Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9
Published: Nov. 24, 2021
Coronavirus
Disease
2019
(COVID-19)
restrictions,
including
national
lockdown,
social
distancing,
compulsory
quarantine,
and
organizational
measures
of
remote
working,
are
imposed
in
many
countries
organizations
to
combat
the
coronavirus.
The
various
restrictions
have
caused
different
impacts
on
employees'
mental
health
worldwide.
purpose
this
mini-review
is
investigate
impact
COVID-19
across
world.
We
searched
articles
Web
Science
Google
Scholar,
selecting
literature
focusing
conditions
under
restrictions.
findings
reveal
that
psychological
teleworking
associated
with
perceptions
its
pros
cons.
resuming
work
can
cause
mild
severe
issues,
whereas
capability
practice
distancing
positively
related
health.
Generally,
employees
developed
experienced
same
negative
positive
health,
whereas,
developing
countries,
reported
a
more
effect
One
explanation
unevenly
distributed
resources
assistances
countries.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,
Journal Year:
2020,
Volume and Issue:
33(1)
Published: Nov. 30, 2020
Abstract
Background
The
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
may
aggravate
workplace
conditions
that
impact
health-care
workers’
mental
health.
However,
it
can
also
place
other
stresses
on
workers
outside
of
their
work.
This
study
determines
the
effect
COVID-19
symptoms
negative
and
positive
health
workforce’s
experience
with
various
sources
support.
Effect
modification
by
demographic
variables
was
studied.
Methods
A
cross-sectional
survey
study,
conducted
between
2
April
4
May
2020
(two
waves),
led
to
a
convenience
sample
4509
in
Flanders
(Belgium),
including
paramedics
(40.6%),
nurses
(33.4%),
doctors
(13.4%)
management
staff
(12.2%).
About
three
four
were
employed
university
acute
hospitals
(29.6%),
primary
care
practices
(25.7%),
residential
centers
(21.3%)
or
sites
for
disabled
care.
In
each
two
waves,
participants
asked
how
frequently
(on
scale
0–10)
they
experienced
during
normal
circumstances
last
week,
referred
as
before
COVID-19,
respectively.
These
stress,
hypervigilance,
fatigue,
difficulty
sleeping,
unable
relax,
fear,
irregular
lifestyle,
flashback,
concentrating,
feeling
unhappy
dejected,
failing
recognize
own
emotional
response,
doubting
knowledge
skills
uncomfortable
within
team.
Associations
estimated
cumulative
logit
models
reported
odds
ratios.
needed
support
our
secondary
outcome
degree
which
relied
them.
Results
All
significantly
more
pronounced
versus
COVID-19.
For
there
12-fold
(odds
ratio
12.24,
95%
confidence
interval
11.11–13.49)
Positive
professional
such
one
make
difference
less
experienced.
association
generally
strongest
age
group
30–49
years,
females,
centers.
Health-care
rely
from
relatives
peers.
considerable
proportion,
respectively,
18
27%,
need
guidance
psychologists
leadership.
Conclusions
toll
crisis
has
been
heavy
workers.
Those
who
carry
leadership
positions
at
an
organizational
system
level
should
take
this
opportunity
develop
targeted
strategies
mitigate
key
stressors
well-being.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
19(3), P. 1592 - 1592
Published: Jan. 30, 2022
The
paper
revises
the
ample
empirical
and
theoretical
literature
on
sustainable
organizational
growth
strategic
leadership
relating
to
critical
aspects
of
ongoing
pandemic,
including
poverty,
social
responsibility,
public
health,
managerial
innovation.
Drawing
from
available
COVID-19,
management,
publications
released
2020
2021,
this
considers
influential
studies
exploring
core
business
concepts,
principles,
philosophies,
activities
for
accelerating,
stimulating,
nurturing
corporate
sustainability.
study
analyzed
characteristics
interrelation
133
articles
through
bibliometric
systemization
techniques.
We
shed
light
significant
influence
COVID-19
has
had
financial,
operational,
psychological
solvency
health
elucidate
expectations
implications
businesses
worldwide
concerning
long-term
financial
functional
impact
COVID-19.
An
overview
relevant
individual,
organizational,
external
factors
novel
disease's
relation
sustainability
are
provided.
emphasize
need
digital
transformation
following
upheaval
throughout
upcoming
years.
