Preventive Medicine, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 166, P. 107341 - 107341
Published: Nov. 11, 2022
Language: Английский
Vaccines, Journal Year: 2022, Volume and Issue: 10(12), P. 2026 - 2026
Published: Nov. 26, 2022
This study systematically analyzed the literature using theory of planned behavior (TPB) as a theoretical framework to examine influence its constructs on vaccination intention against COVID-19. Quantitative studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, Web Science, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. The average rate COVID-19 was 73.19%, ranging from 31% 88.86%. Attitude had strongest association with (r+ = 0.487, 95% CI: 0.368–0.590), followed by subjective norms 0.409, 0.300–0.507), perceived behavioral control 0.286, 0.198–0.369). Subgroup analyses showed that pooled effect sizes TPB varied across geographic regions populations. large Asia, Europe, Oceania, especially among adult general population, parents, patients. Subjective Asia parents Perceived most dominant predictor acceptance Africa These findings suggest provides useful for predicting receive vaccine. Hence, public awareness educational programs aimed at promoting should consider achieve goal.
Language: Английский
Citations
39
Heliyon, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 10(3), P. e24826 - e24826
Published: Jan. 21, 2024
BackgroundMass vaccination against Covid-19 has been recognised as the most effective strategy for overcoming pandemic emergency and remains crucial in ongoing efforts to mitigate impact of virus. The present study aimed test efficacy an extended Theory Planned Behaviour (TPB) model predicting intention three different phases pandemic. Understanding how psychological drivers vaccine acceptance may have changed throughout is essential informing public health strategies addressing hesitancy, even current post-pandemic context.MethodsUsing a repeated cross-sectional survey, we tested hypothesised TPB (intention, attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, anticipated affective reactions, risk perception, trust science, institutions religiosity) across independent samples: before (T1: November–December 2020; N = 657), during (T2: March–May 2021; 818), after (T3: February–March 2022; 605) start campaign Italy.ResultsResults indicated significant differences between time points all investigated variables, pointing general trend improvement acceptability levels at T2 compared T1, worsening T3 other two points. Interestingly, net these differences, multi-group SEM analysis supported invariance, time, structural relationships examined within TPB.ConclusionFindings demonstrated stages pandemic, suggesting that model, its version, represents valuable framework designing interventions promoting uptake.
Language: Английский
Citations
8
Vaccines, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11(3), P. 623 - 623
Published: March 9, 2023
While considerable evidence supports the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, a sizable population expresses vaccine hesitancy. As per World Health Organization, hesitancy is one top 10 hazards to global health. Vaccine varies across countries, with India reporting least was higher toward booster doses than previous shots. Therefore, identifying factors determining hesitance (VBH) sine qua non successful vaccination campaign.This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 standards. A total 982 articles were pooled from Scopus, PubMed Embase, while 42 that addressed VBH finally included further analysis.We identified responsible divided them into three major groups: sociodemographic, financial, psychological. Hence, 17 stated age be factor hesitancy, most reports suggesting negative correlation between fear poor outcomes. Nine studies found females expressing greater males. Trust deficit in science (n = 14), concerns about 12), lower levels regarding infection 11), worry side effects 8) also reasons Blacks, Democrats, pregnant women showed high Few have income, obesity, social media, living vulnerable members as influencing study 44.1% towards could attributed dominantly low rural origin, previously unvaccinated status, or individuals. However, two other Indian reported lack availability slots, trust government, doses.Many confirmed multifactorial nature VBH, which necessitates multifaceted, individually tailored interventions address all potentially modifiable factors. This chiefly recommends strategizing campaign by evaluating appropriate communication (at both individual community levels) benefits risk losing immunity without them.
Language: Английский
Citations
21
Vaccines, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 11(4), P. 816 - 816
Published: April 7, 2023
This systematic review synthesizes the findings of quantitative studies examining relationships between Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs and COVID-19 vaccination intention. We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web Science, Scopus using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines identified 109 eligible studies. The overall intention rate was 68.19%. Perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action were three most frequently demonstrated predictors both primary series booster vaccines. For doses, influence susceptibility slightly increased, but impact severity, self-efficacy, on declined. severity's effect declined sharply from 2020 2022. barriers 2021, it skyrocketed in Conversely, role self-efficacy dipped Susceptibility, dominant Saudi Arabia, had weaker effects USA. Susceptibility severity a lower students, especially North America, health care workers. However, among parents. prevalent modifying variables age, gender, education, income, occupation. results show that HBM is useful predicting vaccine
Language: Английский
Citations
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 20(4), P. 2898 - 2898
Published: Feb. 7, 2023
COVID-19 reminded us of the importance vaccinating for successfully overcoming health-related crises. Yet, vaccine hesitancy is still present. This study examined impacts conspiracy theories, perceived risk, and trust in science on vaccination decisiveness. The was conducted at end third wave pandemic, July 2021, Cyprus. Data were collected via an online self-administered anonymous survey using convenience snowball sampling methods. Participants 363 adults who completed a set questionnaires that their believability ten vaccine-related dangerousness COVID-19, level scientists. results suggest (a) participants with high theory belief are less likely to be vaccinated, (b) perceive as dangerous disease more (c) vaccinated. implications findings discussed can used by public health officials campaigns.
