Little
is
known
about
what
determines
the
perceptions
of
a
person
who
may
have
infected
someone
with
COVID-19.
We
examined
how
observers'
perception
affected
by
(not)
being
vaccinated
against
COVID-19
1)
observer
(study
participants),
2)
infectious
actor
(who
assessed),
and
3)
person.
Overall,
395
participants
were
assigned
to
one
four
conditions
which
differed
in
was
or
not.
found
that
observers
(as
opposed
unvaccinated)
attributed
more
responsibility
for
infection
unvaccinated
actor,
whom
they
perceived
as
less
moral,
trustworthy,
empathetic.
Generally,
it
did
not
affect
evaluation
whether
vaccinated,
just
Our
results
suggest
individuals
be
negatively
assessed
ones
when
are
suspected
source
infections.
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
10, P. e51054 - e51054
Published: Aug. 28, 2024
Background
The
autistic
population
is
rapidly
increasing;
meanwhile,
adults
face
disproportionate
risks
for
adverse
COVID-19
outcomes.
Limited
research
indicates
that
individuals
have
been
accepting
of
initial
vaccination,
but
has
yet
to
document
this
population’s
perceptions
and
acceptance
boosters.
Objective
This
study
aims
identify
person-level
community
characteristics
associated
with
vaccination
booster
among
adults,
along
self-reported
reasons
their
stated
preferences.
Understanding
information
crucial
in
supporting
vulnerable
given
evolving
guidelines
the
ending
public
health
emergency
pandemic.
Methods
Data
are
from
a
survey
conducted
Pennsylvania
April
11
September
12,
2022.
Demographic
characteristics,
experiences,
vaccine
decisions
were
compared
across
status
groups.
Chi-square
analyses
1-way
ANOVA
test
significant
differences.
Vaccination
ranked
by
frequency;
co-occurrence
was
identified
using
phi
coefficient
correlation
plots.
Results
Most
(193/266,
72.6%)
intended
receive
or
received
booster,
15%
(40/266)
did
not
intend
any
vaccine,
12.4%
(33/266)
dose
hesitant
accept
doses.
Reasons
hesitancy
varied
demographic
factors
experiences.
most
previously
contracting
COVID-19,
desire
access
about
discomfort
others
wearing
mask
(all
P=.001).
County-level
factors,
including
density
(P=.02)
percentage
county
voted
President
Biden
(P=.001)
also
significantly
differing
levels.
differed
those
who
booster.
Those
accepted
more
likely
endorse
protecting
trusting
as
basis
acceptance,
whereas
indicated
came
encouragement
someone
they
trusted.
Among
minority
believing
unsafe
would
make
them
feel
unwell
often
reported
reasons.
Conclusions
Intention
receiving
higher
than
vaccines
Pennsylvania.
Autistic
prioritized
others,
while
had
safety
concerns
vaccines.
These
findings
inform
opportunities
strategies
further
increase
rates
generally
better
support
already
strained
autism
services
system
landscape.
uptake
could
be
improved
leveraging
passive
diffusion
combat
misinformation
actively
seeking
alleviate
concerns.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
11(1)
Published: Aug. 28, 2024
Previous
studies
have
demonstrated
links
between
greater
religiosity
and
lower
COVID-19
vaccination
rates.
This
article
delves
into
an
explanation
for
these
relationships
by
investigating
the
role
of
belief
in
science
moral
foundations
that
may
elucidate
why
God
is
associated
with
intention.
Study
1
(n
=
689),
comparing
Polish
Catholics
atheists,
revealed
exhibited
a
intention,
this
relationship
mediated
among
Catholics.
Furthermore,
as
identification
denominational
group
increased,
negative
correlation
being
Catholic
intensified.
Findings
from
2,
conducted
752),
indicated
intrinsic
religious
orientation
negatively
related
to
fully
science.
Conversely,
extrinsic
was
positively
linked
3
469)
found
intention
Catholics,
compared
be
attributed
higher
levels
purity
loyalty
which,
turn,
were
weaker
These
results
underscore
complex
mechanisms
within
shape
their
motivation
vaccinate.
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2024,
Volume and Issue:
12
Published: Oct. 4, 2024
Younger
adults,
aged
18–39
years,
exhibit
low
COVID-19
additional
vaccine
(i.e.,
vaccination
beyond
the
original
2-dose
series)
uptake
recommended
in
Canada.
No
study
has
examined
how
altruistic
and
individualistic
messaging
can
influence
dose
intentions.
The
present
aimed
to
estimate
efficacy
of
altruism
individualism-based
videos
on
intentions
explore
multivariable
associations
between
related
individual
psychosocial
factors
intention
receive
vaccine.
Using
a
web-based
survey
three-arm,
pre-post
randomized
control
trial
design,
we
recruited
Canadians
years
both
English
French.
