Genes & Nutrition,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: May 30, 2018
Biomarkers
of
food
intake
(BFIs)
are
a
promising
tool
for
limiting
misclassification
in
nutrition
research
where
more
subjective
dietary
assessment
instruments
used.
They
may
also
be
used
to
assess
compliance
guidelines
or
intervention.
therefore
hold
promise
direct
and
objective
measurement
intake.
However,
the
number
comprehensively
validated
biomarkers
is
limited
just
few.
Many
new
candidate
emerge
from
metabolic
profiling
studies
advances
chemistry.
Furthermore,
identified
based
on
extensive
literature
reviews
such
as
described
Biomarker
Food
Intake
Reviews
(BFIRev).
To
systematically
critically
validity
intake,
it
necessary
outline
streamline
an
optimal
reproducible
validation
process.
A
consensus-based
procedure
was
provide
evaluate
set
most
important
criteria
systematic
BFIs.
As
result,
developed
including
eight
criteria,
plausibility,
dose-response,
time-response,
robustness,
reliability,
stability,
analytical
performance,
inter-laboratory
reproducibility.
The
has
dual
purpose:
(1)
estimate
current
level
approach
(2)
pinpoint
which
additional
needed
full
each
biomarker
This
position
paper
outlines
second
step
BFIRev
but
identified,
e.g.,
metabolomic
studies.
Bioactive
compounds
in
plant‐based
foods
have
health
properties
that
contribute
to
the
prevention
of
age‐related
chronic
diseases,
particularly
cardiometabolic
disorders.
Conclusive
proof
and
understanding
these
benefits
humans
is
essential
order
provide
effective
dietary
recommendations
but,
so
far,
evidence
obtained
from
human
intervention
trials
limited
contradictory.
This
partly
due
differences
between
individuals
absorption,
distribution,
metabolism
excretion
bioactive
compounds,
as
well
heterogeneity
their
biological
response
regarding
outcomes.
Identifying
main
factors
underlying
inter‐individual
differences,
developing
new
innovative
methodologies
account
for
such
variability
constitute
an
overarching
goal
ultimately
optimize
beneficial
effects
plant
food
bioactives
each
every
one
us.
In
this
respect,
position
paper
COST
Action
FA1403‐POSITIVe
examines
likely
affect
individual
responses
consumption
presents
perspectives
assessment
consideration
variability.
Ageing Research Reviews,
Journal Year:
2016,
Volume and Issue:
35, P. 222 - 240
Published: Oct. 7, 2016
As
people
age
they
become
increasingly
susceptible
to
chronic
and
extremely
debilitating
brain
diseases.
The
precise
cause
of
the
neuronal
degeneration
underlying
these
disorders,
indeed
normal
ageing
remains
however
elusive.
Considering
limits
existing
preventive
methods,
there
is
a
desire
develop
effective
safe
strategies.
Growing
preclinical
clinical
research
in
healthy
individuals
or
at
early
stage
cognitive
decline
has
demonstrated
beneficial
impact
nutrition
on
functions.
present
review
most
recent
series
produced
by
Nutrition
Mental
Performance
Task
Force
under
auspice
International
Life
Sciences
Institute
Europe
(ILSI
Europe).
latest
scientific
advances
specific
how
dietary
nutrients
non-nutrient
may
affect
are
presented.
Furthermore,
several
key
points
related
mechanisms
contributing
ageing,
pathological
conditions
affecting
function,
biomarkers
also
discussed.
Overall,
findings
inconsistent
fragmented
more
warranted
determine
establish
dose-response
relationships
for
optimal
maintenance
different
population
subgroups.
Such
approaches
likely
provide
necessary
evidence
portfolios
that
will
inform
about
new
recommendations
prevent
decline.
Genes & Nutrition,
Journal Year:
2018,
Volume and Issue:
13(1)
Published: May 30, 2018
Biomarkers
of
food
intake
(BFIs)
are
a
promising
tool
for
limiting
misclassification
in
nutrition
research
where
more
subjective
dietary
assessment
instruments
used.
They
may
also
be
used
to
assess
compliance
guidelines
or
intervention.
therefore
hold
promise
direct
and
objective
measurement
intake.
However,
the
number
comprehensively
validated
biomarkers
is
limited
just
few.
Many
new
candidate
emerge
from
metabolic
profiling
studies
advances
chemistry.
Furthermore,
identified
based
on
extensive
literature
reviews
such
as
described
Biomarker
Food
Intake
Reviews
(BFIRev).
To
systematically
critically
validity
intake,
it
necessary
outline
streamline
an
optimal
reproducible
validation
process.
A
consensus-based
procedure
was
provide
evaluate
set
most
important
criteria
systematic
BFIs.
As
result,
developed
including
eight
criteria,
plausibility,
dose-response,
time-response,
robustness,
reliability,
stability,
analytical
performance,
inter-laboratory
reproducibility.
The
has
dual
purpose:
(1)
estimate
current
level
approach
(2)
pinpoint
which
additional
needed
full
each
biomarker
This
position
paper
outlines
second
step
BFIRev
but
identified,
e.g.,
metabolomic
studies.