink-footed
goose,
brachyrhynchus)
size
approaching
goal
[12.Madsen
Yet,
requires
at
level
support
nationally
agreed
actively
contribute
achieving
them
[96.Tombre
al.Population
means
organised
effort:
experiences
voluntary
arrangement.Ambio.
51:
728-742Crossref
(4)
suggests
further
capacity-building
countries,
regional
levels.The
good
strengthen
handle
some
remain,
one
illustrated
protection
barnacle
(Branta
leucopsis)
II),
permitted
At
present,
makes
impossible
reduce
most
Europe,
remains
open
much
less
Thus,
legislative
precautionary
rescue
critically
small
sometimes
order
prevent
irreversible
disservices'.
shifts
inside
outside
(i.e.,
legislation
structure)
[20.Meek
Scholar].Figure
IIThe
shown
going
3–4
causing
(AM).View
Large
Image
Figure
ViewerDownload
Hi-res
image
Download
(PPT)
levels.
three
main
to:
(i)
process'
inadequate
actor
involvement,
shortcomings
operational
processes),
(ii)
'ecosystem',
focusing
environment
was
applied,
(iii)
'governance',
comprising
frame
Canadian Journal of Forest Research,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
51(2), P. 172 - 180
Published: Oct. 20, 2020
Sustaining
the
structure,
function,
and
services
provided
by
forest
ecosystems
in
face
of
changing
climate
disturbance
regimes
represents
a
grand
challenge
for
managers
policy
makers.
To
address
this
challenge,
range
adaptation
approaches
have
been
proposed
centered
on
conferring
ecosystem
resilience
adaptive
capacity;
however,
considerable
uncertainty
exists
regarding
how
to
translate
these
broad
often
theoretical
frameworks
on-the-ground
practice.
Complicating
issue
has
movement
away,
some
cases,
from
other
recent
advances
management,
namely
ecological
silviculture
strategies
that
focus
restoration.
In
paper,
we
highlight
areas
compatibility
conflict
between
two
reviewing
four
principles
(continuity,
complexity
diversity,
timing,
context)
perspective
global
change
adaptation.
We
conclude
given
many
commonalities
outcomes
conditions
capacity,
remain
relevant
starting
point
guiding
operationalization
strategies.
BioScience,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
73(8), P. 575 - 586
Published: July 31, 2023
Abstract
Tree
planting
is
increasingly
being
adopted
as
a
strategy
to
address
global
change,
including
mitigation,
adaptation,
and
restoration.
Although
reforestation
has
long
been
central
forest
management,
the
desired
outcomes
of
traditional
emerging
tree-planting
strategies
face
barriers
linked
lack
ecological
diversity
in
nurseries.
In
present
article,
we
outline
how
insufficient
nursery
seedlings
among
species,
genotypes,
stock
types
impeded
will
continue
hinder
implementation
diverse
or
climate-suitable
targets,
now
into
future.
To
support
this,
demonstrate
disparities
seedling
inventories,
focusing
on
northern
United
States.
overcome
these
challenges,
recommend
avenues
for
improving
policy
financing,
informational
resources
training,
research
monitoring.
Absent
advances,
current
production
practices
fall
short
ambitious
goals
proposed
restoration
change
mitigation
adaptation.
Biogeosciences,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
17(4), P. 901 - 915
Published: Feb. 21, 2020
Abstract.
All
wetland
ecosystems
are
controlled
by
water
table
and
soil
saturation
dynamics,
so
any
local-scale
deviation
in
elevation
thus
position
represents
variability
this
primary
control.
Wetland
microtopography
is
the
structured
typically
categorized
into
a
binary
classification
of
local
high
points
(hummocks)
low
(hollows).
Although
influence
on
vegetation
composition
biogeochemical
processes
wetlands
has
received
attention
around
globe,
its
role
forested
still
less
understood.
We
studied
relationships
among
understory
communities,
tree
biomass,
chemistry
10
black
ash
(Fraxinus
nigra
Marshall)
northern
Minnesota,
USA.
To
do
so,
we
combined
1
cm
resolution
surface
model
generated
from
terrestrial
laser
scanning
(TLS)
with
colocated
table,
vegetation,
measurements.
observed
that
was
an
important
structural
element
across
sites,
where
hummocks
were
loci
greater
species
richness;
midstory
canopy
basal
area;
higher
concentrations
chloride,
phosphorus,
base
cations.
In
contrast,
hollows
associated
nitrate
sulfate
concentrations.
also
found
effect
soils
at
wetter
sites
than
drier
suggesting
distance-to-mean
determinant
biogeochemistry.
These
findings
highlight
clear
controls
distributions
while
supporting
notion
arises
feedbacks
concentrate
nutrients,
productivity
microsite
highs,
especially
otherwise
wet
conditions.
therefore
conclude
fundamental
organizing
structure
wetlands.