PharmacoEconomics,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
40(3), P. 341 - 354
Published: Jan. 20, 2022
We
aimed
to
elicit
preferences
of
the
French-speaking
Quebec
population
regarding
a
COVID-19
vaccination
program
and
characterize
individuals
with
respect
their
behaviors.
A
discrete
choice
experiment
was
conducted
in
Autumn
2020
via
web-based
survey.
Its
design
included
seven
attributes:
vaccine
origin,
effectiveness,
side
effects,
protection
duration,
priority
population,
waiting
time
get
vaccinated,
recommender
vaccine.
Utilities
were
estimated
using
mixed-logit
model
latent
class
logit
model.
Our
sample
1599
individuals.
From
this
total,
119
always
chose
opt-out
option
(7.4%).
According
model,
relative
weights
attributes
as
follows:
effectiveness
(28.48%),
effects
(23.68%),
duration
(17.41%),
origin
(12.75%),
(11.96%),
vaccinated
(3.62%),
(2.11%).
Five
classes
derived
from
Class
1
(9.13%)
wanted
fast
possible
composed
uncertain
more
vulnerable
5
(25.14%)
similar
full
sample,
mostly
favoring
vaccination.
Classes
2
(7.69%)
4
(15.82%)
"vaccine
hesitant
demanding"
but
different
sociodemographic
profiles.
Finally,
"anti-vaccine"
other
hesitant"
3
(42.21%).
This
study
showed
characteristics
that
are
likely
improve
uptake,
which
may
easily
lead
herd
immunity.
Different
profiles
respondents
also
various
levels
acceptance
toward
program,
help
better
understand
hesitancy
Preventive Medicine Reports,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
25, P. 101673 - 101673
Published: Dec. 16, 2021
Vaccine
hesitancy
is
a
challenge
for
the
success
and
optimal
implementation
of
COVID-19
immunization
programs
in
US.
The
objective
this
study
was
to
summarize
multilevel
determinants
vaccination
intention
US
inform
future
intervention
opportunities.
To
end,
we
conducted
rapid
systematic
review
by
searching
published
articles
via
PubMed
October
5,
2021,
following
PRISMA
guidelines.
One
hundred
six
were
included.
According
nationally
representative
studies,
overall
acceptance
rate
ranges
from
53.6%
84.4%.
Individual
(demographics,
health
history,
behaviors
beliefs),
interpersonal
(having
close
friend/family
member
impacted
COVID-19),
healthcare
societal
level
factors
(healthcare
provider
recommendations,
source/credential
related
information,
conspiracy
theories)
all
contributed
vaccine
This
demonstrates
that
vaccines
influenced
various
factors,
particularly
role
providers
enhancing
public
intent
vaccination.
Potential
interventions
mitigate
people's
concerns
over
address
vaccine-related
conspiracy/misinformation
social
media
are
also
critical
encourage
uptake
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(12), P. 1437 - 1437
Published: Dec. 6, 2021
The
emerging
SARS-CoV-2
variants
and
waning
vaccine-elicited
immunity
are
two
public
health
challenges
that
occurred
simultaneously
synergistically
during
the
summer
of
2021
led
to
a
surging
demand
for
COVID-19
vaccine
booster
dose
(BD)
rollout.
This
study
aimed
evaluate
hesitancy
(VBH)
among
Czech
healthcare
workers
explore
potential
determinants
VBH.
A
national
cross-sectional
survey-based
was
carried
out
between
3
11
November
2021,
using
an
online
self-administered
questionnaire
(SAQ)
explored
participants'
demographic
characteristics,
infection
anamneses,
willingness
receive
BD,
psychosocial
drivers
total
3454
HCW
properly
responded
SAQ,
which
80.9%
were
females,
30.3%
medical
professionals,
50.5%
≤47
years
old.
Most
participants
already
inoculated
against
(95.2%),
BTN162b2
most
commonly
administered
(90.7%).
As
sample
planned
represent
target
population,
it
revealed
high
level
BD
acceptance
(71.3%)
HCW,
while
12.2%
still
hesitant
16.6%
currently
available
BD.