Participants
were
randomly
allocated
1:1:1
ratio
active
(COVID-19
general
information),
+
or
individualism.
video
interventions
developed
with
media
company,
based
results
focus
group
conducted
previously.
measurement
dosage
before
after
completing
was
informed
by
multistage
Precaution
Adoption
Process
Model.
McNemar
Chi-square
used
evaluate
within-group
changes,
Pearson
test
between-group
changes
post-intervention.
various
use
validated
scale
self-report
questions.
We
employed
generalized
Structural
Equation
Model
factors.
Analyses
performed
3,431
participants
(control:
n
=
1,149,
altruism:
1,142,
individualism:
1,140).
Within-group
showed
that
transitioned
significantly
all
three
groups
direction
higher
for
receiving
doses.
differences
post
intervention
not
significant.
found
include,
collectivism,
intellectual
humility,
intolerance
uncertainty,
religiosity,
identifying
as
gender
diverse,
being
indigenous
associated
intentions,
whereas
pandemic
fatigue
lower
Our
highlighted
short
includes
individualism
information
increase
among
young
adults.
Furthermore,
gained
comprehensive
understanding
ongoing
vaccination.
findings
be
public
health
around
Frontiers in Public Health,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
11
Published: Nov. 30, 2023
Introduction
The
Chinese
state
has
recently
implemented
the
COVID-19
Vaccine
Communication
Campaign
(CVCC)
to
counter
vaccine
hesitancy.
Nonetheless,
extant
literature
that
examines
acceptance
less
represented
communication
efforts.
Methods
To
address
this
lacuna,
we
qualitatively
explored
how
CVCCs
were
organized
in
communities
by
investigating
54
stakeholders.
Results
This
study
indicates
CVCC
was
sustained
top-down
political
pressure.
CVCCs’
components
involve
ideological
education
among
politically
affiliated
health
workers,
expanding
worker
networks,
training
implementing
media
promotion,
communicating
with
residents
using
persuasive
and
explanatory
techniques,
encouraging
multistakeholder
partnerships,
public
opinion-steered
coercive
approaches.
While
significantly
enhanced
acceptance,
lacking
open
communication,
stigmatizing
refusers,
insufficient
stakeholder
collaboration,
low
trust
vaccination
program
(CVP)
eroded
validity
of
CVCCs.
Discussion
promote
continuity
China,
performers
are
expected
conduct
inclusive
residents.
Furthermore,
CVP
planers
should
create
robust
partnerships
workers
ensuring
their
agreements
on
strategies
for
optimize
immunization
service
provision
depoliticize
CVPs.
Our
will
not
only
deepen
global
audiences’
understanding
authoritarian
China
but
also
offer
potential
neighborhood-level
solutions
local
BACKGROUND
The
autistic
population
is
rapidly
increasing;
meanwhile,
adults
face
disproportionate
risks
for
adverse
COVID-19
outcomes.
Limited
research
indicates
that
individuals
have
been
accepting
of
initial
vaccination,
but
has
yet
to
document
this
population’s
perceptions
and
acceptance
boosters.
OBJECTIVE
This
study
aims
identify
person-level
community
characteristics
associated
with
vaccination
booster
among
adults,
along
self-reported
reasons
their
stated
preferences.
Understanding
information
crucial
in
supporting
vulnerable
given
evolving
guidelines
the
ending
public
health
emergency
pandemic.
METHODS
Data
are
from
a
survey
conducted
Pennsylvania
April
11
September
12,
2022.
Demographic
characteristics,
experiences,
vaccine
decisions
were
compared
across
status
groups.
Chi-square
analyses
1-way
ANOVA
test
significant
differences.
Vaccination
ranked
by
frequency;
co-occurrence
was
identified
using
phi
coefficient
correlation
plots.
RESULTS
Most
(193/266,
72.6%)
intended
receive
or
received
booster,
15%
(40/266)
did
not
intend
any
vaccine,
12.4%
(33/266)
dose
hesitant
accept
doses.
Reasons
hesitancy
varied
demographic
factors
experiences.
most
previously
contracting
COVID-19,
desire
access
about
discomfort
others
wearing
mask
(all
<i>P</i>=.001).
County-level
factors,
including
density
(<i>P</i>=.02)
percentage
county
voted
President
Biden
(<i>P</i>=.001)
also
significantly
differing
levels.
differed
those
who
booster.
Those
accepted
more
likely
endorse
protecting
trusting
as
basis
acceptance,
whereas
indicated
came
encouragement
someone
they
trusted.
Among
minority
believing
unsafe
would
make
them
feel
unwell
often
reported
reasons.
CONCLUSIONS
Intention
receiving
higher
than
vaccines
Pennsylvania.
Autistic
prioritized
others,
while
had
safety
concerns
vaccines.
These
findings
inform
opportunities
strategies
further
increase
rates
generally
better
support
already
strained
autism
services
system
landscape.
uptake
could
be
improved
leveraging
passive
diffusion
combat
misinformation
actively
seeking
alleviate
concerns.