Language: Английский
Citations
17
Pathogens, Journal Year: 2025, Volume and Issue: 14(2), P. 145 - 145
Published: Feb. 4, 2025
In the context of Italian National Herpes Zoster Vaccine program, an exploratory survey was conducted on a sample fragile adult patients to investigate representations disease and its prevention build future local vaccination campaigns. An ad hoc questionnaire administered 271 who had adjuvanted recombinant detect following: knowledge perception risks; information sources confidence in used; vaccination. Fragile have representation as serious (86.5%), they consider themselves informed concerning symptoms health effects. Women are more fearful impact (Chi-square = 10.03; DF 3; p-value 0.018), while those with higher average age less (R −158; 0.039). The that contributed construction illness personnel (73.5%), followed by web social (14.7%), media such radio TV (10.0%). Regarding vaccine representation, confident about science behind it believe everyone should receive it. However, high percentage (62.9%) fear side Our analysis highlights campaigns must be planned based target audience, individual contextual needs, disease, particularly when dealing frail patients, implement effective preventive interventions.
Language: Английский
Citations
0
BMC Public Health, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 24(1)
Published: April 22, 2024
Abstract Background Despite being a major advancement in modern medicine, vaccines face widespread hesitancy and refusal, posing challenges to immunization campaigns. The COVID-19 pandemic accentuated vaccine hesitancy, emphasizing the pivotal role of beliefs efficacy safety on acceptance rates. This study explores influence perceptions uptake Italy during pandemic. Methods We administered 70-item questionnaire representative sample 600 Italian speakers. Participants were tasked with assessing perceived effectiveness each dose, along providing reasons influencing their vaccination choices. Additionally, we conducted an experimental manipulation, exploring effects four framing messages that emphasized and/or participants’ willingness receive hypothetical fourth dose. Furthermore, participants asked about level trust scientific community public authorities, as well use different information channels for obtaining COVID-19-related information. Results Our reveals dynamic shift throughout pandemic, potentially compliance. Initially more effective than safe, this assessment reversed by time third Beliefs regarding safety, rather efficacy, played significant anticipating future vaccinations (e.g., booster dose). Safety-focused positively affected intent, while efficacy-focused showed limited impact. also observed changing trend vaccination, decline infection-related increase social related ones. dynamics evolved differently authorities community. Conclusions Vaccine perception is process shaped evolving factors like perceptions, levels, individual motivations. sheds light complex underlie impact vaccinate. discuss these results bounded rationality, loss aversion classic utility theory.
Language: Английский
Citations
3
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 33(5), P. 1297 - 1308
Published: June 18, 2023
Abstract Attitudes towards socially sensitive topics tend to be polarized and moralized. Literature showed that in the political arena people consider their group different from outgroup moral terms, how this perceived distance is capable of producing discrimination against outgroup. In light evidence, aim study ( N = 234) was examine dynamics between Pro‐vaxers No‐vaxers relation SARS‐COV‐2 vaccine. Participants evaluated strength attitude COVID‐19 vaccine, extent which They reported ingroup completed a scale animalistic dehumanization. Results positive association vaccine its moralization. The tendency moralize positively associated with perception outgroup, A sequential mediation model an indirect effect links dehumanization through moralization groups. are discussed recent theories on attitudes importance institutional communication. Please refer Supplementary Material section find article's Community Social Impact Statement .
Language: Английский
Citations
7
Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, Journal Year: 2023, Volume and Issue: 17
Published: Jan. 1, 2023
Pivetti et al. (2021a; 2021b) examined links between COVID-related conspiracy beliefs and acceptance of vaccinations in Italy Finland 2020. They found that moral purity negatively predicted confidence science, whereas political orientation beliefs. Confidence general beliefs, were to predict support for governmental restrictions attitudes towards vaccines, positively perceptions informational contamination. Finally, vaccines strongly the COVID-19 vaccine. The current research seeks replicate these findings conceptually on a predominately Muslim sample (N = 570, M age 26.69, 69.8% females) Turkey 2021, when COVID widely available. Measures religiosity left, center, right orientations added original instrument. Hypothesized serial mediational models tested using structural equation modelling. Results revealed left center science. Religiosity was related science toward vaccines. Conspiracy which turn government distrust mainstream media. Attitudes [This paper Special Issue “Conspiracy Theories about Infectious Diseases” post-hoc manner. Online publishing allows addition new papers published special issue, thereby permitting issue grow.]
Language: Английский
Citations
7
PLoS ONE, Journal Year: 2024, Volume and Issue: 19(3), P. e0287413 - e0287413
Published: March 14, 2024
As COVID-19 vaccines’ accessibility has grown, so the role of personal choice in vaccination, and not everybody is willing to vaccinate. Exploring personality traits’ associations with vaccination could highlight some person-level drivers of, barriers to, vaccination. We used self- informant-ratings Five-Factor Model domains their subtraits (a) measured approximately at time 100 Nuances Personality (100NP) item pool ( N = 56,575) (b) on average ten years before pandemic NEO Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3; 3,168). tested individual domains’ either items’ (in 100NP sample) or facets’ NEO-PI-3 as well collective ability predict using elastic net models trained independent sample partitions. Although facets did later, correlated sample, vaccinated people scoring slightly higher neuroticism agreeableness lower openness, controlling for age, sex, education. Collectively, five predicted an accuracy r .08. Associations were stronger level. Vaccinated were, average, more science-minded, politically liberal, respectful rules authority, anxious but less spiritual, religious, self-assured. The items collectively .31 accuracy. conclude that unvaccinated may be a psychologically heterogeneous group potential areas action campaigns.
Language: Английский
Citations
2