These
results
consistent
with
other
recent
from
central
Europe.
Medical
professional,
male,
older
more
likely
accept
rather
than
allied
female,
younger
participants.
BDs'
perceived
effectiveness
severe
illness,
symptomatic
infection,
community
transmission
significant
strong
predictor
acceptance,
circulating
not
important
our
population.
safety
ethical
dilemmas
justice
should
be
addressed
sufficiently
communicating
population
groups.
altruistic
reasons
i.e.,
family
protection,
patient
underpin
recommendation
postponing
mandating
in
favour
stressing
these
concerns
amid
messaging.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(24), P. 13373 - 13373
Published: Dec. 19, 2021
Pregnant
and
lactating
women
(PLW)
represent
a
particular
population
subset
with
increased
susceptibility
for
COVID-19
morbidity
mortality,
even
though
the
evidence
about
safety
efficacy
of
vaccines
was
delayed
due
to
their
initial
exclusion
from
development
trials.
This
unclear
situation
could
have
led
vaccine
hesitancy
levels
among
PLW;
therefore,
this
study
aimed
evaluate
attitudes
Czech
PLW
towards
determinants
attitudes.
An
analytical
cross-sectional
survey-based
carried
out
in
University
Hospital
Brno
(South
Moravia,
Czechia)
between
August
October
2021.
The
utilised
self-administered
questionnaire
(SAQ)
adapted
previous
instruments
used
same
purpose.
SAQ
included
closed-ended
items
covering
demographic
characteristics,
clinical
obstetric
vaccination,
potential
psychosocial
predictors
acceptance.
Out
362
participants,
278
were
pregnant
(PW)
84
(LW).
overall
acceptance
(immediate
delayed)
level
substantially
high
(70.2%),
significant
difference
PW
(76.6%)
LW
(48.8%).
70.2%
who
agreed
receive
vaccine,
3.6%
indicated
immediate
acceptance,
66.6%
Only
13.3%
participants
physician's
vaccination
recommendation
during
pregnancy
or
while
lactating,
62.2%
against
it.
Our
results
recent
studies
that
revealed
tended
they
also
inclined
resist
professional
recommendations
because
predominantly
preferred
delay
vaccination.
trimester,
education
level,
employment
status,
live
births
most
commonly
type
mRNA-based
vaccines,
followed
by
viral
vector-based
inactivated
virus
vaccines.
first
top
priority
children,
effectiveness.
Regarding
predictors,
media/social
media,
trust
government,
pharmaceutical
industry,
healthcare
professionals,
partners,
positive
risk-benefit
ratio
promoters
Findings
suggest
promotional
interventions
targeting
should
use
web
platforms
focus
on
evidence,
expected
benefits
harms
infection.
Healthcare,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(11), P. 1566 - 1566
Published: Nov. 17, 2021
Background:
As
the
COVID-19
Delta
variant
has
spread
across
globe,
healthcare
workers'
(HCWs)
knowledge,
worries,
and
vaccine
booster
acceptance
should
be
assessed.
Methods:
Online
questionnaires
aimed
at
HCWs
in
Saudi
Arabia
were
distributed
between
9
12
August
2021,
aiming
to
evaluate
HCWs'
perceptions
worries
about
as
well
their
feelings
receiving
a
booster-vaccine.
Results:
A
total
of
1279
participated,
with
51.1%
being
physicians
41.7%
nurses.
92.5%
aware
emergence
variant.
Still,
only
28.7%
found
have
sufficient
knowledge
variant,
level
worry
it
was
higher
than
Alpha
(2.32/5
versus
1.79/5).
The
main
information
sources
cited
by
participants
social
media
(50.5%),
while
30.5%
used
scientific
journals.
Overall,
55.3%
willing
receive
booster,
one
third
would
preferred
new
mRNA
specifically
developed
for
Factors
associated
both
vaccination
doses
(p
=
0.008),
believing
that
Pfizer-BioNTech
BNT162b2
is
effective
against
variants
<
0.001),
agreement
mixing/matching
vaccines
0.001).