Some
generally
employed
techniques
in
response
adversity
entail
portfolio
diversification,
service
delivery
innovation,
product
redesigning,
new
market
development,
partnering
with
competitors
and/or
complementary
providers,
synergizing
other
stakeholders,
open
International Journal of Workplace Health Management,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
14(4), P. 386 - 408
Published: May 24, 2021
Purpose
The
purpose
of
this
study
is
to
explore
what
extent
employees'
mental
well-being
affects
their
productivity
while
working
from
home
(WFH)
during
the
COVID-19
crisis
and
whether
differ
across
some
socio-demographic
factors.
Design/methodology/approach
A
cross-sectional
with
online
questionnaires
was
designed
472
valid
responses
in
Indonesia.
Depression,
Anxiety
Stress
Scale
(DASS-21)
Individual
Work
Performance
Questionnaire
(IWPQ)
were
administered.
Non-parametric
tests
structural
equation
modeling
employed
analyze
data.
Findings
prevalence
depression
18.4%,
anxiety
46.4%
stress
13.1%,
relatively
good
productivity.
Gender,
age,
education
level,
job
experiences,
marital
status,
number
children
nature
organization
associated
psychological
health
but
not
productivity,
workspace
availability
influenced
both
outcomes.
path
model
showed
negative
correlation
between
WFH
Research
limitations/implications
This
may
contribute
implication
current
mandatory
on
Further
studies
need
address
representativeness
generalizability
issues
as
well
incorporating
potential
stressors.
Practical
implications
Organizations
adopt
a
future
arrangement
identify
individual
occupational
characteristics
that
provide
most
impacts
It
also
necessary
for
them
develop
proper
strategies
mitigate
risks
overcome
challenges.
Originality/value
There
still
lack
investigating
relationship
simultaneous
effects
how
they
affect
variables
context
COVID-19.
Journal of Global Health,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: May 23, 2022
Abstract
Background
This
systematic
review
aims
to
1)
summarize
the
prevalence
of
anxiety,
depression,
distress,
insomnia,
and
PTSD
in
adult
population
during
first
year
COVID
pandemic
developing
countries
2)
uncover
highlight
uneven
distribution
research
on
mental
health
all
across
regions.
Methods
Several
literature
databases
were
systemically
searched
for
meta-analyses
published
by
September
22,
2021,
rates
symptoms
worldwide.
We
meta-analysed
raw
data
individual
empirical
results
from
previous
meta-analysis
papers
different
Results
The
summarized
based
341
studies
with
a
total
1
704
072
participants
40
out
167
Africa,
Asia
(East,
Southeast,
South,
West),
Europe,
Latin
America.
Comparatively,
Africa
(39%)
West
(35%)
had
worse
overall
symptoms,
followed
America
(32%).
medical
students
(38%),
general
(30%),
frontline
care
workers
(HCWs)
(27%)
higher
than
those
HCWs
(25%)
populations
(23%).
Among
five
distress
(29%)
depression
most
prevalent.
Interestingly,
people
least
suffered
less
emergent
other
countries.
various
instruments
employed
lead
result
heterogeneity,
demonstrating
importance
using
well-established
standard
cut-off
points
(eg,
GAD-7,
GAD-2,
DASS-21
PHQ-9
ISI
insomnia).
Conclusions
effort
COVID-19
has
been
highly
scope
outcomes.
meta-analysis,
largest
this
topic
date,
shows
that
are
prevalent
yet
differ
accumulated
evidence
study
can
help
enable
prioritization
assistance
efforts
allocate
attention
resources
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Feb. 3, 2021
Concerns
toward
public
well-being
and
mental
health
are
increasing
considering
the
COVID-19
pandemic's
global
societal
individual
impact.
The
present
study
builds
on
current
body
of
literature
by
examining
role
toughness
(MT)
in
predicting
negative
affective
states
(depression,
anxiety
stress)
during
pandemic.
also
examined
effects
changes
employment
MT.
Participants
(
N
=
723)
completed
a
battery
questionnaires
including
Mental
Toughness
Questionnaire
48-item,
State-Trait
Anxiety
Inventory
,
Depression,
Stress
Scale
–
21
items
.
reported
relatively
higher
levels
depression,
stress
comparison
to
pre-COVID-19
samples
from
previous
research,
with
respondents
who
had
lost
their
jobs
pandemic
reporting
states.
Despite
this,
mentally
tough
individuals
appeared
report
lower
stress.
Moreover,
moderation
analyses
identified
some
interaction
between
MT
status
when
Our
findings
suggest
that
may
have
utility
reducing
adverse
individuals,
however,
further
longitudinal
research
is
needed
support
these
implications.