Przegląd Psychologiczny,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
66(2), P. 31 - 62
Published: Dec. 17, 2023
Cel:
W
trakcie
pandemii
COVID-19
wiele
osób
odczuwało
zagrożenie
swojej
wolności
z
powodu
wprowadzenia
przez
rządy
ograniczeń
dotyczących
określonych
zachowań,
które
motywowało
je
do
podejmowania
działań
przeciwko
tym
ograniczeniom.
Teoria
reaktancji
okazała
się
przydatna
w
wyjaśnianiu
motywacji
tych
sprzeciwiania
regulacjom
antycovidowym.
Opublikowano
badań,
pokazały,
że
doświadczanie
wobec
tej
polityki
prowadzi
nią
sprzecznych.
Celem
niniejszego
artykułu
jest
opisanie
systematycznego
przeglądu
badań
zależności
między
regulacjami
mającymi
na
celu
ograniczenie
a
reaktancją
działań.
Metoda:
Do
włączono
prace
baz
danych
EBSCO,
Web
of
Science
i
Scopus,
których
jednocześnie
dokonywano
pomiaru
jako
stanu
lub
cechy
oraz
zmiennych
bezpośrednio
związanych
walką
pandemią
COVID-19.
Wyniki:
Przegląd
literatury
pozwolił
zidentyfikować
59
antycovidowymi
Przeprowadzono
analizę
cech
badanych
populacji,
metodologii
uzyskanych
wyników.
pracy
wyszczególniono
środki
perswazyjne
nakłaniające
zgodnych
rekomendacjami
rządzących,
nasilają
obniżają
reaktancję
te,
nie
wpływają.
Ponadto
opisano
szereg
(cechą
stanem
przeciw
regulacjom)
gotowością
podążania
za
antycovidowymi.
Konkluzja:
Przedstawiony
przegląd
determinanty
odczuwania
antycovidowym
opisać
skutecznością
tychże
regulacji.
Wyniki
mogą
pomóc
projektowaniu
przyszłych
regulacji
ukierunkowanych
walkę
epidemiami.
Przegląd Psychologiczny,
Journal Year:
2023,
Volume and Issue:
66(2), P. 129 - 158
Published: Dec. 17, 2023
Objective:
During
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
many
individuals
perceived
a
threat
to
their
freedom
due
government-imposed
restrictions
on
specific
behaviors,
motivating
them
take
actions
against
these
limitations.
The
Reactance
Theory
(Brehm,
1981)
proved
valuable
in
explaining
motivation
of
resist
anti-COVID
regulations.
Numerous
studies
have
been
published,
demonstrating
that
experiencing
reactance
policy
leads
contradictory
measures.
This
article
aims
describe
systematic
review
examining
relationship
between
regulations
aimed
at
limiting
pandemic
and
actions.
Method:
included
works
from
EBSCO,
Web
Science,
Scopus
databases,
measuring
as
state
or
trait,
along
with
variables
directly
related
combating
pandemic.
Results:
literature
identified
59
An
analysis
characteristics
studied
populations,
research
methodology,
obtained
results
was
conducted.
study
outlined
persuasive
measures
encouraging
line
government
recommendations
intensify
reduce
reactance,
well
those
do
not
influence
it.
Furthermore,
it
described
various
relationships
(trait
regulations)
willingness
comply
Conclusion:
presented
determinants
effectiveness
may
aid
designing
future
epidemics.
Research
has
shown
a
mixed
relationship
between
education
and
vaccination
rates.
In
the
current
analysis,
we
aimed
to
determine
educational
level
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID-19)
We
performed
cross-country
analysis
on
data
from
133
countries.
Correlation
analyses
showed
that
higher
better
was
associated
with
COVID-19
When
regression
including
education,
health
system,
economic
development
variables,
education-COVID-19
relationships
were
mostly
reversed.
particular,
in
wealthy
countries,
as
mean
years
of
schooling
decreased
pupil-teacher
ratio
increased,
rates
increased.
less
affluent
greater
expenditures,
decreased.
explain
these
contradictions
by
describing
links
rates,
life
expectancy,
education-related
variables.
Our
findings
may
aid
promoting
more
effective
uptake
vaccination.
Little
is
known
about
what
determines
the
perceptions
of
a
person
who
may
have
infected
someone
with
COVID-19.
We
examined
how
observers'
perception
affected
by
(not)
being
vaccinated
against
COVID-19
1)
observer
(study
participants),
2)
infectious
actor
(who
assessed),
and
3)
person.
Overall,
395
participants
were
assigned
to
one
four
conditions
which
differed
in
was
or
not.
found
that
observers
(as
opposed
unvaccinated)
attributed
more
responsibility
for
infection
unvaccinated
actor,
whom
they
perceived
as
less
moral,
trustworthy,
empathetic.
Generally,
it
did
not
affect
evaluation
whether
vaccinated,
just
Our
results
suggest
individuals
be
negatively
assessed
ones
when
are
suspected
source
infections.