Conclusions:
high
percentage
but
small
fraction
had
decent
quality
it.
exhibited
levels
showed
modest
dose.
These
results
encourage
public
health
officials
scale
up
educational
efforts
disseminate
reliable
different
provide
recommendations
booster.
Further
research
on
methods
alleviate
emerging
warranted.
Vaccines,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
9(11), P. 1292 - 1292
Published: Nov. 7, 2021
Achieving
high
levels
of
vaccination
coverage
against
COVID-19
may
be
hindered
by
vaccine
hesitancy.
We
quantified
over
time
the
prevalence
hesitancy
among
university
students,
investigated
its
determinants,
and
analyzed
student
attitudes,
risk
perceptions
compliance
with
preventive
measures.
The
survey
was
administered
online
from
1
March
to
30
June
2021.
A
multivariable
logistic
regression
model
built
identify
predictors
Overall,
we
collected
5369
questionnaires
that
were
grouped
into
three
periods
(March,
April-May,
May-June).
response
rate
ranged
81.2%
76.4%,
whereas
22%
29%.
Multivariable
analysis
showed
April-May
participants
had
higher
odds
than
respondents.
Other
positive
being
male,
not
a
healthcare
student,
having
lower
academic
level,
disclosing
political
position.
Conversely,
perceived
severity,
concern
for
emergency,
confidence
in
safety
effectiveness,
self-reported
adherence
mask
wearing
indoors
outdoors
negatively
associated
found
changed
relation
several
factors.
Strategies
aimed
at
increasing
students'
awareness
engagement,
restoring
health
authorities,
limiting
disinformation
around
vaccines
should
devised.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
Journal Year:
2021,
Volume and Issue:
18(21), P. 11702 - 11702
Published: Nov. 7, 2021
Japan
has
vaccinated
its
older
population;
a
mass
vaccination
program
for
younger
citizens
is
underway.
Accordingly,
this
study
investigated
vaccine
hesitancy
among
Japanese
citizens.
We
used
online
panel
survey
data
from
the
Hiroshima
Institute
of
Health
Economics
Research
University
and
applied
probit
regression
models.
Our
found
that
people
was
significantly
higher
than
people.
Moreover,
women
men
inter-age-group
differences
in
were
women.
Regression
demonstrated
subjective
health
status
anxiety
about
future
associated
with
all
ages,
respectively.
Furthermore,
marital
status,
university
degree,
future,
myopic
view
had
specific
associations
different
while
having
children,
financial
literacy,
household
income
assets,
varying
ages.
Therefore,
these
results
suggest
policymakers
should
consider
diversity
generation
developing
effective,
tailored
communication
strategies
to
reduce
their
hesitancy.
Journal of Advanced Nursing,
Journal Year:
2022,
Volume and Issue:
78(9), P. 2894 - 2903
Published: March 17, 2022
Abstract
Aims
To
determine
coronavirus
disease
2019
(COVID‐19)
vaccination
hesitancy
in
healthcare
professionals
and
students
Italy
across
four
generations
(baby
boomers,
X,
Y
Z).
Design
A
cross‐sectional
descriptive
study
was
performed
through
an
online
survey
conducted
from
May
to
June
2021.
The
STROBE
guidelines
were
adopted
for
reporting.
Methods
Data
collected
by
initially
sending
a
link
convenience
sample
of
students,
which
followed
snowball
sampling.
VAX
scale
validated
adopted.
An
ANOVA
detect
differences
vaccine‐hesitancy
beliefs
between
the
generational
groups.
Results
completed
1226
students.
Worries
about
unforeseen
future
effects
accounted
higher
factor
generations.
More
positive
attitudes
towards
COVID‐19
expressed
members
generation
Z
than
baby
boomers.
Members
X
had
highest
scores
overall
scale.
Conclusion
results
suggest
that
public
health
campaigns
should
take
into
account
achieve
levels
vaccine
acceptance,
including
amongst
Impact
Vaccination
is
most
effective
strategy
tackle
pandemic.
advice
strongly
influences
willingness
general
population.
consideration
patterns
workers
may
increase
uptake
these
populations,
turn
lead
greater
acceptance
vaccine.